Labour’s cruel “severe conditions criteria” (SCC) plan is not designed to protect seriously ill claimants as the government claims, it is intended to save money at their expense.  Because tens of thousands of claimants too ill to ever work again will be forced to live for years on half the additional payment that current claimants receive.

The SCC are part of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill and are intended to be a concession to Labour MPs concerned about the effect of the cuts on disabled claimants.

From April 2026, new claimants who meet the SCC will not have to face future reassessments for health element of universal credit, though they will still be reassessed for personal independence payment (PIP).

At the same time, Labour is almost halving the limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) element payable to new claimants, but claimants with LCWRA who also meet the SCC will get the full amount.

The SCC qualifying conditions

The current qualifying conditions for LCWRA require one of a number of descriptors to apply to the claimant “for the majority of the time”.  For example: 

  • Cannot pick up and move a 0.5 litre carton full of liquid.
  • Cannot press a button(such as a telephone keypad) with either hand or; cannot turn the pages of a book with either hand.
  • Cannot cope with any change, due to cognitive impairment or mental disorder, to the extent that day-to-day life cannot be managed.

The severe conditions criteria require claimants to meet the same criteria “constantly”.

Constantly is defined in the Bill as “at all times” or “on all occasions on which the claimant undertakes or attempts to undertake the activity”.

However, many degenerative conditions such as Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis and muscular dystrophy follow a slow path of decreasing ability, with periods of remission.  So, most days you may be unable to turn the pages of a book, but you may have occasional good days when you can do so.

Or your manual dexterity may be better first thing in the morning but get rapidly worse as fatigue sets in.

At the moment, a claimant in these circumstances would get the full LCWRA amount, which from April 2026 will be £423.27 a month, because they meet the descriptor for the majority of the time.

However from April 2026, new LCWRA claimants in the same position will only get around half this amount, £217.26, because they do not meet the descriptor constantly.

But the same claimant will never improve, their condition will only get worse.  So, if they are already unable to work because of a degenerative disease, they will never be able to work again in the future. 

Under Labour’s new rules, however, they will have to exist on half the LCWRA element, possibly for years after there is no chance of their ever being able to work again, until they can show that they are constantly unable to carry out an activity, rather than just for the majority of the time.

So, far from guaranteeing  that people who will never work again are supported, the SCC guarantees that they will live  on a severely reduced income for years, until their degenerative disease enters its most debilitating stage.

For some conditions, including some severe mental illnesses, there may never be a time when the claimant is certain not to have periods of remission, so they may never get the full LCWRA award.

Substantial risk

The SCC do not apply to “non-functional descriptors”. 

Most importantly, if a claimant has been found to have LCWRA because “there would be a substantial risk to the mental or physical health of any person if you were found not to have limited capability for work-related activity” then they cannot be considered to meet the SCC.  

In 2022 14.6% of new awards for LCWRA were on the basis of substantial risk. 

The substantial risk could be because, for example you have a heart or lung condition and the exertion involved attending work, or appointments at the Jobcentre, might lead to a serious deterioration in your health.  Or you might have severe seizures without warning and travelling to work or being in a workplace would put you at substantial risk.

Or the substantial risk could be due to severe mental illness which means that the anxiety caused by travelling to or attending work would be likely to lead you to harm yourself.

Whatever, the cause, if your have LCWRA because of the substantial risk rules, you cannot be considered for the SCC.

How long will protection last?

The SCC are claimed to protect claimants from ever being assessed again. But, as noted above, people who meet the SCC can still be reassessed for PIP.

From 2028, Labour are planning to abolish the work capability assessment (WCA) and make receipt of PIP daily living the gateway for the UC health element.  But they have repeatedly failed to explain what will happen to someone who meets the SCC if they lose their PIP daily living award on review.

Will they still be able to claim UC health even though they no longer meet the basic qualifying conditions?  If not, then the SCC guarantee may only last a few years, rather than a lifetime as Labour claims.

As of May 2024, just 32.1% of claimants who received the UC LCWRA element also had a PIP daily living award which included a score of at least 4 points for one activity

Peace of mind

In unveiling the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, Liz Kendall claimed that it “represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.  This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot. . .”

In reality, the Bill simply seeks every opportunity to take more money from disabled claimants, whilst telling them it really is in their own best interests.

[Edit: information on substantial risk added]

Latest news on PIP/UC changes

What’s changing, when

What you can do

New PIP test

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    Where's all the disabled jobs coming from no one will give a disabled person a job over some one that's not disabled all this should be sent to itv news 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @Wayne 1m losing benefits.  Resolution Foundation state that 7,000 will get jobs.  That's a shortfall of 993,000
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    Bedford councillor quite labour over benefit cuts and Palestine protests stance

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    This government is stating if you lift a 500 ml bottle of water than your  disablilty won’t stop you working. How on earth does this criteria work. I think there will be lots of high court cases and human rights broken if this reform goes ahead how can these ministers and MPs say they are human. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Slb @Slb  not many will be sent to Poundland as they gradually closing, but the questions are not appropriate I agree with that, who thought them up I don't know.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @Diceman24 The WCA is utterly stupid and always has been, not just for us but also the DWP.  With activities such an lifting an empty cardboard box - what job consists of doing that? And there's also the issue that it assumes disabled people are forever destined to work in poundland.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    Clueless Kendall, Timms etc would have us all believe that all a disabled person has to do to find and sustain work is be "encouraged" aka threatened to apply for them and the job is theirs for life. Because employers love taking on people with complex health needs who have large gaps in their CVs and no recent references and no healthy applicants exist as competition. 

    Meanwhile, in the real world...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @MATT They also would have done reforms to get people into work before culling their financial support. All about cost cutting, except there are consequences as they are messing with peoples lives.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @Eloise If Kendall et al were really serious about getting disabled people into work (they're not) then they would need to enact very stringent anti-discrimination legislation, in tandem with anti-ageism laws, plus some form of 'bung' whereby employers who do take on disabled people wouldn't have to pay NI contributions, or lower levels of corporation tax.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    This will have no impact for the large numbers of us on PIP and who don't receive the health element of UC. It represents yet more cruel gaslighting from the red tories in power. The moral depravity of these people knows no bounds.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    labour party are showing that they really don't care for the people of this country and have turned out to be faszionist! There is something really wrong with this leadership living in it's ivory towers 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @Bronc Can't wait to put my X on the ballot paper, & see those nodding donkeys on the front bench get humiliated, and thrown out of power, the next 4 years can't come sooner.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @James They are in hock to the billionaire classes, the defence of whose wealth is major priority. Labour will lose the next general election and good riddance to!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    Half a million more children homeless due to LCWRA & PIP ‘reforms’

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    may I ask people posting links to articles to paste a title too? this would help many. thanks.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Saturday, I put together a little graphic for X, which people could repost or use in order to tag their local MP in.  A couple of hours ago, it was removed from X.  Presumably somebody complained about it.  I'm assuming that means it's doing its job and making Labour MPs face up to the questions they don't like.  It has now be reposted.  It says:

    IS THIS WHY YOU BECAME A LABOUR MP?
    800,000 people will lose their PIP entitlement.
    The Resolution Foundation says only 7,000 will find work.
    Those losing PIP will ALSO lose UC LCWRA from 2028. That’s a cut of £9000 a year.
    PIP is NOT an out of work benefit. Cutting PIP will send 250,000 people into poverty, not work.
    People who need assistance to eat, wash, cook, and use the toilet will no longer qualify for PIP.
    CAN YOU REALLY VOTE FOR THIS WITH A CLEAR CONSCIENCE?  ONE DAY IT MIGHT BE YOU OR YOUR FAMILY.     
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Article in the observer yesterday by Catherine Neilan. 150 labour mp's ready to rebel against welfare reforms. Sorry, but don't know how to link it here, but it gave me a little bit of hope.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Please decline my previous post, I forgot the url.   Please post this one!

    An article from the i newspaper earlier today (no paywall). Note that DWP evidence shows that PIP fraud is 52 times lower than UC fraud - and yet the Mint-Cake tells us that WE'RE "taking the mickey."

    https://archive.ph/94KPV
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @SLB Yeah but it's not like those of us only on uc aren't being targeted, she's equal opportunity evil
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    An article from the i newspaper earlier today (no paywall).  Note that DWP evidence shows that PIP fraud is 52 times lower than UC fraud - and yet the Mint-Cake tells us that WE'RE "taking the mickey."
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Gonna take a moment to thank all those that post links to new news articles, much better than having to go search them out 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Why don’t Labour just come clean and say they redefining the SCC as follows -



  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    It makes for grim reading. As the article mentions, it's not unusual for most people's chronic health conditions to fluctuate even within a single day, let alone over longer periods. It's rarely a constant, 24/7. So this will see many genuinely ill people stripped off significant financial support that they rely on to survive with dignity, so that Stamer's Labour can balance the books, avoid adding a small tax rise on the wealthiest & fund yet more costly overseas military escapades in future. I fear that with Tory backing, most of these measures will be passed (as much as I dearly hope I'll be proven wrong). But while 2029's GE seems a long way off, one will never forget the damage being done to the vulnerable & chronically ill. I'll never vote Labour again (the last time I did was when Corby was leader). Ditto Tories or Reform, as they'll be no better. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Shabana Mahmood, offered a curt explanation of why the government was set on its plan: “This is the Labour party. The clue is in the name. We believe in work.”
    Such banal obstinacy gets in the way of any deep understanding of the issues swirling around this story.
    ...
    These, needless to say, are all complex stories that demand careful answers; what the government is proposing, by contrast, amounts to the insane idea that you can immiserate people out of their problems.


    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jun/22/labour-disability-benefit-cuts-keir-starmer
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Old Mother Absolutely this. It’s shocking. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @gingin 'Immiserate' will be my new word of the week 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @gingin It’s almost a discrimination - as those who can’t work are being denied equality of representation- if Labour are only representing those who work. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I will be in the ESA CB group and I therefore I assume won't get any job coach assistance either, as I will not qualify for universal credit, not a great outlook.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Elizabeth Vidler Im in the same situation as you . Its frightening.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Elizabeth Vidler I am in the same boat, that’s a very good point you raise about access to a work coach. I wonder if that has been addressed anywhere.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Schedule 7 LCWRA descriptors does not appear to include those who qualify Schedule 9 for LCWRA.

    Those covered by schedule 9 not 7 so ineligible for the severe group. 

    The claimant is suffering from a specific illness, disease or disablement by reason of which there would be a substantial risk to the physical or mental health of any person were the claimant found not to have limited capability for work and work-related activity.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I’m emotionally drained and exhausted and this has had an impact on my health, not only mental but physical as well.
    I dread any news and I check here daily, but despite few glimmers of hope there’s more doom and gloom.
    Labour are trying their hardest to strip us dignity and respect, without any concerns about severe consequences and implications on our lives, be it wellbeing or financial (which lets be honest is dire as it is).
    The way I see it they’re hell bend on punishing the disabled people and are trying their hardest to get as much as they can in order to balance the books. This I doubt it will work, the hole is far too deep to fill it up, but they haven’t thought the strain and additional costs this cuts will put on NHS, local organisations etc.
    Instead of trying to find other ways to raise money, first thing that comes to mind is tax the rich (they have the means of avoiding paying the taxes) they spent these past few months on declaring a war against the disabled people! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @Lost and helpless I can totally empathise with you. The stress of this has all worsened my health, particularly my physical pain. I already find life not worth living most of the time but have a duty to my cat to survive.  I recently got awarded enhanced PIP, things started looking a bit brighter for me, then this. My mum is starting to show early signs of dementia, I'd love to work and be looking after her. Instead she has to help me bathe because I'm saving as much pip as I can ready for when they take it all away. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @gingin I think one of our biggest problems right now is the news cycle.  The Israel/US/Iran situation is pretty much taking the headlines right now.  If it wasn't, the resignation over the weekend would no doubt have been a bigger story.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Lost and helpless Don't give up. When Labour first published the green paper it looked like no hope at all that the bill would be defeated or even amended. Now it's looking more likely that it won't get through without AT LEAST amendments, and we even have some hope it will be defeated. I know how draining this is on every level. Just hang on to a glimmer of hope (and maybe take a break from here and any news of the welfare cuts for a bit. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.