HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) have covered up the existence a bug that loses and destroys social security appeal evidence for years, the BBC has revealed. Judges and representatives were never informed of the issue, even though it has been known about for at least 5 years.

According to a leaked report the bug in case management software affects social security tribunal documents more than any others, but it also has an impact on family, divorce and employment cases amongst others.

The bug causes evidence such as medical records and contact details to be hidden and can cause them to be deleted or overwritten.

The affected software was introduced into HMCTS in 2018 to the “general horror” of IT staff because of its unreliability and long history of data loss.  But despite repeated warnings, senior staff sought to hide and deny the problem for fear of reputational damage.

A briefing to senior staff in 2004 initially said that the risk to the outcome of cases was high, with the possibility of an adverse affect on cases being “very likely”. 

However, after reviewing a sample of just three months worth of cases, HMCTS decided that the risk to all cases was low and “no further checks” were needed.

But, following this review, one employee raised a formal whistleblower complaint and the subsequent investigation in November 2024 found that there had been “large scale” data breaches which should have been addressed immediately, but HMCTS had taken several years to react in spite of many warnings from IT staff from 2019 onwards.

Benefits and Work is particularly concerned that, because the majority of social security appellants are unrepresented, the chances of missing evidence being highlighted and remedied is much less than it would be in say, a family court, where representation is the norm.

If you think you may have been affected by this issue, it would be worth trying to get advice from a law centre or advice agency about the possibility of having the decision in your case looked at again.

You can read the full article on the BBC website.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Ids(Ian Duncan smith)writing in the sun newspaper today saying he would make the medical tougher for mental health and impose more sanctions and stop the fit notes although things are a bit uncertain now and in the near future at least don’t have him in charge anyway I had a uc 50 this week for universal credit reacessment for 2017 but my local job centre plus said their is very long waits for everybody so nothing will happen to it 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @James Liz Kendall is his prodigy and was trained by him and his institute of social injustice which was funded by the very right wing Bradley Foundation in the USA
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @James From the article - "First, tighten eligibility for benefits to people with more severe mental health conditions while reinvesting the savings in the support we know genuinely helps people to recover"
      Considering how many ppl killed themselves under his watch probably isn't the best judge of who has the most severe mental health conditions.
      Also when people say that they mean not anxiety and depression. Yes because no one has ever ended up dead with just those! I've had them my whole life and I'm a mess, covered in scars, a lifetime of meds that barely work and a enough former nhs therapists to fill a large room! 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Sorry I don’t know where the best place to post this, 

    Every household where the billpayer receives an eligible means-tested benefit will now be in line for the warm home discount of £150. The government is now issuing a call to eligible households to check they are named on their electricity bill, with suppliers set to rely on customers’ records as of Sunday 24 August.

    In England and Wales, this means households in receipt of Housing Benefit, Income-related Employment and Support Allowance, Income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance, Income Support, Pension Credit and Universal Credit will now be eligible.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Boo This makes no sense.
      Since 2022/23 in England and Wales it has been automatic (excluding some of those living in mobile home parks or residential parks) using DWP benefit claimant addresses, they do not need to be the person named on the household bill. Is this public announcement intended to draw attention to the government widening claimant eligibility for the sake of positive publicity? Because I doubt they have stopped automatically paying it based on DWP claimant addresses and now the claimant's name has to be on the bill. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    so convenient, the glitches never work FOR people....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Ala That would be fixed day one once discovered it wouldn't make news headlines.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Bug? Sounds more like a feature to me. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @billkruse My laughter was in response to billkruse's comment. Hope that I have not offended anyone.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @billkruse ha ha ha!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    another great IT solution from the government that is full of bugs, cost billions, end up with cost ove runs, and then turns on citizens ! If you take together all the IT systems the UK government has created the cost is most like to end up being over 30bn and they still don't work right!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @HL I believe the offical answer was "la la la not listening!"
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    Well there must be a data protection offence in there somewhere? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Moose Yes I agree. but those don't get investigated unless in the newspapers like  the post office scandal/ infected blood etc. it's the only way they investigate to say they have ticked a box. then blame another government and pat themselves on the back..... all forgetting victims the post office people even had to start a choir to get it in the news and lots of them still not received a penny..... it's the likes of the company and investors who should be putting there hands on there pockets not letting those (victims) suffer on
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    Always listen to your IT folks, hiring them then ignoring them is utter recklessness. Though (if I may don my tinfoil hat) curious why it only deleted appellants evidence, not the DWP's. Very glad we index our submissions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Marc Allison NEVER listen to the IT folks.

      Switch it off and back on again is the height of their ability.

      IT won't have picked up on this issue, it would have been the project team assigned to stress test the new IT system who will have raised the alarm on any anomalies. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Marc Allison When I worked as an IT consultant a man in government said the following to me. "I don't understand it, we hire expensive consultants and then end up not listening to them!"

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.