The DWP has provided Benefits and Work with a copy of their latest PIP assessors training guide covering autism and ADHD.  However, they have redacted almost every page as the drive for maximum secrecy and minimum accountability under McFadden and Timms gathers pace.

The 38 page document, “Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Neurodiversity/ASD”, which we obtained using the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act, covers:

  • Autistic spectrum disorder (ASD)
  • ADHD
  • Dyspraxia
  • Dyscalculia
  • Tourette’s Syndrome

The first section of the document, up to page 22, describes the different conditions and explains the likely functional effects of each of them. This section has been redacted on the grounds that it is intended for future publication and so is exempt from FoI laws.

In their covering letter, the DWP say that they have now taken over producing training and guidance materials for health assessors and that “all training and guidance materials are currently undergoing a comprehensive review and update” using independent clinical experts to ensure they are accurate.

The department says it will publish the materials in the public domain once they have all been reviewed.  They claim that “Releasing the current versions now would risk confusion and undermine the department’s efforts to provide clear, accurate and authoritative guidance.”

Unsurprisingly, the DWP give no indication of when the information will actually be published. 

Nor do they explain how publishing the guidance health professionals are currently relying on would cause any confusion whatsoever.

The publication date of the redacted guidance is November 2025, so it is in current use.

The second section of the document, which contains case studies and “Activity specific considerations” for ASD and for ADHD has been redacted under the law enforcement exemption, which applies where publication is likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of crime. Using this exemption means that they have no intention of ever publishing this information.

The DWP say that “providing detailed information for certain health conditions would allow a member of the public to use this information to make a claim to benefit to which they would not otherwise be entitled to.”

We know that according to the DWP’s own statistics, fraud in PIP is currently assessed to stand at 0.4%.  For universal credit, the figure is 8%, twenty times higher.

Fraud in relation to ASD and ADHD is likely to be even lower, as these are conditions which cannot be diagnosed by a GP.  If you planned to commit PIP fraud, these are not the  first conditions you would be likely to choose.

We also know that the DWP have redacted other documents on the same grounds, when the reality is that the redacted items could not possibly have aided in committing fraud:  DWP argue fraudsters may fake kidney failure if shown unredacted guidance

The reality is that keeping guidance secret leaves the department free to produce biased, ill-informed information which reduces the possibility of successful claims and no-one will be any the wiser.

The refusal to release training documents for these conditions is also likely to extend to every other condition the DWP produce guidance for – though if readers choose to make FoI requests for their own conditions to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., we’d be very interested to hear the results.

You can download a copy of the redacted guidance here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    This is the worst form of discrimination for people who are already challenged to try and fit in the neuro typical world. I despair. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    The assessments etc 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    My partner of 15 years  was diagnosed with aspergers in 1995 he's 41 and in the support group as he has exrmre anxiety tooand just had a review form I'm terrified for him about this timms report will a 30 year diagnosis still count from a doctor? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    Sounds like the DWP what to take the power of declaring if someone has ASD, adhd etc themselves.

    If they just require proof of a diagnoses from a trained medical professional .. it would save so much money and time.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Lou But a diagnosis doesn't mean you're entitled to pip. Some ND people manage life really well, but others (like me) do not. I have to show how I'm affected in order to get my daily living enhanced rate, I can't just say I have ADHD.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Reeks of echo’s of the Epstein files (with all that blacking out)

    The dwp over blacking out has already been taken to court but I wonder what else can be done as dwp treating disabled like hardened criminals and this should be a hr issue. 


    Also going back to the dla where official diagnosis paperwork was mandatory?/held more weight than it does in pip, would surely remove the excuse of dwp reindacting to prevent fraud
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    "In their covering letter, the DWP say that they have now taken over producing training and guidance materials for health assessors and that “all training and guidance materials are currently undergoing a comprehensive review and update” using independent clinical experts to ensure they are accurate."

    Why in March 2026 would you be writing a load of health condition specific assessor guides used to help assessors determine who is eligible and who is not for benefits. That the public cannot read as they could be used to play the system and fraudulently obtain benefits. When you are not supposed to know what the assessment system is going to be in April 2027 or April 2028. As the Timms PIP review has not yet decided, let alone been published and gone through parliament. If you do not know what assessment system will be and if it has descriptors what they will be and what the thresholds need to be met them will be. How can you write guidance for assessors to help them determine who will qualify or not qualify.

    That they are writing assessor guides now. Makes the Timms review look rigged. As I doubt they are writing the guides in 2026 with the aim of throwing them in the bin a year or two latter and writing new guides.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Neil Moving the goal posts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Neil We don' t know they are, but  health condition specific assessor guides suggest they're trying to tighten eligibility around neurodivergence and mental health. Gonna be a long time, Neil, so try not to worry.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @rookie They are removing mental health conditions? What the hell are these sick people playing at?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @John It looks along the lines of removing a lot of mental.health conditions from eligibility.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    The country could grind to a halt within weeks if theirs fuel shortages,so welfare Reform could go on the back burner.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Can anybody tell me if they have been awarded lcwra for asd adhd depression anxiety im awaiting reacessment via a change of health on the journal since  last summer currently lcw now before that i have always been in the esa wrag but just for depression only did get support group 2013 because was sectioned then before that was on incapacity benefit and dla going back 25 years so the question is am I building  my hopes up to much this time or will it be lcw and work coach interviews yet again 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @James h I am in the same boat as you. If I do not get this, I will not have enough to live on. Simple.

      ASD and ADHD I have not worked just over 10 years (tried, couldnt) and am waiting for my re-assessment, a year since I sent the form in (plus a year it took for them to send it late).

      I will try to remember to let you know if I find out.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @James h I would say you could be disappointed and may have to go down the work coach route again,mind you we could all be seeing work coaches before long as I read that they are going to deviat from the unemployed to concentrate on the sick.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Transparency, rebuilding trust and disabled people at the heart of everything we do they said.

    Yeah that'll do it.