Liz Kendall has been sacked as secretary of state for work and pensions in Labour’s cabinet reshuffle, following the resignation of Angela Rayner. Kendall has become science secretary and been replaced at the DWP by Pat McFadden.

Mc Fadden has been an MP since 2005.

He was Minister of State for Business, Innovation and Skills under Gordon Brown.

He was also a show cabinet minister under Ed Miliband and under Jeremy Corbyn, who later sacked him for alleged disloyalty.

He was reappointed to the shadow cabinet under Keir Starmer and was appointed Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for Intergovernmental Relations when Starmer became PM.

McFadden is seen as being on the right of the Labour party.

His voting record on welfare benefits has generally been in favour of increasing benefits for sick and disabled claimants and against cuts in welfare spending.

But if readers are wondering how different from his predecessor he will be, it’s worth noting that McFadden nominated Liz Kendall for her bid for the Labour leadership in 2015.

It is also being widely reported that Skills is being taken from the Department for Education and handed to the DWP, making it an even larger and more powerful ministry.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    so reform are coming after us and labour want another bite of the cherry as well. its all looking exceptionally bleak out there. 

    we expect reform to blame us all for everything, but labour... i just hope the party does its thing again as thats the only positive, the party is decent, the govt is just.... not.

    my reform voting family are salivating though, disabled people just need a kick up the backside and stop being lazy i remember one said. i am afraid the British values of decency and fairness are no long applicable.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Pat McFadden will seek to implement Digital ID's to access for example the Universal Credit site, he's a Blairite who is fanatical about Digital ID's, he was cheering on the cuts when Liz Kendal brought the subject up in Springtime. 

    Darren Jones is another nasty piece of work. All in all between Labour and Reform they do not like disabled people on benefits one single bit, though Reform hate the "Neets" or unemployed "Zoomers". 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @Fiona NEETS is “Not in Education, Employment, or Training", referring to young people aged 16-24 who are not engaged in any of these activities.

      ZOOMER 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Dave Dee
      Thanks Dave Dee. Do not know how I will cope with all this Digital ID etc.  I don't even own a smart phone. Keeping my old 2G mobile phone going until it doesn't work any more.
      Still have a land line too!  2G not going yet, am 77 I think my current mobile will see me through!
      I use a desk top computer, no wifi in my gaff. All turned off. I can access it but I have electrical sensitivity so hardly use it.  Every device is hardwired with ethernet! Old school me! Not a "neet" or unemployed "zoomer". %-)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Dave Dee Sounds to me it's the (organ grinder and the monkey) there all out to climb the ladder, no matter what they believe is right,they believe only voteing to the right matters, but forgetting the core country who don't think that way they are not just so"outspoken" and surprise they they all still have a vote,more fool them.

      Dave Dee What are "neets and zoomers" 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    General reminder that this is the same Pat McFadden who - when the predictions of 250,000 people (including 50,000 children) entering poverty due to welfare cuts were put to him - he said that impact would rest on 'people's responses to changes'.

    Basically another one who of those who likes to parrot that anybody who goes into poverty due to a loss in benefits - including literal minors - is at fault for not getting off their lazy behinds and finding work. God, I hate rich people.

    He was also very fond of insinuating that PIP was an out of work benefit unless challenged otherwise, just like his predecessor. So, yep, sounds like a right ray of sunshine. Also, does he even blink? I don't think he blinked barely once in the clip I linked. So, I think whoever described him as an android here may be onto something. lol
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @RookiesUncle Call his bluff!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @SLB With all due respect, I don't see how your added context changes anything?

      I'm aware McFadden was just doing what he could to keep his cushy, well-paid government job and potentially climb the ladder. I don't care, quite honestly. 

      We saw resignations over these cuts, including a party whip. MPs have been unfairly suspended for standing up for us. If McFadden was not willing to side with us and resign also, he is very much part of the problem you're describing.

      The only reason I brought up my link is because I don't want people on this site to be misled by his voting record. Liz Kendall also had a spotless voting record on welfare before she landed her role. Doesn't make her any less evil for proposing what she did in the first place. Same goes for McFadden for cheering her on.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Dez @Dez I don't think Robots blink, and they definitely lack all compassion and understanding of fear and poverty. This never ever ends for us. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Dez Pat McFadden must be good at poker if he doesn't blink.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Dez I think we need to put it in context, though.  He was a member of the cabinet.  He had to give the party line, whether he believed it or not, or resign.  That he was willing to do that doesn't exactly give us much hope, but it wasn't necessarily a case of what he believed but what he was willing to say to keep his job.  But that's the problem we have at the moment - no politicians with a conscience.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    How early can they bring in any proposed welfare changes? I'm really terrified of all this, I don't think I can cope with this much longer.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @Matt The Conservatives are finished and won’t be in power for at least a decade, if that. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @SLB Let's hope corybn gets up and running start emailing your mps now and keep emailing 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Dave Dee For those currently on PIP, it's what's going to happen after 2029 and the next GE.  Whether we like it or not, we're not going to get a radical, left-wing Government; more likely is some form of Conservative/Reform coalition, with all that will entail, although if they try to rule as a minority Government (quite possible) they won't be able to do anything too radical.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Neil Cook Wonder what the reason for the down votes are?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Neil Cook middle of 2027 perhaps
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Circle the wagons, Starmers blue Labour is coming back for a second attack on the disabled.
    McFadden supported cuts to PIP. And Darren jones has been appointed to a new senior role in charge of day-to-day delivery of PM's priorities. The same Darren Jones who offensively compared PIP to pocket money.
    Don't be fooled, they have not changed, they have not learned, they are not Labour anymore.
    They look down their noses at us, they refuse to tax the rich and powerful more, while falling over themselves to attack the poor and vulnerable.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @SLB I assumed it was a joke. Maybe not?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Peter John. Spending as a percentage of GDP (the best measure) is flat according to Prof Geiger: https://inequalities.substack.com/p/is-welfare-spending-out-of-control
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Peter John. I suppose "our children" doesn't include disabled children who are going to be denied PIP between the ages of 16-18 because they're expected to be in higher education when they can barely cope with mainstream education?

      Get out of here with your performativeism. lol
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Peter John. Peter, if you are trying to tell us you are in support of cuts, hopefully you are well aware of the lies the government are spinning:

      1.)  That the number of people claiming the health element of UC is higher now than ever before.  
      a.) Of course it is, because there has been an enforced migration of people from ESA, thus making the UC figures go sky high.  
      b.)They haven't told you that while UC has gone up, those on other benefits have gone down.   

      2.)  That the number of PIP claimants are higher than ever before.  Of course they are.  
      a.) In much of the country, the waiting list for help with mental  health issues is around 18 months.  That's certainly the case in my part of the country.  As a comparison, it was about 6 weeks back in 2012.  
      b.) What's more, there are more PIP claimants because of NHS waiting times for elective surgery such as hip and knee replacements (and much more).  
      c.) The pension age has gone up, and so now PIP has new claimants aged 65 to 67 added to the tally.

      3.) People are claiming PIP when their primary condition is acne and constipation.
      Not true.  Primary conditions are often chosen not because they are the most disabling that a person has but simply because it's the first condition entered into the computer system by numpties in an office who know nothing about disabilities or health conditions.  So, no, that is not their primary condition, and if you had any knowledge of the application process you would know why that was the case. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @jim You think the current level of welfare is acceptable? You clueless destroyer of our children's futures.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I can only remember bad things about this guy and brief readings of right wing media suggest this move will make things tougher for those of us on benefits. 
    They want people into work
    That is going to be an issue if they cut access to work as well
    This doesn’t bode well 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Bronc Your Party currently offers nothing.  And that is likely to continue unless they get their arse in gear and actually do something.  Jeremy Corbyn, loser of two elections, is not an angel coming to save us.  At the moment, there is no angel.  There is no party on our side - certainly not a competent one, at any rate.  The new leader of the Greens is an excellent media performer, and he may well be able to get many more MPs for the Greens at the next election.  But splitting the left vote is also more likely to let Reform in by the back door.  At the moment, no matter what the option, it looks bad for us.  But four years is a long time. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Bronc
      "Your party offers disabled people the best chance there is to defend the welfare state."

      If the new party gets up and running it's essential that they come to some sort of arrangement with Zack Polanski and the Greens. The two parties will certainly be in agreement on an awful lot, including the welfare state, so it's vital that they don't stand candidates against each other and split the vote.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Catherine McFadden is a real little lickspittle, who will do whatever he is told to do. He is Wes Streeting without the hair and makeup
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Uncle buck Labour is committed to the destruction of the welfare state through its increasing use of privatisation in the NHS and private contractors to deliver health assessments. Labour is not the lesser evil. It is just as evil as Reform. Labour is pandering to racist prejudice with its so called war on small boats. It's war on free speech and the right to privacy. Labour is enabling the genocidal Israeli regime. Need I go on. 
      Your party offers disabled people the best chance there is to defend the welfare state. 
      We all have a role to play in fighting to defend benefits and the welfare state. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Catherine @Catherine No it doesn’t and with farage and co in the near distant future a possibility their won’t be much of the welfare state left for anybody it will be down to the bare bones it will be like eating a kfc without the chicken if you get my drift 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    The night of the long knives is an illusion as the labour party will fragment even more over this change and there will be lots more plotting the demise of Starmer who let his ministers get out of control or loss of control more appropriately on many fronts. Labour can go two ways it can seek to placate its traditional voters from haemorrhaging to Yourparty, the LibDems, and the Greens or it can dig itself a bigger hole. We will see what happens in the next few months as to which way Labour and Starmer are headed and how fast that descent will be.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    It's a pity that Timms didn't get re shuffled as well........
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Ann Timms at least isn't against disabled people as Kendall is. Neither is Pat McFadden. Whatever has gone before, his disagreement with the left, he is not in favourof the draconian benefit cuts as he knows what vote losers they are and there are major local elections next spring, immediately after increases in benefits. What does worry me is Education losing skills, now given to the DWPS under McFadden. This Super department as it's termed could become overly powerful.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    If Kendall was the cruella de vil of ministers as fictional villains does that make McFadden the T1000.


    McFadden over the past year has been the go to minister Labour leadership has shipped out for morning briefings. His wife is Morgan mcsweeney (aka the Labour Dominic Cummings, aka Labour chief puppet master) number 2 and many media outlets call him the most powerful politician you’ve never heard of.

    Liz Kendall was a nasty piece of work but McFadden is almost android like in comparison (when comparing human traits such as empathy and compassion - a harsh statement but those are the vibes I get)

    What this move says is that the Labour higher ups didn’t trust Kendall with the second attempt at welfare cuts so have now put mcsweeneys personal assassin/well trained attack dog in charge

    Basically mcsweeney is now in full control of dwp and welfare cuts have been made an even bigger priority than before (the dirty tricks of forcing through the universal credit bill in record speed may feel like child’s play in comparison to what we could have coming)

    To summarise the summer is over, winter is coming and Labour leadership has deployed 2 white walker kings in McFadden and timms to deal with us disabled.

    Hope everyone’s rested enough over the summer for the sequel
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @D Liz Kendall was on parr with Esther McVey and Ian Duncan Smith.  Nast people.  I dont trust Timms either.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @D Well said. McFadden is an emotionless cyborg who defends every aspect of this government. He is a starmer hatchet man whose brief no doubt includes making cuts to benefits by other means. We can expect no change in approach. He will be just as bad as Kendall. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I'm not sure policies will change one way or the other - they might have done if, for example, one of the disabled MPs was given the job.  But this is continuation politics, really.  Which is what I don't get about the reshuffle.  It's the same old faces playing musical chairs.  There's no great promotions or backbenchers coming forward, and that suggests how few good MPs there are in parliament just now, no matter what side of politics they belong to.  

    But as Titan has said in their comment, the current biggest worry is Reform.  If they get in 2029, we're all completely and utterly stuffed.  And that's our problem.  We have no faith in Labour, but almost every viable option is worse.  Corbyn's party will probably never get off the ground.  The Greens need to get more vocal if they are going to make inroads, and the LibDems have 70 MPs, but are doing nothing with them.

    Can Reform really get a majority?  It's nearly four years to the election, and so it's hard to tell.  But it seems potentially doable.  BUT, one look (and listen) at their conference shows they are not competing with the main parties.  A two day conference is less than the so-called main parties.  Farage's speech was fine, if you don't want details on how he and his party will do anything he's promising.   He has promised to stop the boats within two weeks of gaining office - well, his friend Trump promised to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours, and that didn't work so well.   And then there was Andrea Jenkyns singing a song called Insomnia - hardly the right title for a song given it was the end of a day of political speeches.  There's plenty of time for Reform to implode.  And for that reason, I don't object to the amount of airtime they are getting, as it gives more chance for them to do something stupid.  

    If the polls are correct, Reform would get an 80 seat majority.  Unfortunately, I think we have to hope for Reform to screw up, as there's not much chance at the moment of Labour or the Tories bouncing back.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @tintack The media has promoted Farage and his parties for years. The situation is very worrying with their position in the polls but their complete ineptitude in local government may make voters wake up to what they are like. They are losing councillors all the time, as their criminal behaviour, corruption or offensive utterances are exposed or are standing down as they cannot be bothered with the hard work of actually trying to run things. Aseem Malhotra's anti- vaccine disinformation may put voters off as well.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Bronc Your Party is not our saviour.  They can't get the launch of the party, or even a name, sorted. At the moment it just looks like an amateur outfit.  The idea they could make serious inroads at the election is for the birds.  Sadly.  In fact, the new leader of the Greens looks like the most promising option right now.  He has charisma, seems to like the spotlight, and could well be a huge disruptor if he fulfils his potential.  But that is a big if.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @SLB
      Realistically, the best case scenario at the next election is a hung parliament in which the vote is so heavily fractured that it's impossible for the Tories and Reform to get the numbers to push through controversial legislation (or for Labour to do so, given that they are now increasingly hard to distinguish from each other).

      I think there is a reasonable chance of that. If Farage is still around by then there will be some anti-Reform tactical voting - his base may love him but much of the country can't stand him - and while he is undoubtedly their biggest strength, he's also their biggest weakness. Reform are so dominated by Farage as to be a one-man show, so if anything happens to take him out of the picture or seriously discredit him their support is likely to nosedive. They were pretty much nowhere when Tice was leader and there is no-one else who could maintain anything like the same level of support.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Carer much No, Carer, I most definitely do not.  But that doesn't mean we can't be honest about the likelihood of us getting an even worse option if they lose the next election.  Reform wouldn't cut benefits, they would remove them entirely. If Labour's plans would wreck lives, Reform's would quite literally kill thousands of people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @SLB And then what, do you want to keep these that are ruining the country now
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    DWP is a poisoned chalice for whoever runs it and is only trumped by Home Office. 
    None of the MPs have any clue about any of the departments they run and that’s not new or limited to Labour. 
    The success or failure of any department is down to the advisers in the background.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Oh goodness, no. More cuts on the way.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @jim The lowering of taxes (specially for the rich) is the issue! It is the issue because taxes are lowered even when there is a budget deficit which in turn causes the government to borrow more and pay out more in interest payments. It is a merry go around as it is essentially borrowing to lower taxes! This cannot be in the interest of any country in the long run as it does not address the actual deficits and why that is so! I think the budget deficit in the hands of the Conservatives and Blue Labour is doing more harm than good and perhaps it should more aptly be named as the tax deficit!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Cathedral city The government is broke. It is in debt up to its eyeballs because of the financial burden of funding a war in Europe, the financial consequences of a pandemic and brexit. As a result the government dos not have 'extra' money to lower taxes for the rich and big business without more austerity to fund it.
      The country itself is not broke, we are the 5th richest country in the world. That wealth is not being put back into the country, it is being syphoned off by very wealthy individual's and big business, and is contributing to the equality gap growing ever larger. 
      And yet most of those on the healthy side of that equality gap still demand tax cuts rather then tax hikes, knowing full well the cost of this on public services, the poor, disabled and just about managing would be devastating.
      Be in no doubt, anyone (such as reform) promoting tax cuts while the government can not afford more borrowing is.. promoting more austerity.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Despondent What no one wants to acknowledge is that we're a rapidly ageing population (I'm 57) with a very low birth rate (as is the case in most of the developed world) so Britain is facing three big problems: the rapidly rising costs of the State Pension, the fact that an older population is an iller population needing more support from the NHS, social care and sickness/disability benefits, coupled with the need for mass, legal immigration which (plus the illegal) which is causing tensions in deprived areas such as Petery.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Cathedral city We are totally broke with no growth and increasing taxation. We spend far more than we are able to earn. Run on the £? We are stuffed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I found Liz Kendall rather offensive. I am referring to her portrait pictures taken - the forlorn look which was quite unbecoming but epitomised her condescending, yet, draconian and satanic stance towards the disabled. It does not worry me about Pat McFadden. All of the politicians are the same, they all come out of the same mould / mold especially as it seems the younger generation of Labour MP's who are Oxbridge certainly do, will try to achieve much the same as Liz Kendall. I am not unhappy to see Liz Kendall go. 
    What is worrying is the support that is growing for Reform UK, they are pledging to make much greater cutbacks to disability benefits if they are elected into power. 
    If the current Labour Government follows through on a more compassionate approach  vector through the Timms review (which is unlikely) it may well be a short lived victory for disabled people in the event that Labour is then voted out of power shortly afterwards. 
    Reform are looking to implement even deeper cuts to disability benefits. What needs to happen, is the legislation that is agreed upon between Timms, the disability fraternity, charities and organisations working in favour of the disabled, ensures built in protection from future cuts in the event a different government is elected in the forthcoming general election. This would at least make it difficult for Reform to implement policies that are even more inhumane than the current Labour Government. Any cuts, any legislation should be protected for at least 10 years after it is agreed upon. If protection can be given through the triple lock for pensioners, then why can't disabled people have this as well?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Moose Asylum seekers however are not illegal, Their method of arrival is irregular and 78% of them will be accepted as refugees. Of the total migrants the boat asylum seekers make up only 4% of all migrants. So if you take 78% of 4% you get slightly less then 1 percent who will be not given refugee status and sent back to their country of origin. This whole issue has been a false trumpet designed to make British citizens give up their human rights in order to stop the boats! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Moose I’m sorry Nigel Farage has said previously, “Yes, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has stated that his party would make "serious cuts" to the UK's welfare budget if they win the next election. He argues that it is unfair for those who work and pay taxes to support those who choose not to work.
      leftfootforward.org”

      It will be far worse if Nigel gets in power he’s following TRUMP agenda!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Moose Did you see Farage speaking at their conference today?  He was quite clear about massive cuts to benefits and how unfair it is to hard working people who have to get up to an alarm every morning and go to work, while those who choose a life on benefits are given more than hard working people earn.  There's their plan right there.  They are going to destroy the welfare system and wreck the lives of anyone on benefits, including ill and disabled people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @TitanAX9901 Reform only have one single aim - sort out illegal immigration.

      They have no plan for any other department of Government.

      Government is of course about all the different departments not just one. 

      Whilst they are getting support on their supposed plans for illegal immigration, even those wont be got over the line quickly because of the many obstacles to stop it.

      With their single mindedness on that issue I think they will be a worse party to have in power than all of the others.


We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.