Claimants who had a face-to-face personal independence payment (PIP) assessment last year were almost a quarter less likely to get an award than claimants who had a telephone or video assessment, figures released by the DWP have revealed.

The statistics were given in a written parliamentary answer by DWP disability minister Stephen Timms.

They show that over the last three years the gap between face-to-face assessments and telephone/video assessment success rates has been growing, rising from 11% in 2022 to 13% in 2024.  The full figures are:

  • 2022  Face-to-face: 42% Telephone, video: 53%
  • 2023  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 56%
  • 2024  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 57%

The difference in success rates does not appear to be explained by, for example, by the DWP inviting people who have less severe conditions face-to-face assessments, because allocation to assessment types appears to be largely random.

According to Timms, where claimants need a specific type of assessment, such as a telephone assessment because of difficulties with travelling, then they will be allocated that.

But all other claimants will get the next available appointment, regardless of whether that is face-to-face, telephone or video. 

Part of the difference in success rates may be the opportunity to for assessors to undermine claims with baseless “informal observations” at a face-to-face assessment, such as:

“Is tanned.  Suggests good health.

Overweight.  Suggests good appetite.

Smartly dressed.  Suggests good drive.”

In November 2024, the latest statistics we have for assessment types:

77% of assessments were remote, either telephone or video, but overwhelmingly these were telephone

18% were paper

4% were face-to-face

1% were unspecified

So the chances of having a face to face assessment have been small since the pandemic. 

However, Timms has also revealed that the proportion of face-to-face assessments is set to rise from Autumn of this year, so the risk will increase in the coming months.

As a method of reducing the number of successful claims and cutting the cost of PIP, switching to more face-to-face assessments appears to be an effective strategy.  It also requires no legislation whatsoever.

But claimants can ask to have  their assessment type changed, for example because travelling to an assessment centre for a face-to-face assessment would be painful or distressing.

The right to a review of the type of assessment you are allocated and the right to a further review are explained at pages 105-107 of our member’s Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews, along with sample written requests for a change of assessment type.

We have also updated the section of the guide headed “What kind of assessment will you have?”  at page 103, to inform readers about the different success rates for different types of assessment.

Members can download the current Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews here.

You can read the full parliamentary question and answer here.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    is it definitely next Wednesday when Reeves will announce the cuts?  I'm free and would like to watch BBC Parliament.  I do think we, as a disabled group, need to come up with practical solutions the issue of employment because whoever is in power are only interested in tax receipts.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    The most severe changes Labour wants to enact are going to court, surely "Mr Human Rights Lawyer" Keir Starmer has figured that out? It would be a terrible look for the former head of the CPS to have his plans to brutally cut benefits seen as unlawful. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    It is worth reminding everyone that the Tories cut £156 a month from those in the LCW group of UC back in 2017.  BUT if you were put in that group BEFORE 2017, you STILL get that £156 a month now, in 2025.  

    Using that as a precedent, any new cuts to the amount of PIP or UC would likely only apply to NEW applicants rather than current claimants.  Alternatively, they could work it in a similar way to transitional payments from ESA to UC.  It is highly unlikely that current claimants are going to have cuts of hundreds or thousands each year.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    If they are wanting people with long term mental health issues to get off benefits and get a job they are doing it wrong, all this talk has made me so much worse and even further away from ever being able to do as much as volunteer
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    I am disabled and I have autism spectrum and am half fortunate is that I am in Scotland and so might only slightly be affected by these cruel cuts being proposed by the UK Government . I feel for those that live in England an my moral conscience that I cannot sleep at night as my concern has always been  to think for those less fortunate than myself. I wish I could work but I cant due to my disabilities and I feel ashamed that I cannot do anymore to stand up for those disabled financially worse off than myself. My heart goes out to every disabled person that might be impacted by these cuts. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Tom Some will consider moving to Scotland especially thoses who are living in the North.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    I imagine so John 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    Well it's seems pretty obvious to me that Starmer, Reeves and Kendall are effectively throwing benefit claiments under a bus. I can't actually believe what I'm hearing and reading about these benefit cuts. Why not go after the billionaire and millionaires instead of taking money off people like us who are getting barely enough money to live on in the first place.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Matt Maybe it's time to limit how much money can be taken out of the country like many other countries have laws against doing so.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @CJA They are doing this because they have no ideas as to how to make the economy grow, invest, or do all the normal things a government does to achieve economic growth. Instead they have managed to contract the economy and reduced government revenue because of their own self inflicted tax freeze and so have little room except to attack money spent on the welfare of the disabled and sick. They took about unsustainable but seem to forget rather conveniently that this increase in the baby boomers population will actually start coming down once the boomers have died off. The spin words to us thinking we are not educated or bright enough to understand things. They try to split the working classes into segments so that they can attack our disabled and sick children, grandparents, and family making them into a scape goat. They are also putting in place things that will affect every single now working man and woman when they fall sick and disabled as they will being after all humans. This is the most disgusting and low attack on the people of the country while pandering to the rich and privileged to become even more richer. If this is not corruption and lack of genuine good government then I don't know what is!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @CJA Because, unfortunately, billionaires can move their money out of the country at the touch of a button and take it to a tax haven, eg Panama. And if you have money, you have power.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
     Very good article well worth a read, posted today titled “labour is becoming the enemy of the vulnerable “ on funding the future
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    Peston last night leaked what they're thinking, 25% cut or 50% cut to those on uc lcwra didn't give details on pip cuts,you can probably watch the program on catchup ot maybe itv catchup platform, they gave the amounts as well
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Anon but these cuts have already happened or will as when we migrate to UC, we wont get inflation increases …
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Anon @Anon Holy gawd.. that is absolutely insane. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Anon That literally breaks so many uk & international laws of human rights I can see them being taken straight to court. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    Just mathematics:
    PIP in 2028-2029 is projected to be £28bn from £13.3bn in 2019 increasing by 110%.
    The government is spending £22bn on PIP at the moment which means the spending increased by 65% since the pandemic.
    Now the government wants to save £5bn from the post pandemic increase which means cutting down that increase from 65% to 27% by targeting the conditions behind this sharp rise, like mental health conditions especially among young adults.
    Should we worry? Yes, because we do not trust politicians nowadays because they have taken the country from failure to another but I am certain the coming changes will not be bad as the media portrays.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Mr. Unknown The government does not take into account inflation rates, it's own increase in tax revenues, nor devaluation of money to buy things. Measurements like this should not be on year on year cost rises but should be on year on year living standards and in that the governments are failing. It is the standard of living they need to worry about not the costs since it is always offset by increase in tax revenues
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    When will this government realise  if your to I’ll to work how can they make you or force  you to something you can’t actually physically or mentally do. This government won’t get voted in again they have already took away pensioners heating allowance than the farmers dispute now the sick disabled vulnerable group thanks for reading my post 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    They could easily save money if they would stop all the unnecessary reassessments and Tribunals!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    It’s being reported by the media, that the benefits reform announced, which many expected to come tomorrow, has been pushed back a week. As Labour MPs have expressed concerns about them.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    are changes to pip announced in the upcoming budget likely to come into effect immediately?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @John No, it could take a couple of years for them to come through and you can probably expect any radical changes to be contested in the courts if recent history is anything to go by.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @John Yes
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @John No, I thinks that is highly unlikely
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    All charties have just started to put pressure on Racheal reeves budget now charties have started to boil then comes the steam perhaps Racheal reeves might just listen if she don’t sure there going to be court cases against government. Disability discrimination act and human rights why should genuine disabled who actually cannot work end up worse off than a able bodied jobless person or am I really missing something out here any comments welcome on my post thank you 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Michael Very true
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Anon I'm surprised that seems very low
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Michael No that’s not right. Being able to work but unemployed is different to not being able to work due to illness and disability. Because the 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Bert I'm on cbesa and I only get £273 every 2 weeks
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @diceman24 As disabled people we get alot more money than the average job seeker they receive just under £400 a month standard Universal Credit
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I paper was the first newspaper to reveal that the government is aiming to save £5bn by reforming disability benefits. 

    Now because the misinterpretation of the information received by ITV that the £5bn will be saved by cutting PIP only, the media followed ITV stating that the £5bn is due to be saved by cutting PIP and that is faraway from the reality because even if they exclude mental health illness from qualifying for PIP they would not save this number.

    The newspaper also reported that they are going to freeze PIP payments next year, so If they are going to save the £5bn then why on earth are they going to freeze it next year because it would be a fraction of what they going to save? 

    What I believe is that the £5bn saving will be spread over the disability benefits by making it harder to qualify but not significantly because if you take out £5bn of £65bn the government spending on the disability benefits at the moment, you will find that %8 of total benefit recipients will be affected. 

    Anyway, we will not have to wait longer to see these changes as we are expecting the green ipaper to be published anytime soon.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @SLB "And anyone who has been following this story over the last year should realise that the amount of money spent on disability benefits cannot continue to rise at the rate it is doing at the moment. So, SOMETHING has to be done, whether we like it or not."

      I agree. All these silly people getting ill and disabled, eating our taxes to pay for for their stupid disabilities. We need to control this by cutting their money, making PIP more difficult to obtain and abolishing LCWRA. We'll save even more when they starve to death or die of hypothermia.

      They absolutely shouldn't tax the rich. Spending billions on weapons of destruction is also a good idea.

      Seriously, what planet are you living on? Cutting disability benefits is NOT okay. I'm not grateful for the government demonising and punishing disabled people. So I will continue to attack their disgusting decisions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Stevefairc Well this is interesting given this directly affects me.  My Pip renewal is not until October 2027, if it still exists then, so if it does last until then, and the review form is like that, I just won't bother claiming as I will be closer to pension.

      As for it brings mental health in line with physical medical areas, I don't quite agree with that. A person's medical history and detailed GP records will provide evidence of a person's mental health condition without an actual diagnoses.  As there can be a lot of very complex reasons why a person's mental health is as it is. ANd sometimes treatment does not work in the same way with the mind and mental health that physical therapy may with a physical illness.   There are many reasons why someone may not be able to engage with others, even with support.

      Everyone should contact the Citizen's Advice Bureaux as they are experts in knowing how to avoid these loopholes and protecting people from this kind of form.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Stevefairc I too was very surprised by the complete back-to-front-ing of the review form presentation. But they will not take advantage of any B&W reader by giving ever-smaller boxes to write in. I found it easier to draft the answer for the final question for each first, then the earlier ones, hope this tip helps others.

      All I did was type a page for each of the 12 activities, repeating the four or so questions and filling in the answers for the person I represent ["Miss X cannot..." etc], So all I hand-wrote on each form activity page was " See Doc 1," etc. Punched the whole lot and the form and treasury tagged them together.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @Steve I've just completed the PIP renewal form. It shows evidence of what you think is correct. Mental Health is a key area. This is they only category that targets like this.....

      It highlights mental health in a unique and new way. As I understand it. Here's my brief opinion. It may be incorrect. 

      The questions should not be answered yes or no. (As all the pip renewal questions, they are designed to confuse)


      68 Do you have any support such as
      therapy or counselling that helps you
      mix with people face to face?

      This is a trick question. 
      If you answer simply Yes. To this. Because it's two questions in one.
      If you say yes. Are you saying yes, the support IS helping you mix or yes you are having counselling. 

      Simply by saying Yes, could an assessor surmise that you've just given evidence to negate your claim? Ie you've just justified why they shouldn't give you pip points not should 
       
      Tell us what support you have, 

      when it started, 

      if it has ended 

      and how it has
      helped you. 


      This above sentence is four questions in one. I've split it into four. It's very easy to miss all four as it is stated.

      Again the last question is a trick question? 

      They are asking for a positive evidence statement that will justify why not to give you points!! You should be saying what it hasn't helped if you want pip points?!


      Also tell us if you are on a
      waiting list for any support and when
      were you put on the list

      This is again tricky. What support are you getting for face to face mixing. Is your therapy for that, includes that? Does it say? If not. Could an assessor give you zero points for this category because your therapy is for something else? 

      So they might say you've no evidence for this category because you are under an umbrella type therapy that covers many areas? Therefore you don't suffer with this condition because you aren't been treated for it.

      In a way this brings the mental health areas in line with other physical medical areas.simply put you can't claim for having cancer if you don't have that diagnosis or treatment plan...


      All of the PIP renewal form uses this new device of asking questions that lead to answers that are justifying evidence an assessor can use against you. 

      All this is my own personal opinion please don't panic, I personally didn't realise the review form had changed. I will be paying very close attention to this excellent site with all its moderators. Many thanks 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Steve Unfortunately, sensational headlines result in clicks.  And there is also the issue in this forum/comments where every opportunity is made to attack whoever is in govt.  A year ago, everyone was worrying about a voucher scheme taking away cash PIP payments altogether. Now, PIP may or may not be frozen going forward, which would cost those on the highest PIP around £35 a month in real terms.    Well, would people rather lose PIP entirely to vouchers or lose £35 in real terms?  Because that is the very clear difference between the stance of the two parties.  

      And anyone who has been following this story over the last year should realise that the amount of money spent on disability benefits cannot continue to rise at the rate it is doing at the moment.  So, SOMETHING has to be done, whether we like it or not.  The problems start to arise if PIP is frozen AND the rate of LCWRA on universal credit is lowered.  A double hit in that respect is going to cause lots of people problems - especially for those of us used to the current rates.  

      But how long would it be before current claimants are affected?  UC was announced 13 years ago, and those of us on ESA are only just being moved over - and then with a transitional payment to ensure we're not worse off - although that is essentially a benefits freeze.  But my point is that any changes to PIP and/or UC are likely to occur in the first instance to new claimants only.  AND there has to be a consultation first, and that hasn't even  started yet.   This is, in reality, going to be several years away for us already in the system.  And the truth is that benefits were going to be hit by whoever was in govt.  But I'd much rather get a reduction in benefits than a move to vouchers as suggested this time last year - and I bet most others feel the same. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    We exist merely to act as a deterrent to others from becoming sick, stopping work, and claiming help to exist…

    I have a job.  It is to do everything possible to stay out of hospital, thereby reducing my impact on the state. It is a full time job, 24/7, 365. They undermine my efforts.

    What do we give ‘them’? We give the opportunity for them to have, to find, to develop…compassion, kindness, a conscience. 

    This government has let us all down. Because their decisions mean we move closer to a right wing authoritarian state.  

    They will flee the country. Leave with their millions.
    Shame on them.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Michael That's my argument
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @DJMH15 Managing the countries tax receipts to make it fair for both recipients of said money and the taxpayer, is not right wing. It's fanciful to even suggest the countries finances in such a simplistic manner. Right & left do not exist in the same way you still envisage from a bygone era. Citizens, all citizens expect their money, to be spent efficiently. When the country has got to a stage, as the UK has, where it is a financial impossibility to be able to keep financing such astronomical costs to the state and it's people, it is there responsibility to do something about it. 

      The other option is the country collapses.

      It's a government's basic job to protect us from a financial meltdown. That and giving it's citizens pritection.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @DJMH15 This govt's choices have let us down?  I'd like to remind people that before the election we were facing the Tories doing away with PIP payments altogether and vouchers taking their place.   Some people seem to have VERY short memories.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @DJMH15 DJMH15 well said 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Hold on to your hats, The Chancer-lor  Rachel Thieves is making a statement this week, possibly Wednesday, ahead of 26th March's "fiscal event" Praying it's not as bad as we're all expecting 😔
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @SLB They should be asking drug companies to pay compensation to the people harmed by the covid jab I'm not one of those people 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @pollenpath There won't be a reprieve.  But people need to remember that just a year ago we were facing the prospect of PIP cash payments being removed altogether and vouchers being issued instead. So, what option do you prefer?  A freeze on payment amounts or a voucher scheme?  People seem to have very short memories.

      But, once again, there is nothing to say the financial changes will apply to those of us already on benefits.  And, once again, the benefits bill can't continue to rise at the rate it currently is.  So what cuts would YOU make?  Do you really think there are hundreds of thousands more ill and disabled people than there were five years ago.  You can't keep eligibility for the benefit the same AND keep the payments at the same rate.  It's not feasible, whether we like it or not.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @boris1 I just mentioned the same thing I've posted here. It was on the front page of the Telegraph when I was in the supermarket this morning. Now it is being reported in the Guardian too, and a couple of YouTube commentators have posted videos about it. That's all I can tell you I'm afraid. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @pollenpath I don't know about a reprieve, but there are going to be lots of challenges, and we're a long way before the eleventh hour.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.