Within hours of the High Court finding that a Conservative consultation on changes to the work capability assessment (WCA) was unlawful, Labour has announced it will “re-consult on the descriptor changes”. 

Earlier today, we reported that the High Court had found that a consultation on changes to the WCA by the Tories in September 2023 “was so unfair as to be unlawful.”

The judge held that the DWP had: failed to adequately explain the proposals; had failed to explain that the main purpose was to save money rather than to get claimants into work; had failed to provide sufficient time for the consultation.

Following the now outlawed consultation, the Conservatives announced that they would save £3 billion by making three major changes to the WCA.

These were:

Mobilising:  the points would be unchanged, but the highest scoring descriptor would no longer give claimants limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA).

Getting about: the highest scoring descriptor would still give limited capability for work (LCW), but the scores for the other descriptors would be reduced.

Substantial risk for LCWRA:  this would be unchanged for physical health.  But for mental health the criteria would be made much stricter. 

At the same time, the Conservatives said that a “Chance to Work Guarantee” would mean that they would “abolish the WCA for the vast majority” of current claimants with LCWRA, thereby “giving people the confidence to try work”.

When Labour came to power in July 2024, they confirmed that they would be reforming or abolishing the WCA, but have refused to give any further details.

However, they fought the judicial challenge to the Tories consultation as if it were their own consultation that was being challenged.

And now, within hours of the High Court decision, the Guardian has reported a government spokesperson as saying:

“The judge has found the previous government failed to adequately explain their proposals. As part of wider reforms that help people into work and ensure fiscal sustainability, the government will re-consult on the WCA descriptor changes, addressing the shortcomings in the previous consultation, in light of the judgment. The government intends to deliver the full level of savings in the public finances forecasts.”

The announcement seems to suggest that, rather than introducing their own changes to the WCA, Labour intends to re-consult on the Tory proposals.

If it was Labour’s intention all along to introduce the Tory WCA changes, which they would not have needed to consult on again were it not for today’s High Court ruling, then many voters will feel that the government acted in extreme bad faith by keeping their plan secret since before the election.

And given the spokesperson’s firm undertaking that Labour intends to deliver the Tory’s forecast savings, few people will  have any faith in the genuineness of this new consultation.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    there will be a big back lash with all this, high court etc including with any messing with idealistic ideas on PIP. A judge has clearly seen through their nonsense.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    what does this mean for us all?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    What does it mean they'll  re consult  If a judge has said it's unlawful on the last plans  they won't be able to match the cuts the last government wanted no way and they won't be able to hide anything when doing green paper it's confusing on what to think will happen next .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    Labour want to cut that 3 billion the Tories pledged to cut, it's baked into treasury numbers.

    So how are they going to do it? You have to come to the most rational conclusions, look for what is brought up in the press as the Downing Street tells the press in advance to test the waters.

    What has the Telegraph/Mail/Times being banging on about since 2023? Depression and Anxiety.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Dave Dee Depression and anxiety can affect day to day life sometimes more than other illnesses can.  The only way they can cut benefits from people with extreme depression will be that the people they assess do not know how to verbalise how depression affects them.  People with extreme/depression would not be able to go out to work, sometimes not able to go out, so there is no way they can be found fit for work, under any assessment process.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    Unless I've missed it, I can't find any mention of this on the BBC news website. Can't say I'm surprised by the omission.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    It would certainly be interesting to take LCWRA away from me, I don't know what they suppose I should do. I have a rare form of dwarfism, I'm 3ft something in a wheelchair. My health complications dictate everything,  I have no consistency as to when or if it could work due to the swings of migraines, tiredness and pain levels thanks to degenerative joint issues. I was called into the job centre recently, they didn't know what to do or say. I guess work coaches don't see many people with dwarfism, let alone trained in disability awareness. I pointed out that every computer they had was out of reach if I had to use them. You could see how embarrassed they were forever apologising.  When you're the size of a 5-year-old child it's nearly impossible to function independently as the infrastructure just isn't there.  The government might want me to work, but employers are never going to take that chance.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    which begs the question - will the Green Paper on PIP reform be the same 'consultation' that the previous Government unveiled last April?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago

    If the Conservatives were still in power, these changes could have been pushed through much faster, without even a second consultation. Labour being elected at least bought some time, and this re-consultation means the process will be delayed further—giving us a chance to keep making our voices heard.

    I know how exhausting it feels to keep going in the face of such relentless pressure, but this ruling proves we are not powerless. Together, we’ve seen that the system can be challenged, and I believe the more we speak up, the harder it will be for them to ignore us. Every delay matters—it’s time we can use to prepare, push back, and support each other.

    Let’s not give up. These setbacks don’t define us, and we’ve come too far to let them break us now.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    Celebrate the delay.  And be prepared for what the future brings.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    I am 52 and have voted for Labour since becoming of age in every General Election.  I am rightfully signed out of work on substantial risk due to a psychotic illness.  If they either attempt to take my LCWRA payment off of me or others entitled I will NEVER vote for them again and I will educate my children (currently educated to vote for them) and my grandchildren NEVER to vote for them again.  I will vote REFORM out of sheer spite. I will also make sure my just old enough to vote children do the same while I still have some influence over them.

    Just leave me alone and stop adding constant anguish onto my already fragile mental health.  Your pushing me to the limit.  Comments such as this make my illness worse.

    I am not adverse to maybe trying some work but if you want me to do so then lower the cliff edge.  The fear of losing the whole LCWRA makes me lose sleep at night and losing sleep at night is not a good medicine to consider trying a small amount of work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    Meet the new boss, same aa the old boss. Red Tories/Blue Tories no difference in the treatment of vulnerable people.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So NO surprise there then , LIB/LAB/.CON/GREEN are a UNIPARTY, IE continue WITH Fake Tory Agendas, have  others here not thought these politicians  do not serve the people of  this country?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @tom Please don't say reform are any better,I read their proposals and they were worse,we gave to face it,they do not want to pay the sick and disabled anything,it will be the stick and no carrot and if you can not join the land of the working then you will be in big trouble, I do not understand how they think that by taking away a person's income they will just fall on their feet and all their mh or physical health conditions are just going to go away and theat they will thrive and support themselves, no,many will end up in complete poverty and homeless and sadly some will decide they can't go on,its absolutely crazy, all of it is utter madness but let's face it,they're all mad enough to do it anyway because they have no idea what our lives are like and they seem to believe in a magic fairy tree where all claimants troubles will be solved overnight, oh dear!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @tom Don't fall for the snake oil salesmen though. They are NOT the answer.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Typical, despite Ellen's victory and despite the fact that the previous government was told by the EHRC last year that they had breached the rights of sick/disabled people in the UK, this stubborn government are STILL hellbent on pushing ahead with these dangerous and reckless reforms. When will they learn, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. They can tighten up the WCA criteria all they want and get as pushy and forceful as they want - it does not change the fact that if someone is too sick to work, they can NOT work. Simple as that. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Wish I'd never voted for them but even if I hadn't we would still be facing the same challenges. I never expected Labour to implement stuff even the Tories would not have dared do.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact