A great deal has happened in the two and a half months since the Green Paper was launched.  Whilst we wait for the first legislation to be published, it seems a good point to look at what has happened so far and what still needs to be done.

Consultation

The Green Paper consultation is due to end on 30 June, after the first Green paper bill is likely to have been published.

The consultation does not cover the most crucial issues, such as the changes to UC payment rates, the scrapping of the work capability assessment (WCA) or the PIP four points system.

We have no way of knowing how many people have taken part, but given the widely held view that it was a largely bogus exercise we suspect the numbers will be lower than for the Tories consultation on PIP vouchers.

The Zoom consultations have not gone well, with few people invited and even fewer attending.  At least one was cancelled after the DWP shared the email addresses of all the attendees, then it was relisted but failed to open and finally just got quietly dumped.

The in-person consultations fared no better.  Few people were invited, venue details were kept secret until the last moment, there were demonstrations outside some meetings and the final consultation, due to take place in Cardiff, was cancelled by the DWP although the protest still took place.

It’s probably fair to say that the consultation process has gone very badly for the government so far.

Reports and analysis

There have been some very critical reports published in relation to the Green Paper.

Perhaps the most damaging so far is the hard hitting Citizens Advice (CA) “Pathways to Poverty”, given that CA work closely with the government in providing support for managed migration and so might have been expected to pull their punches.

Others have included the Joseph Rowntree Trust, the Resolution Foundation and Health Equity North.

The Commons work and pensions committee has also produced an interim report calling on the government to delay any changes to PIP and UC

Individual actions

It has undoubtedly been the flood of emails, letters, phone calls and personal visits that has had the most effect on Labour MPs who are now considering rebelling.  Every communication makes a difference, adding to the weight of doubt and fear that many MPs are now experiencing as they contemplate the future.

And we know from the comments below the line that Benefits and Work readers have been hugely active in this regard, from the very day the Green Paper was published.

Some readers have gone even further, finding opportunities to address groups of MPs and starting social media campaigns.

In all, we know our readers have made a real difference and we don’t doubt you will continue to do so.

Protests and campaigns

There are an increasing number of protests happening around the country, mainly organised by Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC).

Many of these are small local events, some have centred around the in-person consultations and there has also been a mass lobby of parliament.

The People's Assembly are organising a national demonstration against austerity on 7 June, assembling at Portland place W1B at 12 noon for a march to Whitehall.

Meanwhile over 100 disabled public figures have begun a campaign to stop the cuts.

Labour rebellion

The estimated number of Labour MPs unhappy about the Green Paper started at 27 in April and is now variously estimated at between 150 and 200, with most commentators suggesting around 170. 

According to the Institute for Government, Labour’s current working majority is 165, and it would take 84 Labour MPs to rebel to ensure a government defeat in the House of Commons (provided all opposition and independent MPs vote against the government).

Of course, not all of those 150-200 unhappy Labour MPs will vote against the government or even abstain.

But we are definitely in the territory where a government defeat is a genuine possibility.

Other parties

It seems clear that most opposition parties will oppose the bill.  The Lib Dems seem set against it, as do the SNP and the Green party.

Most importantly, it now seems very likely that the Conservative party will vote against, it on the grounds that it has been badly thought through and does not save nearly enough money.

Waiting game

At the time of writing we are waiting for Liz Kendall to meet with Labour back benchers to try to persuade them of the necessity of the Green Paper cuts.  Their reaction will tell us something about how the rebellion is progressing.

We are also waiting for Rachel Reeves to deliver her spending review on 11 June, in which we might get more hints about changes to the winter fuel allowance and two-child benefit cap, intended to try to buy off Labour rebels.

And, of course, we are waiting for the first bill relating to the Green Paper to be  to be published.  This is expected to bring in the changes to universal credit rates from April 2026 and the 4 point PIP rule from November 2026. 

When the bill is published

We are far from experts on parliamentary procedure, but if Labour are to have any hope of getting the bill made law before the summer recess begins on 22 July then there cannot be much time to spare.

As far as we can tell, two weekends have to elapse after the Green Paper bill is published before the first Commons debate and vote can take place.  So even if the bill has its first reading and is published by Friday 6 June, it can’t have its second reading and a vote before Monday 16 June.  If it passes that vote, then it has to go through committee and report stages and a third reading at which another vote takes place.  Then the bill is sent to the Lords.

So either Labour are very confident of having a majority in the House of Lords, or they have some sort of procedural ruse prepared, such as making the bill a money bill, in order to rush it through.

What to do next

Whilst we wait for the Green Paper bill to appear, it’s still worth contacting people you might not yet have been in touch with. 

Local councillors and local branches of the Labour party are unquestionably becoming more vocal in their opposition to the cuts and they can exert some real influence on Labour MPs.

It’s unlikely that Rachel Reeves will listen to her Constituency Party’s condemnation of the cuts.  But the Labour MPs in Sheffield are likely to take more note of the opposition of three of the local councils.

We still also think it’s worth trying to contact a few members of the House of Lords, because we don’t know what type of bill Labour might bring forward and what influence the upper house might have.  (See the What you can do page for how to do this).  And if anyone has had a positive response from a member of the Lords, do please contact us, as we’d like to share some ideas.

When the bill is finally published it will be crucial that MPs are bombarded with messages from their constituents telling them how they want them to vote, regardless of which party they belong to.

And finally . . .

And finally, please take a moment to realise what an extraordinary distance we have travelled in just eleven weeks, from shock and despair at Labour’s betrayal to a point where we can seriously contemplate their massive majority being overturned. 

Labour thought by rushing things through they could prevent any real opposition building . . . they got that badly wrong.

So, keep on doing what you’ve been doing, because it’s definitely having an effect

As Green MP Sain Berry told her local paper this week “It is officially crunch time now, and I hope that people keep up the pressure on me and all local MPs to stand up and vote down these plans.”

Latest news on PIP/UC changes

What’s changing, when

What you can do

New PIP test

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Anybody who thinks Angela Raynor, Wes Streeting or even Andy Burnham will be any better than what you have got now, then you have clearly learn't nothing, all these people are interested in is in one thing at is themselves don't be fooled, no party now is really fit for govt, sad but true.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    I think we are not far away from fractions of the Labour party start to split with fallouts ,Sit back & get your popcorn ready   .
    Reeves has got to go she has wrecked financial stability  growth of our nationeckless quick hasty decisions .
    We  are all paying the price for her ignorance from nasty.hasty, cold decisions.
    The Labour party hound Liz Truss for her actions but they are just has bad .
    When Starmer does resign from his unpopularity i hope that the Mayor of Manchester Andy Burnham applies to take over .
    He has done a magnificent job of running Greater Manchester & looking after the people of Manchester .
    He is the man to pull the party back together & protect all the vulnerable in society .
    whether it be The pensioners , The Ill , disabled & the poor who are on their knees trying to get by  .
    He would also be good for firms & the workers .
    Starmer & co are evil & a disgrace with their inhuman ignorance & do not represent Labour Party valuations .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Vic Burnham would first need to resign the mayorship and find a safe parliamentary seat (and win a by-election) before any leadership challenge. Personally I think the next labour leader will be Wes Streeting, although I do have a bit of a soft spot for Big Angie.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Vic Well said and I totally agree with your comments on Andy Burnham, he defiantly seems to have a social conscience and empathy for those less fortunate than himself, that is defiantly rare in politics and politicians.  Fingers crossed this house of cards so called "labour government" comes crashing down soon. They are monsters and an insult to the original labour party and all it stood for. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    This Daily Record article suggests pensioners undergoing reviews after November 2026 WOULD be subject to the new rules.

    https://www.google.co.uk/url?q=https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/lifestyle/money/dwp-confirms-exact-number-years-35321951&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwi_kKCDx9uNAxWGWUEAHSR5M1gQFnoECAEQAw&usg=AOvVaw0d1OoEPdRjDrnHMP1uA9L8
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    There was a discussion with Fraser Nelson on Times Radio today, where he basically says all the penny-pinching and cuts would be politically worthwhile if they were going to turn around the economy, but that's not going to happen:  "So the problem here is people are understanding that you need to offer no pain-no game.  That's what John Major would say, but Labour has got  new formula: all pain, no gain."
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    A couple of points in the Big Issue article caught my attention:

    1) "although there is uncertainty over whether the infrequent “light touch” reviews carried out on pension age PIP claimants could also lead to a loss of benefits".

