Prime minister Rishi Sunak appeared to blame claimants for high taxes and high migration numbers as he set out his five point plan for welfare reform in a speech given yesterday at the right-wing think tank, the Centre for Social justice, founded by Iain Duncan-Smith.

The five welfare reforms the Conservatives will introduce if they win the election are:

  • the WCA will be made harder to pass;
  • GPs will no longer issue fit notes;
  • legacy benefits claimants will move to UC sooner and work requirements will be increased;
  • PIP will no longer always be a cash benefit and fewer people will be eligible;
  • DWP to be given powers to seize goods, arrest claimants and impose fines.

Irresponsible burden

In his speech, Sunak claimed that there 850,000 more economically active people in the UK since the pandemic, due to long-term sickness.

He argued that the country “can’t afford such a spiralling increase in the welfare bill and the irresponsible burden that would place on this and future generations of taxpayers.”

 As well as increasing taxes, the rising number of claimants is to blame for high migration numbers according the prime minister:

“We can’t lose so many people from our workforce whose contributions could help to drive growth.  And there’s no sustainable way to achieve our goal of bringing down migration levels, which are just too high without giving more of our own people the skills, incentives, and support, to get off welfare and back into work.”

Sunak went on to set out five welfare reforms the Conservatives intend to introduce in the even that they win the next election.

Reform 1:  the WCA will be made harder to pass

Sunak argued that in 2011, only 20% of those assessed under the work capability assessment (WCA) were found to be unfit for work.  But the figure now is 65%.

“That’s wrong. People are not three times sicker than they were a decade ago.” Sunak argued.

The solution is to make it harder to pass the WCA, something the government is already drawing up plans to do.

“So we are going to tighten up the Work Capability Assessment such that hundreds of thousands of benefit recipients with less severe conditions will now be expected to engage in the world of work – and be supported to do so.”

Reform 2:  GPs will no longer issue fit notes

The Conservative’s attempts to replace the sick note with the fit note, which says what work you can still do with support, has been an abject failure.

94% of fit notes still sign people off completely.

So, now the Conservatives plan to stop GPs issuing fit notes altogether and give the job to people who may not even be medically qualified:

“So we’re also going to test shifting the responsibility for assessment from GPs and giving it to specialist work and health professionals who have the dedicated time to provide an objective assessment of someone’s ability to work and the tailored support they need to do so.”

A consultation on reforming the fit note process was launched yesterday and will run until 8 July 2024.

Reform 3: legacy benefits claimants will move to UC sooner and work requirements will be increased

Sunak announced that “we’ll accelerate moving people from legacy benefits onto Universal Credit, to give them more access to the world of work.”

The DWP have since used X (formerly Twitter) to reveal that

“The Prime Minister’s welfare reform speech earlier today announced the acceleration of the Managed Migration of legacy ESA/ESA & HB cases to #UniversalCredit. All migration notices will now be sent by the end of December 2025. We will work with stakeholders on the detailed plans.”

The rules around UC and work should also be tightened according to Sunak.

Instead of nine hours, “Anyone working less than half a full-time week will now have to try and find extra work in return for claiming benefits.” 

In addition, “Anyone who doesn’t comply with the conditions set by their Work Coach such as accepting an available job will, after 12 months, have their claim closed and their benefits removed entirely.”

Reform 4: PIP will no longer always be a cash benefit and fewer people will be eligible

Sunak claims that spending on PIP will increase by 50% over the next four years unless the rules are changed.

He argues that whilst some people need money for aids such as handrails or stairlifts “Often they’re already available at low cost, or free from the NHS or Local Authorities.  And they’re one-off costs so it probably isn’t right that we’re paying an ongoing amount every year.” 

In addition, claimants with mental health conditions are to be targeted because “for all the challenges they face it is not clear they have the same degree of increased living costs as those with physical conditions.”

In fact, Sunak wonders if these claimants should be given money at all:

“And we’ll also consider whether some people with mental health conditions should get PIP in the same way through cash transfers or whether they’d be better supported to lead happier, healthier and more independent lives through access to treatment like talking therapies or respite care.”

Sunak announced that a consultation will be launched in the next few days to decide how to stop the PIP assessment system being “undermined by the way people are asked to make subjective and unverifiable claims about their capability.”

The government wants to see more medical evidence required to substantiate a claim and “a more objective and rigorous approach that focuses support on those with the greatest needs and extra costs” with a limit on “the type and severity of mental health conditions that should be eligible for PIP.”

Reform 5:  DWP to be given powers to seize goods, arrest claimants and impose fines

Sunak announced that the Conservatives are preparing “a new Fraud Bill for the next Parliament which will align DWP with HMRC so we treat benefit fraud like tax fraud with new powers to make seizures and arrests. And we’ll also enable penalties to be applied to a wider set of fraudsters through a new civil penalty.”

In other words, the DWP will be able to search claimants homes, seize possessions such as computers and mobile phones, arrest claimants and impose fines.

The plan to give the DWP police powers is something we have been warning about for some time.

Will any of this ever happen?

These plans are largely based on the Conservatives winning the next election.  There is no indication that any of them will be supported by Labour if they win.

Of them all, the one most likely to come about whatever the election result is the earlier date for moving income-based ESA claimants to UC.  The move was delayed by the government until 2028/29 in a bid to save money and the pause was never popular with the DWP, who would prefer to complete the process in one go.

There is a real possibility that whichever party is in power next, they will decide that yet another change of date will cause too much confusion.

For the rest of the reforms, the best we can say is that when it comes to voting, claimants now have  a clear picture of what the Conservatives have planned for them - even if Labour’s intentions are still unclear.

You can read the full text of Sunak’s speech here.

You can read more about the PIP changes and find out how to take part in the consultation here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Stephanie · 4 months ago
    What Sunak needs is a roll off the tongue phrase to encapsulate all of his new ideas.  Hmm, something along the lines of "Work Makes Freedom" springs to mind???
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Angel · 4 months ago
    Stopping pip for mental health - my mental health stops me going into the garden and doing windows yes it is also physical but mental health as well
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Jen. · 4 months ago
    The thing is that if a health professional issues a fit note then they have to be able to evidence that they have made a sound medical decision. Also rather than doing the hard work and fixing things like NHS, waiting times, lack of mental health support, the state of social care and the constant demands on council budgets that is damaging communities.  Then more people would be working as they would have the resources and treatments they need to be well enough to work. But why fix the things you’ve been relentlessly breaking down for well over a decade and just target the most vulnerable in our society. And if they were treated this way how much corruption, theft and misappropriation of funds would we find?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    A down and bluesy person · 4 months ago
    To paraphrase Sunak, just cheer up. This is the kind of bunkum I've come to expect from this Government. This careless kind of vilification makes it OK for the rest of the population to discriminate against us too.

    When my own mental health was at its worst, I was agoraphobic and had panic attacks over even the most trivial of things, like getting stuck in a multi-storey car park which was gridlocked, having to stand in a queue, etc. I could not go anywhere except in my Dad's old car. At home I was sleeping 16 hours a day and having to look after two autistic children and a disabled father as well.

    Dark days, but I got through it and now work with my local mental health trust to give the patient and carer view of services from the other side. If someone had the made these comments when I was severely depressed, I WOULD have done away with myself.

    This is a classic example of MPs being on a different planet to disabled people and not taking the time and trouble to listen to us and BELIEVE what we say. 

    I now have physical disabilities which prevent me from doing what I want to do, but I am now retired, not having had the opportunity to save for a decent pension. But now, doing these small bits of work with the NHS means I have to pay tax on my earnings. Very galling.

    One son still lives at home with me and my husband, and is unfit for work. Trying to force him into work would not be effective and he would need so much support to be in work that he'd never hold down a job. The other son is now working in the NHS as a part time cleaner and living with his autistic friend, which is working out well. He is treated very well at work and is well liked and respected. If support through their formative years had been adequate, they would possibly be working better jobs and paying more taxes, rather than experiencing stress and bullying by being put through mainstream school and later on experiencing intollerance and bullying in the workplace. Neither have taken to drink or drugs or been in trouble with the police, so I must have done something right. We have muddled through. They have more empathy than the Government and are always pleased to help out if they can. 

    The only thing that now gets me into a panic is a letter from the DWP! You are not alone. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    BirtyB · 4 months ago
    First point, Sunak is making a habit of making announcements like this when they should be made in parliament. Second point, this is what I have come to accept from this desperate PM. I am not sure how much of it is something they would actually try to put into law and how much is a desperate attempt to try to win votes from a certain element of the electorate that might vote Reform. Either way he needs to be stopped or nobody knows how low he would go
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    JC · 4 months ago
    I think my biggest concern is the lack of response from Labour. Their rhetoric around disability has been unquestionably Tory under Starmer, and their reluctance to condemn any of the Tory proposals starts to feel like an implicit endorsement.

