There are widespread, but as yet unofficial, reports of “massive concessions” by the government in relation to planned benefit cuts, which will see current claimants protected and the backbench rebellion end.

According to reports in the Guardian and the BBC, cuts to PIP and the LCWRA element of universal credit (UC) will not apply to current claimants. 

In addition, a package of employment support measures worth £1bn will begin this year with more to come, rather than being introduced in 2029.

There will also be consultation with disability groups on other planned changes to benefits.

Future claimants, however, will be subject to the PIP four-point rule and to the reduction in the LCWRA element of UC.

It is claimed that the heads of government committees, who were leading the rebellion, have all accepted the government’s offer.  Though one campaigner, MP Peter Lamb, has said he will still not support the bill because the government is ignoring better options.

No official details of any concessions have yet been released and given the governments rushed timescale for getting the legislation through parliament, there will be little opportunity for MPs to scrutinise and debate the details.

Updatethe BBC are reporting that the protection of current claimants is now official, stating "Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told Labour MPs that claimants of the personal independence payment (Pip) will continue to receive what they currently get, as will recipients of the health element of universal credit. Instead, planned cuts will only hit future claimants."

They also quote the leader of the rebellion, MP Dame Meg Hillier as saying she would now support the government's welfare bill.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Liz, Kier, Rachel

    Was it worth it?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    What a total loads of balls from this appalling Govt, just adding yet more stress to people already on the breadline and forced through hoops to claim benefits they are ENTITLED to, I mean no one claiming has set the rules and the amounts etc, its the GOVT!

    and now they have decided the bill is too high so sorry people we are going to have to cut benefits , even though inflation is still high and rents , which most benefit claimants have to pay continue to rise. 

    A better saving would be to CAP rents like they do in Germany and Austria. Do you know it's cheaper to rent a flat in Vienna than in Bournemouth where I live ? Absurd .

    RENT is the huge cost that the Govt is paying for, not disability benefits per see, but they won;t change the system as  a lot of MP's are landlords and they don't want to lose money going into thier own pockets , so now you know how Govts, it always protects the rich ( and all landlords are rich)  not the poor. 

    So onto this absurd and stupid bill which sees current claimants 'protected', protected that is until they are due to be re-assessed and then they become NEW claimaints probably and are then booted in the face and will lose money, so in fact NOTHING has changed at all!! 

    And even if they were properly protected, what happens if someone getss ajob and comes off UC, then falls ill again and has to go back onto UC, they wold then we worse off as well,!! 

    ALso why should new claimaints be discriminated against, are their health conditions not the same as people already claiming, why would they suddenly become subject to different rules etc , sure ly this is morally and probably legally wrong , and I hope it gets challanged in the courts if it ever goes through 

    YES the benefits system needs reform, its way too complex and there;s too many benefits , the whole thing is costing the UK a quater of its GDP, its not sustainable ... 

    Cheaper just to give everyone a minimum income and to borrow the one decent Reform idea to raise the tax free income to £20,000 a year. This would immediatly life so many people out of poverty and would actually make work pay, instead of the stupid system where on UC they take 45p for every £1  you earn, again a stupid policy disincentivisingwork

    I despair 

    Count Vespasian




  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    New Labour are absolutely unbelievable.

    I honestly believe, (and I am not kidding) that a group of kindergarteners making random choices would have done a better job of these proposals than the government.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Paul "Kindergarteners?" Nice try, bot
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    'According to reports in the Guardian and the BBC, cuts to PIP and the LCWRA element of universal credit (UC) will not apply to current claimants.' 

    By current claimants do you mean anyone who claims between now and November 2026?

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    What is not clear to me is whether current PIP recipients will or will not be subjected to the 4 points rule when they are being reassessed (unless they have been given an indefinite lifetime award) which tends to happen every 18 months or so (on average). The creation of a 2 tier system does not seem to bother so many of the so-called rebels if they are prepared to vote in favour of this bill.
    It is a total shambles, a car crash of a bill, with the big ideological pawprints of Kendall and McGovern who were also very supportive of the Tories's Green Paper last year before the GE and whose language has always been hostile. It's incompetent, lazy and cynical.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Why are they saying it will only affect new claimants. No mention of the fact that at renewal is also classed as a new claimant. I've read an article where one lady had to appeal to tribunal under the current system she went to say she won she also thinks because she is in the system future claims will be under the current system but she won't. People are very much being mislead and not fully understanding. My pip currently is the high rate for both but no 4 points in anyone area. I'm absolutely petrified because my last claim contributied to me having a serious mental breakdown and as a result I've now also got a rare neurological condition. But my next claim is Feb 2027. Missed this deadline by 8 weeks or so. I am absolutely worried sick this will make me seriously ill again. The very thought of it. If I lose this I will lose my new style esa too and I will have no income. And fear I will lose my home. They should be ashamed of themselves for doing this to disabled sick people. And not creating a 2 tiered system at all. It should be the same rules for one as it is for the other. They are making it look good but hiding the whole truth to people and people are thinking it's about new claimants only? And that should never be either who can help it if they become incapacitated and when. So when people are breathing a sigh or relief and they have a 10 year award then that's good for those people. But what about the ones like me that are heading right of the beginning of this lot. Its not fair. I suppose I will need to appeal along with thousands of others. But I can't deal with that kind of stress. I fact I can't deal with any form of anxiety without it having huge implications on my physical conditions which have left me crippled.! And crippled up with pain. Something needs to changed. Before people end up suicidal. I've been there and does not bare thinking about should I ever end up taking that path again. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    What will happen to claimants wait for a tribunal date 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    So basically there are no massive concessions, they are just postponing it for current  claimants until reassessment. When they will reduce what you get to the new pay if you qualify at all, appeasing tge idiots in the party by saying they will tweak it. There are so many issues with the new bill. What happens to the ones who dont qualify under the new system and genuinely  need the support. No carer no money. They die! What happens to the children going from dla to pip who genuinely can't  be left alone and need full time care? If they are classed as a new claimant they will not qualify for any help
     Who takes care of them. The fact they need a carer and support does not go away just because  the government says so. What about those who are in their 60s who have to come out of work due to ill health and can't qualify age wise for the tiny bit of pension they'll recive. It will be unlikely they will meet the new criteria or 4 points so what happens to them. I agree change is needed but lets not start with our vulnerable who are barely surviving as it is. How about we stop the amount of paid parliment members, most don't  contribute. How about we stop expenses for those in government? How about they pay for their own parties and food and transport. I any many others dont get any expenses for working. Wage only. Cut it to 'living wage'. Stop paying ex employees 
    . I have never been paid still after leaving a job that's  insane. Stop paying expensive contractors millions to do simple jobs. Stop people coming in we can't sustain it. Two working ppl full time can't survive our country is a joke. Tax the rich. There are many ways the government just don't  want to loose their extras. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    But what about current PIP claimants whose reassessments fall post 2026 & those on legacy benefits whose migration to UC LCWRA also falls post that date? The rules in place at the time of assessments, not original date of claim, usually apply to such reassessments.  Kendall didn’t mention those circumstances.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    https://act.38degrees.org.uk/act/tax-the-super-rich-0924.
    Labours Richard Burgon, tax super wealthy instead of disability benefits. Still a day left to sign & share
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    Labour party Richard Burgon, tax the super wealthy instead of disability benefits. Please sign and share if you want to. Still a day left.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1257987772358855&id=100044429319599&set=a.482963379861302
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    What will happen to current PIP claimants when they are reassessed?  Will they be assessed on the new or old system? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Kirsty It says the new with they wont have to do they 4 points though but they will then be on the new rate. Basically if you are on benefits they will screw you over anyway
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    I feel there’s a trap, when existing PIP claimers are re-assessed later after Nov 26, they could stall some of those re-assessments so they will come under the new pip reassessment. Sir Timms is reviewing the PIP assessment. If this is changed it could let current pip claimers fall into the new assessment criteria, NOT the 4 pointer rule, but the one he is working on now which he is working on with disabled people and charities.  They will no doubt make re-assessments harder! Especially for people like me with low point scores in many sections. As I have many illnesses that are all going to deteriorate. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    Sorry for commenting twice, but i think it is very important to note that the 3 billion saved by cutting PIP could be taken by other less cruel means. A 0.3% wealth tax would also bring in around 3 billion.
    2.0% would raise an estimated £24 billion tax revenue each year. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    Reassessments are for existing claims only. My understanding is that the qualifying criteria remains the same for those applicants unless they lose the award and it is not reinstated at the mandatory reconsideration, or tribunal stage.
    So you are only a new claimant if you lose at the tribunal stage. If you get PIP before November 26 you will always be under old rules until your circumstances change enough that you lose it entirely.

    Of course the snakes who tried to push this cruel change through will have to be monitored closely as they could be underhanded in their wording and meaning.

    Corbyn.. "The government has announced a two-tier benefits system.
    Under its plans, you can keep your benefits if you are disabled now, but not if you become disabled tomorrow." 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Jimmy Jim Jimmy Or from what I understand if you are a child going from dla to pip. Meaning you've needed help, and possibly a career all your life, and you wont qualify for any help until a certain age. Meaning they'll be no one to help you if you are disabled, or in cases of  mentally challenged children when they turn 16  who  it is unsafe to leave alone, You wont qualify for a career so your left where ? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    I've recently had my migration letter from ESA to PIP, does anyone know if you still get the transitional protection & would this be treated as a new claim & not eligible? Its all so confusing & worrying. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Justin lovatt You are still protected when you migrate, sorry for grama 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Nutcracker I thought it was ESA to universal credit people are migrating from and not pip, wherever tho are are still protected when you migrate and it will not be treated as a new claim and you will receive migratory protection so you will not lose out on money's you currently receive, Im so pleased for us existing pip and lcwra but still people are not happy with this? and now talking about the new claimers, all I can do is think about my personal current situation and not people I don't know in the future, I'm happy for all us existing claim 😊.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Nutcracker I have just migrated to UC from Esa, you should still get the transitional protection. 

      It is confusing and worrying. Your letter would be from ESS to Universal Credit not PIp. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    What about those who have recently lost awards
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    The thing that confuses me is if you have a review, are you classed as a new claimant? Or will you remain in the 2 point system? My next review is in 2027, and was given a 4 year term this time, so will I be classed as a 'current claimant'?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Veero In short yes you are protected and will not be treated as a new claim on your next review, I have my next review at end of October 27 and when reviewed I/we will be reviewed under the current system and not the 4 point categorie, same with LWCRA we will keep are awardmants, so it does sound that we are safe under the current system moving forward ☺️. Thank God I was bricking it...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Veero Calling reassessments new claims/claimants would not wash in a court of law, as new claimants can not be reassessed, as you can not reassess someone for what they do not already have. So as such, someone who is being reassessed is.. not a new claimant. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Veero That's exactly what I first thought but after looking into it we are on going claims and not new claims when it comes to your review time's, thanks God for that.
      Kind regards Justin.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    What about if your due a review after a November 26  is it the 4 point rule
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Mick No it's the current 2/3 point rule In your next review, your safe and can now have peace of mind ☺️🙏
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    As I understand it Existing Claimants are to be reviewed under Current Rules. Meanwhile even after Nov 2026 their Awards will Not be subject to the 4point rule.?  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Het Hi I'm hoping and praying that you are right on that one. As my renewal is Feb 27 and I'm. Worried sick. From. What I am. Reading on Google. Searches it defiantly saying that it will affect renewals with the 4 point rule. But it's so frustrating that they are not saying on the news anything about that aspect. I've also seen the new so called 3 conditions that will be scraped are chronic back pain. Arthritis and certain neurological conditions. I've got all of those and fibromayalgia.. My back pain is chronic with nerve compression in many areas. How on earth can anyone be expected to work. When cripple. Up in pain..im just hoping something will change between now and then but it is already having a huge impact on my already bad mental health and in turn with my neurological problem. It's having a massive impact on my physical conditions. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact