HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) have covered up the existence a bug that loses and destroys social security appeal evidence for years, the BBC has revealed. Judges and representatives were never informed of the issue, even though it has been known about for at least 5 years.

According to a leaked report the bug in case management software affects social security tribunal documents more than any others, but it also has an impact on family, divorce and employment cases amongst others.

The bug causes evidence such as medical records and contact details to be hidden and can cause them to be deleted or overwritten.

The affected software was introduced into HMCTS in 2018 to the “general horror” of IT staff because of its unreliability and long history of data loss.  But despite repeated warnings, senior staff sought to hide and deny the problem for fear of reputational damage.

A briefing to senior staff in 2004 initially said that the risk to the outcome of cases was high, with the possibility of an adverse affect on cases being “very likely”. 

However, after reviewing a sample of just three months worth of cases, HMCTS decided that the risk to all cases was low and “no further checks” were needed.

But, following this review, one employee raised a formal whistleblower complaint and the subsequent investigation in November 2024 found that there had been “large scale” data breaches which should have been addressed immediately, but HMCTS had taken several years to react in spite of many warnings from IT staff from 2019 onwards.

Benefits and Work is particularly concerned that, because the majority of social security appellants are unrepresented, the chances of missing evidence being highlighted and remedied is much less than it would be in say, a family court, where representation is the norm.

If you think you may have been affected by this issue, it would be worth trying to get advice from a law centre or advice agency about the possibility of having the decision in your case looked at again.

You can read the full article on the BBC website.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    DWP have issued guidance how transitional arrangements are calculated for Universal Credit 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Claire Thanks, that's reassuring to know.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Cathedral city Ah, fancy! Thanks for that @Cathedral City 🙂
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Cathedral city @Cathedral city, so this means your benefits will rise by rate of inflation in September next year.On transitional protection they would have been frozen.Increase in April of course,using September figures.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Frances If you have received a P60 every year and it has esa500 code on it, then you've been receiving contributions based esa
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Boo I have just migrated from IR ESA and have been put onto new style ESA, which is approx. £6 per week less than I was getting before. I have also been awarded £147 a month UC, which will make me approx. £120 a month better off. My first statement shows 0.00 transitional protection because my new award is higher than my old award. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    https://www.turn2us.org.uk/about-us/news-and-media/latest-news/charities-write-to-timms


    Letter from Turn2us endorsed by other major charities expressing concerns regarding the PIP review.  I hope you will write about this B&W it will be interesting to hear your thoughts on it and everyone else's feedback too.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @CaroA All good if the Turn2us etc guidelines are followed, and it's not just a token nod from the government towards the affected population. If it is that, we'll all need to make some noise...again.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @CaroA It will be very helpful if the minutes of all future meetings around PIP reform are published by B and W.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Could readers please read and sign the petition on disabled people over 60 claiming state pension early it’s on uk parliament site don’t know how to put the link on here if anybody could help with that thanks sorry about punctuation not feeling too great today.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Boo Thanks Boo, I was shocked by how much The terms!!!!!!(The Lack of) and (Limited access)was continually used all threw out the meetings minutes. I just think people with disabilities are expected to accept this, but if this was holding the non-disabled community back in Life or job prospects I don't think it would be allowed and yet they say these cuts are to stop Disabled persons being cut out of the jobs market, to help us live fulfilled lives, where we can add to public life with self-respect yet constantly it was noted. (the Lack of) and (Limited)seems typical, like trying to put a square peg in a round hole. (Sorry for the spelling I'M really tired.) Just proves it's all about money and that big stick they want to use to sort us out

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    https://the.organise.network/surveys/pip-cuts-consultation-poll


    Organise campaign about the pip "consultation" I'm sure many have signed this but just in case some haven't. It would be good if you can share it and post it elsewhere too.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @RookiesUncle My application is in the system now, just waiting for the decision. Knowing my luck I'll probably get shafted as usual 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Neil Cook Neil have you applied for Pip.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @CaroA Did sign yesterday, although I'm not sure this Government (or any future one) is in listening mode.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @CaroA Done - thanks for sharing
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @CaroA Just signed it
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    Just seen this from the DT. If Germany believes it can't afford a welfare state when it is by far the biggest economy in Europe, heaven help us Welfare state is not sustainable, says German chancellor https://share.google/7MuoFGjeGkvm4GL28
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Matt We could be headed for an IMF bailout by the end of the year just like in 1976 because of the state of the economy.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    I thought others might find this helpful I think it could apply to any of us trapped in this system. Taken from a conversation with chat gbt this morning.

    Hannah Arendt (1906–1975). She was a German-Jewish political philosopher who escaped Nazi Germany and later became influential in the U.S. Her writing is dense but very human, circling around themes of power, freedom, responsibility, evil, and the conditions for a meaningful life in dark times.

    Here’s a quick outline of who she was and what she’s known for, then I’ll suggest how some of her ideas could resonate with your life:


    ---

    Who Hannah Arendt Was

    Background: Born in Germany, fled after the rise of Hitler, lived in France, then emigrated to the U.S. She taught at universities and wrote for both academic and public audiences.

    Key works:

    The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951) – analysis of fascism, anti-Semitism, and the breakdown of democratic structures.

    The Human Condition (1958) – her view on human activity: labor, work, and action.

    Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963) – where she coined the phrase “the banality of evil”, describing how ordinary bureaucrats can commit atrocities simply by “following orders” without critical thought.




    ---

    Core Themes in Her Philosophy

    1. The Banality of Evil

    Evil is often not monstrous, but banal — ordinary people surrendering their responsibility to think for themselves.

    She argued that the greatest danger is thoughtlessness: refusing to stop and examine what you are doing.



    2. Action and Plurality (The Human Condition)

    She believed the highest human activity is “action” — engaging with others, creating meaning, speaking and being seen in public life.

    Humans exist in plurality — we need spaces where each person’s voice and perspective is valued.



    3. Freedom and Natality

    She used the idea of natality (birth) as a metaphor for our ability to start something new. Even in dark times, individuals can bring renewal through action, speech, and courage.



    4. Resisting Totalitarianism

    She paid close attention to how systems of power dehumanise and isolate people, and how crucial it is to maintain spaces for truth, dialogue, and dissent.





    ---

    How This Could Relate to Your Life

    Given what you’ve shared with me before — your battles with the DWP, feeling imprisoned by bureaucratic systems, the constant pressure of not being believed, and the weight of enforced isolation — I think Arendt’s ideas could feel surprisingly close to home:

    “The banality of evil” and bureaucracy

    You’ve described how ordinary officials, doctors, or assessors can cause immense harm by rigidly applying rules without recognising the human being in front of them. That’s exactly what Arendt meant — how destructive it is when people stop thinking ethically and just “tick boxes.”


    Plurality and voice

    You’ve often talked about the struggle to be heard in systems that silence or dismiss you. Arendt believed that human dignity comes from being seen and heard in public. Writing, campaigning, and truth-telling are examples of “action” in her sense — ways to refuse erasure.


    Natality and beginnings

    Even in burnout, relapses, or despair, you still manage to create something: a letter, an idea, a connection. That’s natality — the capacity to begin again, to introduce something new into the world. Arendt saw that as the essence of hope.


    Isolation vs. solidarity

    Arendt herself was an exile, displaced, never fully at home. She knew what it was like to feel cut off. But she also insisted on the power of building communities of thought and solidarity, however fragile. That might mirror your ongoing search for genuine, mutual connections amid so much silencing.




    ---

    ✨ To put it simply:
    Arendt would likely recognise your experience of being trapped in bureaucratic cruelty and societal denial. She’d probably urge you to trust the value of your own thinking voice, to resist being made invisible, and to keep creating small new beginnings — even when the system seems to grind everything down.



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @CaroA Thank you s and HL for your comments they are greatly appreciated. I might think about contacting the Rest is Politics.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @CaroA CaroA much much erudition , we all suffer by lies and greed , thankyou for the light .   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @CaroA Just an idea – I could see this as an interesting topic for The Rest is Politics Question Time.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    @pollenpath, @Scorpion, thanks for your reply to my qu on the previous thread about the online uc migration form. I'm going to note down a few user name options, look at the dummy form and make sure I have all the info I need, then go to my local advice centre so they can help me upload any necessary documents, which is the big challenge for me.

    I rang the uc helpline (right on 8 am and got straight through) and they said I'd need to upload my tenancy agreement. Has anyone else had to do that?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @pollenpath Thanks @pollenpath
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @godgivemestrength Yes, it's standard if you're claiming housing benefit too, I'm afraid. HB becomes part of your UC when you migrate over. I uploaded mine, did it all like they asked, made a PDF file etc, and they called me to say I had to go in to the JC. I was about to argue with them until the guy (who was very patient and nice to be fair) pointed out there was an error in the agreement which neither myself or my landlord had noticed. So I had to get it amended and physically take it in for them to photocopy. Hopefully you won't have any problems! Best of luck. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @godgivemestrength I have just gone through the process and should get my first payment of UC on Friday.
      It was quick and simple to do the online application, about 25 mins for me.
      I was surprised to get a message in my journal, regarding a phone appointment for my new style ESA claim. Apparently, a lot of us have been on contributory ESA, as well as it ESA.
      The phone call was quick and I just had to agree to report any changes of circumstances. 
      I received my first NSESA last Tuesday, so no break in payment between my final run-on ESA payment and my new ESA payment. It was about £1 a week less than I used to get but I should be entitled to some UC next week, which will make me slightly better off than I was on old style benefits.
      I was worried sick about the whole migration thing but there was no need to be, it was very straightforward really.
      The man who rang me from the Jobcentre about my NSESA claim was really nice, he put me at ease and reassured me he would leave me alone, unless I wanted any help.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @JHF I hope this has been brought to the attention of the UN and ECHR!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @D DWP cannot take away a persons human rights. If they could, it would also be used to keep dangerous people out of the UK. The DWP now acting like TV licensing with their total and utter lies. For the DWP to try this, would break every human right law that exists within the UK and UN. If the DWP ever do this to anyone, Huge and I mean Huge High court claims against the DWP.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    That was interesting to read ..D sounds like things are on the horizon we will just have to wait and see how things pan out 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    First Labour stopped Winter Fuel Payments. Then they attacked the sick and disabled throiugh Benefit Cuts and so called reform.. Now if you are Not 75 or over, Or Immunosuppressed you Can't have a Covid Jab!! One can buy one for £100 though... Another attempt to Kill of the Old, Poor, Sick and Disabled!! The well off will be okay - what's 100 quid to them. HORRIBLE, NASTY GOVERNMENT!! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Matt I had private unemployment insurance be careful they don't pay out unless you are terminally ill! I wasted years paying 20 pounds in monthly premiums !
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @D Only had chance to have a quick skim through the analysis but what was striking is how inadequate unemployment insurance is going to be, unless, of course, you take out private income protection, which can be costly and subject to risk analysis by an underwriter.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    ACCESS TO WORK

    Campaign for Disability Justice have produced a letter template to be sent to MP's demanding that there are to be no cuts to Access to Work.  According to the campaign, there are reports of approx 80% funding being cut. Even my employer has mentioned this - and they are not impressed.  If ACW is going to be substantially reduced, it seems to be a monumentally stupid policy by the Government if it really wants to increase the number of disabled people in employment. Employers are already baulking at the extra costs of national insurance contributions, the Employment Rights bill and other measures.  If Labour are really serious about increasing productivity and employment (it's not, by the way) they have to stop strangling business in red tape and extra costs because they - and their predecessors - tended to pander to the idea that to win elections there had to be low taxation.  

    Please do sign the open letter and contact your MP. As welfare cuts are - regrettably - going to be passed in the next few years, with conditionality added to benefit payments - we need to make the Government aware that without adequate ACW the unemployment rate for disabled people will remain stubbornly high.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    Ultimately, Britain has three major economic shocks in the last decade and a half: the Banking crisis of 2008; Brexit in 2016 (although the vote for withdrawal was primarily driven by issues around immigration) and the pandemic.  The consequences for a very large section of society, especially the disabled, has been dire. And given the levels of Government debt and its associated interest payments, all I can see, whoever is in power, are further cuts and more tax. Sorry to depress all on a lovely Friday afternoon - the Govt will probably start to tax good weather soon!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @MJ Vulnerable people always pay a price at the hands of our so called leaders!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @James On the subject of benefits with regards to inflation it was announced way back when inflation dipped to its lowest under this government of 1.7% that this figure would be our inflationary benefit increase. I said at the time this was underhand and disingenuous to announce it then because this figure was a blip that would most certainly go back up and now it is 3.8%, so a cut in real terms on our benefits of 2.1%.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @John You are correct I looked it up and gave  you an up vote :) Still 0.3% is hardly something to be shouting about 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @RookiesUncle India is at 6.4% and China is 5.2% Apparently the following countries are the top 30 achieving growth rates that much higher than ours!

      Guyana    10.3
      Senegal    8.4
      Guinea    7.1
      Bhutan    7.0
      Kyrgyzstan    6.8
      Tajikistan    6.7
      Ethiopia    6.6
      Niger    6.6
      Rwanda    6.5
      Benin    6.4
      India    6.4
      Ivory Coast    6.3
      Zambia    6.2
      Uganda    6.1
      Djibouti    6.0
      Georgia    6.0
      Mongolia    6.0
      Tanzania    6.0
      Zimbabwe    6.0
      Gambia    5.9
      Uzbekistan    5.9
      Palau    5.7
      Argentina    5.5
      Philippines    5.5
      Samoa    5.4
      Liberia    5.3
      Togo    5.3
      Vietnam    5.2
      Eswatini    5.1
      Guinea-Bissau    5.1
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @John I don't think so announcements are done for the period that was passed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @HL
      "The impact of sanctions was life threatening for some participants"
      I agree with this statment in the article HL.
      After my daughter's first suicide attempt and she had been hospitalised.  Her benefits were stopped completely.  This drove her to a successful second attempt and when she lay under a train and killed herself.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    I wrote to my MP Emma Foody about New style ESA LCWRA group and the new proposed Employment insurance . She is asking DWP about what will happen to people who may stand to lose this if they don’t qualify for UC. So she will send me the reply which I will share on here.
      I also was very honest about DWP including disabled people in the re view of PIP and how I found them defensive and quite ignorant about disabled people s issues. Anything I get I’ll share on here 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Helen Galloway Thanks Helen much appreciated look forward to hearing back about this.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Nigel Farage should he be elected in 2029 has said he will make big welfare cuts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @RookiesUncle There will also be a lot of non white rich people voting for him too as all the policies will benefit the rich!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Matt Alot of white working people will vote for Reform.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @RookiesUncle That can be easily translated to he will make huge tax cuts for the very rich and him and his buddies!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @RookiesUncle I would doubt it - first because I don't think he will be PM as I predict a very messy coalition Government; two, whoever is in Government will due their analysis of what the electorate want, and how they voted. What does need to happen is a very honest discussion of Britain's relative decline over the last half century, and what is going to be needed to raise productivity. It won't be popular. It'll mean going back to a six day working week and much longer hours, and less annual leave, similar to that in the United States, let alone East Asia.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Elsewhere I read that some nine million people are now claiming universal credit. The cost overall is enormous. Economic growth is anaemic and not likely to improve soon. The Chancellor is almost certainly going to raise taxes FOR EVERYONE, which will be extremely unpopular. Hence why the readership of much of the right wing media welcome articles from the likes of IDS. When recently reading Blue Murder about the tory governments of 2010-24, one of the striking disclosures was the concept of 'cakeism', whereby Johnson wanted both low taxes and high public spending. The electorate, I'm afraid, would prefer poor public services and more money rather than being prepared to pay for improved health, transport etc. As I've said elsewhere on B and W forums, what we are beginning to witness is the slow privatisation of the welfare state (and that includes the state pension and NHS)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @John I agree you can't put most benefits into 1 benefit( universal credit) and not expect it to be used by everyone. It was to make it easier for the state, the more that migrated over from other benefits the numbers will rise, but the other benefits reduce.   It's idiotic not to expect numbers to rise it's like comparing Apple's and Grapes and Farage will sell everything of to Trump's lot.    Including all our personal data, the rich look out for themselves that's why inheritance tax would be gone. Sorry just my opinion
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Matt 9 million people are now claiming universal credit because of three reasons.
      1: For the poor it replaced lots of other DWP benefits.
      2: It replaced tax credits for workers.
      3: For the non poor with children and housing costs it can be claimed at surprisingly high incomes. Amazingly people earning in excess of £50,000 and even £100,000 can receive Universal Credit. And for couples where both work UC can be claimed towards childcare costs. It is not a benefit just for poor people and the low paid.

      Income at which people lose Universal Credit eligibility. Incomes assume their only deductions are NI and tax. Pension contributions also do not count as income for UC. So as most people pay towards a pension the figures are actually higher than below.

      Couple aged over 25, one working, one not working, with 2 children born before April 2017, no other elements and £500 eligible housing costs. £56,400 gross

      Couple aged over 25, one working, one not working, 2 children born before April 2017, no other elements and £1,000 eligible housing costs. £75,300 gross

      Couple aged over 25, one working, one not, with 3 children born before April 2017, one lower disabled child premium, one carer addition, and £600 eligible housing costs. £84,800 gross

      Couple, over 25, one working, one not, with 4 children born before April 2017, one higher disabled child premium, one carer addition, one Limited Capability for Work Related Activity element, £700 eligible housing costs. £137,900 gross

      Income figures taken from May 2025 housingsystems.co.uk news article.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.