The DWP is continuing to hit universal credit (UC) claimants with a harsh sanctions regime, the latest official figures show.  The vast majority of sanctions are for failing to attend or to take part in a mandatory interview.

The sanctions rate has remained above 7% from August through to November of 2023, the most recent months for which figures are available.

Sanctions were at their highest in January 2017, at 11.83%. 

But from there on they fell almost uninterruptedly through to March 2020, when they had reached a low of 2.51%.

Face-to-face interviews were then suspended due to the pandemic and sanctions fell to almost nothing.

However, with the gradual reintroduction of face-to-face appointments in April 2021the level of sanctions has increased rapidly.  By October 2021 it had already surpassed the pre-pandemic level, reaching 2.69%.

Since April 2022, it has never fallen below 6% and has risen as high as 7.3%.

UC Sanctions rate graph

uc sanctions rates graph

95% of all sanctions are imposed for failing to attend or to take part in a mandatory interview.

Benefits and Work members can download a copy of our 30 page guide to Ways to prevent and overturn ESA and UC sanctions from the ESA and UC guides page.

The full UC sanctions statistics are available here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    James Moore · 1 years ago
    Are older people close to retirement a couple of years away have to undergo "managed migration" or has nobody thought about them who are not only older but also sick and disabled in many cases
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Welsh · 1 years ago
    If two of my benefits PIP and Adult disability payments are being administered by the Scottish government and my ESA, by the DWP, how can I be transferred to UC as different governments have different rules?   
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Mrs C · 1 years ago
    Why is it called ‘migration’ and ‘transfer’ to UC, when we are having to make a new claim from scratch and that claim may be turned down. I’ve already done SDA to ESA. Now I’m having to claim again for UC when it’s my turn. Once again I’m worried sick I’ll be turned down. I receive PIP, but that’s not enough to live on. I was stupid enough to save some money as I have no work pension. I will be destitute if my UC claim fails. Every time they change the name of a benefit, I have to claim afresh. Why don’t they go and catch the organised crime crooks, instead of scaring ME again and again. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Phoebe · 1 years ago
    Is it not unethical to force claimants to apply for UC, rather than simply transfer them over?

    Social Security Scotland aren’t making (Scottish) PIP claimants apply for their new version of PIP (Adult Disability Payment), they’re simply transferring us, with no additional work for us or interruption of payments. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Jen Knox · 1 years ago
    This will be the second migration I've done as went from incapacity to esa and now to uc which will make my income decrease substantially. I did not ask to be ill and this is on top of pip assessment.I have had to fight since 1996 for all my entitlements so unfair.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    MrFibro · 2 years ago
    Just another way to kick off disabled claimants from their life-line benefits.  Does this mean going on UC equates to you being not disabled, and or fit for graft ???????????????????????????

    Guess it'll all come out in the wash soon enough.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      James Moore · 1 years ago
      @denby Partygate and other wrongdoings is exactly why the innocent are punished to distract attention away just like the 2008 bankers and MP expenses scandal was!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Vik · 1 years ago
      @Eliza As far as I understand it, there are no new assessments from migration. You will only have an assessment if you are applying for UC for the first time as a new claimant
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Eliza · 1 years ago
      @MrFibro There is the low capability for work related activity element of UC but what is concerning js will the managed migration trigger more medical assessments. There has been no consideration on how difficult it has been to get to see medical professionals and all the support services are on their knees from cuts so getting evidence for these assessments is a minefield as it stands already. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      denby · 2 years ago
      @MrFibro I only wish I could share the 'guess it'll all come out in the wash soon enough' optimism. Look at partygate. With inflation already in double figures on basics, there is not enough shouting about the 'transitional protection' not being inflation proofed.