    The chances of the Conservatives winning the next election is in the region of < 5%, so I'm not worried about whst they intend to do as they're simply not going to be around to do it. However, with Labour's refusal to condemn anything, and their own policy line of "getting disabled people into work" I'm still terribly frightened that some version of these proposals will come to pass.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      andrea · 4 months ago
      @Anon As I said somewhere else, Labour's silencs is becaust they do not want to give the Tories any excuse to use against them in the election, so they won't condemn anything at the time.  And they will probably tighten up certain thresholds, and anyone who can work should.  Those are sick shouldn't.  They are bound to be softer than the Tories as they always have been historically and their whole outlook is.  They have to be seen to doing the right thing otherwise it could jeopardise their choices.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Old mother · 4 months ago
      @Jen. This is not true and is feeding the a false Tory  narrative. Please think carefully before making unfounded accusations. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jen. · 4 months ago
      @JC Yes I completely agree about the lack of response from Labour and the fact that when asked Starmer skips around the subject and doesn’t appear to have a counter or a real plan. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anon · 4 months ago
      @JC Yes, I too have made a similar comment about Labour's silence. However, I seem to remember a speech from their party conference last autumn that said something about anyone who can work should be made to and eligibility for benefits will be tightened.
      I think anyone hoping Labour will be their saviour are in for a shock
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Gambolputty · 4 months ago
      @wibblum That's where I think our current political system works in our favour, even if in a very broken way. We'll almost certainly have a Labour government after the election. 

      It would have to be a spectacular scandal for Keir Starmer to lose this one, so as long as he's not revealed as Jack the Ripper, or plans on writing Mrs Brown the Musical (starring Joe Pasquale's Napalm Death Extravaganza) I doubt that will happen. 

      We'll most likely get a second term of Labour before things end up going wrong, and then back to the Tories who'll push for fascism, and everyone get fed up of it and bring Labour back again. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    axab43 · 4 months ago
    Also, does anyone know if the suggestion brought up last year, about being supported to try work (or in my case working from home) while keeping benefits as a stop gap, is still likely to go ahead?  Labour and the Tories were talking about this but haven't heard anything about it lately.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    axab43 · 4 months ago
    I think I've asked this before but can't seem to find an answer.  Can anyone estimate how long the changes to PIP suggested by Rishi Sunak will take?  (Ie only rough suggestions, this year or sometime next year?) The same for the migration to UC brought forward from 2028?  This year or next year?  My mental health was not great before and really struggling now.  A timeframe might help.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Stephanie · 4 months ago
      @Robert I don't somehow think that Rishi Sunak along with his 730 million pounds will worry too much about being forced to languish on the dole!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      axab43 · 4 months ago
      @Robert Thank you, that helped.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Robert · 4 months ago
      @axab43 I wouldn't get too worried he said in his speech that the changes would be introduced after the next election.no1:He will be on the dole by then. No2:The ESA will be introduced B4 the end of 2025 but by the looks of things things are moving at a snail pace so might not be moved over due a few years.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The Dog Mother · 4 months ago
      @axab43 axab43 looks like the end of next year. , as far as I know, hinges mostly on the torys being re-elected. Maybe someone on here knows differently, but that's my understanding. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anne Keenan · 4 months ago
      @axab43 I think they have been brought forward to the end of 2025 but I believe that if Labour get in at the next election this will not happen. They will have to save money from somewhere but to target the disabled like this would be a travesty of everything Labour stands for. We need to fight any suggestion of this. I am disabled and could not get by without my pip.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Bridget · 4 months ago
    I have never read such cruel intentions, nor can I understand how this can be allowed to be implemented, what kind of people are actually in charge of our country. Only yesterday I was reading a paper on Benefits Levels in the UK
    The committee presented this question to participants:
    581 votes were cast by 27 individuals between 23 August and 29 September 2023. 28 ideas were added by participants, with 38 voted on in total. The following ideas were the top 10 according to participants’ votes.

