Current personal independence payment (PIP) claimants under state pension age would be subject to a much harsher assessment system under plans unveiled by Reform UK today.  In addition, some disabled claimants could face sanctions including indefinite loss of benefits, for failure to carry out duties such as “pothole and patching gang labouring”.

Under Reform UK’s plans, the current PIP assessment system and the work capability assessment (WCA) would be abolished.  They would be replaced by a new disability needs assessment (disability needs assessment) .

The assessment would decide three things:

Whether you are eligible  for the new PIP/Health Security Allowance (PIP/HSA).

Whether you are eligible for additional disability-related costs to be met through a Disability Support Account (DSA).

What work requirements you would face if you are a UC claimant.

The disability needs assessment would begin with “structured medical evidence” gathered by a GP, which Reform UK say would cover “diagnosis, severity, duration, prognosis, treatment history, expected recovery or deterioration, treatment burden, functional impact, mobility, supervision, safeguarding risk and evidenced additional costs.”

It is not clear what the rest of the disability needs assessment would consist of.

However, some conditions would automatically qualify for the highest level of support under the disability needs assessment, including “profound untreatable deafness, blindness, severe physical or intellectual disabilities, and terminal disease.”

Reform UK say that those expected to pass the assessment and be eligible for the new PIP/HSA payment would include:

“those suffering from terminal illness, severe permanent physical disability, profound learning disability, severe autism with high support needs, severe enduring mental illness, major neurological disease and serious brain injury. It would also include those who are highly dependent on support for daily living, have irreversible or highly unlikely-to-improve conditions, or otherwise suffer from serious, unstable or deteriorating conditions where prognosis, treatment burden or safeguarding risk justified continued cash support”.

Some claimants would be subject to enhanced scrutiny at assessment, including those living with ADHD, anxiety, and depression..  

Current working age PIP claimants with “mental health or trivial conditions” would be targeted for a disability needs assessment first and  brought into the new system over the next three years. No definition is given of trivial conditions.

After three years, other existing PIP claimants would begin to be reassessed using the disability needs assessment. Current claimants who pass the “severe, enduring or high-risk gateway” would keep the current cash value of their awards.  However, awards would not be uprated using the current system.  Instead a new measure will be introduced which will increase benefits by around 0.6 percentage points  less on average a year than the existing CPI. 

Reform also says the new HSA would be means-tested under standard UC rules, taking account of the claimant's earnings, their partner's earnings and their assets. It says this would “not affect existing grants until reassessment”.

New claimants with severe conditions would initially be entitled to a single flat-rate payment of £429.80 a month at 2026/27 rates, subject to the proposed means test, in addition to the standard elements of UC.

As well as their cash payment, HSA recipients would be considered for a Disability Support Account (DSA) to cover the verifiable additional costs of their disability.  However, existing claimants who retained the cash value of their current PIP/UC Health awards would not receive a DSA on top.

Not all claimants who get the HSA would also get the DSA and, conversely, some claimants would get the DSA without being eligible for the HSA.

In addition, whilst those who are eligible for the HSA would have “no ordinary work-search or work-preparation requirement”, people receiving the DSA could be given work requirements as a condition of receiving UC.  

The DSA would be administered by local authorities or mayors and would not necessarily be in cash.  It would cover things such as equipment, aids, adaptations, mobility support, transport, communication support, personal assistance, employment-related adjustments or other approved services.

It would not include unmodified motor vehicles, as currently provided by Motability.

Child DLA would be changed for new claims involving anxiety, ADHD and depression, so that they were treated in a similar way to working-age disability payments. Existing child DLA claimants would not be affected by this change, nor would claims involving other conditions.

Reform UK say they would “reinvest around one-fifth of the child DLA savings into treatment options directly targeted at these mild conditions.”

The two child benefit cap would be reinstated  by Reform.

Separately, fewer people receiving PIP or child DLA would mean fewer households were exempt from the overall benefit cap, potentially causing a further loss of benefits.

UC claimants in the Seeking Work conditionality group who had been continuously claiming for more than 12 months would be required to work 20 hours a week in placements assigned by local councils.  Tasks could include:

  • Fly-tipping clearance
  • Litter bin emptying
  • Household waste recycling centre (HWRC) assistant
  • Beach, riverbank and towpath cleaning
  • Pothole and patching gang labouring
  • Cleaning of council premises

“Failing to participate, absenteeism, poor performance, or on-the-job misconduct” in a work placement would result in immediate sanctions which could include “full non-time-limited revocation of benefits”.  Reform UK say that this is “a much harsher sanction” than in previous workfare schemes in this country or abroad.

A new sickness benefit, Return to Work Cover, would provide support for two years after Statutory Sick Pay ended. Most employers would have to insure against this cost, although larger employers could provide the cover themselves and DWP would provide it for the self-employed and employees of small firms. The payment would be equivalent to the lower UC LCWRA rate, except in certified severe cases when it would be paid at the HSA rate.

The changes would cover England, Wales and, Reform UK assumes, Northern Ireland.  In Scotland, disability benefits are devolved.  But if the Scottish government does not follow Westminster Health Security Allowances will be lower and disability support accounts would not be provided.

Foreign nationals would be prevented from claiming most welfare benefits.

Reform's costing assumes that just 47% of existing working-age PIP spending would be protected as cash entitlement, with the remainder allocated between DSA and no-cash groups. It estimates that 2.89 million unique PIP and UC Health claimants would be affected by reassessment under the new system.

For new child DLA claims involving ADHD, anxiety and depression, Reform's costings assume that only the most severe 10% of cases would continue to qualify. Because those children tend to receive higher awards, Reform calculates that around 22% of spending on the affected claims would remain.

It is notable that Reform UK have waited until after the Clacton byelection to unveil this attention-grabbing plan, which may suggest they fear it will not go down well with some of their core voters, although no doubt many will be delighted. 

For the rest of us, the possibility of a future in which disabled claimants could be required to fill in potholes or face losing their benefits indefinitely is one we will strive hard to prevent ever becoming a reality.

You can download a pdf copy of Making Welfare Work from the Reform UK website.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I think there are so many sides to this and it makes it very complicated, but I believe those most in need are going to be the ones that suffer the most as usual. 
    I know of people playing the system and they are part of the problem and absolutely need to be taken from the claim group and made to contribute. But then there are people who are genuine, they are struggling, and they are now in a situation where they are worried about loosing their pip and basically can't afford to live anymore. 
    Someone fit and healthy claiming stress and anxiety looses their pip, they are able to go out and get a job and earn what they've lost in benefits. 
    But what about the genuine person. Let's take an example. 
    Let's say someone who's in a relationship, both parties working and take home £500 a week each, but after 30/40 years of working and contributing one has to give up work due to illness/disability. Household income is immediately cut by £500. The partner is still working, so supporting both people and paying taxes, but earning too much to get any benefits. The person who had to give up work is entitled to pip. On the highest rate it's less than £200 a week but the couple now have additional costs for the person with health issues. Utility bills increase due to being at home all day, the cost of prescriptions, maybe help in the home, cost of adaptations and things to help the person live as close to a normal life as possible. But with Reforms plan this couple would loose pip based on it being means tested and the person  who's had to give up work in a situation that they spend their life in constant pain, distress etc because they can't afford medication, help at home, are unable to leave their home. Should a person who has lost their sight or hearing have to give up their assistance dog because they can't afford the costs of keeping them. If Reform push forward with this agenda they risk damaging the lives of the most vulnerable in society
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    "Reform wants people off benefits. But where are the jobs?"

    https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2026/08/17/reform-wants-people-off-benefits-but-where-are-the-jobs/#gsc.tab=0

    "Jenrick's argument has a gaping hole in it. He assumes that if people currently receiving benefits could be persuaded, encouraged or, most especially, compelled to look for work, employment would be available for them."

    "There are already substantially more officially unemployed people than there are jobs available, with the ONS saying there are 2.5 unemployed people for every vacancy in the UK at present, even before Jenrick potentially adds millions of people to the queue who are currently receiving sickness and disability benefits."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Faith They don't actually care. Homelessness and hospital admissions are a price worth paying. We are a net drain on the system after all to them. Seeing people on the streets would only affirm to reform that they are doing the right thing 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I agree with Stephen's post "I honestly think the likelihood of stuff like this happening is being downplayed far too much in the comments section".

    What Farage's Reform party announced yesterday is what Blair wanted to do but was stopped by his own cabinet and MPs before it even got to parliament. And has been the direction of travel ever since Blair including under the Tories and the current Labour government.

    Labour plans to refocus PIP on the most severely disabled and make PIP daily living the passport for UC LCWRA. While the think tanks Labour listens to are proposing the next step should then be to over time replace PIP cash benefits for many health conditions with support in kind.

    Reform plans to replace PIP with Health Security Allowance HSA focused on the most severely disabled and paying a cash benefit for pre-existing claimants equal to PIP + UC LCWRA. And for new claimants replace the PIP cash benefit with support in kind.

    For those deemed less disabled Labour plans to remove eligibility to PIP and ESA/UC LCWRA. So they get basic UC. And where needed wants to provide them with support in kind. And have them subject to conditionality with work coaches adjusting conditionality on the basis of health.

    Reform plans to abolish UC LCWRA and PIP. With those less deemed less disabled getting basic UC and being where needed provided with support in kind. And have them subject to conditionality with work coaches adjusting conditionality on the basis of health.

    The differences between Labour and Reform are:

    Reform has given a large figure for the number of pre-existing claimants it expects to not be eligible for the Health Security Allowance. While Labour has not yet said how many will lose PIP and UC LCWRA due to the Timms PIP review changes to the PIP assessment system and the plan to abolish the WCA. Labour's figure is expected to be lower and we can hope pre-existing claimants might be given some protection. But, the direction of travel is clear and we know from past experience eligibility is likely to narrowed again and again by future governments including Labour governments.

    Reform has announced the move from PIP cash benefits to support in kind as policy. While Labour state it is not Labour policy and not being considered. Meanwhile the think tanks Labour listens to propose it as the next step. And Labour's plan is already to in effect remove PIP and UC LCWRA and instead provide support in kind for those it deems less disabled. And slowly or not so slowly erode the cash premium for those it deems more disabled, by reducing UC LCWRA premium by a direct cut and freezing uprating for most new claimants and by uprating the premium by less than inflation for pre-existing claimants and those new claimants deemed the most severely disabled for life. While simultaneously increasing basic UC by more than inflation so narrowing the gap between unemployment and incapacity benefits. While Reform plan to increase unemployment benefit by £30 a week for those deemed capable of work and on benefits for more than 12 months, although they will be required to do 20 hours a week of work for their benefits. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Bob @Bob "what Blair wanted to do but was stopped by his own cabinet and MPs before it even got to parliament"

      Exactly. So it can be stopped again.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Bob Reform and Labour also have similar policies for new claimants.

      Labour's plan is a new contributions based time limited (6 months or 12 months) benefit that pays the same as UC LCWRA. After which claimants are assessed with only the severely disabled (on PIP daily living) then continuing to get benefits at UC LCWRA level and the less disabled seeing their benefits drop to the basic UC level.

      Reform plan is the same except their new benefit is for 2 years and paid by the claimant's employer. And instead of PIP it is Health Security Allowance that entitles the severely disabled to continue to get benefits at the UC LCWRA level.

      Both want employer's to be more involved in keeping in touch with and helping back to work those off work due to health.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Bob No offence bob, but all your comments are doom/gloom. I can't read them. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Even routine road repairs are hazardous work requiring proper training, not unskilled labor. Pothole repair involves heavy tools, hot asphalt, and chemicals requiring protective gear and safe lifting techniques. Workers face moving traffic risks and potential contact with underground cables during deeper repairs. Proposing this as "unskilled" work seems to overlook the very real safety risks.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I agree with everybody who has said it won't happen, As others have said Reform is slipping in polls fast, count binface got a large vote in Clacton.

    Then we look at the fact that the amount of pip claims in most (possibly) all seats is larger than the majority they got, so I think this announcement was their funeral.

    I would apparently still qualify from the criteria above, but that's not the point, we can't allow this dangerous & ridiculous type of "idea" to slide by just because it'll likely not happen, they need telling strongly what they can do with their plans and how it won't be accepted. If Labour or the tories get any smart arse ideas about taking any ideas from this, they can forget it too!

    criminals are treated better, they truly are. It's disgusting. This community is stronger than they'd like to think.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Wow, so they basically want to kill us off?  Forced labour for the vast majority of mental health claimants, unbelievable. 

    At this stage, any disabled person who votes for them is voting for their own demise. 

    It's funny how Reform want to stop immigration so that we can "look after our own", except that our own doesn't include disabled people, they're happy throw us to the wolves. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    People will also have pip carer allowance taken away because it's tyid to pip and forced to work with no one looking after there sick person NHS will go bust in no time
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    If you have an indefinite enhanced PIP mobility and daily living award are there likely to be affected; reassessments qualification etc etc ? I'm only 6 years from retirement age with severe lifelong mental health issues in using PTSD. Im stressed already about this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Tinkertytonk My diagnosis was changed from anxiety and depression to PTSD and autism this year after I had 30 sessions with an art therapist at the cmht. All it takes is for bipolar to come under depression and PTSD to come under anxiety (both technically true) and we don't have a leg to stand on. It's actually making me wonder why they don't use the CMHT as the benchmark, but then I remember how hard it was for me to be referred to a CMHT in the first place 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Out of touch Multi Millionaires, spouting cr*p about things they know nothing about. 
    They wouldn't know struggle and pain if it hit them in the face.
    Telling absolute lies that people get Pip and mobility cars for acne and food intolerance. 
    They should 100 % have to back up them claims. They are causing hate and division.
    It won't end well for them. 
    A lot of their voters in poorer areas will be on benefits. As well as those working low paid jobs.
    Let's see if when the time comes, they are going to go to the ballot box and vote to have their lifelines taken away. I doubt it.
    The sooner people see them for what they really are, the better.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crl76jkxel3o

    Article above from the BBC which I think is worth a read. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I don't want to scare people as I appreciate there are a lot of vulnerable people on here but I honestly think the likelihood of stuff like this happening is being downplayed far too much in the comments section.

    Reform UK are now a major UK political party and regardless of whether they get into power, what they're proposing will be taken very seriously by the main parties, especially Labour and the Tories. So we will probably see this influence their manifestos. 

    And it's not like the worst of this couldn't happen, just look at the USA where workfare and food stamps are very common and where inequality is much worse. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Stephen It comes down to exceptionalism ultimately. Nigel means those less deserving people should lose their benefits. It doesn't include me because Im one of the genuine ones. 

      Not my thoughts but definitely a reform voters mindset. Let them eat cake 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @James48 But we all use the NHS, even those who go private. Not everyone claims benefits so no, I don't think the NHS is next unless of course Reform do get a majority.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Stephen @Stephen Whilst I don't believe Reform will get to fully enact their plans, I agree there is cause for concern. The Reform agenda does have an influence - on other parties' policies, on the media and in society - which damages the interests of the vulnerable.

      We need to remain vigilant, challenge this onslaught where we can and not sleep walk into submission. Labour and Conservative have dismissed Reform publicly, but they could be tempted to adopt harsher measures on the basis of not being as bad as Reform.

      In addition, Reform have a chance of forming a coalition government, heaven forbid, in which they would impact policy.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Stephen @Stephen Then it will be the nhs next all sold off and will have to have health insurance to get treated at least with all this more people will start to see threw them and will loose even more votes 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Stephen People seem to forget, the government have already slashed the amount of benefit for new health element claimants in half. They are ALREADY carrying out their disgusting plans openly in plain sight.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Reform's momentum has gone to dust. Mark my words, many, if not most of, its current MPs will lose their current seats.

    They can even promise the earth and the whole galaxy, they're gone but will remain blabbering and moaning without any impact.
     
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Foreign nationals would be prevented from claiming most welfare benefits. Does this apply to full settlement status for people who have been in the country over 25 yrs.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Adriana Yes it would apply to those with settled status regardless of how long they have lived in the UK and regardless of how much UK tax and national insurance they have paid.

      If Reform become the government of the UK. Then the only benefits non British Nationals could receive would be war widows pension and contributions based state pension. The only exception would be for UK armed forces veterans.

      And Reform also plans to make it more difficult to get British citizenship.

      The next general election is expected to be 2029.
      If there was a general election tomorrow going by polling Reform would have a 2% chance of forming a majority government and a 37% chance of being part of a Coalition government. And a 61% chance of not being in government. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    The fact that over 9500 people voted for a bloke with a bin on his head rather than Farage tells you everything. I think Reform will just gradually self destruct infact Farage and Jenrick have as good as pressed the button already.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I don’t like reform but it’s clever what they are doing by putting all about what they would LIKE to do especially when they know labour times report should be out soon than they can say but labour don’t far enough with pip benefit. But labour will do it compassionately and fair we hope. Reform was for months shouting about the boats and that’s gone quiet  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    This has been Trialled before back in the Noughties companies like Ingeus sent the Unemployed on 6 month work placements for 35 hours a week and you only received your bus fares as extra compensation. I should know i was one of the Mugs.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I think it’s highly unlikely Reform will ever get in power so why is everyone so worried? Everything will be done to stop them and I believe they will eventually collapse because of their revolting policies .   
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    The only thing they missed out was that any benefit would also be taxable! But they’ll probably add this in later. 

    Regarding the requirements for actual work, who exactly is going to be vetting people to ensure they are not placed in sensitive areas I.e in close proximity to children or vulnerable people? What about data protection? Can’t have any Tom Dick or Harry just let loose with a hoover in data sensitive offices i.e Council premises. Who will be actually supervising these workers? How will it be fair? What extra workload will this place on existing managers and supervisors in addition to their existing staff? Wait till they (and their unions) kick off about more money?

    Reform are clueless. They are only interested in immigration and everything else is an ill thought out wish list.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    So…..A British worker that has paid taxes all their working life unfortunately has an accident and is not fit enough to go back to work and seeks help and benefit support to help then with there daily living.Then reform come into power…”Ckfu you”..we’re not helping you lot…”The poor,the sick and the disadvantaged” because our dear Nigel needs finances to help his hedge fund.
    Reform…..just a bunch of fake crooked bankers..🖕
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Sunglasses70 Well said 😄
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Sunglasses70 I think some unemployed disabled people should go round to Nigel's and trim that hedge fund. It's become a little overgrown.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    No need to worry. Reform will be taken apart over these unworkable, discriminating plans. There isn't going to be a General Election until 2029 anyway and by then, Farage, Jenrick and Tice will all be gone, and so will Reform. 
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.