We will have to wait for the publication of the Green Paper later today for full details of changes to personal Independence payment (PIP) and Universal Credit (UC).

But here are some of the main points of the speech.

Personal Independence Payment (PIP)

  • No vouchers
  • No means-test
  • No freeze.

But, from November 2026, claimants will need to score at least 4 points from a single descriptor to qualify for the daily living component of PIP, as well as scoring a total of at least 8 points..

So, if you select 4 descriptors scoring two points each, that will be 8 points, but it will not qualify for an award. 

But if you select one descriptor scoring 4 points and two descriptors scoring 2 points, that will be 8 points and you will qualify for an award.

There will also be review of the PIP assessment system led by disability minister Stephen Timms.

PIP existing claimants

The DWP says it "will work with Department of Health and Social Care to ensure that existing people who claim PIP who may no longer be entitled to the benefit following an award review under new eligibility rules have their health and eligible care needs met. The government is consulting on how best to achieve this."

This suggests that existing claimants will be subject to the new rules when their award is reviewed.

 Work Capability Assessment (WCA)

The WCA is to be scrapped in 2028 and a new single assessment system introduced. Under the new system, any extra financial support for health conditions (including PIP, ESA or UC health) will be assessed via a new single assessment which will be based on the PIP assessment – considering on the impact of disability on daily living, not on capacity to work.

There will be an increase in  Face-to-Face Assessments for PIP and the WCA.

Reintroduce reassessments for incapacity benefits, with exceptions for those who will never work and those under special rules for end-of-life care. Reassessments have largely been switched off since 2021.

A "Right To Try Guarantee" will be introduced which will guarantee that attempting work will never lead to a benefits reassessment.

Universal Credit (UC)

From April 2026, Labour will hold the value of the universal credit health top-up fixed in cash terms for existing claimants, and reduce it for new claimants, with an additional premium for people with severe lifelong condition

The Standard Allowance will be raised above inflation by 2029/30, adding £775 annually in cash terms for a single person aged over 25.

Access to the health element of Universal Credit will be delayed until a claimant is aged 22.

Existing claimants.  The DWP say “Those currently in receipt of UC health will benefit from the increased standard allowance and will not be affected by plans to reduce UC health in future.”

Assessments

People with the most severe disabilities or with health conditions that will never improve will never be reassessed.

When

The DWP say they will bring forward primary legislation this session to enable delivery of the PIP additional eligibility requirement and UC rebalancing reforms from 26/27.

The Right to Work Guarantee will be delivered through separate primary legislation which will be introduced “in due course”. 

Savings

The DWP say the changes are expected to save over £5 billion in 2029 to 2030.

Links

The Pathways to Work:  Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper.

 Liz Kendall speech

 

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago

    "

    Yet when the Tories proposed this, Labour were furiously against, but now they're proposing exactly what they were against less than a year ago!

    Hypocrisy combined with cruelty at its finest.

    I really wonder who would pass such a single assessment based on toughened criteria intended to fail claimants!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So much for me writing yesterday hope it isn't too bad. Actually it is worse than I thought it would be. The Work Capability Assessment will be scrapped in 2028. So much for the health component of UC that was ESA being reduced, it is in fact being scrapped altogether! Just ordinary Jobseeker's/UC. And in addition they will bring in an "expectation to engage" alongside an offer of personalised employment support Kendall said. 

    So we will lose the health component of UC completely and they will pester us as well. Oh dear. I feel sick.

    PIP as the leaks predicted is now to be made harder to qualify. But with the above being scrapped if you don't get PIP and many won't now, I don't think I will qualify now, then we really are going to seriously struggle to live. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @MJ We will have the same experience possibly as regular job seekers.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    This is absolutely barbaric if this goes ahead anywhere close to what was announced then the suicide rate in this country will go through the roof and I'm NOT scaremongering either
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    "People with the most severe disabilities or with health conditions that will never improve will never be reassessed."

    Autism is lifelong and not going to improve, but autistics are the disabled group being targetted as fit for work. 

    Also if the WCA is scrapped and assessment is based on the PIP assessment, how does that affects the ones of us that only get ESA SG/UC LCWRA but don't claim PIP? Or has Labour not thought of that?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout "People with the most severe disabilities or with health conditions that will never improve will never be reassessed."
      The irony of Kendall saying this! Wiping out hope in one sentence for so many! And anyhow how will this be measured? Does she have a crystal ball? I cant imagine people with mental health issues ever qualifying …when did you ever hear a psychiatrist saying ‘ your condition will never improve’ ? As someone else mentioned … the result could well be in increase in suicide rates 😢
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout That is going to be heavily skewed towards severe physical disabilities.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Exactly, spot on! I rolled my eyes and was frustrated reading that bit! I just know with my gut that sentence somehow won't apply to us who are autistic, or anyone with an invisible disability. It never ever applies to us! and they wonder why autistic people are amongst the least employed and have amongst the worst of life expectancies? Imagine if wheelchair users were forced to use the stairs every time, that's how inaccessible many aspects of the world feel to many autistic people. 

      As for your question, they would probably lose either part or all of their benefit. Would be nice to have a government that would just do the right thing for once, rather than obsess over saving money regardless of the individual consequences all the time. I get changing the welfare system is hard, but they tried the tough stance before, it never worked. How about making it actually fair? Either way, we can never trust the DWP ever.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout I'm one of those on UC/LCWRA via an indefinite or recurring fit note what about those categories 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Yes they have - you (we) won't get anything more than basic UC if you don't qualify for PIP. It won't be until 2028 though it seems. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    This means many people losing part of their PIP award or all of it. My last assessment got me 14 points total in daily living meaning I was given an enhanced award. However none of the individual categories scored more than 3. Under the new proposed regime that will be my Daily Living award completely gone. So many other people will be caught by this needing 4 points on one single category thing.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Hugo Does any category in the PIP assessment actually have 4 points available? I thought 3 points were the maximum 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Hugo We will legislate for a change in PIP so people will need to score a minimum of 4 points in at least one activity to qualify for the daily living element of PIP from November 2026.
      So has to be 4 points to at least one category 
      Apparently does not affect mobility part full stop 

      That is currently on gov web site if it helps anyone here  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Hugo I am not sure but I have a feeling that if you score more than 12 points across the board then you will already be seen as in need of enhanced rate and this focus on 8 pints and one disciptor aimed at 4 points I think is aimed at standard rates.  I could be wrong but I cannot see how they could legally not give someone pip enhanced if they scored way over 12 points regardless of which disciptor they got points for .. I think this is to get a lot of people off standard rates however I think this is going to be legally challenged 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Hugo It will mean a lot more people will demand mandatory reconsiderations and to go to tribunals.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So, what now? I'm not going to bother describing how this will wreck my and my kids lives, but what practical steps can we take between now and implementation? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @Clay @Clay aye OK. Let's just break that down for someone like me with 14 conditions ..I've severe ibs. I throw up as well as the obvious,  I collapse on my floor due to the extreme pain, i black out, I can be there up to 9 hrs, I need someone to get me up, get me into a shower and hold me there while they clean me. Usually my sister. I'm exhausted,dehydrated and wiped out.
      My migraines cause aura where I cant see, I get double vision, black spots, zig zag lines before my eyes,one sided facial numbness and arm numbness, I smell things that aren't there and taste odd things. I need to lie in a totally black room for hours on end, if the headache itself goes my head feels like it's been used as a foot ball afterwards, and I'm drained. 
      My asthma attacks are the worst in thirty years ,I've had six since Saturday, it's only Tuesday.
      I won't go on but you get the idea. So no not even part time.
      My lifes taken up just trying to survive daily. Throw in all my other conditions too. And I'm not the worst off. There are others fighting the same if not worse daily. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Clay As an agoraphobic of 30 years with 11 rounds of cbt exposure therapy having failed, that option us not open to me noone is going to employ someone who can't turn up on most days and needs heavy meds to turn up at all,I've lost 3 jobs and I was better then then I am now,the menopause has made it x10 worse and I'm currently unable to even walk around rhe block,I'm on contribution based esa and pip,no descriptor at 4 points although engaging with others should have been at least 4,I feel that I'm going to lose everything, I can't claim uc as hubby cashed in a pension last year to get the damp done ( every room ground floor) but i was too ill and still am after a breakdown over THIS,ironic I know! but I feared destitution,gave myself a breakdown and now it looks like my fears are indeed real,I can't work money or no money!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Clay Some of us aren't able to take on any work. And there are many of us who should be on higher rates of PIP, but aren't because of dishonest assessors deliberately marking us down.

      Appealing isn't something some of us are well enough to do either.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @abysmalmusings I would complain to your MP about this- there still has to be a vote on these measures. MPs must be aware these they are cruel and would be expecting angry responses from their constituents.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @abysmalmusings Take on part time work, I guess, which is what they want us all to do (at the very least).  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @David On further examination I think the £775 increase is by 2030. So no surprise there!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Would B&W please come up with a template to help respond to the consultation with respect to ME/CFS and Long Covid, as having to score 4 points in one descriptor will particularly affect those with fluctuating conditions such as ME/CFS.

    It is already hard enough to qualify for PIP as it is now. This change would make it virtually impossible.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Does this mean those with severe disabilities wont be re-assessed for UC but will be re-assessed for PIP (using the light touch review) ?

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @coolday Is this from the new green paper regarding light touch reviews? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @tony horse It appears that your pip assessment results will be used to determine if you get lcwra for ESA. The problem is, they are going to make pip harder to get, so I'm guessing if you don't qualify for pipunder the new criteria, then you won't get lcwra for UC.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @tony horse Improving communication with people receiving an ongoing award in PIP who are likely to remain on disability benefits for life
      168. In the current system, people receive an ongoing award in PIP if the impact of their health condition or disability is not likely to change in the long-term, or if they have the highest level of award and the impact of their condition is only likely to get worse. Ongoing awards can be given at any award level in PIP.

      169. Most people with ongoing awards are not formally reassessed. Instead, they have a ‘light touch’ review every 10 years which aims to maintain a minimal level of contact with people to ensure their details are kept up to date and adjust awards if necessary.

      170. By providing PIP awards for an ongoing period, we remove the need for people whose conditions are unlikely to improve to undergo more regular award reviews. Yet we still hear that people with lifelong and progressive conditions are concerned they are being put through unnecessary repeated assessments.

      171. We are considering making changes to improve communication around receiving ongoing awards in PIP. These include improving the information we provide when we write to people about ongoing PIP award decisions, what support is offered to people receiving ongoing awards between ‘light touch’ reviews and reviewing the length of time between ‘light touch’ reviews.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Apparently contributory ESA and JSA will be merged into time-limited "Unemployment Insurance"? Isn't that effectively the end of National Insurance as we know it? which was an insurance policy that everyone paid in to and that protected you in the event that you could not work, whether that's for 6 months or for the rest of your life. This would be even more perverse than time limiting the state pension, since at least many younger pensioners can work!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Veri For new people claiming?? What does that mean for New Style ESA/ESA CB (legacy).
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Veri This is what I have been wondering about as well. I currently receive Old Style CB ESA with IR top up and I will be migrating over to UC next month. My Old Style ESA portion will be transferred over to New Style ESA. If the new Health Insurance benefit comes into force, will there be a time limit for existing claimants, or will they be exempt? Or will the CB part be scrapped and I just receive all relevant portions of UC instead? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Pathways to work, page 17, para 54 "(for new people claiming)" What does this mean for existing claimants of New Style ESA (Contribution based ESA Support Group)?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Stephen I don't know Stephen, maybe it's a new system for new claimants and a phasing out over time for existing claimants as they retire/recover? Also people with LCWRA who also get PIP were no longer having WCA as of the end of 2024. I wonder if this still stands. Reassessments for WCA are apparently restarting.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Hmmm, I wonder if there were some last minute u-turns, because this isn’t AS BAD as feared from the leaks. I’m in no way dismissing anyone who’s going to be worse of from this and genuinely feel terrible both for you and friends of mine who may be affected.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    If they want to change it so you have to score at least 4 points for an award, then they need to be scoring descriptors accurately!

    I have the highest award for daily living and mobility, yet I was scored as 'needs prompting' for preparing food. I have a physical health issues which doesn't magically get better, enabling me to cook a meal because someone prompted me to.

    As it stands, according to my last pip review, I would not qualify, which is crazy because I was mostly bed bound at the time.

    I didn't bother contesting it, because I hit the overall points needed, but now I fear they will get it wrong again, and take the award away. It's not like PIP assessors have a good reputation for accuracy is it?

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Leah "It's not like PIP assessors have a good reputation for accuracy is it?"

      Can we all just take them to court over this please.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I just watched Liz Kendall's statement, and I surprised and impressed. This is totally different to what I was expecting. It was genuinely fair and compassionate, and supportive, and sensitive to peoples anxieties. In fact, far from being an attack on us, I think these reforms are an overall net positive. I am really surprised. Liz Kendall really has compassion, empathy, and good intent. For me, Labour are redeemed today on welfare. These reforms are not coming from a place of hatred, as is so palpable from the Torys. The only thing I don't like in these reforms is scrapping the WCA in 2028, because this risks locking disabled and vulnerable people out of support if they fail to pass a more stingent PIP test. We should fight to keep the WCA. But overall these reforms are commendable. Congratulations to Liz Kendall and a warm thank you on behalf of all disabled people. We appreciate you! We voted for you!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Ernie My comment has been rescinded fully. I did not initially realize the full implications of these reforms. They are essentially withdrawing everything from everybody who does not score 4 points on a single PIP descriptor of an even stricter PIP test. This is absurd. Absolutely absurd. I am 100% opposed to this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Wow! and theres me congratulating you for fine sarcasm
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Wow! you have sarcasm finely honed there wow!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @Wow! Someone has got more down votes on a post than Bert! Wow!!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @Wow! My earlier comment was a mistaken initial reaction, sorry! I had not yet read all of the details or realized the full implications of these changes. Some of these reforms are very bad indeed. While clearly not nearly as destructive as Tory intentions, and delivered with more empathy by Liz Kendall than has ever been shown by Tories, nevertheless we must all collectively oppose these reforms because there are major and serious risks to vulnerable and disabled people from these proposals. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So, make the health component of UC dependent on getting PIP - while also making it much harder to get PIP than it already is. Thus ensuring most people won't get the health component of UC.

    I'd like to know if this applies to existing claimants or only to new claimants. If it's only new claimants I might just about survive. If they apply it to new claimants I'll lose all of the health component - I'm currently on ESA but presumably will be transferred to UC sooner rather than later - as I don't think I'd qualify for PIP now, let alone under harsher eligibility criteria. If that happens I won't have enough to even cover the bare essentials required to survive.

    And predictably enough, the Tories are already complaining that these changes aren't harsh enough, so we now know that it doesn't matter if Labour or the Tories are in power - we'll be under attack from our own gvernment either way.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @tintack
      I should have said "if they apply it to existing claimants I'll lose all of the health component".

      Come to think of it, will those of us who are still on ESA be considered new claimants of UC when we're transferred to that? Or do we count as existing claimants because we're already on a health-related benefit, i.e. ESA? If we'll be counted as new claimants then presumably we'd better pray that we're migrated to UC under the existing rules, before the horrific changes announced today are brought in.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    One key section in the now-published green paper is the possibility of bringing in transitional protection for current claimants who lose pip at their first post-November 2026 assessment.  Presumably the new pip eligibility criteria will apply to claims or reassessments that start the process after November 2026, rather than those already in the system.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @slb We know by now, any transitional protection, is only temporary smoke sceen.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Is the above for definite or is it up for consultation? Need a vote in the commons etc? Could it be changed in theords?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Arthritic Annie I think they need some kind of safety net for those about to lose out on PIP and those getting LCWRA and not PIP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Hannah15 My MP's reform's Richard Tice. How much on the side of benefits claimants do you think he is? It was his other half who called us parasites.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Arthritic Annie Much of it needs a vote, and Kendall acknowledged that.    Much of what was said were proposals and up for consultation, although, according to the green paper, not the change to PIP eligibility - but that will still be implemented through primary legislation, with a vote in the commons.  However, there is an important paragraph about the changes to PIP eligibility:

      "We are mindful of the impact this change could have on people and so want to consider how we can best support those affected. This includes options for transitional protection for those who are no longer eligible for PIP and the entitlements linked to their award. In addition, we also want to consider how to support those with lower needs in a large number of PIP activities, as part of these changes. We are consulting on whether those who lose entitlement need any support and what this support could look like." 

      The elements mentioned in that paragraph are part of the consultation.  But I read it as suggesting that there might be financial protection for those suddenly losing PIP.  And does the question of supporting those "with lower needs in a large number of PIP activities" mean that there might be a new tier of payment within PIP?  It opens that possibility, for sure.  It could be the autumn before we actually find out.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Arthritic Annie It's a Green Paper so it's not definite yet. We have to oppose it with everything we have and get our MPs on side. It's outrageous. Target the vulnerable and leave the filthy rich!! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I get UC & the LCWAWRA award. The only part I need to understand is, 'when, as an existing claimant, will I be reassessed?' I am signed off work due to moderate to severe CPTSD. I have read everything released by Liz Kendall today, I was clear on most of the points but not that one. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Cee They could reassess everyone between now and 2028.  I am not sure if they will have the capacity to do so.  They most certainly will do as many as they can.  With a view to remove as many people as possible from current groups.

      I am very worried.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @BH Hi BH, thanks for your message, yes I've already read that but it doesn't give a timescale of when the reassessments will happen. I've just decided that I have to just forget about it all and It'll simply be counter-productive to any recovery from my ptsd to also worry about a looming reassessment too. I'll just put all I can muster into the reassessment process as and when it's needed.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Cee In part 159 of the Green Paper there's a whole section under the heading: 'Switching back on WCA Reassessments'.
      I highly recommended reading that section, it'll answer your question.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Does no reassessment include those on indefinite fit notes?

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact