The Labour Party has published its manifesto today.  Astonishingly, its 136 pages provide not a single concrete action relating to welfare benefits – the issue has been almost entirely airbrushed from the document, leaving disabled claimants with no idea what Labour has in store for them.

The closest thing to an actionable idea relating to benefits is on page 78 of the manifesto, which says:

“Labour is committed to reviewing Universal Credit so that it makes work pay and tackles poverty. We want to end mass dependence on emergency food parcels, which is a moral scar on our society.”

So, a review will take place at some undefined time, but with no hint of whether the intention is to increase or reduce UC for disabled claimants, increase or reduce sanctions or anything else.

The document does say on page 42 that:

“We will tackle the backlog of Access to Work claims and give disabled people the confidence to start working without the fear of an immediate benefit reassessment if it does not work out. We believe the Work Capability Assessment is not working and needs to be reformed or replaced, alongside a proper plan to support disabled people to work.”

 But this tells readers nothing concrete. When will reform or replacement of the WCA happen and what form will it take? It sounds like Labour has no clear ideas on the subject, just a vague aspiration.

There is, though, the obligatory threat on page 42 to people who are not in work but, in the view of the Labour Party, should be:

“Labour will reform employment support so it drives growth and opportunity. Our system will be underpinned by rights and responsibilities – people who can work, should work – and there will be consequences for those who do not fulfil their obligations.”

On child poverty, the document says on page 79:

“Labour will develop an ambitious strategy to reduce child poverty. We will work with the voluntary sector, faith organisations, trade unions, business, devolved and local government, and communities to bring about change.”

This suggests that there is no intention to increase benefits payments related to children or to remove the two-child benefit cap introduced by the Tories in 2017, which has been such a driver of child poverty.

Aside from that, there is an undertaking to retain the triple lock for the state pension and a stern warning that Labour “will not tolerate fraud or waste anywhere, whether in social security or the excessive use of consultants”.

And that’s all we could find, please do tell us in the comments section if you discover anything else.

This is a cruel manifesto from the point of view of disabled claimants. 

The Conservatives put in motion some ferociously anti-disabled claimant plans, including moving forward the forced migration to universal credit, making the WCA harder to pass, consulting on replacing PIP with vouchers and spying on bank accounts.

But it will be Labour, not the Conservatives, who are virtually certain to be in charge of claimants’ fate after the election. 

Labour’s decision to give no hint of which Tory plans they will reject and which they will adopt will leave many claimants in a state of real distress for weeks to come.

You can download the Labour Party manifesto from this link.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Craig (pseudonym) · 3 months ago
    I'm a disabled person and claim ESA and PIP, and I'm worried about the move to Universal Credit. I'm voting Labour tactically to get the Tories out; I do not want to waste my vote on Reform, Greens, Lib Dems, or other candidates. I certainly do not live in Keir Starmer's constituency; if I did, I would have voted tactically for him to lose his MP seat.

    For those that are not voting, please do vote tactically to get the Tories out; I do not want them to have a surprise return!

    I'm fully aware of the abuse the Tory administration has done to disabled and vulnerable people, which caused people to commit suicide with their diabolical welfare reforms. They should know why crimes like robberies and shoplifting have gone up because their diabolical policies are the cause of it! People need to spend money to get their essential goods and services, regardless of whether they are employed or not. Of course, a slice of the money does go back to the Treasury in the form of VAT, alcohol, fuel duties, etc.

    If the Labour Party fails to deliver improvements to the benefit system, I suggest putting pressure on the general secretaries of the Labour Party Affiliated Unions, which are: ASLEF, Community TU, Communication Workers Union, Fire Brigades Union, GMB, Musicians Union, National Union of Mineworkers, TSSA, Unison, Unite, and USDAW.

    We can't expect everything to be fixed on day 1 once the Labour Party gets into 10 Downing Street.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      lesley · 3 months ago
      @Craig (pseudonym)
      Loved "I certainly do not live in Keir Starmer's constituency; if i did, I woud have voted tactically for him to lose his MP seat" made me laugh out loud.
      I live in Tulip Saddiq's constituency and may vote lib dem tactically.  Normally vote labour but what a shower!! Gone are the old style labour like Stan Newens.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    bluejay52 · 3 months ago
    Im going to be frank and honest here.
    I have no idea who to vote for,the tories are going to shaft the disabled on pip.
    For gods sake who can live out of a catalog.
    Now we have no idea what the hell labour are going to do its as clear as mud.
    Reform are a unknown quantity? but I will say this.
    If anyone knocks on my door I will scrutinise them closely,for instance if Labour knock I will ask then where they stand with PIP Likewise Reform and the rest of the shambolic people that knock.
    If they cant answer I will be asking them to leave.
    The DWP are a law to themselfs as far as im concerned,and cant be frusted.
    The problem is that most politicians have never lived in the real world and dont know what its like to  struggle.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Helen · 3 months ago
      @bluejay52 My Labour candidate came round last week,  I'm bedbound so invited her in. We spoke for 45 minutes,  she agreed with everything I said about the persecution of disabled people and carers, she expressed disappointment that the Labour Party were not saying what support disabled people would get under Labour, and her frustration at what we're going through,  but could not promise anything because she just doesn't know. This was before the manifesto was published, so neither of us are any the wiser now. If Labour win my MP is unlikely to become a Minister. I feel frightened. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      FiWearsVintage · 3 months ago
      @wibblum It amazes me that any disabled person would even consider a vote for Reform UK Ltd. People really do need to read into their ‘contract’ a little further. They want to abolish the NHS in favour of insurance based healthcare. How on earth would people with our sometimes very complex health needs get favourable health insurance that we could afford? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      FiWearsVintage · 3 months ago
      @bluejay52 Perhaps Labour’s plan is to leave alone for the time being and prioritise getting health and social care into better shape so those wanting to work are better supported. I’d be kinda of relieved in some way to know where I stand without any major surprises at least for their first term. Then we can work on our Labour MPs who will hold the majority and push for change. Lib Dems have some good ideas but I have serious doubts about how they could be funded right now. The main priority for me is to get rid of the Tories and kick their disgustingly hostile anti-disabled policies into oblivion! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Tony · 3 months ago
      @Craig (pseudonym) My mp is tory, I'm labour thru n thru BUT on many occasions my mp has come up trumps on personal matters inc PIP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      wibblum · 3 months ago
      @bluejay52
      I have no idea who to vote for either, because it seems like there is no-one who can  realistically form a government that will serve the interest or improve the situation of those with disabilities. Quite the opposite, in fact.

      The only parties that have openly expressed any intention to treat those on disability benefits fairly and humanely are the Greens and the Lib Dems. Make of their promises what you will, but it is certain that neither party can realistically form a government by itself at the present time (and it's objectively fair to point out that the Lib Dems already have a proven history of abandoning their promises and going back on their word so that they can hop into bed with whichever party will offer them a spare key to number 10).

      I can however say this: Reform are most definitely NOT an unknown quantity - they are a party comprised entirely of money-grubbing, self-aggrandising one-note grifters like Farage, partnered up with all the frothing loons who are too right wing even for the tory party of today. Reform don't just want to cut disability benefits, they want to abolish the welfare system entirely.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Daniel · 3 months ago
    My wife and I were fully intending to vote Labour, mostly because I have a grey area disability that makes me not disabled enough to claim benefits but disabled enough to be unemployable. My wife and I have been struggling immensely with staying afloat with her as the only stable earner and we were hoping, praying, that Labour were going to make our lives easier. We are absolutely devastated at this manifesto. We are broke, up to our eyeballs in debt, and there’s absolutely no light at the end of the tunnel. Me dying is literally the only hope now, because of my life insurance will help my wife pay off the debt and she will receive more help with me gone. We’ll probably not even bother voting because what’s the point? We”re screwed no matter what.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      john lewis · 3 months ago
      @Daniel If you do not vote though, you will get the tories and you will DEFINITELY be completely stuffed. It is hugely important to vote..
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    feebee · 3 months ago
    Good Morning. I feel that all of us who rely and depend on the Benefits in this country are more worried by the cruel tactics the DWP are made to do by the rich Tories. We need  a Government that believes in Disabled people whatever your need may be, and stop the anxiety it causes the millions of us who suffer at their disposal. WHO wants vouchers?? Because you won’t be able to use them when your paying bills and council tax and rent shortfalls?? These Parties are all the same, entitled liars all sharing the same script. If It wasn’t for the fact that my illness entitles me to a postal vote, I wouldn’t be wasting my time going to vote. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      VOTEREFORMNOT · 3 months ago
      @wibblum I meant the extra element that people get on ESA because they are in receipt of PIP is covered by transitional protection.  Judging by the comments here though I am well of with how people feel about it.  I just know from myself I cancelled my ESA made a claim for UC.  I did take a loan to cover the first month and paid it back over a year.  I am getting £30 a week more than I was getting on ESA.  I had to go to the Job Centre once to show them ID and no work coach has bothered me ever since.  Perhaps I am the dumb one somehow and should of stayed on ESA.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      wibblum · 3 months ago
      @VOTEREFORMNOT Don't get the fear? Well for one thing, there's the enforced nature of it and the prospect of being left entirely without support if you don't comply in exactly the 'correct' manner (judgement of which is usually subject to an individual DWP caseworker's whim) and within a certain time frame.

      Then there's the whole aspect of it being entirely the claimant's responsibility to apply for it (which some are practically and/or mentally and emotionally unable to do for themselves entirely *because* of their disability), which means that it isn't technically even a 'transfer' at all because the word 'transfer' implies an automatic process. There is also the fact that as a matter of course the whole process can usually only be initiated and administered online, when many claimants have little or no regular internet access.

      Being in receipt of PIP should have no bearing or impact whatsoever (good or bad) on anyone's ESA>UC migration and PIP has nothing to do with receiving transitional protection, either. So unless you're just mixing up PIP with Support Group status then I'm not sure why you've brought PIP into it. Citing PIP to claim that people will be 'better off' under UC is technically a false equivalence - despite the DWP hype, there are too many variables involved in calculating UC entitlement and so there's no guarantee at all that ESA claimants will get more on UC than they would on ESA.

      And if you have no other income or savings, then the wait for that first UC payment (which can and does stretch further than 5 weeks in some cases) could reasonably be considered as being rather more than just 'a pain'.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Rik · 3 months ago
      @VOTEREFORMNOT Perhaps it's that those on ESA with the Severe Disability Premium will be worse off.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The dogmother. · 3 months ago
      @VOTEREFORMNOT You won't get it if you aren't in that position @VOTEREFORMNOT
      Some of us can't begin to face the f2f with a workcoach even if it's just to sign a claiment commitment. 
      Both physically and or mentally unfair to do so. It's all the other baggage that goes with it never mind the wait. It should be an automatic transfer. They want us on it ,we don't.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Michelle · 3 months ago
      @Anon Yes thay can  because  it's only  on green paper  has not actually  gone through  parliament  and parliament  has been  desolved 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    lesley · 3 months ago
    I used to receive milk tokens back in the seventies for my two children.  I used to be able to take them into a local corner shop and redeem them for food. Oh my would never want to go back to those days.  Used to save co-op stamps up too and then go to the co-op when I was broke and redeem them for food.  Are we going back to those days? Could not go living back to hand to mouth. It all sound horrendous!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Agent No.1 · 3 months ago
    "give disabled people the confidence to start working without the fear of an immediate benefit reassessment if it does not work out."

    Ashworth has already outlined this about a year ago maybe 2, they (Labour) will allow you 1 year to try out a work placement or a job on full LCWRA benefits, and if you don't succeed within that year and fail to stay in employment, you won't have to go through the WCA reassessment process again and then return back to your pre benefit status, but with PIP it doesn't say if that will be effected if you took employment, as you have to notify the DWP for any change of circumstances so that brings the question of how Labour would handle it all and there is no detail in that at all. He outlined this as Shadow DWP minister, he is now Shadow Paymaster General so this is nothing new.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      PaulaW · 3 months ago
      @Agent No.1 As stated by Annie, PIP is not means tested and you can get it even if you work.
      This is what worries me about speculating like this and Labour should verify its stance on disability benefits as people who are not aware of the laws regarding benefits are making statements that are terrifying disabled people. The impact on mental health is terrifying.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      ANNIE BANANA · 3 months ago
      @Agent No.1 Why would you have notify pip if your working? It's an in work/ non means tested benefit?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Old Mother · 3 months ago
      @Agent No.1 This is great ! They have my vote!  

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Cstcat · 3 months ago
      @Agent No.1 Where the jobs  coming from will they accept lots of sick days I just cannot cope months of tories now this I thought they would help 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Carol K · 3 months ago
    What is it they say? No news is good news? Let's hope so
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    diceman24 · 3 months ago
    he all im glad to see people have looked at my post earlier some people gave it a thumbs  up and some gave it a thumbs down  for pip benefit so lets do a quick survey, a thumbs down for a voucher system or a thumbs up for pip to be means tested lets see how it goes
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Elizabeth Vidler · 3 months ago
      @diceman24 I disagree with any voucher, or invoicing system for PIP, it would managed disaterously by the DWP, and I have told my MP this.  However as for means testing no, I understand that you can work or at least that is supposed to be the idea for some, but for others not, I would not claim it if I was wealthy in anycase, but I do have some savings but I also have a long term health condition, which for me means I would find it extremely hard to get work.  So if I lost my PIP and I have already lost part of it, and if I lost ESA due to its abolition I would need my savings to pay for food, bills and other expeniture, after that I don't know.The whole thing is a disaster, but means testing NO.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MariW · 3 months ago
      @diceman24 diceman24 Your post reminds me of Question 18 in the Green Paper consultation questionnaire in which participants are asked to order their priorities. I doubt that PIP claimants would welcome a mean-tested system or a voucher scheme. I wouldn't vote on this post. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Bethan · 3 months ago
    People who are already claiming pip should keep receiving it till they reach the end of there award what is vouchers going to get us that can't pay our bills and some people will feel anxious and embarrassed going into a shop with a disability voucher 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Em9 · 3 months ago
      @Bethan I agree with ya Bethan even though after people reach end of their pip claims how are people with down syndrome, people in wheelchair, people who have 1 leg, 1 arm or none at all how are they meant to get into employment and can't pay bills ect with pip vouchers? I find this a disgrace to be honest I seriously hope Labour doesn't change pip cash payments to vouchers they should just decrease bit of amount people get and still be able pay bills
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Messed up · 3 months ago
      @Bethan Some cannot leave the house
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MariW · 3 months ago
      @Bethan @Bethan Even the longest PIP awards are short for claimants with lifelong disabilities. The reality that some people are disabled for life or have a progressive condition was brushed over when PIP was initiated. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Goody · 3 months ago
    Labour and reform need to make it plain to all of us with disabilities what they are really going to do.. there saying people with disabilities and health conditions will be made to look for work...so i have a severe health conditions( ipf) and ulcerative colitis both of which make me very tired the meds i take my me drowsy as well so yes i get it get the lazy people into work but show more sympathy and compassion towards us all with disabilities and serious health conditions.. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      CaroA · 3 months ago
      @wibblum 'Little sisters of the poor' made me laugh!  Laughs in short supply at the moment so appreciated.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      wibblum · 3 months ago
      @Goody Reform have made their views on all forms of welfare more than plain, and they make the tories seem like The Little Sisters Of The Poor by comparison.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Aw · 3 months ago
      @Goody Reform are not a serious political party, they are a bunch of snake oil salesmen. Interesting how Farage only announced his candidacy after his prospective employer found himself facing jail...
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    andrea · 3 months ago
    I don't think this is cruel.  Labour have to be vague on anything they say about wefare as the Tories are just waiting to use it against them.  By not saying much and being deliberately vague, they are not giving the Tories that stick to beat them with.  That is all I see.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Syl · 3 months ago
      @andrea I hope that's the case.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Paul · 3 months ago
      @andrea Let's hope so.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MariW · 3 months ago
      @andrea @andrea I'd love to believe this even after the vacuous responses from my Labour MP's office but we haven't even heard the usual spiel about looking after the most vulnerable....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Holly · 3 months ago
    BBC news are doing an interview with Kier Starmer and have asked what questions should be asked. I would encourage (if thats ok) everyone to fill this in to find out what Labours plans are for PIP. I have done this myself.  its for BBC Panorama. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Diane · 3 months ago
      @Holly I've sent in the same question about pip to bbc, itv and sky. Yet all that gets discussed on each on isthe same subjects over and over again. It's utterly disssapointing 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The dogmother. · 3 months ago
      @Holly It's saying page can't be found. 😔
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    diceman24 · 3 months ago
    hello all ive been going through peoples thoughts on this topic and can honestly say in my opinion on the pip benefit saga i think that labour will means test the pip benefit which would be alot easier to admin and control and i for one would be very happy to  means test the benefit rather to have vouchers. i suffer from several health issues one of them is progressive  muscular dystrophy plus scoliosis of the spine and i honestly believe that people with genuine disabliltys have nothing to worry about and worrying about what if and what will happen will only cause our health issues worse so everyone need to take a deep breathe and what will be will be thank you for taking your time to read this opinion of mine
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Elizabeth Vidler · 3 months ago
      @diceman24 So what you are saying is that somebody like me will lose what remains of my benefit allowance, will have to work through my savings to pay for food and bills and then maybe when I am bankcrupt and possibly homeless I might be eligble to apply for PIP and U/C oh great, as I did work to get my own home along with my husband , but due to my health being utterely appalling had to give my job up, and so we would be penalised for that what a joy.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      mrfibro · 3 months ago
      @CaroA Well call it unsettling, but we know whats going to happen to us, if the Tory rats hold onto power. I hope labour knocks 7 bells out of those Tories on voting day, and wipe that snidey  smirk of hunt's face.

      The country needs a change, that's for sure.  And if labour makes a lash up of it, they just need to do what the tories did to labour.  Simply put the blame on the party in control @ number 10.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MariW · 3 months ago
      @blandie @blandie Not necessarily. If PIP were absorbed into UC disabled working people who are eligible for UC could claim  PIP ... or whatever the DWP would  call it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      boris1 · 3 months ago
      @diceman24 I wholly disagree with pip being means tested because a lot of genuinely disabled claimants will be penalised and lose money.
      I am on means tested esa and unlike people on universal credit I was not illegible for any of the cost of living payments so how is that fair because I worked so hard for years and paid taxes and NI
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MariW · 3 months ago
      @diceman24 Means-testing diceman24 ? Income-related benefits are reduced if the claimant has more than £6000 and eligibility ceases at £16000. Life with major, lifelong disability is costly as you surely know. Hence PIP. The sums of money quoted wouldn't last long. What then? 

      I'm living on less than claimants on income-related benefits because I have a few savings. 

      Nothing to worry about? Any severely disabled person has had plenty to worry about for 14 years and there's no light at the end of the tunnel. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Dosydora · 3 months ago
    What are the plans for over 66 on pip award
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      John · 3 months ago
      @Mr B As I mentioned earlier. But should repeat...

      Chapter 28 of the Green Paper reads.

      he consultation will focus on the main non-means tested benefit paid to adults of working age with disabilities and health conditions – Personal Independence Payment. Other extra costs benefits are not in scope for this consultation.

      From this It would appeared that senior citizens are not affected. This is not to say the rest of the heinous plans being proposed by the mega rich Tory devil's is in any way fair or reasonable!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      John · 3 months ago
      @cyclist Yes. I have copied this from the Green paper...

      The consultation will focus on the main non-means tested benefit paid to adults of working age with disabilities and health conditions – Personal Independence Payment. Other extra costs benefits are not in scope for this consultation.

      From this It would appeared that senior citizens are not affected. This is not to say the rest of the heinous plans being proposed by the mega rich Tory devil's is in any way fair or reasonable!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      mrfibro · 3 months ago
      @cyclist Yes it does.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      mrfibro · 3 months ago
      @Dosydora I thought we'd all get a light touch, and get another 10 year award.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Lancs lurcher · 3 months ago
      @cyclist Correct. If claiming Pip before the age of 66 years of age, the benefit carries on with no further assessments 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    MarkE47 · 3 months ago
    On page 43 they also state they plan to “devolve funding so local areas can shape a joined-up wok, health, and skills offer for local people.” Are we to read that as now disabled people have to worry about a postcode lottery of service levels and bankrupt council priorities? Sounds like a nightmare!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      lesley · 3 months ago
      @MarkE47
      We don't want "joined up" anything!!!

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Agent No.1 · 3 months ago
      @MarkE47 "Are we to read that as now disabled people have to worry about a postcode lottery of service levels"

      That will already be happening with the contracts that have been already handed out for tender to cover PIP assessments, areas will be covered by different companies now, there is a page on here from some time ago with the names and areas, but there is a new player in town, a company from Australia who will be covering PIP and WCA together in some areas, they are renowned as being worse than ATOS from what I have seen from those in Australia and there experiences with the equivalent to the DWP.

      Labour may choose to cancel those contracts but I highly doubt it as it was Blair and Brown who took the decision making for WCA and DLA / PIP into these private companies, before it was all handled by the DWP under the Social Security offices.

      Most of what underpins the law is still under the Social Security Act 1992.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Joe · 3 months ago
    As others have said, Labour need to be vague to avoid an attack from the Tories.

    It all boils down to who you would want in charge of your fate, the nasty party or Labour.

    I know where my vote is going. Labour.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      gingin · 3 months ago
      @Hmmm In my area Labour have no chance of winning, it's between Conservatives and Lib Dems, which is why i'll vote LD - at least they can represent our views on welfare in parliament, should Labour want to take benefits away.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Elizabeth Vidler · 3 months ago
      @Joe I would think you might want to be wary of both of them, not really much to choose between them is there.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Mik · 3 months ago
      @Joe I agree they are not spelling it out, but they can’t. Ultimately there would be no Labour Party if they didn’t help the disadvantaged.
      Farage doesn’t even agree with nhs let alone disability benefits.
      If you rely on your pip or esa don’t be a turkey and vote for Christmas!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Realistic peeved off · 3 months ago
      @Alicia Mitchell Really ? Libdems were in Coalition with the Tory s***m, please,sensible statement.Need to Stop DWP sanctions,hate and much more,this Rogue Gov Dept is needing destroyed.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Hmmm · 3 months ago
      @Alicia Mitchell With all due respect to your intended vote, voting for the Lib democrats is a waste of vote. They aren’t going to win so why vote them 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    jason · 3 months ago
    Tactically the Tories evidently having data that shows 'soft on welfare' is one of the few attack lines they have. Labour has in the media discourse responded by not taking the bait. This is an extension of that. It makes sense with their electoral aims, if it is the right thing outside of that is another matter. Of course, it's frustrating because of the recent announcements especially. The minimum wage wasn't set out by New Labour before 97 afterall, but any 'new' benefit model like Universal Credit was pre the Coalition is now highly unlikely. Reverting that policy back to it's original levels may be politically possible, as that was the mandate the first time and what was endorsed. Things can indeed only get better, but we have no sense of how. Disappointing but not surprising.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    David Palmer · 3 months ago
    I was disgusted to hear the "labour advisor" calling pensioners ,"old codgers"
    Meaning "coffin dodgers" 
    Bearing in mind we worked out working lives, and paid for the right, in my case, entitlement going from 65 to 66, I emailed Kier Starmer, but I appreciate he's too busy to reply.....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      wibblum · 3 months ago
      @Alicia Mitchell 'Sensible' like they were in 2010, when they finally realised that even by riding on the back of Nick Clegg's dubious 'charisma' they still wouldn't get enough votes to form their own government, and jumped straight into bed with the tories?

      The Lib Dems enabled the past 14 of tory government by propping them up in 2010, and then by being too weak to form an effective coalition with them. All they became was the tories' whipping boy and scapegoat for five years.

      The Lib Dems aren't fit to govern, practically or morally, and I'll never trust them with my vote.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Alicia Mitchell · 3 months ago
      @David Palmer Vote Lib Dem’s… they seem the only sensible ones who care equally about disabled and the working class. All other party makes out that disabled people are scrounges who don’t want to work without considering that they can’t! I hope no one in either labour or conservative ever suffers a disability or MH issue! 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact