The government has announced that tens of thousands of universal credit (UC) claimants with limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) are to be offered support from jobcentres, including signposting to HGV driver training and on the job training in construction and hospitality.  Accepting the support is voluntary and your benefits will not be affected if you refuse.

1,000 Jobcentre staff - to be known as Pathways to Work advisers - will offer support to claimants with limited capability for work (LCW) or LCWRA.  They will be based in every jobcentre in England, Wales and Scotland and will aim to engage with 65,000 people by the end of the financial year.

The DWP say that “The offer is voluntary and will be made to LCWRA claimants via their Universal Credit journal with tailored appointments taking place monthly.“

The kind of support on offer includes:

  • being directed to Connect to Work, which provides personalised job-search assistance, employer engagement and on and off the job support, or
  •  WorkWell, which combines medical help with career guidance
  • signposting to work placed training schemes in sectors including construction, hospitality, and manufacturing
  • skills training in programmes such as IT or HGV driving.

We would stress again that there is no obligation to take part in this programme, claimants are free to simply turn the offer down.

There’s more details from the DWP here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 minutes ago
    The stress and fear are rising, just as when the government last had a good idea, remember - the 4 point rule etc? It wont work. It can't happen. Our worst enemy is letting them inside our heads.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago

    Be careful although they say its voluntary and you don't need to respond to the offer on the UC journal
    disabled people are finding that the DWP are still contacting them via phone saying " they want to explain this offer more clearly "

    The good advice is to politely but firmly say No Thank you then terminate the call.
    If needed get the callers first name and where they are based in case you need to make a complaint.

    Reposted as the full comment was not posted
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    Be careful although they say its voluntary and you don't need to respond to the offer on the UC journal, 
    disabled people are finding that the DWP are still contacting them via phone saying " they want to explain this offer more clearly " 

    The good advice is to politely but firmly say No Thank 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    These offers are being made to claimants bus their online journals ?if so what about those who were phone claim only claimants? Where does that leave them.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    It’s only voluntary so no big deal just ignore the journal message or a polite no thank you if this ever this becomes mandatory though in future then that’s when the problems start  they going on about hgv construction and  kitchen all stressful long hours even for an able bodied person I would say working with animals would be better more of a calming experience and a career too 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    I did shop, cleaning and factory work, these all made my health worse, I also went to an admin college to learn clerical work, even that was tiring.

    Appointments taking place monthly? I only speak to my son 99% of the time, the 1% is my mum, I rarely leave my home. I have enough issues with my mental and physical health without this spiteful lot adding to them.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    The Work and Pensions Committee – 5 current inquiries

    Govt. response to Get Britain Working: Pathways to Work is now overdue.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    MPs on the Work and Pensions Committee have called on the DWP to reform the conditionality regime, including sanctions, placed on jobseekers and people in work on Universal Credit. The Committee also want to see a personalised action plan, which better reflects their skills and experience, replace the Claimant Commitment.

    Jobcentres shakeup needs more detail and ambition, say MPs

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    I have Severe heart failure, give me the big truck!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    This is what ChatGPT has to say about what the system could look like:

    > What’s so frustrating is that it didn’t have to be this way. If, over the years, the DWP and successive governments had focused on genuinely supporting people rather than surveilling and punishing them, we might be in a completely different place.

    Instead of gaslighting and endless reassessments, they could have built a culture of trust — where people’s accounts of their own conditions were believed, and where support was shaped around building confidence, stability, and quality of life. Instead of hammering everyone into the same boxes, they could have looked at what each individual needed to manage their health and, if possible, explore safe and meaningful ways to reconnect with society or with work on our terms.

    A humane system would have recognised that living with long-term illness or disability is already a full-time job in itself. It would have valued the right to relax, the right to some peace, the right to a life worth living — rather than constantly threatening to take those things away.

    That’s not weakness or dependency; that’s the basis of dignity. And perhaps, if there is genuine listening to claimants’ experiences, what is currently a blunt and damaging process might one day reform itself in the truest sense of the word — into something more humane, flexible, and respectful of the lives it touches.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 minutes ago
      @HL Thanks HL I just copied in the piece id written below I had been chatting with it about all of this anyway.  Hope this helps.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @CaroA That’s interesting – what were your search terms?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    There is absolutely no acknowledgement of the extreme harm the DWP system has done to so many of us over so many years. How many of us physically shake when asked to fill out forms about our health or personal circumstances? How many avoid GPs altogether for fear they might say something that gets twisted and used to undermine benefits?

    The systemic gaslighting — with forensic reassessments carried out by incentivised private companies — has left us constantly on edge. The implication that you could work if only you “tried harder” seeps into every aspect of life: our relationships, our ability to manage extremely challenging health conditions, and even our relationship with relaxation itself. Many of us now find it almost impossibly hard to switch off or believe we have a right to any quality of life, because even a thin veneer of looking “well” can feel like a risk to our security.

    Meanwhile, neighbours slap us on the back with “cheer up” or “take a holiday” suggestions, not realising the toll. For some, the pressure and self-hatred this creates has even led to self-harm.

    And now they expect us to ‘engage’ with work coaches? For many of us, the very idea evokes dread. As SLB has said, there’s no genuine tailoring here — just one-size-fits-all hammering round pegs into square holes.

    It’s hard to know what to think. Thank God for now it’s not compulsory. Let’s hope it’s more refined than their Reform agenda press release seems to imply.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    So we must all prepare to be a jack/jill of all trades, depending on the labour shortage. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    It sounds more like the premise for a comedy sketch than a government policy. So we have assessed you as so severely disabled you are effectively incapable of any and all paid employment, and incapable of any activities towards working, and qualify to have a someone claim carer's allowance to provide you will full time personal care. Have you thought about becoming a bricklayer on a building site? How about a lorry driver? How about a waiter?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @John This is the future they're pushing us towards though, isn't it. There will be no such thing as limited capacity for work related activity unless you fit the severe conditions criteria. That's what the Bill passed over the summer was laying the groundwork for, sadly. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @John It's voluntary, and people have a wide range of conditions for a plethora of reasons.  Could help some people who are depressed and feel trapped with no options, and are worried about being forced into a minimum wage job - this would give them a skill. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    I was working in hospitality – it was exhausting. The shifts were long and mostly late, with no break until the nearly the end of the shift. So working hungry and tired – even the healthy young workers found it too much.

    Whilst I don’t know if this is typical, this type of scenario would need to be addressed in order to make jobs suitable / sustainable.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    Just retired after over 40 years roofing.
    Tough work,all weathers,no guarantee work or pay.
    Stopped three years ago crippling arthritis knees and hands.....like most building workers it does catch up with you.
    BW have been fantastic in advising me how to claim the entitlements I am due...not a benefit as I have paid thousands in to the Hoover the years since 1975( £19k Tax/NI ten years ago)
    If you need help definitely subscribe to this site 👍.
    Point I make is construction is a very tough industry and NOT an easy channel for government and job centres to think they can just move people in to.... especially if medically or mentally vulnerable.
    Great industry but not for everybody.
    Good luck all

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    Right, so if you're on LCWRA you're deemed to not be expected to work, so let's ease you in with CONSTRUCTION, HOSPITALITY, and driving an HGV!!! That will really help people with physical health conditions, and those with anxiety issues.  One has to wonder what the people at the DWP are smoking.   But this harks back to a general problem which we see in the WCA, too.  When trying to find out if you're fit for work, they ask you if you put your arms up in the air and lift an empty cardboard box - as if all disabled and those with health conditions are capable of aspiring to is manual work, seemingly in Poundland.  It would be funny if it wasn't so insulting.   

    I realise that comment might sound snobbish towards those who do manual work, but it's not meant to be.  What I'm getting at is that the only work they think we could possibly do is minimum wage jobs stacking shelves.  There's a general assumption that the disabled are not trained or qualified in anything else.   

    I now have sixteen books under my belt - most (but not all) self-published - and I would be over the moon if they offered me a training course on marketing those books, or even how to make effective advertising videos for social media (particularly tik-tok which I really don't understand, but is known to increase book sales substantially when used right) so that I can make the most of them, and maybe make a living from them and eventually stick two fingers up at the DWP!  But there's no indication that what they offer is ever going to be fine-tuned in that way to what an individual might find useful.  And I'm sure there are other "self-employed" people (I use the term in quotes as many of us don't make a living from it) who could find courses on aspects of their business useful too - especially as being self-employed is often the only likely way of us returning to work as it allows us to work around our conditions. 

    Instead, they view the disabled as one big group, as if we have lost our individual identities, aspirations, and aptitudes as soon as we became ill.  But we are not one big group, we are a hugely diverse group, educated anywhere from GCSEs to PhDs, and each of us with our own skill sets that could, perhaps, at some point be utilised to get us back to work.  They just don't see that - or want to.  They want a one-size-fits-all answer for a group of millions because it would be an easy fix and a good headline.  Except that, unless they change their view, that fix and headline is never going to happen.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @SLB Can I just make note - this is a voluntary scheme but, anything the job centre ask you to do must make it more likely that you will gain employment. Had this when they'd wrongly put me in LCW before I was moved to LCWRA. They tried to send me on a CV writing and basic skills work programme. My CV was already up to date and I had been teaching every GCSE subject up to becoming ill. I've an honours degree in Geology. They threatened me with sanctions if I did not go to a class I was mentally capable of teaching, but not of physically attending which was due to all of the above just not going to happen. 

      Also, is it going to be the same as the last scheme where disabled people were "invited" to volunteer - but then there appeared compulsion in the form of sanctions for non-attendance?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    The dwp link above says that among lcwra claimants there are "approximately 1.3 million because of a mental illness and 900,000 with back pain, arthritis, and other musculoskeletal conditions".

    So, by April, Jobcentre staff are aiming to engage with 65000 of them, who are then going to build houses and drive lorries. Mm hmm.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    Dwp minister speech transcript from earlier today:

We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.