If you have the opportunity to vote on 7 May 2026, we’re suggesting that you try to make your vote really count by engaging with local parties to tell them why you are or aren’t supporting them. 

In spite of 29 of the 63 local elections being cancelled, there will still be:

  • local government elections
  • Scottish Parliament elections
  • Senedd Cymru elections
  • mayoral elections in England

taking place.

To find out if there is an election you can vote in, type your postcode into the Electoral Commission website.

We think it’s vital that you do vote if you can, but we also think it’s really valuable to contact local political party offices and tell them why you are, or are not, going to vote for them.

This especially matters if you are not planning to vote Labour, given that they are the current party of government.  Because if Labour do very badly in the May elections there’s a real possibility they will consider a change of direction.

The problem is that MPs on the right of the Labour party will argue that the party should move further right to achieve better results – which will include more of a crackdown on welfare - while those on the left will argue for a move to the left.  Many centrist MPs will have no clue what is best.

So, we think readers who intend not to vote Labour because of the party’s benefits policies should tell their local Labour party that this is the case.  That way, there will be some actual evidence of why people voted the way they did.

Equally, if you intend not to vote for other parties because of their benefits policies, tell them that. So, if you are disgusted with the rhetoric coming from Reform and the Conservatives, for example, contact their local office and tell them so.

For some parties, it’s easy to find local party office contact details, others are not so easy.

To try to help, we’ve put together instructions on how to contact each party’s local office on our What you can do page - look under “Contact your local political parties”.

If you do contact any local parties, please consider sharing what you sent – and any replies you received – in the comments below.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 days ago
    I’m a member of the Labour Party and disgusted at the present welfare policies, they are just carrying on with the same policy of the previous government. The delays in PIP new claims, transfer from DLA to PIP and reassessment of current PIP awards. 
    I went 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
     "by mistake", as if, and if it is true, HOW CAN THAT POSSIBLY HAPPEN!! Heartbreaking. Dwp has no accountability.

    Everyone who posts and/or reads B&W posts, please, look out for those around you who are vulnerable, and seek support when you need it.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    A very sad story in the sun newspaper today about a young girl who took her own life because pip sent out a reduced award letter by mistake 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    In other news.

    In November 2025 the government appointed Alan Milburn to head an independent impartial expert review into why so many young people are Not in Education, Employment, or Training. The review is focused on disabled young people and expected to report in spring 2026.

    He did a interview with the Times Newspaper today.
    Milburn says:

    "It starts in schools. One in five pupils are now getting Send diagnosis. The vast majority of those then trip into the benefits system because they get child disability allowance. The vast majority of people on child disability allowance qualify for adult PIP. And then you're into a world of benefits. Honestly, is that the aspiration we should have as a society, for a whole generation of young people? A life on benefits?"

    "So there’s a whole cohort who are sort of invisible. We just don’t know what’s going on. But if what is going on is that they’re stuck in their bedrooms gaming, and the incentives in that system are to enable them to do so — hey, Houston, we have a problem.”

    "And if you're on benefits and not in work in your twenties you're probably not going to be in work in your thirties, your forties, your fifties, and that exacts huge consequences. I think a lot of the debate around this has been framed in the wrong way as fiscal problem. It is a fiscal problem, but it's a moral problem"

    "So Anxiety is normal. Depression is normal. I got asked a brilliant question the other day by the guy leading the mental health prevalence review for Wes, which was what proportion of the adult population at any one time could be classified as having a mental health condition? I got the answer completely wrong. Because it's 83 percent. There's a difference between a diagnosis and a disorder. And OK, so people might have anxiety or depression, but it doesn't mean that therefore you should be written off for not being able to work"

    “We’re at real risk of the debate in the country being about work being bad for your mental health rather than overwhelmingly work being good for your mental health. Because the alternative to that is being unemployed, being out of work, being economically inactive, that’s bad for your mental health because you don’t have purpose. You don’t have earning power.”

    “Net levels of migration are falling fast. Every employer complains about the shortage of skilled labour. So the workers have got to come from somewhere. And here we have a million young people or thereabouts who are a potential source of labour. This is what you might call an opportunity.”

    "we've got to look at where we're spending public money. We're spending more money on health and disability benefits for 16 to 24-year-olds than we are on apprentices. Is that the right priority?"

    "You've got to make the right choices. As I say, I think as a country we've been making the wrong choices and we're now paying the price"

    Gee Wiz I wonder what the independent expert review findings and recommendations will be.

    All three current independent, impartial expert reviews. This one on young disabled people. The one on if mental health conditions, ADHD and Autism are being over dragonised. And the Timms PIP review. All look rigged to me. The government picks people whose opinions are already well known so knows the conclusions it will get. Just to give the government and MPs the façade of saying they are going by expert advice and evidence and co-production. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @John Bravo
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @rookie @rookie, please would you post under a different name, and not the one I've been using for many months.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @rookie That would make sense for contributions based benefits. And used to be the case. But, successive governments have eroded the contributions based disability benefits, the insurance your national insurance contributions are supposed to pay for.

      Contributions based IB for people who work and contribute and then become incapable of work due to disability. Was replaced by contributions based ESA work related activity group (misleading name as it is for people not work capable) and support group. Which was replaced by contributions based ESA work related activity group time limited to 12 months despite still not being capable of working, and for the most disabled contributions based support group non time limited. Which is to be replaced by new contributions based unemployment benefit time limited to 6 or 12 months, then no money for you unless your household is poor enough to qualify for means tested benefits.

      Non contributions based Severe Disablement Allowance for people disable from a young age who were never capable of working. Was replaced by being made eligible for contributions based IB despite not contributing. Which was replaced by being made eligibile for contributions based ESA support group despite not contributing. Which was replaced by no passporting to contributions based ESA support group for you, no money for you unless your household is poor enough to qualify for means tested benefits. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @John Surely you should have to have a work history before accessing benefits, unless very severely disabled you can't have been on benefits for 50 years.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    We haven't been able to vote in years now and currently not allowed this year either. Like living in a dictatorship democracy died in 2020
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    In other news.

    The government has setup it's disability advisory panel. Note this is not the PIP review panel. The disability advisory panel is supposed to represent the views of disabled people in the creation of government disability policies.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/from-lived-experience-to-lasting-change-disability-advisory-panel-begins-work

    According to a quick google search of what their various organizations and companies do.

    Chair Zara Todd former government advisor on disability (specializes in creating organizational change to support inclusion and accountability)

    Laura Fulcher - Founder & CEO, Mission Remission (A organization for people in cancer remission that runs wellbeing activities and also campaigns for dismantling barriers to working)

    John Kerr - Employability Development Officer, East Lothian Council (Their job is improving people's employability)

    Jeff Banks - CEO, Lightyear Foundation (Increasing disabled peoples uptake of Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics education)

    Tracy Lazard - CEO, Inclusion London (Amongst many things it funds employment support and employment related resources for disabled people and employers)

    Nabila Gardner - Director/Founder, Ways for Wellbeing UK CIC (Health and Wellbeing Coaches focusing on mild mental health conditions)

    Molly Deakin - Policy and Campaigns Officer, Together Trust (Bridge College, Inscape House College, Inscape House School, Residential care homes, Respite care homes... Amongst many things also does vocational education and training)

    Arun Veerappan - Director of Research, The Disability Policy Centre (Arun's policy area is on employment. Their most recent policy paper is about boosting the Exchequer by £20bn by getting more disabled people and carers into work)

    Noor Al-Koky - Senior Commissioning Manager, Gloucestershire County Council & NHS Gloucestershire (Commissions support services)

    Damian Bridgeman - Director, Freedom 365 Limited (in home and respite care, housing, care and mobility planning and support brokerage and services)

    Isaac Samuels OBE - Co-chair of the National Co-production Advisory Group and the Think Local Act Personal Board (promotes creation of care services)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @John I wonder if any of these people/organisations have or are still receiving government grants.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @K For some reason the first paragraph of my reply got edited off.

      I maybe wrong but going by a quick search on Google it looks like none of the Disability Advisory Panel are severely disabled, 3 are disabled and 8 are not disabled. Which is a bit odd for a panel that is suppose to be shaping government policy "form lived experience to lasting change".
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @K
       

      What is also concerning is that most either head or work for organizations that might possibly in future get government grants or contracts. If the government pursues it's aim of cutting benefits and using some of the savings to fund support.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @John Incredible, no one who has actually experienced chronic illness or disability. Everyone on the panel has the same belief that work sets you free from sickness & disability, or age. Of course it's just a Fabian hub of planners looking at reducing support to save cash, all the while the gov commits public money to other ventures, like ID cards no one wants, without a second thought. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Through my union I have organised lobbies of the 2 local Labour parties in my area. I even got to speak at one of them last July. The local Labour parties are spineless and unwilling to publicly oppose the cuts to disability benefits as their MPs support the cuts. They will thoroughly deserve to get trounced in the local elections.
     Let's not play the lesser evil card that somehow Labour is 'better' than the Tories and Reform. This so called Labour government is carrying out attacks which the blue Tories would have shied away from.  Labour is committed to attacking disabled people on benefits and using us as whipping boys to help divide the public against us. Plus it is keeping the privatisation of benefit assessments and keeping the murderous DWP as an unreformed organisation. Besides this, Labour is continuing the disastrous privatisation of the NHS, wants to take away our civil liberties and continue preparing for a future war with Russia, never mind its support for the Israeli genocide in Gaza. 
     Sorry but you don't mention the new left party called Your Party which has over 50,000 members. So traditional Labour voters do have an alternative to the red tories in power.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @bronc The cuts proposed by Sunak before the last general election and the cuts proposed by Badenoch and the cuts proposed by Farage are all far bigger than those so far proposed by Starmer. Labour is bad but the Tories and Reform are far worse.

      The LibDems are saying the cuts are too harsh. But they supported cuts to disability benefits when they were in the Coalition government. And their leader last year said there is massive amounts of abuse of PIP with lots of people receiving it who should not.

      In my opinion only the Greens and Your Party genuinely oppose cuts to disability benefits.

      But any vote for the LibDems, Greens, Your Party would help signal Labour MPs that they need to shift to the left. Not chase Tory and Reform votes. 
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.