    Not everyone is the same and not everyone copes the same as another. 
    Make the system less complicated and more inclusive;
    More attention to dignity required and less rigidity in the assessment process such as PIP. People’s dignity is denied and people live in fear;
    Universal Credit should be replaced by a system more like Working Tax Credits where payments are made ahead of time and not in arrears;
    The system needs to be based on care and compassion for all, seeing the humanity in everyone and treating people with respect;
    Dignity;
    Compassion;
    Accessibility and inclusion;
    A far more streamlined system that affords people and carers respect in the process and far less reliance on lay people or systematic points;
    Person-centred; and
    Fairness.

    Why are such committees carrying out these in depth investigations when the governments intentions have no such care, compassion, dignity or respect. I am lost for words
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    MariW · 4 months ago
    It’s been six days since Rishi Sunak made the speech that has absolutely terrorised so many of us. We await the publication of the consultation on Personal Independence Payment.. Meanwhile, there has been silence from Kier Starmer and his Shadow Cabinet.
     
    Those of us who have been disabled a long time will remember the review of Disability Living Allowance awards in 1997/98 when Tony Blair took power. PIP was is a "young" benefit, introduced by the Welfare Reform Act 2012. I'm not sure that the very scary DLA-PIP roll-out has even been completed. 
     
    I have written to my Labour MP this week, asking that he urge his Shadow Cabinet colleague to respond to Sunak’s speech. We need clarification of what a Labour administration might have in store for us. I encourage you to lobby your own Members of Parliament.                                             
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anon · 4 months ago
      @MariW Mines a Conservative,so i don't think I'll bother
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      BirtyB · 4 months ago
      @MariW When PIP first came out the vast majority of awards were for short periods 2 to 5 years. Gradually the length of the awards has increased. Why, because more and more people are using the resources of sites such as B&W and are challenging unfair decisions which in turn means more MRs. As usual PIP is understaffed so they have increased the lengths of the awards to reduce the workload and backlog
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Tim CW · 4 months ago
    I voluntarily care for a number of adults with physical, mental and learning difficulties. It concerns me greatly that the Conservative Party has such plans to reform benefits. There's likely to be more people take their lives because of such actions. 

    It always appears to be the case that those, often less fortunate are put in difficult positions. Whilst I agree there the cost of benefits is too high, there are other ways to address such issues. It has always been the case that PIP is non means tested meaning a millionaire can claim  PIP albeit morally I believe this is wrong. 

    The government has also given money to everyone because of hikes in energy bills this was received regardless of their ability to be able to afford their energy costs. Others such as park home dwellers had to push to get any support at all. 

    Moving people from legacy benefits to UC is in theory a goid idea, it could save money administratively, however the implementation appears to penalise people rather than support them.  

    We already know how the WCA can be unfair and very much dependent on how skilled the assessor is, as well as their ability to be able to emphasise with the person they are assessing. To make the WCA even more complex is ridiculously, it already is too difficult.  It's likely more appeals will result creating further cost to the benefits bill.

     


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jim · 4 months ago
      @Tim CW I agree, means test pip give it to the poorest in society.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The dogmother. · 4 months ago
      @Tim CW Moving us onto UC early is OK if you aren't on the pointy end of it. 
      I, for one, was dreading it in 28-29, never mind next year. 
      Yes, it's a 'Good idea'... for the government. 
      Along with all their other 'Good ideas'.  
      And yes, it will penalise us. At the start of applying,because for many, it's a mine field,right through to the erosion of premiums and every other part in between. The sick and disabled should, at the very least, be automatically transferred over.
      As for the WCA ,if it wasn't serious, it would be laughable. 
      Pip changes, don't get me started.
      It's pathetic. No longer about money saving measures,if it ever was. I am livid and sick to my stomach. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Tori · 4 months ago
    How can he make people with mental health issues go back to work.  My daughter suffers from really bad mental health and haa been told thats shes not allowed to work because shes a danger to herself and others.  An employer wouldnt entertain someone like this nor offee them a job.  Its a complete joke whats hes trying to put in place
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Ally · 4 months ago
    My two main expenses are my car and my dog. If you didn't know anything about MH they might seem like needless luxuries but they are as crucial to my mental stability as equipment would be to someone with physical needs. I suffer with extreme social anxiety, agoraphobia and sensory overwhelm. I live in social housing and the stability of my tenancy is also crucial, but it does mean I am forced to live on a housing estate with all the noise and presence of other people which I cannot cope with. The only way I can manage not to become a heap of raw nerves is to get away to an isolated place, away from all people and as much noise as possible, I need a car for this - I can't use public transport and I can't tolerate walking for hours due to both natural physical ageing and also because I can't cope with being exposed to the outside for long periods. If I don't get this time outside, my MH becomes really bad. My dogs are my carers, I cannot tolerate people at all and without a reason, I would be nocturnal as nighttime is the quietest. This is really bad for my MH though and also makes me depressed. My dogs get me up in the day, give my day structure and meaning and give and recieve love, something I need to survive as a human, but am unable to do with other humans. Sunak "isn't clear" why I would have these expenses. It makes perfect sense to me. If i am stripped of these things, my MH will collapse and I will have no reason to go on. I have had over 20 yrs of MH treatment, but this is who I am and it's my therapist's professional opinion that I am very unlikely to change now.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Carol · 4 months ago
      @The dogmother. I had a dog as they will alert you if anyone comes near your house. Especially if you are paranoid. Iv been gang stalked for years and i need my dog to motivate me. For company and protection 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The dogmother. · 4 months ago
      @Ally @Ally You sound just like me.
      However, I've never looked upon my dogs as luxuries ,Esp as I neither smoke drink or go out. 
      Who could deny us the companionship,loyalty, love and protection of our dogs with any clear conscience. 
      I don't drive,never have, my MH would never allow it,plus two of my cardic conditions mean I'm susceptible to blacking out.
      It's different strokes for different folks. Whatever get us through the day. How can anyone deny us that!
      I can't even go dog walking for various reasons, so that's taken care of for me. 
      We should not have to justify anything but it seems we have to justify simply breathing. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    derek H · 4 months ago
    So it's the Tory Terrorists (Definition of terrorism under EXTREMUS AG Acts committed for political, religious, ethnic or ideological purposes suitable to create fear in the population or any section of the population and thus to influence a government or public body.) So they will pass some powers to the DWP (Doesn't Work Properly). As you can tell, I'm bitter. My disabled wife save her mobility allowance to pay for a car outright.  She also pays mot, repairs, tyers and insurance. Did you know it's classed as savings?. This means anything over £16,000 yo can't claim council tax allowance or many other benefits. She as Muscular Dystrophy and I’m her unpaid carer at 70yrs old, she is 60yrs. For the last 2 years I have suffered with an immune induced Rheumatoid Arthritis bought on after the covid booster. It's made us stronger, looking after each other after being refused Attendance All for the second time. The DWP keep putting out info on what you COULD claim when in reality you can't. So we potter on.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Clare · 4 months ago
    If money needs to be saved How about getting the assessment correct first time No reassessments or appeals which cost money Which could be better spent Rather than fiddling the books to make it look better only to pay it at a later date These one off payments Will still cost As will the extra treatments Where are these appointments coming from With waiting lists  many months or years long Having waited myself for an appointment ( Via telephone) in one department for almost a year Now I am waiting for all the appointments for the tests to arrive then be completed My next appointment post tests is December Before any action to help cure or reduce symptoms How are all these extra appointments going to be done All this time with reduced benefits Which could  be helping with the disability or illness While on the inevitable waiting list Some treatments take months or years Many are indefinite One round of physio or mental health help Can be 6 sessions With weeks between them For many this quick fix does not work and is not cost effective But a good way to move paying for things from one pot of money to another for any government Actual money saved ZERO 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    john b · 4 months ago
    Mr Sunak was unable to provide any details about which "specialist professionals" would be given the job of issuing fit notes and whether they would have to be recruited and no mention of DUTY OF CARE ?
    Disability charities go along with all this and they always back down a help the government.
    JUST remember all people on benefits are pawns in a game in elections (all the time) and the worse thing is labour goes along with all this they started it all.

    The government has said they can use Occupational therapists but they aren't medical doctors (MD) or doctors of osteopathy (DO). They can't diagnose health conditions, prescribe medication or perform surgeries and doctors physician is not a qualify GP ok and nurses are not doctors either.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    john b · 4 months ago
    Duty of care is a big word in the DWP they HATE it they will have to take duty of care NOW.
    In law, duty of care is defined as a duty to provide care at a level reasonably expected of any competent doctor, nurse, midwife, surgeon, etc.
    DWP SAYS, department does not have a statutory or common law duty of care THAT WILL HAVE TO CHANGE NOW and it will have to if they do GP sick notes and DWP will set FAIL TARGETS (thats when the DWP say 60% must fail tests like with ESA and PIP medicals. Dwp office workers DO NOT have medical training (they think they do and think they are GODS now)they are just office workers thats it and now the duty of care is in play they take responsibility for life and death and that means if a DWP workers say you are fit for work and you then die the dwp is going to be responsibility of it just like the GP is now. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    John · 4 months ago
    I have a disabilty and receiving pip and LCWRA, both were awarded a year and a half ago. My rent is included in the LCWRA payment and my landlord has just told me that he's going to raise my rent imminently.  I'm worried that if I contact the DWP to let them know the rent increase, then it might encourage them to reassess me earlier than they would have. Could this be the case? Really stressed about this!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      John · 4 months ago
      @Judith Winn thanks Judith,
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Judith Winn · 4 months ago
      @John This absolutely should not be the case. Your rent is worked out separately and has no bearing on which group you've been placed in. Your reassessment will come at the same time as it would have done anyway. Having said this, I completely understand the 'keep your head down' attitude they scare you into!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Christine · 4 months ago
    I recently rang the DWP to ask to have my PIP mobility reassessed as I need to buy more aids to help me move around my home or go outside, as I can't walk and have restricted movement due to 3 medical conditions. Quite bluntly the person on the phone told me I couldn't have my case reviewed as "you're too old".
    What the .........?! It's at my time of life when I need more help and I'm told that I'm too old and they don't offer any more help once you're retired.
    REALLY?????
    I'm sure I'm not the only one in this situation, but living alone I need to try and retain some form of independence.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      lesley · 4 months ago
      @Christine
      Christine and Anon,
      I am on DLA and am 76 almost 77.  I only get low rate mobility DLA. I do get high rate care.
      My mobility has detioriarated because I had an ankle fusion and cannot go out alone, I mobilise with crutches and a zimmer frame indoors.  I know that I cannot get any more for mobility because of my age.  I should really be getting more for mobility but know there is no chance.  There is no mobility component for Attendance Allowance.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anon · 4 months ago
      @Christine I believe it’s called “Attendance Allowance,” when you are past retirement age. Have a look at that one and apply for that
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      KABTT · 4 months ago
      @Claire Crazy rules, when we get old our health slowly declines rather than stops in it's tracks. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Claire · 4 months ago
      @Christine It’s true you cannot get an increase in mobility or indeed a new mobility allowance once retired.They don’t like to mention this,you always need to get any reassessment done way before retirement ! It’s so hard and only set to get harder for future disabled,makes me sick.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    A · 4 months ago
    Here is what PIP pays 
    The added cost of electric to be home because chances are disabled people are home and with rising energy that’s an added cost 
    For mental health 
    The private therapy that needs to be accessed because the NHS waiting list is 12 months in most cases and LIMITED ON SESSIONS (like 8-16 sessions of therapy and suddenly you’re all better according to them)
    Gym membership - because that could help mental health issues 
    Self help books (don’t need to explain this) 
    In some instances a cleaner - if you’re that depressed and mentally ill there’s a chance you live in a shit hole. Not always but this creates a vicious circle 
    Better food access… why shouldn’t disabled people be able to eat better food which can have better outcomes on health? Considering a lot of mental health medication actually causes increased hunger and weight gain… 
    For those mentally ill due to sexual assault for instance… taxi might be needed too and from medical appointments.
    There’s lots of reasons why someone mentally ill needs a bit of extra financial support 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Nanna · 4 months ago
      @A
      The wait for intensive therapy is 2 - 2.5 years in Devon. 
      It was this long 4 years ago, so nothing new there.
      GP's won't even refer for mental health assessments unless you are seriously at risk.
      And yes, after your allocated sessions are used up, you get discharged from MH services and that's it. Patients are back on their own.

      The local NHS trust have a 24 hour phone line called 'First Response' for those in absolute crisis whilst waiting. 
      Guess what they tell you when sobbing down the phone... 
      "Have a bath soak with bubbles / light a scented candle / eat a favourite meal / read a book / watch a funny film" then they ask what your hobbies are and suggest you get back into them.

      Suicide rates are sky high here, but then let's face it, if someone does end their life, that's less burden on the welfare state...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      axab43 · 4 months ago
      @A You should send this into the consultation on PIP.  It is good.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      robbie · 4 months ago
      @A Good detailed analysis there, A.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.