didnt recieve letters from atos - declared fit

how is that reasonable?

so since that case says they have to prove its been dispatched,. what sort of evidence would they provide for that?

eg. when I used to work and letters were sent out to workers who were suspended to attend disciplanries they were sent tracked delivery because the company had to pay compensation in the past for not having proof the letters were sent. It does seem the law has been shaped to allow special treatment.

If the DWP are allowed to assume letters will arrive by basic post whats the logical reason it cant be done the other way?

I have not seen an evidence pack no, I havent even got any letter confirming they got my appeal yet. But I assume there is past cases where the DWP will have had to submit proof of dispatch and since they dont use tracked delivery I am very curious how they could reasonably do that. Proof of correct address is not proof of dispatch right?

I couldnt see the details other than it says it would need proof of correct address, and proof of dispatch. to register on rightsnet is the only way to see the full details? sorry but to me is confusing

thanks and sorry if too many questions.

Ok am I right the missing sicknote wont affect the appeal been submitted? its only required if I was going to get the assessment rate?

the new one is been posted on wednesday.

I read the full case document, I appreciate that, although its left me just as confused as it didnt specify what evidence was acceptable as proof of dispatch.

My sister aked the HR department where she works what they have to do as proof of dispatch (for staff on sick/suspended) and the answer was they send recorded. When I get the appeal documents, which seems to be taking forever I will check what rhey have submitted as evidence as you said. So far no postal acknowledgement at all from them that my appeal is recieved.