We will have to wait for the publication of the Green Paper later today for full details of changes to personal Independence payment (PIP) and Universal Credit (UC).

But here are some of the main points of the speech.

Personal Independence Payment (PIP)

  • No vouchers
  • No means-test
  • No freeze.

But, from November 2026, claimants will need to score at least 4 points from a single descriptor to qualify for the daily living component of PIP, as well as scoring a total of at least 8 points..

So, if you select 4 descriptors scoring two points each, that will be 8 points, but it will not qualify for an award. 

But if you select one descriptor scoring 4 points and two descriptors scoring 2 points, that will be 8 points and you will qualify for an award.

There will also be review of the PIP assessment system led by disability minister Stephen Timms.

PIP existing claimants

The DWP says it "will work with Department of Health and Social Care to ensure that existing people who claim PIP who may no longer be entitled to the benefit following an award review under new eligibility rules have their health and eligible care needs met. The government is consulting on how best to achieve this."

This suggests that existing claimants will be subject to the new rules when their award is reviewed.

 Work Capability Assessment (WCA)

The WCA is to be scrapped in 2028 and a new single assessment system introduced. Under the new system, any extra financial support for health conditions (including PIP, ESA or UC health) will be assessed via a new single assessment which will be based on the PIP assessment – considering on the impact of disability on daily living, not on capacity to work.

There will be an increase in  Face-to-Face Assessments for PIP and the WCA.

Reintroduce reassessments for incapacity benefits, with exceptions for those who will never work and those under special rules for end-of-life care. Reassessments have largely been switched off since 2021.

A "Right To Try Guarantee" will be introduced which will guarantee that attempting work will never lead to a benefits reassessment.

Universal Credit (UC)

From April 2026, Labour will hold the value of the universal credit health top-up fixed in cash terms for existing claimants, and reduce it for new claimants, with an additional premium for people with severe lifelong condition

 

The Standard Allowance will be raised above inflation by 2029/30, adding £775 annually in cash terms for a single person aged over 25.

Access to the health element of Universal Credit will be delayed until a claimant is aged 22.

Existing claimants.  The DWP say “Those currently in receipt of UC health will benefit from the increased standard allowance and will not be affected by plans to reduce UC health in future.”

Assessments

People with the most severe disabilities or with health conditions that will never improve will never be reassessed.

When

The DWP say they will bring forward primary legislation this session to enable delivery of the PIP additional eligibility requirement and UC rebalancing reforms from 26/27.

The Right to Work Guarantee will be delivered through separate primary legislation which will be introduced “in due course”. 

Savings

The DWP say the changes are expected to save over £5 billion in 2029 to 2030.

Links

The Pathways to Work:  Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper.

 Liz Kendall speech

 

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    Just listening to Kendall on LBC radio with Andrew Marr. She says those with long term conditions that mean they cant  ever work will ‘be protected’. What is the criteria for ‘cant ever work’? What are these long term conditions?  I can imagine some examples but think where mental health is concerned this could be contentious? I heard her mention schizophrenia and psychosis as examples which I can understand but wasnt sure if she was saying she accepts people with these conditions will be protected or whether they will be ‘supported’ to work? If you are someone experiencing such a mental health condition how many will be pushed over the edge when that letter for a reassessment  now arrives?

    Imagine after years and years of being in the support group and not having any reassessments suddenly being reassessed ( a process that in the past has caused breakdowns) and then told you need to find work? And where are all these jobs going to come from? 

    Also what does ‘protected’ mean?


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Mo She was saying those with mental health including schizophrenia and psychosis should be supported into work : (
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Mo Sorry, but I'll be brutal: those who Will NOT be reassessed will (probably) be the following:-

      Cancer - terminal
      Profound learning disability (in my day, mental retardation)
      Severe multiple sclerosis 
      Motor neurone disease
      Quarterplegia
      Profound dual sensory loss, with a best corrected visual acuity of less than 3/60 and profound hearing loss in excess of 60db in both ears along most frequencies 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    Scope have come out against the changes, I think there needs to be a line in the sand, there are some proposals I agree with then there are some I'm against. I feel PIP should have more tiers dealing with mental issues completely separate from the other tiers, then there's this fact the Media or the political class ignores, people without money resort to desperate measures. 

    Say to the person with crippling anxiety that "they should get a grip" and that such an issue won't qualify for any financial rest bite that person will go off into the deep end and doesn't it cost more to keep people in prison or being sectioned? There are counties in Europe where if you're classified with Autism you can get lifetime awards for incapacity benefits yet Britain see such issues as a put on, what is wrong with this country? It's got money for war, money for quangos, money for MP's expenses, money for other subjects I can't mention but when it comes to incapacity benefits it's a bridge too far....something is wrong in Britain and it needs to change.

    If you believe you can get to a point where you can enter employment will the DWP have the resources, the time with input from the NHS in order to help you in spite of your physical and or mental issues? I do not believe the DWP can or wants to do that. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    Another Question,sorry for this.
    I've awful brain fog and vertigo today...
    Ok so, if you are due a pip review next year ,before Nov ,as I understand that's when the new criteria comes in , will you still be considered for the benefit under the current rules. In my head you will but someone might know differently. Once again sorry, I'm a bit overwhelmed trying to take things in. Thanks 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @MJ MJ Thanks. Was thinking more along the lines of when you receive the form and get it back to them before the Nov cut of date.
      Not the actual reassessment  Itself. But I understand what you mean.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @The Dogmother I would say yes, but let's not forget how long the PIP review takes to be done, mine took 11 months recently. So that muddies the water even more.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    Wow so you will be able to do TRY BEFORE YOU BUY!!!! Only last week wasnt kendal screaming about fraud ... fantastic idea mind ... and if you transfer frm ESA TO UC before next april.. you wnt lose a penny and get full trans protection . Thoughts guys?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    While those on income based ESA will be moved to UC so will be under the rules of that benefit I am a little hazy about how those who are on contribution based ESA might or might not be affected by any changes announced today How are they going to get through all these reviews When it is taking so long to get through the amount they have now ? I am just glad that my review was finally completed last month with an ongoing award 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Clare Looks like they're going to be bringing in an unemployment insurance to replace JSA/ESA which will be non-means tested.. It will be paid at the ESA rate for a time limited period only. The green paper says 'it would end the indefinite entitlement to ESA'. After the limited period is up you'll have to apply for UC depending on your personal circumstances. It's saying this is for new people claiming. Don't know how this will effect people on ESA (CB) if being reassessed etc.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    What's the definition of a "New claiment " for UC? Someone moving over due to migration or someone who comes straight on to UC for the first time and not via Iresa.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    It will be interesting to find out how many like myself that has mental health conditions/disorders will qualify for the new requirements on PIP whereby you have to have 4 points in one category. This will rule me out and it's very likely therefore it will rule out many others with mental health conditions/disorders too. So even if there is no distinction overtly given between PH and MH, because that would be discrimination of course, it does seem however as if it has been indirectly covertly built into the new criteria. In other words it will disportionately affect those will MH.

    Any others like like myself out there that will not qualify under the proposed new criteria? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @MJ Call me cynical, but maybe that is the reason for the new criteria? 

      Cut out MH without actually saying that is the aim. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @MJ I have mental health issues but would qualify on one of the categories.  Mind have obviously recognised discrimination as they have posted twice about this now.  I put one of their posts up in this thread as obviously a lot of people are panicking. Which is ironic as with mental ill health, this will just make them worse and further away from recovery.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    What does all of it mean for people on cb Esa (2019), will I be merged with jsa and be time limited now?  Will I lose money if transferred to uc after time limit is over?   I'm also still on indefinite dla and it looks like it will be much more difficult to get pip in the future so I could possibly lose out there too.  I'm so confused and stressed about it all.   Can anybody help clarify things. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    Countries with Strong Welfare Systems:
    France:
    Often cited for its comprehensive social protection, including healthcare, unemployment benefits, and family support.
    Finland:
    Known for its strong focus on social equality and comprehensive welfare benefits, including generous parental leave and education support.
    Belgium:
    Features a robust social security system with a wide range of benefits, including unemployment insurance, healthcare, and pensions.
    Denmark:
    Known for its high levels of social spending and universal benefits, including healthcare, unemployment benefits, and childcare.
    Italy:
    Has a long history of social welfare programs, including healthcare, unemployment benefits, and pensions.
    UK's Position:
    Average Ranking:
    In comparisons of social expenditure, the UK typically falls in the middle of the OECD countries, not among the top performers. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    sooo, they need even more bones  climbing to the top of the greasy pole trampling on our skeletons beneth ther feet.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    The suicide rate is going to go up. They have broken me today 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @Sam Please hang on, Sam. 
      This is only a green paper, and with any luck people will fight it. 

      You are not alone, hun. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Sam Sam maybe the Samaritans might be worth a call?just to be on the safe side 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    What evil entity has possessed them/ and into electorla suicide.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @A my honest belief is that starmer is an accepted one term PM and it is all to do with issues like the ukraine,the fact that he ramps up the agenda with welfare,and delivers a few ,of which could be the final nails in a lot of folks coffins worries him not.there is actually no choice now between these political offerings they are all actively involved in the destruction of the welfare state,but good lord we need to fight them at every turn,because we are the ones do be destroyed it would seem!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    so the fight begins over PIP 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    The 4 point requirement is going to decimate the help given, and they haven't ruled out changing the points allocated. There are a lot of people struggling on £200ish a week who will go down to £90. They really are determined to kill people
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    If you only get UC and LCWRA how much and likely when will we lose out?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    I guess this also means if you fail the PIP assessment then you will also lose any ESA award also because other benefits will only be a passport from being successful with PIP claim. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    Improving communication with people receiving an ongoing award in PIP who are likely to remain on disability benefits for life
    168. In the current system, people receive an ongoing award in PIP if the impact of their health condition or disability is not likely to change in the long-term, or if they have the highest level of award and the impact of their condition is only likely to get worse. Ongoing awards can be given at any award level in PIP.

    169. Most people with ongoing awards are not formally reassessed. Instead, they have a ‘light touch’ review every 10 years which aims to maintain a minimal level of contact with people to ensure their details are kept up to date and adjust awards if necessary.

    170. By providing PIP awards for an ongoing period, we remove the need for people whose conditions are unlikely to improve to undergo more regular award reviews. Yet we still hear that people with lifelong and progressive conditions are concerned they are being put through unnecessary repeated assessments.

    171. We are considering making changes to improve communication around receiving ongoing awards in PIP. These include improving the information we provide when we write to people about ongoing PIP award decisions, what support is offered to people receiving ongoing awards between ‘light touch’ reviews and reviewing the length of time between ‘light touch’ reviews.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    People were revolting when Keir Starmer and co. hinted at freezing PIP, but now that they've switched to freezing the benefits of those on LCWRA, no one says anything!

    These are drastic and dreadful changes.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    regarding pip there is no way existing claims will be subject to new rules, you cannot change them once you have qualified for the benefit, all they are doing is moving the goal posts, this will be taken to the high court in london, its like passing your driving test then change the rules now you have to  take it again, it just wont happen, clearly the government have got this wrong.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    Overall, these changes seem fairly discriminatory to me, especially towards younger people who already get lower UC payments and are restricted with housing benefit, get paid less at work etc. Not like cost of living is lower for a 20 year old. Autism certainly affected me in broadly the same ways back then, as it does now as a 30 year old. Just because someone is young, doesn't mean a disability is less of a disability. When I was at school, I knew someone with type 1 diabetes, it didn't affect them less just because they were young! 

    Also, are Labour expecting us to be grateful PIP will go up next year after all? Talk about the bare minimum. Changes to welfare and DWP are definitely needed, but they need to end this toxic culture and move to a more logical, fair and humane system. Not talks of yet more cuts, which are always counter-productive! A good starting point would be to drastically reduce the numbers of reassessments, many conditions, it is simply pointless to reassess someone like me every couple years. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.