    How do we not yet have clarity on this? The question needs to be asked publicly, and a straight answer demanded.

    2)"A government spokesperson said: “The majority of people who are currently getting PIP will continue to receive it."

    So why go through with the cuts? So much misery for so little achieved, especially with concessions already made and others forecast.

    https://www.google.co.uk/url?q=https://www.bigissue.com/news/social-justice/disability-benefit-cuts-pip-carers-allowance/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiwxMLssdqNAxUbWUEAHb3AMckQ0PADegQICBAD&usg=AOvVaw0SqKnpjA7kHRfeEZriH2Ny
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @robbie Because the majority probably qualify for some level of mobility, so they can get away with saying that even though it's disingenuous. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @robbie Well, regarding (2), the government is either lying or they are planning a much easier PIP form.  The lying sounds more likely.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    What the hell does this mean? From Disability News Service:

    "

    He said this would be at least in part because the healthcare professionals carrying out PIP assessments for the companies contracted by DWP would “reflect” the importance of four points.

    He said: “So, there is going to be much more focus on that, the assessors are going to reflect that.”

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Dez The problem they will have with that approach is that WE'LL go in with four points on our mind - and every assessment will be audio recorded.  Therefore we'll stress the problem we have that they are hoping not to hear about.  For instance, I've never really bothered that they only give me 2 points instead of 4 for preparing food because it wouldn't change my award.  But if the changes go ahead, I'm going to be going in there banging on about it as much as I possibly can - and would then appeal if I don't get it.  With all the extra appeals they are going to get, I wonder if they'll save any money at all.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Paul From what I've gathered from people reporting that PIP assessors have been trying to coerce them into giving answers that would only score them 2 points as opposed to 4: it's just pretty much that on the tin. I get the impression that assessors are going to further encouraged to play down the severity of conditions so that it becomes harder to score 4 points in an activity.

      Which aligns with them redoing the assessment and making it even harder to score points. I get the impression that they're aware that this particular hurdle may be foiled by claimants getting advice via either the internet or Citizens Advice so they're no doubt priming assessors to be their second line of defence against people making a successful claim.

      It really makes you wonder if there's even going to be any point in doing a paper-based assessment in the future considering it may as well be used for toilet paper by the assessors when it comes to having an interview with them.

      And another thing is that a lot of people feel there is no point applying for PIP because they feel they will not be successful and it isn't worth the stress. DWP are absolutely going to play on this and up the ante so that even more people feel discouraged from applying because the overall system is just going to become even more degrading and worse than it already is if they're saying that gaslighting claimants is just going to be more part and parcel than it already is just so pesky fraudsters are dealt with.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Paul Is it something to do with how they'll gatekeep initial claims and reviews after 2026? Most people who, on paper, clearly won't get 4 points on one descriptor probably won't be assessed further. The ones who make it beyond the claim forms might then be assessed by "healthcare professionals" who specialise in "severe disability." Something along those lines, maybe? Because they keep saying they're going to overhaul the assessment criteria, and that could mean just about anything at the moment. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    On Free school meals announcement the Guardian says:

    we should question the total number of children lifted out of poverty. The government says it’s 100,000 and the IFS agrees. But look what happens when you factor in the dire effect of the upcoming £5bn disability and Pip cuts.’

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jun/05/free-school-meals-children-england-government
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    A guardian article stated the gov plan was to complete all commons stages before summer recess, not lords also but I could be wrong
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @SLB If I recall correctly, a money bill can only be debated by the Lords for a month. Which isn't super ideal but I suppose it's better than it bypassing the Lords altogether.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @D I'm pretty sure that one can't happen without the other.   The bill would have to go through the commons for three readings (I believe), and then it would go to the House of Lords.  If the Lord make amendments, then it goes back to the Commons, and back and forth if need be.  If it's presented as a money bill, that doesn't happen, but I can't see how it can be pushed through that way.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I have just emailed the local Labour Party in Exeter to see if they would be interested in hearing further details as to why the cuts must not go ahead. Will update B & W if I receive a reply.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Let's not foget what's probably the real point behind these so-called reforms; removing state provision of health insurance opens up a multi-£Bn private market, plenty of gravy for everyone involved, politicians, the media, everyone. That's all this is about. Greed. I very much doubt Kendall et all give a fig about getting re-elected as they'll have made their pile as reward for granting this opportunity to the private insurance sector, who are predatory as we know. These are the delightful people Labour are opening the door to https://people.com/parents-sue-after-son-dies-of-asthma-attack-blame-usd500-increase-in-meds-8787290
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    https://www.bigissue.com/news/social-justice/disability-benefit-cuts-pip-carers-allowance/

    In the article it mentions that the scrapping of the WCA won’t be voted on until later on in the year. Is this something that is happening- that they will have a vote on whether or not to scrap it? This is the first I have read this anywhere.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Theres a no confidence petition  for government sure it's  on change .org somewhere it's had alot of signatures .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Hi all, quick question: is Reeves' going to announce the spending review after PMQ's next Wednesday?  I would like to listen to her 'speech'.  I'm wondering where all the money is coming from for relaxation of WFA, free school dinners etc and whether there are going to be any 'concessions' for the health element of UC, and changes to the proposed cuts to PIP. I'm not hopeful.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    If this government and its ministers were really trying to help disabled and sick people into jobs then they would not take away their funding, and instead increase it to incentivise people. So if you managed to get a job with an employer who is willing to take you on, help should be available to enable you to work and monetary incentives provided to make people try and achieve those goals. Punishment of those who are sick and disabled is really not the correct approach and all it will do is abandon the sick and disabled to a life of poverty with no jobs because there was no support to actually achieve these lofty goals.
    The current proposals have missed the importance of support and incentives to help achieve what the government says it wishes to do by helping sick and disabled people feel healthier through work. 
    Coming out with statements and not putting the money into funds to help achieve this is nothing but a white wash of lofty goals and and incredible cruelty and not incentives. Anyone who looks at how human behaviour in the employment market and indeed organisations would see that this has to be a managed approach of incentive such as paying more in benefits and providing the tools for achieving that through training and equipment and software. 
    You cannot kick people into achieving things but you can incentivise them to do so instead. This system of management is archaic and belongs to the old ways and I mean really old ways of Systems 1.0 management styles which was abandoned by  most companies to be replaced with a more vertical System 4 management style. I am afraid people with power and no real world experience take to using the stick instead of providing the carrots! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @James Hasn't Liz Kendall got a pot of £1 billion pounds too help the disabled into work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Seems  quiet lately don't know what's happening the government trying to distract everyone with another subject .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I see that there is to be a White Paper after all. It is mentioned  in paragraph 37 of the Executive Summary section of the Green Paper on scrapping the WCA.

    (And I see in despair that I'm only in the middle of the Executive Summary. There is no way I can read this thing, make notes and respond by the end of the month.)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Time to find out how my MP intends to vote - copy of the email I've just sent!

    "Dear Mr Farage,

    I would like you to keep my personal details confidential and private please.

    Both my wife and I are your constituents and we are both in receipt of the enhanced rate of the daily living component of PIP due to disabilities and ill health.

    We stand to lose these benefits if the current green paper (Get Britain Working: Pathways to Work), is enacted into law.

    I write to ask how you & your Reform colleagues intend to vote on this issue.

    Will you vote for the proposed cuts to disability benefits, as many political commentators suggest you might?

    Or will your group vote against the proposed cuts to disability benefits, because they are Labour's proposed cuts?

    Thank you for your time.

    Regards

    Yorkie Bard"
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I am trying to regularly research and update the list of prominent individuals and organizations who are opposing these cuts. Please try and spread this widely perhaps send it to your MP, copy onto X, send to your advocacy groups, journalists etc for them to share. Every new version that is updated will have new names and organizations on it I hope we can keep adding more.   Let me know if you would like to alter the wording or if you think any other changes are needed

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @TAL Absolutely TAL thank you happy to do this that was a good report I've seen it. 👍
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CaroA Can you add the charity 'Money and Mental Health Policy Institute': CarolA?
      I don't think I see them in your latest list. Well done BTW!
      I added the report they published today below I think. They are Martin Lewis' charity. Been mentioned in a couple of newspapers today. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact