× Members

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG

  • bro58
10 years 3 months ago - 10 years 3 months ago #118411 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG

Freda wrote: FYI I won't be eligible for legal aid as my husband works.


Hi F,

Remember, The UTT will not be "retrying" the decision as such, so they will not be re-looking at the actual evidence itself.

The will be looking at whether the FTT have erred in law in coming to the decision.

There is a list of what can be considered an error of law in the links already provided.

Therefore, you should concentrate on highlighting how and why The FTT erred in law in coming to their decision.

bro58
Last edit: 10 years 3 months ago by bro58.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Freda
  • Topic Author
10 years 3 months ago #118412 by Freda
Replied by Freda on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
You quoted my last post but I can't see your reply?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
10 years 3 months ago #118413 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG

Freda wrote: You quoted my last post but I can't see your reply?


It's there now F,

I hit quote instead of edit. :silly:

bro58

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • bro58
10 years 3 months ago - 10 years 3 months ago #118415 by bro58
Replied by bro58 on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
Hi F,

An error of law could be one or more of the following :

Insufficient findings of fact, failure to explain why they have disregarded any evidence favourable to you, failure to explain why they’ve relied on any material evidence against you, particularly where that evidence was put at issue by you, complete mishandling of relevant evidence or applying the law incorrectly, etc.

Try and choose what particular error/s of law applies to your FTT decision, and highlight it.

For example, even though the UTT may not "re-look" at evidence used at the hearing to make the decision, they may feel that The FTT failed to take it into account, or did not pay due regards to it in coming to the decision, etc, etc.

bro58
Last edit: 10 years 3 months ago by bro58.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Freda
  • Topic Author
10 years 3 months ago - 10 years 3 months ago #118431 by Freda
Replied by Freda on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
Hi OK I already put all of this down in my letter to the FTT applying for permission to appeal to the UTT. I explained where I felt that important evidence had been disregarded, insufficient reasons given etc. So what I'm asking is, do I just have to regurgitate this or should I try to hone it a bit more? Will the UTT expect to hear exactly what I've written to the FTT? I'm not sure what to do next. Have tried searching online for professionals who specialise in this stuff but no luck. Beginning to feel very stressed out about it all as the time limit is ticking away. Not sure if I can take it any further or even if there is any point. Probably the best I could hope for anyway would be for UTT to bat me back to a new FTT, is that correct? I don't think I could go through all of that again. Really struggling with it all now :(

PS I could tell you what the FTT have said in the Decision Notice but I'm wary in case they are monitoring these forums :unsure:
Last edit: 10 years 3 months ago by Gordon.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 3 months ago #118436 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic Appeal to the Upper Tribunal re ESA WRAG
Freda

For each point that you think is an Error of Law you need to reference it in the written Statement of Reasons and explain why you think it is an Error. You don't have to repeat what you sent to the FTT when you asked to appeal, but I would expect most of the points to be similar.

Whilst it is not impossible for the UTT Judge to make an award, by far and away the most likely result if you win will be a new FTT hearing with a direction in regard to the Errors that the first hearing made.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: Freda

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: bro58GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserjimmckChris
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.