The DWP is to begin continuous surveillance of the bank accounts of all pension credit, universal credit and employment and support allowance claimants using powers under a bill currently going through Parliament.  The department have said that they intend to use their new power to force any third party to pass on data to them more widely in the future.

The power to compel third parties into providing any data that the DWP wants in order to search for fraud and error is being conferred in last minute amendments slipped into the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, which has now passed its third reading in the Commons and moved to the Lords.

Initially the DWP say that they will use their powers to oblige the UK’s top 15 banks to monitor the accounts of all means-tested benefits claimants and report every time an account goes over the  capital limit or is used abroad for more than four weeks.

Because every DWP payment into a bank account has an identifying code attached to it, all banks know exactly which of their customers is on benefits and which benefits they receive.

Setting up software to automatically send details to the DWP of every claimant account that goes over the capital limit or is used abroad for more than four weeks will be very straightforward for banks.

The DWP say that each identified claim will be investigated in the normal way and that penalties will not be automatically imposed.

At the moment, almost 9 million claimants would be caught in the surveillance net, including:

  • 5.8 million universal credit claimants
  • 1.6 million employment and support allowance claimants
  • 1.4 million pension credit claimants

Any bank failing to collect and pass on data to the DWP will be subject to heavy fines.

 The new system will begin to be rolled out in 2025, though all banks may not be fully involved before 2030.

The DWP estimates that it will cost around £30 million a year for them to investigate potential fraud identified by the new system, but that they will save £500 million a year through reduced fraud and error.  

They also estimate that over the first ten years, the new powers will result in 74,000 prosecution cases and 2,500 custodial sentences.  

There is no doubt that the DWP intend to use these new powers much more widely.  The impact assessment for the new powers says that:

“The power is not limited to a specific type of data or type of institution/Third-Party to allow us to fight new fraud and error issues as they emerge and engage with new institutions as efficient opportunities become available to us.”

Later, the same document says: 

“This measure is drafted broadly . . .  to enable DWP to apply this measure to non-financial organisations in future if it is deemed appropriate and proportionate”

The new surveillance powers for the DWP appear to enjoy cross party support. Only 51 MPs voted against the amendment, with 30 of those being SNP and just 7 each from Labour and the Lib Dems.

Anyone who imagines that the DWP will use such sweeping powers reasonably and proportionately probably hasn’t ever claimed benefits.

And they probably also don’t remember the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, which was brought in to combat terrorism and organised crime and ended up being used to spy on dog walkers, pigeon feeders and people putting out their wheelie bins too early.

Capital and abroad fraud account for less than 15% of benefits fraud and error. The DWP will want to delve into many other aspects of claimants lives in order to identify the other 85%.  This is, beyond doubt, the thin end of a very thick wedge.

You can download a copy of the amendments to the Data Protection and Digital information Bill here.  The Power To Require Information For Social Security Purposes section begins on page 98.

You can read the impact assessment for the DWP surveillance powers here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    tintack · 5 months ago
    What do you with a government department with a long track record of incompetence, callous indifference and contempt for evidence? Why, the answer is obvious - give it sweeping powers to let it do what it likes. What could possibly go wrong?

    If only the government put such effort into fighting tax evasion, which costs the country vastly more than benefit fraud and error. But that would involve taking on people with the money and power to push back. And we obviously can't have that.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    The Dog mother · 5 months ago
    Dwp runs the uk. Because what they say goes, no matter how far reaching, intrusive or down right vindictive it may be. I fear what comes next, what's up their sleeve,Because they are always cooking up something. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    tinycat · 5 months ago
    thought i lived in UK not china, this should only be for extreme cases of suspected fraud,  there obviously doing this so they can put that britcoin thing a centralised crypto currency so the government can control what you spend and see what you spend money on.

    we are losing our freedoms everyday
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    clearwater · 5 months ago
    Pensioners in receipt of Pension Credit, Housing Benefit & Council Tax, etc 

    are also under surveilance



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      DundeeFruitcake · 5 months ago
      @LISA101 Meanwhile in Westminster they've all got their snouts in the trough.....whilst being evilly mean to the most vulnerable in our society, the sick and disabled.  Iain Duncan Smith and 'Call me Dave' Cameron both claimed sickness benefits for family members because they could.  How's about them being done for fraud and handed custodial sentences.  They certainly didn't NEED the money they claimed did they?!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      LISA101 · 5 months ago
      @clearwater Should anybody be under surveillance without grounds for suspicion is the question. 

      Meanwhile inn Westminster....
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.