The DWP is to begin continuous surveillance of the bank accounts of all pension credit, universal credit and employment and support allowance claimants using powers under a bill currently going through Parliament.  The department have said that they intend to use their new power to force any third party to pass on data to them more widely in the future.

The power to compel third parties into providing any data that the DWP wants in order to search for fraud and error is being conferred in last minute amendments slipped into the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, which has now passed its third reading in the Commons and moved to the Lords.

Initially the DWP say that they will use their powers to oblige the UK’s top 15 banks to monitor the accounts of all means-tested benefits claimants and report every time an account goes over the  capital limit or is used abroad for more than four weeks.

Because every DWP payment into a bank account has an identifying code attached to it, all banks know exactly which of their customers is on benefits and which benefits they receive.

Setting up software to automatically send details to the DWP of every claimant account that goes over the capital limit or is used abroad for more than four weeks will be very straightforward for banks.

The DWP say that each identified claim will be investigated in the normal way and that penalties will not be automatically imposed.

At the moment, almost 9 million claimants would be caught in the surveillance net, including:

  • 5.8 million universal credit claimants
  • 1.6 million employment and support allowance claimants
  • 1.4 million pension credit claimants

Any bank failing to collect and pass on data to the DWP will be subject to heavy fines.

 The new system will begin to be rolled out in 2025, though all banks may not be fully involved before 2030.

The DWP estimates that it will cost around £30 million a year for them to investigate potential fraud identified by the new system, but that they will save £500 million a year through reduced fraud and error.  

They also estimate that over the first ten years, the new powers will result in 74,000 prosecution cases and 2,500 custodial sentences.  

There is no doubt that the DWP intend to use these new powers much more widely.  The impact assessment for the new powers says that:

“The power is not limited to a specific type of data or type of institution/Third-Party to allow us to fight new fraud and error issues as they emerge and engage with new institutions as efficient opportunities become available to us.”

Later, the same document says: 

“This measure is drafted broadly . . .  to enable DWP to apply this measure to non-financial organisations in future if it is deemed appropriate and proportionate”

The new surveillance powers for the DWP appear to enjoy cross party support. Only 51 MPs voted against the amendment, with 30 of those being SNP and just 7 each from Labour and the Lib Dems.

Anyone who imagines that the DWP will use such sweeping powers reasonably and proportionately probably hasn’t ever claimed benefits.

And they probably also don’t remember the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, which was brought in to combat terrorism and organised crime and ended up being used to spy on dog walkers, pigeon feeders and people putting out their wheelie bins too early.

Capital and abroad fraud account for less than 15% of benefits fraud and error. The DWP will want to delve into many other aspects of claimants lives in order to identify the other 85%.  This is, beyond doubt, the thin end of a very thick wedge.

You can download a copy of the amendments to the Data Protection and Digital information Bill here.  The Power To Require Information For Social Security Purposes section begins on page 98.

You can read the impact assessment for the DWP surveillance powers here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Could constant/regular surveillance be a breach of data laws and human rights laws e.g right to privacy?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Worsethanchina&russia What privacy?  You have a PHONE. Tracked... Friends, Travel, Health, Beliefs, Work etc. And that is just your phone...... your on camera everywhere from when you leave home. ???
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Inglis 25 And you are correct and it’s not just here it’s all over the world we have very sinister people in charge
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Worsethanchina&russia They change laws at will, therefore if the Lords agree with the Governments plans they can go ahead. I believe they are trying to do away with all of our human rights.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    This is incredibly scary 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Big Brother Watch are writing about this subject and how the benefit system is becoming a panopticon for the disabled.  They have sent me an e book about the state of surveillance but I cant copy the link.  It was part written by a manchester representative for the disabled.  Big brother watch is well worth supporting as they oppose all this stuff.  CBDCs, spy cameras covering the uk etc.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Thank you to all those people who have signed the petition. I am attaching the link again for those people who haven’t yet seen it.  It would appear that the politicians have forgotten that we, the public, employ them, we are not under contract with them, they are under contract to us. They have no right to infringe our Rights, discriminate against us or assume that we are all of dubious character and employed in fraudulent activities. 


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 months ago
      @Emma On Parliament website, search, regular checking of bank accounts 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Emma Try Googling organise as it wont let me post a link.  I’ve also put a link under our forum headed dwp snooping on bank accounts
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Wendy Scott Signed also sign the Organise petition which has over 50,000 signatures about this
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Wendy Scott couldn't find this petition online other than your comment.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Wendy Scott Thank you Wendy..signed ... hopefully everyone here sees this and sign too...we need all the help and support from one another...👍
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Thus has been going on for years. I know a man who trains the dwp to access banks of claimants thus is over 14 years. Disgusting. Finances and health should be PRIVATE .
    I keep my money in a safe and avoid the banks like the plague. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Rea Yes but the difference is they need legal clearance to use it this will mean they dont and can randomly snoop on you.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Can anyone list the banks involved as I assume using Chase or whoever who are outwith the normal reach of the courts/parliament will circumvent this legislation 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    The house of lords are pretty decent people compared to the commons.

    There's no way this is getting through, although they can't completely stop a bill they can make life hard for the commons to the point it's watered right down to basically ve worthless anyway.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    A group called Organise are running a petition about this and asking for people to write to their mps.  Thousands have already written to them but dont rely on other people get active and push back on them.  This is an outrageous over reach by govt. with very little consultation to justify it.  They are trying to sneak this through on the QT.  As Stephen Timms said in parliament why do they also need the details of thousands of pensioners?  Remind people that this wont stop at the disabled govt want to snoop on all of us and for what purpose?   Sign the petition and write to your MP.  They hope to get this through without much fuss.  Dont let them get away with it!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    This is crossing the line. How do we stop it? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Chocolady thank you chocolady I need to hear this to combat depression around it
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @MrFibro Of course you can thousands pushed back on digital ids and marched and they weren’t brought in during covid.  They will keep trying but they just want to see how much push back they get.  We are the many they are the few remember.  Every little act is huge when added together.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Anneee Annneee,

      You can't only if it's out voted in the commons and, or the house of farts.  Or if a new Government gets in @ the next GE.  Saying that all parties, they all hate sick, ill, disabled people.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Anneee Use a bank they don't have access to search accounts apparently its 15 of the top UK banks. I'm sure they will be other banks that are not playing ball 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    This needs to be stopped there discriminating people on benefits 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    This is an obvious breach of human rights that is my and all others to privacy if this goes ahead I want the right to have checked every mp and Lord in this country for their interests when being lobbied so we can weed out the fraudsters in government also their interests in all  deals at home and abroad 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Chris They had to shut down the department that looked at mps expenses as they were so aggressive when questioned.  Arrogance off the charts 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Chris Totally agree, but we know it will never happen as their accounts are overseas 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    So what about all the tax fraud committed by the richest 10% which accounts for a lot more money and fraud than any benefits fraud, but this is acceptable by the government as most of them use loop holes created by them to help them avoid taxes. But as always its the hardest hit that pay the price, I am not saying that every claim is legal or correct but the tax dodgers far outweigh them, but nothing is or ever will be done.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @K And for those on benefits who are protected by the Equality Act 2010 on the grounds of a protected characteristic such as disability then I imagine there will be quite a few successful discrimination claims. And rightly so because this really does amount to discrimination.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Justin B Totally agree with you it's discrimination against people on benefits 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    My PIP and today’s payment of winter fuel allowance will have pushed my savings account above the limit for pension credit. I do not leave excess in my current account as every tiny amant of interest is valuable. Someone looking at my account today would say I was above the limit next week I have nearly £1000 in bills to pay out of this money which will take me below the limit again. I suspect a lot of individual save over the month and pay their bills at the end   Most of us will use a savings account to do this. The DWP monitoring this would be taking money and then giving it back. The amount of  pointlessly wasted time and paperwork wouldn’t justify the amounts paid into the treasury. I hope there is going to be some sanity guidelines when this comes into force. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    I get pension credit. I do not have a problem with DWP confirming my savings. I have 2 concerns I am a nominated Administrator for a dead persons estate. I am required by law to keep safe the sums that have refused by first line recipients. I have to do this for 7 years until I can distribute to the next level of beneficiaries. These monies have to be kept in a bank account, preferably attracting some interest otherwise I would be considered negligent. I can supply documents providing the current status of my accounts and of my position as an Administrator. There would be no need for DWP to deal with the bank directly as the information I can supply would be a complete picture. My second concern is regarding DWP making a decision on information gathered direct from my bank and assuming that all the monies held in the account was mine to spend.
    If recipients of benefits refuse to provide proof of savings then there is justification for a direct approach to their bank. As always my concern is the level of skill of the individuals reviewing these accounts and the context that cause people to declare savings that are different to the amounts held in accounts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @DragonWolf That persons estate should not have anything to do with your p
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @DragonWolf I would get a couple of opinions on your situation and not declare anything yet.  Try the Citizens advice or similar.   If the bank account is in the deceased person's name and not your own I don't think it should be a problem.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Does this include both income and contribution based ESA does anyone know please 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Does this include PIP, tax credits, Housing Benefits? I can see Tax Credits mentioned but it references 121DA, which isn't in the document. Can we get some clarity on this? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Kc Rest assured it will be all accounts if they get this through
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Wiggles It includes any income based benefits administered by DWP so does not include PIP or Housing Benefit (Local Authority). However all claims for tax credits and Housing Benefit will end and you will have to make a claim for Universal credit which is administered by DWP and is income based.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Surprised, I'm not.

    Did you know that all financial trading organisations, and banks, like Ebay and Paypal, are / have now been obliged to report your trading and balance exceeding £1000 a year to be shared by government department's inc DWP & HMRC and Local Authorities. Using AI to filter the results will mean not only will DWP be on your back if you exceed their thresholds, so will HMRC and Local Authorities where HB or council tax allowances are given. You may also find yourself liable for capital gains tax.
    Should you trade with your hobby on say Ebay, or any platform, and "turnover" more than £1000 a year, your liable, they are obliged to provide the information on you, un-prompted. Whats more, move, spend, attempt to hide or dispose of assets, including money, even from under your mattress, makes you liable for Money Laundering, and subsequent incarceration in prison. Did you also know, your liable for Capital Gains Tax if you sell your possessions worth over £1000, or any of the above collectively.
    The Tories, not having raised allowance thresholds, will have been largely ignored by many, but this brings millions more people into liability. Tied up to this is the little acknowledged digitisation of Health Records, that are being administered by Donal Trumps empire for the UK, which will be covertly available, again to all government departments, who will know more about you than you yourself.

    Happily, there are exceptions, being Off Shore Accounts, Race Horses, and vehicles, funny that.

    So while the snoop law is not yet in force until passed by the Lords and ratified, enough powers are in place and coming together to penalise just about all citizens. Local authorities have jumped the gun, asking for bank statements showing both income AND expenditure. If you get such a demand, refuse until these powers are law. Now why do you think that expenditure might be of interest, yes you guessed it. By the way, postings on this, and any other website will come under the same legislation.

    Welcome to 1984 folks.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Several years ago, I had an investigation officer on my doorstep after the DWP found money I had in a savings account. It was extremely distressing, with threats of stopping my benefit, seizure of assets etc. This was money that I did not need to declare because I was not above the capital limit according to the rules - but that didn't stop the DWP reducing my benefit for years and I lost probably around £6000 in total. If the DWP won't follow the rules, they shouldn't expect claimants to. Good luck to anyone genuinely struggling with health issues and not getting enough money to live on - do whatever you need to do to survive - you are not being dishonest.
    I guess that if a kind person gives a donation to charity while in receipt of means-tested benefits, the DWP will deduct the amount from your benefit!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    How will this catch the fraudsters who work cash in hand? And any self employed not declaring cash? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 months ago
      @Akire24 What about if you have been staying abroad for long periods of times to be with your husband so he can see his daughter ? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Moss I believe that they have always been able to find out how much you have in savings by the amount of tax you pay each year on your account. Once more than a certain amount is paid hmrc will inform them. So you have to ask what this is going to be for ?? I imagine it will be used mostly for pip to track individuals who say they are unable to do certain things. The payments will show what they are doing day to day for example going to concerts football matchs etc etc

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Akire24 So the fraud thing is people saving way above the capital limit etc. whelp I hardly have any savings in any of my bank accounts, whenever I get paid from DWP I spend it on essentials and bills/food more than anything. 

      I think they will find out that a low amount of people actually commit these crimes (or the ones that do it 24/7 are swerving DWP fraud officers). 


      Anyway good luck to all, luckily my bank providers are not in the top UK banks.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @John Windom No it is not . Cash transactions have increased this year for the first time in 10 years and cash is used more commonly during recessions or near recessions . Do keep up 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Jaf Excatly if you are fiddling the system then you will work around it. Get wages paid into other peoples accounts. Cash cash cash. Those who accidentally Go over because they are in hospital for months and are not spending anything will be getting harassing fraud letters for
      Owing £50 in back pay. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    This is the reason banks are closing, pushing for you to use the App. (Which if you read terms & conditions, they have access to EVERYTHING on your phone)All the surveillance will be done by AI and algorithms. There will be no privacy, don’t have a smart meter either, because they will be able to immediately cut you off, not able to do this yet, but that’s on the cards too.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Mrs M Apps can’t access other apps unless you give permissions or you’ve been hacked. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Mrs M They can cut you off if you don’t pay 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.