Claimants who had a face-to-face personal independence payment (PIP) assessment last year were almost a quarter less likely to get an award than claimants who had a telephone or video assessment, figures released by the DWP have revealed.

The statistics were given in a written parliamentary answer by DWP disability minister Stephen Timms.

They show that over the last three years the gap between face-to-face assessments and telephone/video assessment success rates has been growing, rising from 11% in 2022 to 13% in 2024.  The full figures are:

  • 2022  Face-to-face: 42% Telephone, video: 53%
  • 2023  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 56%
  • 2024  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 57%

The difference in success rates does not appear to be explained by, for example, by the DWP inviting people who have less severe conditions face-to-face assessments, because allocation to assessment types appears to be largely random.

According to Timms, where claimants need a specific type of assessment, such as a telephone assessment because of difficulties with travelling, then they will be allocated that.

But all other claimants will get the next available appointment, regardless of whether that is face-to-face, telephone or video. 

Part of the difference in success rates may be the opportunity to for assessors to undermine claims with baseless “informal observations” at a face-to-face assessment, such as:

“Is tanned.  Suggests good health.

Overweight.  Suggests good appetite.

Smartly dressed.  Suggests good drive.”

In November 2024, the latest statistics we have for assessment types:

77% of assessments were remote, either telephone or video, but overwhelmingly these were telephone

18% were paper

4% were face-to-face

1% were unspecified

So the chances of having a face to face assessment have been small since the pandemic. 

However, Timms has also revealed that the proportion of face-to-face assessments is set to rise from Autumn of this year, so the risk will increase in the coming months.

As a method of reducing the number of successful claims and cutting the cost of PIP, switching to more face-to-face assessments appears to be an effective strategy.  It also requires no legislation whatsoever.

But claimants can ask to have  their assessment type changed, for example because travelling to an assessment centre for a face-to-face assessment would be painful or distressing.

The right to a review of the type of assessment you are allocated and the right to a further review are explained at pages 105-107 of our member’s Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews, along with sample written requests for a change of assessment type.

We have also updated the section of the guide headed “What kind of assessment will you have?”  at page 103, to inform readers about the different success rates for different types of assessment.

Members can download the current Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews here.

You can read the full parliamentary question and answer here.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Politico are reporting this evening that the freeze to PIP next year won't go ahead.   It's also reporting that the govt is "still looking at" cuts to the LCWRA rate in UC, suggesting that isn't yet set in stone either.  These are examples of why we mustn't assume that the ideas that have been leaked will necessarily go ahead.  

    The biggest problem as I see it is if the changes to PIP eligibility outlined in the Times today come into force - that people have to get 4 points on at least one question to get the benefit (+ another 4 points from elsewhere).  That could mean lots of people losing it - especially in the daily living section.  If it's true.  And if they don't back down on it. 

    I think it's worth reiterating how far away we are from any of these things happening.  What we are hearing about are proposals - that doesn't mean they will come into law.  There's going to be the announcement, then the green paper, then the consultation, then the examination of the results of the consultation, then a revision of what was planned because of the consultation, then the preparations of the new PIP forms etc.   

    We could, perhaps, go by the proposed changes to the WCA by the Tories in 2024 before the election. OK, those changes were more substantial than those being proposed by Labour but the Commons Library says that the changes to the WCA would only apply to new claimaints from 2026/7 at the earliest, and for existing claimants from 2029 "at the earliest."  

    Now, it might be that the changes being made by Labour won't require a White Paper in the way to the Tories changes would have done, but a year has passed since the Tories proposals were made, so let's say that cancels out the time needed to get the white paper through parliament.   If the changes to the WCA would have been phased in - first new claims and then old ones - surely that would suggest the changes to the PIP form would be phased in, too, leaving those facing reassessments using the old form/system for some time after the initial introduction of the changes.   Let's hope so.  I guess we'll find out in due course.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @SLB THank you. It is so important to write down all these things, like Green Paper, white paper and not just go by newspaper headlines that say £1 million in cuts for everyone, terrifying people.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    https://archive.ph/46FfC

    LCWRA rate to be cut to standard rate of UC, much stronger work conditionality imposed.

    PIP lower tier awards basically ended, and the higher tiers more difficult to claim.

    Mental health conditions, autism and ADHD to be targeted for exclusion from health benefits.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @slb a lot of these headlines could seriously trigger and make people with mental health conditions a lot worse!  Thank you for challenging this one, it is annoying me now as this is a serious issue and just giving people more to be upset about is really wrong. ALmost feels like the work of trolls on this page sometimes posting these headlines... there I said it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Democracy is a lie This is UNTRUE.  LCWRA rate, according to itv, will be cut by £60 or £143.  no decision on the amount.  Basically rate will get a small increase.  Please see my long comment putting together info from Peston.  It's further down this page.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Just an idea, but if everyone on pip,( is it 3.6 million?)gave just one pound each, this would raise an extraordinary sum, a sum that would be used to challenge through the courts the cuts that are coming, watered down or not, cuts that are going to affect all of us.  That would send a really powerful message.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    "They suggested any vote in parliament – only required for the Pip freeze – would lead to a significant rebellion and the threat of resignations."

    The above paragraph, which is from the Guardian, suggests that only PIP freeze would require a primary legislation. 

    In this case, it won't take them long to put their damn reforms through and implement them, as according to above, only PIP freeze would need vote in the parliament and the House of Lords.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    We keep hearing about lcwra cut can government scrap lcw rate and make u/c more money for claimants after all lcw group are already looking for work or are government thinking off scrapping lcwra and put who’s disabled into lcw it’s getting confusing that’s only my opinion 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    "Minor mental health problems" is a loose definition which will end up becoming part of a legal challenge. Invest in the NHS mental health services to nip these "minor mental health problems" in the bud....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    This article says that "minor mental health problems" are going to be targeted by the reforms, not all mental health problems, as some people on here stated and others. It also says the stricter criteria would be for new claimants. The headlines about this recently have implied that all people with mental health problems would have their PIP taken away before reassessment, which just shows how scaremongering all this has been.



    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/other/benefits-claimants-with-minor-mental-health-problems-to-be-rejected/ar-AA1AVXoN?ocid=msedgntp&pc=W046&cvid=8d600b8b6a5740d080103e2d3fd88bd6&ei=12
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @axab43 Sorry I have never read on here or elsewhere anything saying mental health conditions will be exempt from PIP. That is just ridiculous. If some twit said that then you should have just dismissed it for what it is rather than use it here to keep saying everyone has been scaremongering when that hasn't been the case, people have just speculated and showed concern as we still don't know the truth. You are now saying it will be this and this, don't worry, yet you don't really know either. You are merely speculating yourself.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @axab43 Don't worry about your comment being downvoted by X number. There are people on this comments section who downvote anything and everything, including my comment.

      You haven't said anything wrong and your points are valid.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @MJ I remember someone reacted to a comment I made implying all mental health conditions will be involved and they made a point of saying yes it will. And it has been headlines on newspapers that "mental health conditions" will be exempt from PIP. Many headlines about this, not saying minor mental health conditions but all of them  And even minor health conditions can be debilitating. I'm not going to find the comment I was referring to above as not going to mention names
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @axab43 But it is still so bad that people in the future will not be eligible.  Its not right.
      Its beyond words that MPs are taking a pay rise of 5.5% at the same time as doing all of this.  


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @axab43 WHy has this been marked down nine times? I read there has been a division between people with physical and mental health illnesses. Severe mental health illness can be as debilitating and traumatic as any physical disabilities. With severe mental ill health, you can be curled up in a corner of a sofa, unable to move for weeks on end. Self care becomes impossible, self neglect happens a lot. PIP is actually needed for that to employ carers and things like gardeners, people to help with every day life.

       Any discrimination between physical and mental health disabilities is really old  in these times when there is awareness of how horrific mental ill health can be. Mental ill health can kill instantly and any time and it often does. The
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    "Liz Kendall is unhappy with the scale of proposed cuts, the New Statesman reported last night".


    Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves are obviously the ultimate selfish demons who want to please the Treasury at the expense of disabled people and people with long term health conditions.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon Or a different part of their anatomy 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Scorpion All this sounds exactly like when Iain Duncan Smith and George Osborne has a supposed public showdown
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Scorpion "'I think we've always been clear that clearly we need a system that protects those who cannot work but we also need to fix the broken welfare system that has put welfare spending on an unsustainable path."

      There shouldn't be a "but" at the end of the first part of the statement but OK. The simple fact is not all of us can work and to strip of us of our benefits just because you want to save money is inhumane and it didn't work for the Tories and their plans for reforming the WCA. It also won't work for Labour. Here's hoping they also get dragged through the courts by their hair. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Scorpion Being unhappy is not enough. She should resign as Ian Duncan Smith did in 2016, when he resigned due to pressure from George Osborne to cut disability benefits.

      The above was part of my earlier post but was cut off.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Please note, my earlier post got deformed and part of it was cut off.


    "Former shadow chancellor Ed Balls says plans to cut disability benefits ‘won’t work’."

    He said in summary:

     "Cutting the benefits of the most vulnerable in our society who can’t work, to pay for defence spending increase is not going to work. And it’s not a Labour thing to do … It’s not what they’re for.”

    Even George Osborne, the architect of welfare cuts, does not agree with these cuts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Scorpion Ok, fair enough but neither of these people are in government anymore, so their opinion won't hold any sway.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    As far as PIP cuts go I can see them
    Removing using a microwave only points and arguing that many people don’t cook these days and it’s not unusual to do so. Given now most things are made especially for or easily cooked with microwave than 30 years ago. Those 2 points would be enough to bump many out of the standard daily rate. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Emily James It depends how you view the question and answer.  micorwave food costs alot more
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Emily James I stand corrected from my previous post replying to you.  According to the Times on Saturday (15th), the changes could see that anyone going through the assessment process might need to get 4 points on at least one question and 8 overall.  The cooking question is indeed in the firing line. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Emily James To go with what James said, this also wouldn't fall in line with the government's repeated claims that a lot of people claim benefits "just because they're obese" and just need to be (forcibly) injected with slimming jabs.

      To complain about people gaining weight and living an unhealthy lifestyle and then argue that they can just survive on microwave meals just so they don't get PIP wouldn't even remotely get close to legislation.

      It would also be called out for what it is - a "starvation bill" - and would be almost akin to arguing that we could just live on cereal, crisps or other kinds of snack food and never have to go near a microwave, much less use one. But that's not how human nutrition works.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @James Someone should tell the hospitals this!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Emily James I don't think it's quite that simple.  Those questions are, theoretically, meant to give a general idea of what someone can or can't do beyond that one task. If they can't cook a meal from scratch that means they can't do other things either.  And it's also about how much money your condition costs you.  If you're living on (relatively decent) microwave meals, it's going to cost you more than cooking meals from scratch.  Two micro meals a day is going to cost you £8 a day if you were cooking from scratch, you could spend that amount cooking something that lasts you two days. 

      The weird thing about the pip form is that there is no question about dietary requirements such as gluten free or lactose free, both of which can cost considerably more than traditional versions of the same products.  4 pints of lactose free is around double the cost of regular semi-skimmed, for example. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Please pass on and email your MPs. Everyone in our community knows friends, colleagues and/or acquaintances... Labour MPs should be VERY afraid 😡 Use this link:

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I paper reported that benefits cuts could be watered down amid Labour MP anger.
    Please write to your MP expressing your frustration and anger from these benefit cuts and its impact on you.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Steve I hope its watered down till its the state of the rancid piss water this government seems to view us as. No apologies for the language I am really scared of losing my money because I need new batteries for my mobility scooter.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    A few months ago I was in a shop and an elderly gentleman was talking to a shop assistant it ended with him shouting all over the place about Reeves taking the money of the poor pensioners and how Labour would be sorry, it would finish them and he would be watching with glee. Given how the polls reacted it would seem he was not alone. And now this. Someone in Labour is half as smart as they think they are.  A while back I commented on how all this stuff comes from the committees and all the parties, mostly Tory and Labour have already come to broad agreement between themselves by the time it goes anywhere near the press. I think they call it "going through the usual channels" or something. Currently there are articles floating about commenting how left and right aren't that far apart. I also suspect that a lot of this stuff has leaked not only as a way of generating headlines but also a as negotiating position between the Labour leadership and it's MPs. Think about that? A leadership so far removed from it's MPs and membership it is HAVING to negotiate with them. But that's what happens when they lie and lie again. It took Labour 15 years to get into power and it was only because the Tories were so bad that they got in on an agenda of change. Change being the new lets just keep doing what everyone else was doing. I honestly believe this is the end of both Labour and the Tories. The genie is out of the bottle. Politics is so fragmented and there are so many parties and individuals that people are willing to vote for now. Hence the "Left and right" not so far apart. That's "political" for future collaborations between the big 2 (and the libdems when they come of the swings and round about). Labour have huge majority which they COULD have used to do a lot of good and actually build something with their last throw of the dice but instead... this..  But as I say to my Doctor I'm just a patient and have to do what I'm told. And I'm just a stakeholder and have to take whatever is thrown at me.  All we can do is go through the system, respond to the green papers, go to tribunals, courts and use the ballet box. Come the elections they will trot out the "it would have been worse under *whoever* (no it wouldn't for reasons set above), don't ever fall for their appearing to listen because it just a political ploy and they "listen" to everyone, vote for someone else and if there honestly isn't anyone stand yourself and split their vote. Even if it results in complete chaos and stock market collapse and the pound runs to hades. Do you know who that effect most? People with money! And we don't have any anyway! The rest of the world actually have things very well organized and it is surprisingly difficult for rich people to move money about now so there's a good chance the people in and in the ear of parliament will actually take a hit. Not a large as the one they want to give us but as they saying goes misery punches down and we are right down at the bottom. Although true to their socialist principles current government is trying to set London up as a hub to make it easier to move money about. Also remember a few years ago The Tories tried to separate mental health conditions from physical ones when it came to benefits. They were taken to court and didn't even contest it in the end. They pleaded guilty and the judge ruled it was blatant discrimination. Not only does it mean that person won their case but it set a president. Mental illness must be treated the same as physical illness. True to form I suspect it has more to do with treaties than parliament bills but it's something to watch out for when people start complaining about the EHR. I know this is a very difficult time and people will feel like giving up. They will feel alone and under constant attack. So I'm going to paraphrase a brief speech somebody on my own quarter of a island made a few months ago when defending a group of people from a power mad, arrogant, ignorant hate filled mob. There will be people who will carry the same flag as you and will claim to believe the same things you do. They will tell you that they are a part of the same community as you. They are not. Look around you. Look at the people who are standing with you. Think of the people who support you. Who you work with. Who help you when things are rough. They are you community. They are the people who you can rely on and who can rely on you. Stay vigilant. Stay strong. And protect the vulnerable. And never forget who your community is and who stood with you and who did not.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @s Me too,I  have has serious mh issues over this for 12 months now,my panic and anxiety have heightened so much I had a nervous breakdown in october and I am trying to recover but with this still going on the progress has been slow,my agoraphobia is worse and I'm now struggling to walk around the block and unable to visit the nearest town without panic all the time I'm there,they are damaging us,eroding our confidence and frightening us with ludicrous proposals which may be fine for ordinary job seekers without limitations but totally unsuitable for us,noone ever takes into account the affect agoraphobia has on a person's ability to do anything outside alone or accompanied,because I still gave all the same symptoms to deal with when someone comes out with me,last time when incapacity benefit was changed to esa I was placed in the wrag and told to attend a job centre 7 miles away ,I rang them up and told them I was completely housebound which I was at the time,she couldn't understand why I couldn't attend and had never heard of anyone not being able to travel and didn't know what a panic attack was, fortunately they changed it at mandatory consideration and I didn't have to go because she would not accept what I said and told me my money eould stop if I did not attend,what a joke,wize the staff up to mh conditions and stop being totally incompetent!!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Corvus Thanks for all your comments. It's always good to let people know they're not alone. Morality is great but when it comes to politicians nothing spurs them on than a dose of pure self interest. Should the opportunity arise please feel free to point out that Labour only won the election by 2.8 million. They've already kicked pensioners and now they're about to kick 6 million disabled people. Who are spread through out the Land but thanks to health inequality there are large amount of them in the seats they claim to be so desperate to win or hold on to. That's a display of disruptive thinking on a scale worthy of Trump / Musk. I know how difficult it is and it's the kind of meaningless stuff people say but try not to let this stuff get you down. Put it aside for a few hours, try not to doom scroll etc.and take care of yourselves. And other people if you can.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Corvus This is spot on, thank you. In this day and age, you cannot separate mental health conditions from physical ones as mental ill health can be more restrictive and debilitating then physical ill health sometimes. And as you said, it is blatant discrimination.  You put it well.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Corvus Corvus they won't print 
      Me on this lamentable site.. I am in esa support group .. the most disabled group .  I am terrified mentally , what you have just said in print is more than decent 
      Thankyou yours 
      ..... s .... 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Corvus Brilliant! Thank you!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    terrified of using telephones, so no choice for me. But it has to be a home assessment for me, not at a centre.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Ian Duncan Smith warning the Government it will be really difficult for them to get benefit reforms for PIP through as the processes the changes will have to go through will take a long time and face failure anyway.


    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/ids-benefits-warning-universal-credit-cut-unable-work-3579092?srsltid=AfmBOopAWvRdKYP9TB0P73uAlZBwy7Qs3k6ZxxnzjNIllFRjDLqgaxiz
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon If IDS is saying their plans will fail, then you know it’s got to bad!
       All 404 Labour MP are having meetings today and some where held yesterday about the proposed cuts, I suppose these talks are to try and win the “rebellious” MP’s over, up to 80 of them are furious at the plans. Let’s hope they stick to their guns and do not backdown from what they stand for.  
      In the mean time I suggest everyone emails their MP with concerns! Let’s show them we will unite, fightback and not be walked over. We are disabled, we are vulnerable, we matter! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon Yes exactly, hearing Ian Duncan Smith's views on this was really interesting. He of all people should know what it is like to push benefit reforms through. The fact Labour are the ones so willing to do this is shocking, especially to people whose families have voted Labour for many years. Never going to trust them so easily again.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @axab43 It's a safe bet. The House of Lords is known to be quite sympathetic towards the disabled and it was them who was initially pushing Labour to be more transparent with claimants about their plans from the very beginning. Let's hope if legislation does go through, it'll be heavily revised from what Starmer actually wants.

      Also, trust Ian Duncan Smith of all people to paint us having rights and people willing to protect us as a negative. These poor rich politicians having to deal with being told that targeting the most vulnerable of society for mere pennies isn't the right thing to do. I don't know if they'll ever get over the trauma.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Bit like a driving test result! You could pass it in the morning and do it again in the afternoon and fail. F to F assessments purely take a black and white snapshot on that time/day.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Most Assesment Failed because The assesors are unaware of certain medical issues and Never is there Report!! In Favour of The Claiment!! I Hope Everybody Appeals!! If they are not Treated Properly!! The Dwp!! Cannot be Trusted Anymore theres too Much Damage thats Been Done!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The whole assessment process is designed to fail claimants, current and new. I distinctly remember TV reports of severely disabled children who were deemed well enough even though they clearly could not be left unsupervised at any time and yet, the assessor decided that they looked well enough...
    I was also told as functioning well became when they did the assessment at my home, they saw my many books (they are never ever setting foot at home!), and that's even though I clearly looked unwell and could not string a sentence together. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @SLB No it isn't. What is happening is the assessments are failing people because the are set up to do so. They are literally incentivized to do so. People are taking them to Tribunal who are deciding that the assessments were rubbish and using whatever evidence the claimant provides plus their own observations / questioning to determine eligibility and more often than not awarding them the benefit. For the record attending a tribunal is just as traumatic if not more so than the assessment. And to make it worse we are now at the point were the DWP do mandatory reevaluations and seem to come to the same conclusion. IE the assessments were rubbish. If I were them I'd be taking the companies to court for providing rubbish assessments.             
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @pipsqueak That's probably true.  But if those getting PIP and the higher rate of UC is rising at the rate we're getting told, it's failing in its efforts to fail claimants.   I think the truth of the matter is that no assessment form is capable of dealing successfully with all the variations that can occur within illness, physical disability and mental health issues.  It can't be done.  And the WCA is just downright bonkers, making the assumption that anyone with health issues is only ever going to want to work in a job where you press buttons and lift cardboard boxes above your head. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @pipsqueak The alchemy they use to assess us wouldn't go amiss in a Harry Potter film. Pure magic. They know without even considering the extend of our health needs,without properly assessing us in real terms we are faking, chancers, with made up conditions and don't really need any help at all. Set up to fail, definitely, esp as it's unfair from the get-go. What job in the world would allow such ineptitude and downright inaccuracies, and let's face it lies, and then they get away with it. We get away with nothing,even with irrefutable medical evidence. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Yes I definitely think that’s right! If you read my medical records it’s crazy how many health professionals have said wow, from looking at you I wouldn’t even realise what you had going on.

    I think having a telephone appointment helped the assessor concentrate on my actual health rather than the image I portray.  Some illnesses are hidden and we hide them well. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Hannah On the door of the disabled toilet in my local Asda it says "Not all disabilities are visible" How true that has always,been
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Budgie I agree. I have Addisons disease and part of my lung removed as well as mental health issues. Looking at me you would have no clue. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The government is writing its list for Santa, bit of this, bit of that, bit more with bells on as they get carried away. But you haven't been good girls and boys, have you, Keir, Angela, Rachel, Liz? You haven't been kind, you haven't shared, you haven't been honest, you haven't helped old ladies and oh, you really haven't done your homework. What is more, we are well placed to tell you, there is no Santa. Maybe you'll get a sour dry orange in your stocking, more than most of us, just not what you wanted.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.