The Universal Credit Bill has completed its passage through he House of Lords in a single session, with an amendment critical of the impact of the legislation heavily defeated

Because it was certified as a “money bill, the Lords have no power to prevent the Universal Credit Bill becoming law, or even to make changes to it.

However, an amendment to the bill was voted on which, whilst accepting that it should have its second reading, also “regrets the impact of the Bill, particularly with regard to age discrimination, the impact on people with high levels of need and mental health conditions, and the overall impact on rates and severity of poverty among people with disabilities, and notes the human rights concerns expressed by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.”

Had the amendment succeeded, it would have been a rebuke to the Commons for creating such an unfair law.

In the event, however, the amendment was defeated with just 17 votes in favour and 120 against.  Those in favour were mainly LibDems, with a few crossbench peers.  116 Labour MPs voted against, along with three Conservatives and a bishop.

You can see a full breakdown of the votes here.

The bill completed has now completed its second reading, committee stage, report stage and third reading in the Lords and just awaits royal assent before it becomes an act.

Update:  You can now download the Hansard record of the debate from this page.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    The government is now trialling Pathways to Work support and will have a national rollout in April 2026.

    All new claimants affected by the reduction to the UC health element will be offered support, provided by a dedicated Pathways to Work adviser. Additional work coach support to provide one-to-one personalised support to disabled customers and those with health conditions to help them move towards, and into, work. Pathways to Work Advisers will support claimants on Universal Credit (UC) who are awaiting their Work Capability Assessment and those who have been found to have ‘limited capability for work’ or ‘limited capability for work and work-related activity’ who want, or could benefit from, more help to move into work.

    A conversation about their needs, goals and aspirations; offered one-to-one follow-on support, and given help to access additional work, health and skills support that can meet their needs. This will include:

    Access to specialist local Supported Employment provision across England and Wales for individuals that are disabled, have health conditions or other complex barriers to employment through Connect to Work. Support through local Trailblazers and the WorkWell initiative, which will be available in around half of England and parts of Wales. In other areas, we will work to draw on health, skills and wider services and to put in place additional provision where this is needed.

    Connect to Work
    Offers tailored, one-to-one help from Employment Specialists and Employment Support Officers
    Connects employment with health and skills support
    Gains access to training, upskilling opportunities, and local services that boost your confidence and employability.
    Is shaped around your community’s needs.

    WorkWell
    It is anticipated (but not required) that WorkWell services will particularly work with individuals with mental health (MH) and musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions, reflecting that these are two of the key drivers of ill-health-related economic inactivity, and a focus of the major conditions strategy. We expect work and health coaches will be able to provide:
    an initial assessment of barriers to employment
    return-to-work/thrive-in-work planning, with clear objectives that address physical, psychological and social needs
    employer liaison. If the participant consents, the employer can be contacted to share the work plan and provide advice
    advice on workplace adjustments
    personalised work and health support with follow-up as required, including ongoing support in the form of locally determined, low intensity appointments to take stock of progress and recommend further actions and activities
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    On a related topic, which I fear will impact many disabled people, the Samaritans are planning to close around half of their 200 offices, and move much more to a phone based function which I don't think offers anything like the same support as a face to face consultation. Like RNIB and other charities, they are struggling with declining income.  (Article, BBC news).
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    Jeremy Corbyn coming back! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    The courts are going to be clogged up with benefits appeal cases. Which just costs more money &  unnecessary stress to claimant's. Unfortunately I fear that lives will be lost. If the claimant gets the dwp decision overturned, just costs more money. What a ridiculous waste of time and money. To think Keir harmer was a human rights lawyer 🤔. The man is dangerous and needs to be gone. He is destroying this country. I think he is the worst unstable and dangerous prime minister we've ever had.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/starmer-labour-rebel-mps-welfare-b2795015.html

    Labour MPs should not be okay that their party leader is running the Labour Party like a dictatorship 

    MPs true bosses are the constituents that vote them in…….sadly they only seem to remember that a year before the next general election 

    Hope this annoys the flip flop rebels that their leader has so little respect for them


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @D
      His authority has taken a hammering and this isn't likely to change that. If anything it will just annoy his MPs even further. 

      If Labour gets clobbered at the English local elections and the Scottish and Welsh elections in May of next year then Starmer's authority really will be completely shot and a leadership challenge will then become a genuine possibility.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    At least we can console ourselves with the thought that if we lived beyond 2060 we will not be able to claim a state pension until either 74 (OBR) projections, or 80 (according to a consultancy organisation).  What we are beginning to witness is the privatisation of the welfare state.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Matt Thanks that has cheered me up no end. Lucky for me I won't see anywhere near 2060. 😔🤣. Gotta laugh.  Understand people are stressed and shattered by all of of this, but ...... Hey ho. Try not to think that far ahead, not everyone has that. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Matt Thanks that has cheered me up a lot. I😔🤣. definitely won't get anywhere near 2060.  But thanks for the info.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    The government that claims increasing disabled people's contact with the DWP will not increase stress or distress. As if there is no fear of brown envelopes from the DWP. Has sent the Labour MPs who rebelled on the Universal Credit bill, brown envelopes from the Labour party Whips office. To make them fear they are going to be suspended. Only to find out it is just a reminder that voting against the Labour government is against the rules of the Labour party.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John Warped.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John Ha. Fear of them gave me an eating disorder 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    @Chaz, re your comment below about lib dems being two faced:

    Are you saying this because lib dems voted for the amendment? Voting for the amendment was voting against the government. Voting against the amendment was voting with the government.

    The lib dems voted for the amendment, against the government, which is consistent with lib dems being pro disabled support, so not two faced in that respect.

    This seems to have caused some confusion, with people thinking that voting for the amendment was voting for the bill. The amendment of regret was highlighting the faults of the universal credit bill, ie saying to the government 'we see you', even though it couldn't prevent the bill from passing.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    This vote is yet another argument as to why the unelected House of Lords should be abolished and replaced with an elected second chamber. 
    Labour is finished after these cuts and its continuing austerity economics which are causing tens of thousands of job losses across the NHS. 
    In my region the ICB has had to close down the regional suicide prevention service due to the cuts ordered by Labour to the budget of the ICB. Across the country ICB's which commission local health services are suffering mass redundancies and this affecting front line services. Plus we have the ongoing privatisation of the NHS which is causing terrible damage to services.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @SLB @SLB And this time they didn't have an opportunity to properly vote against the bill so an amendment was their best way of showing dissent. It's a shame not more voted for the amendment as it's difficult to see how anyone could disagree with anything in it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @bronc I'm sorry, but this is not simply the case.  Just because we did not get the symbollic win we were looking for is no reason to abolish it.  Indeed, on 300 divisions in the last three years of Tory rule, the Lords voted against the government - and over 70 times during the current Labour government (and that includes voting for a motion against the winter fuel payments being cut).  

      https://www.parliament.uk/about/faqs/house-of-lords-faqs/lords-govtdefeats/
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Can private a diagnosis now be used to support 'severe conditions criteria'?

    The Universal Credit Bill states that for the 'severe conditions criteria' the diagnosis needs to be made "in the course of the provision of NHS services".

    After several members of the House of Lords criticised the exclusion of private diagnoses the Minister of State for the DWP, Baroness Sherlock offered the following 'clarification':

    "To meet the severe conditions criteria, the condition needs to be recorded somewhere in the NHS, following a proper clinical investigation and a formal medical diagnosis in line with NHS best practice. That does not mean the initial diagnosis has to be done by the NHS, but it has to be recorded somewhere in the NHS system. For a person who has a severe, lifelong health condition, their diagnosis will be in their GP record, even if it was made privately. I hope that helps reassure noble Lords." [from Hansard, the official record].

    This 'clarification' seems quite different from what is actually written in the bill. 

    However, this may be something positive. Perhaps a private diagnosis will be accepted for the 'severe conditions' group. Hopefully some more definitive clarification will be forthcoming. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Tallbob2 "Hopefully some more definitive clarification will be forthcoming."

       As if. Let's ask Timms, shall we? 🙄
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Tallbob2 Everyone who has a private diagnosis needs to get their GP to add it to their notes, & if you give the GP a copy of the diagnosis report they can scan them onto your notes as well. I’d also get any of your consultants to do the same.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Tallbob2 Just a little heads up. For every bill that becomes an act there are explanatory notes that accompany them which will be used to clarify the intents around every section. These are important as they will be ones that judges will refer to when looking at a particular section of an act! Hope this helps
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    At least i knew the conservatives were going to do away with pip benefits or try to . And being very open about it but I expected better from labour . Wasted vote never again 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Yorry Yorry . Reform UK manifesto suggests huge cuts, threats to disability rights, and risks to safety of benefit claimants. See the below article from the respected Disability News Service website:

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Yorry
      In my opinion Reform is Farage and Tice.

      Farage has said disability benefits are too generous, unfair to tax payers who "feel, why bother? I'll be as well off on benefits" and are bankrupting the country. That they are far too easy to claim and people are taking the Mickey. And that Labour's planned cuts do not go far enough.

      Tice has said mental health is the modern bad back and disabled people are swinging the lead. And that being on disability benefits is a lifestyle choice. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Matthew Pettigrew When did they say that?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Tom and Jerry The Reform Contract for all to read states exactly -    Personal Independence Payment and Work
      Capability Assessment should be face to face.
      We will require independent medical assessments
      to prove eligibility for payments. Those registered
      with severe disabilities or serious long-term illnesses
      would be exempt from regular checks.           I have watched/read all Reform statements/announcements to understand their position on PiP & I can't find anywhere that they state they will reduce the amount or change the criteria. From what I'm understanding they think too many people scam the system with over the phone assessments.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Tom and Jerry In 2024 I did not vote Labour. My reasoning was Starmer reneging on his Labour leadership promises. The Labour party manifesto omitting the promises made by Labour to disabled people. What Starmer, Reeves, and Kendal had previously said about welfare and disability benefits.

      I voted Green. I didn't find the Green's manifesto very realistic but I agreed with most of the sentiment behind it.

      But that was an easy choice for me as the LibDems were a shoo-in where I live and Labour come a very distant third place. So it is not like it was a choice between Conservative or Labour. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Something helpful - it was asked during the House of Lords debate if secondary legislation could be considered to sort out the issues of fluctuating conditions in relation to the 'severe conditions criteria' in the Universal Credit Bill.

    This was asked by Baroness Lister of Burtersett. She pointed out the discrepancy between the reassurances that had been offered about fluctuating conditions and what is actually written in the bill. She also said this gap had been flagged up in the civil society briefing. 

    I believe she was referring to the 'reassurances' given by Sir Stephen Timms about fluctuating conditions still being eligible for the 'severe conditions criteria' despite the fact that the way the bill is written makes it sound like they are not eligible. She also referred to similar reassurances given by Baroness Sherlock, Minister of State for the DWP. 

    Paragraph 6 of Scehdule 1 of the Universal Credit Bill was identified by the Baroness for potential WITHDRAWAL so that the House of Commons could write up clear legislation. It was pointed out that this paragraph was simply amending the existing regulations. She requested that this be considered.

    This question did not receive an answer from Baroness Sherlock, Minister of State for the DWP - the Minister said she could not pick up on all the points that were raised. 

    Possibly we can do something to push for secondary legislation to amend this part of the Universal Credit Bill. I will be writing to Baroness Lister of Burtersett and to my MP to see what they say.

    Anyone else have any thoughts or ideas?




    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Tallbob2 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/apply-to-join-a-regional-stakeholder-network-for-disabled-people/how-to-apply

      It appeared on government’s website 23.07.2025, 

      The RSN ensures that disabled people have a routine route through which they can discuss the issues facing disabled people in their region. It provides a way in which they can share their insight into specific strands of government-led work.

      There are 9 regional groups in England:

      North West
      North East
      Yorkshire and the Humber
      West Midlands
      East Midlands
      South West
      South East
      East of England
      Greater London
      Each regional network consists of a chair and between 10 to 40 members made up of local disabled people, parents and carers of disabled people and disabled people’s representative organisations.

      They meet regularly, at least 4 times a year. The meetings provide an open forum to share views and experience of policies and services that affect disabled people.

      The link provides an hyperlink to apply to join.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Tallbob2 Well spotted @Tallbob2. This is exactly the sort of thing they try to sneak through. Let us know if you get any replies!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    F***!
    This is terrible news for the future of disabled people 😡
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Shadowcat you mean the people who are working now should not fall ill, have bad health, or have an accident and certainly not have kids who have serious illnesses. We will see how this attack on the working people will last when everyone realises they are the ones who are being deprived inspite of having paid NI contributions through their working lives. The key word is that NI is a premium contribution for having a national insurance system. They will have to get rid of it and replace it with a privately accountable system. The government cannot be allowed to get away taking the NI payments and treating it as a simple tax while not providing the cover that it is suppose to give. People need to be aware just how evil and rip off this is to them and their families
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Shadowcat It could yet be terrible news for current claimants too, I cannot shrug off the feeling this is all a play on words. I will only be convinced when everything is in place and up and running, assessments are under way and under the new rules including those for current claimants etc. Despite being told by many this current v future is all set in law etc, I am just having a hard time believing any of it. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Democracy has gone, we are voiceless at the ballot box now, but we probably have the worst psrty that I can remember being in power in my adult life, I have never voted Labour and never will, having said that I would never vote for the Conservatives, frankly I find it hard to see who is worth voting for, and no not the Greens  or Lib Dems, as for looking at our bank accounts I wouldn't rule that out, don't mind a bit of fraud going on in the DWP.though do they.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Elizabeth Vidler Sorry I meant 1935 and was left with very few labour MPs supporting him then! Starmer is a complete throw back to Ramsey McDonald and will fail in the end when the entire left devour him for what he has done.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John This government is just as bad as the Ramsey McDonald Labour Government and look at what happened to them in the end! I hope all the unions stop backing this government and switch to the new progressive party and stand up for working people and their families unlike this fake bunch. Ramsey McDonald did pretty much the same and he lasted 9 months in 1937
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Paul My pointing out the 2010-2024 Coalition and Tory governments made far far bigger cuts to incapacity/disability benefits than what Labour has so far done. Is not intended to downplay what Labour has done by passing the Universal Credit bill.

      It is intended to remind people of the vast number of cuts to incapacity/disability benefits and support 2010-2024 and the huge numbers of people who suffered and died due as a result.

      I find posts saying the current Labour government are the worst ever government on incapacity/disability benefits annoying. So far it is simply not true. But if people so easily forget what government's do it may become true as government's think they can get away with causing mass suffering and deaths. With politicians carrying on their lives as respected public figures and media personalities. And come election time their party's candidates knocking on doors having friendly chats. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Elizabeth Vidler Don't despair the new Left party headed by Corbyn is coming soon. Several opinion polls give between 15-18% of the 'vote' before it has even been launched. Once it is launched disabled people will finally have a party which will fight their corner and oppose all of the attacks on benefits planned by the red tories in power.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John Anyone sticking up for them and defending what they are doing is not worth listening to....matey....!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    What happened to democracy?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    What happened to the mass surveillance of bank accounts Bill? It's all gone very quiet.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @bronc There's nothing new in this, and it's not what @Anon was asking about. If you want to keep your life private, don't broadcast it. Surveilling bank accounts is a long way from looking at someone's publicly accessible instagram account.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Fiona @Fiona, It would be truly terrible if our activity on this forum were monitored, when we are only seeking/swapping advice, news and support.

      However, sneaky though it is of dwp to look at social media, if people don't make their accounts private anyone can look them up. It's not just Big Brother watching when people want to broadcast their business to the world. They can't go 'look at me' then complain when that happens - they have to take some care over what they are sharing.

      It's not in my gift to guarantee your privacy, but I'd say if you find this forum helpful, it's a reasonable risk to use it!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @bronc I know it sounds really Paranoid but that's my middle name,they can't monitor the forum and names are hidden surely we are entitled to some privousy and advise without monitoring it's terrible I have to question it
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Anon That is already happening to people on benefits as revealed by a new report from Big Brother Watch. The DWP is secretly scrapping people's social media looking for 'evidence' against people. It has already used pics on social media to investigate people and stop their benefits. So be very careful what you post on social media.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Anon The Bill is still going through the Lords
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cost-of-living/universal-credit-claimant-fears-losing-32097195

    This terrifies me every single day - being able to afford a few ‘luxuries’ hugely impacts quality of life and wellbeing 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Three conservatives and a bishop walked into a bar...but it doesn't end well.

    How could anyone not have the regrets expressed? It means anyone voting against the amendment thinks the impact of the Bill, as laid out in those regrets, is all fine, and that those who didn't vote at all couldn't care less.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @robbie The sins of Simony or sale of church office! Aristocrats would leave their wealth to their eldest sons but the other sons had to find their way and one of them was the sale of a church office knows as sins of Simony! This is nothing new and has been going on for a long time 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    A reminder that the management of the Church is nothing but a vehicle to funnel power to the ambitious.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.