A panicked Rachel Reeves has said she will give more details of Labour’s plans for benefits next week, well ahead of the Spring statement on 26 March.

As Labour struggles with the highest sustained government borrowing costs for decades, they are desperate to get the markets on their side by convincing them they have real plans for increasing growth and cutting spending.

So, Reeves  told the Sun on Sunday that next week she will “expose how the Conservatives lost complete control of the benefits bill – with a project overspend of more than £8 billion”

Reeves went on to say that “Sun on Sunday readers will agree, as a country we cannot keep footing the bill for the spiralling numbers of people out of work.”

She added that “This is an urgent problem. It can’t be ignored. We can’t walk around it, as the Tories did. We’ve got to grip it, once and for all. That’s why we’re setting out our detailed plans before Easter.”

Reeves will be making her statement on Wednesday.  It remains to be seen how much detail will actually be revealed, but we’ll publish a full account of any benefits-related content as soon as possible after Reeves’ speech.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Reevesbot5000 “bring back modern slavery”
    Social security is a human right. Can’t foot the bill for human rights then it’s not competent leadership. Have you thought about rent controls so people can actually live when in work? Maybe they won’t get so sick..
    What next, abolish the modern slavery act because it’s not financially justifiable?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    It’s just been in the news that business are set to cut jobs. I don’t see how businesses, already getting rid of staff they’ve already hired, are going to be willing to take the risk of hiring sick and disabled people. Or are we talking about modern slavery like when Jobcentres forced claimants to work in Poundland?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Guest This is the problem with getting disabled back to work - the amount it's actually going to cost.  How much will it cost to make sure every firm has disabled toilets, or grab rails around the offices?  How about transport?  Buses have one or two spaces reserved for wheelchairs and pushchairs to use.  If all these disabled people are going back to work, the transport system woudl need to change, too.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Guest Ironic Reeves went over to China.  Slave labour ring any bells ?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    punching down on the sick and disabled. nice. even worse than the tories!. anyone who fell for labours lies and voted labour hoping for change well as you can see this lot are even worse. very very bad politics, starmer and the whole cabinet completely clueless, they have gone after everyone from the pensioners to farmers and even though the public have in general disagreed with all these tax hikes and cuts etc they have implemented so far it all falls on deaf ears. starmer reeves etc dont actually care, they are like robots and should not be politicians. disgraceful
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @sausage belly They are probably being paid off by the rich - David Cameron earned £10 million in his first year after he stopped being PM.  Compare that to the £150k salary they get, and it's clear where their allegiances lie. 

      Rishi Sunak's father in law is one of the richest people in the world, so his salary is literally pocket change to him. 

      I'll bet my savings that Starmer will get a highly paid job after leaving office.  Our politicians are owned by the institutions these days, which is why they won't tax them fairly, and always go after the sick and disabled.  It's disgusting, we need real change. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    My conscious is clear I voted for the green party. This current Labour government are just if not more cruel than the previous tory governments. People was warned about them 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Adama I tried telling people, but their reply was "green won't get in".  It was clear that Starmer was bought and paid for, and I originally feared they'd be Tory light, but it now seems that they're every bit as bad. 

      If enough people voted for Green they'd get in, I really don't see how people don't get that. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Adama me too. after my local labour authority cut disability council tax support from 100% to 50% last year  making me nearly a grand a year worse off i knew what this lot would be like and voted green
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    really worries for those over working age and  its ramifications
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @MrFibro I think they might be coming after Pension Credit.

      Got a DWP letter early Dec, Headed About Your Pension Credit, saying 'we need to make sure you're getting the right amount of PC'. The current amount of PC is based on what you told us when you applied' (3 yrs ago)-'we now need to check this information to keep our records up to date.'
      So, what they want is details of savings and investments, housing costs, personal or work related pensions, and any other income. And will contact by phone or letter. Only signed 'Office Manager' 

      Since anyone is obligated to report a change of circumstances, and faces fraud accusations and loss of benefit, this all sounds very hollow and sketchy. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @pusscatsmum What worries me is, will they hack away at the state pension, and or will they start clobbering pension credits.

      After that I cannot see what else labour can penny pinch on.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I don't watch the tv and stuff but I just heard that everyone is going to be forced to have digital ID via their mobiles, advertised deceptively by mentioning driving licences, and a few other gov things... then an extremely pointed attack on disabled ppl something about taking licences away?

    there are so so so many things wrong with this. MObiles are not in any way secure devices, they can be cloned, infected etc. and they are easily and increasingly stolen.
    then on top of that what most ppl do not realise e.g you are driving or someplace a police officer asks for your id. you are going to have to pass your device over to them... do you realise you have now consented for them to search your device? it's true, they could even cloane it, or basically do what they want with it....

    THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.... it can't be allowed and this war against us by succesive govermnets must end... I wouldn't mid if I could work, I hate not wworking.. but I am not well and deffenatly not safe to work with as sadly far too many of us are... the last thing the worst thing is being made to feel like a criminal all the time
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    You can't just make sick people magically well enough to work again! What is it about our environment - toxic culture at work, air pollution - that is making people ill? Because believe me almost nobody would settle for a life on benefits (with all the sneering you have to put up with starting with DWP staff) and constantly worrying about your bills unless they had to.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Ok so if the overspend is 8 billion, how come there are reports of more billions unclaimed that people are entitled to? What is going on?! 
    I agree, we all suffer through Covid and then they expect us, as a nation, to be fighting fit. No care given whatsoever. No thought to how anxiety and depression can immobilise you mentally and physically. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I laughed at the bit that says "we can't walk around it" but she wants to send those of us who can't even walk at all out to a workplace that isn't accessible😡
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @GailMarie Majority of the UK is unfit for disabled people  in a workplace period.

      Labour is just penny pinching, their bending the knee to the rich, elite & the corrupt people of our society.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Tax the billionaires!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Michael Nonsense, you clearly don't understand how it works. 

      Amazon paid £18 million in tax the other year, after doing over £27 billion in business in the UK.  That's NOT their fair share. 

      The arguement is that they invest in infrastructure and jobs, but arguably they would have had to do that anyway. 

      Then there's American companies like Uber, Just Eat, Deliveroo, AirBNB etc that are acting as middlemen and taking over every facet of our lives.  Hotels, BnBs, food deliveries, taxis, the list goes on.  The workers get paid a pittance, and these companies essentially get paid for doing nothing.  They take a cut when you have a pizza delivered from a local business to your house, it's nuts. 

      We only need to look around the average high street to see the results - boarded up shops everywhere.  The small business owner can't compete these days, and it's only going to get worse. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @Michael Michael-Rubbish no government has effectively taxed the rich!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CarolK Agreed, but that wont happen. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CarolK They have. And so have business' They left and now the economy tanks because with it, they retake investment and jobs, which is where taxes come from, which pays your disability.

      You're basically requesting for your money to be reduced.

      Nice one.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CarolK You can't tax the rich, that's communism (apparently)! How will Tarquin and Jocasta afford their fourth Mediterranean cruise of the year if they have to pay slightly more? We just can't put up with that sort of grinding poverty.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    I have written 3 times on here recently , very recently , denied sindication . Not one bit controversial. Terrible denied by your own !!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    They really are competing for the "nasty party" label, I don't know why they don't go the whole hog and do a full-on Trump. And following reports that she'd listened to non-doms and decided she was a bit harsh so was reining back the plans to make them actually pay some tax, the blow was even harder. 

    Starmer reckons he wants to be PM for 10 years. I can't think of a single group he has made angry! But worse, people are fed up with the major parties and moving towards the slick promises of Reform, which really would be disastrous for anyone ill or disabled.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Jane Reform are the Tories from the 1980s, the likes of Farage came from the Thatcherite wing, these people do not like any benefits claimants of any variety.

      I agree with Mr Fibro, both the Tories and Labour are just 50 shades of Blair, by the way Thatcher called Blair her "greatest achievement".
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Rik The Blair years continue even to this day.  But I can't say on here, as they kill my posts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Jane I think they are in league with each other.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Jane Labour have always been the worse of two evils. Seems many don't remember the Blair years!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Reeves is the architect of her own. Making by claiming there was a black hole and causing borrowings to cost more she has set of a downward spiral by her own negativity over the economy and hamstringing her opinions to raise taxes when needed
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @James You're absolutely right.
      They immediately blew confidence with their doom and gloom.
      Incompetence beyond belief
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Rachel Reeves no doubt by Christmas she'll be doing I'm a celebrity get me out of here!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Cutting benefits stops money going back into the economy. Needless to say I am absolutely terrified with being ill physically and mentally plus a vulnerable person. Think is beyond bullying 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Reeves has done it again where she has fiscally boxed her self in again!

    Lord almighty! Why did Starmer hire her! She's really bad 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    I should add that it's Labour and the Tories who need a Work Capability Assessment, both of them are clearly not competent to govern. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    I'm 52 and worked for the majority of my life up until 2020 when due to a health condition in relation to my eyesight was put on Lcwra. What I want to know is were are suddenly all these jobs for and employers for people with disabilities, health and mental health conditions and how do they expect people to suddenly cope with work who have these conditions to deal with. A full time job is 40 hours a week and with travel that could be 50 hours a week and a job can be any of the 24 hours in a day and any of the seven days in the week and if you have a disability, health and/or mental health conditions that's no picnic.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @axab43 One of the reasons I mention self-employment is that, as has been stated, there are not enough suitable employed positions available, those that are often physically demanding (eg, social care in nursing home where you have to be adept at using a hoist).  Also, the Govt will point out that disabled people will be able to work from home.  It's not so much the Govt wants to cut the benefit bill....they want to increase the tax take. Non-dome, I'm afraid, have the ability and resources to emigrate, and according to the Times, they are, hence Reeves' softening of her initial policy.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Matt thank you.  I don't always see all the posts as I sometimes avoid checking on here every day due to potential anxiety triggering.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Matt Have you read this before?  I actually might be able to do self employment, in a year or two as I am too mentally ill even for that now.  THey will have to provide help though and not put stringent restrictions on how many hours a week and sanctions if that number is not reached.   Help to become self employed would be a good option.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CJA I have said on previous posts, the aim will be self-employment 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    From a post I saw on another forum =

    "Rachel Reeves Fast-Tracks Benefits Crackdown and Calls Time on Jobless Britain."

    Firstly, she isn't fast-tracking anything. It was already announced last year that a Green Paper on this issue would be launched in the spring, so absolutely nothing has changed. We’re not being told anything we didn’t already know, and certainly nothing is being “fast-tracked.” This seems to be part of Labour’s briefing strategy: releasing a couple of articles each week from a minister claiming how much they’ll cut sickness and disability expenses. No concrete plans exist yet, but it creates the impression that something is being done, regardless of the distress it causes to large numbers of people. In reality, it all just seems like a load of hot air from Labour, designed to make them look like they’re tackling the issue seriously and to be seen to be doing something, when in fact very little is actually changing.

    The Green Paper will run for at least 12 weeks, followed by several weeks or months for the government to respond to the consultation. After this, the government typically takes its time to draft and publish a White Paper, which presents detailed policy proposals based on the feedback. The White Paper may then undergo further consultation, followed by any necessary revisions. Once finalised, the government will introduce the formal draft legislation. Afterward, the bill will go through the first and second readings, committee stage, report stage, and third reading in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Any amendments will be considered before the bill receives royal assent and moves to implementation—none of which will happen by Easter.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Matt Thank you.  I get my state pension in four and a half years so hopefully, I will escape some of it.   Not sure how much more I can take, or we can all take come to that.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @axab43 I may have an idea: universal credit was initially introduced in April 2013. Labour did promise to scrap it but that was dropped. We are nearing the end from heritage benefits to UC. So about twelve years. Assuming they decide to reassess all PIP claimants and move them to a new, more stringent DLA like benefit, it could take two Parliament's to complete.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @JJ Indeed, it's all about the optics, all about perception.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @JJ Can you tell how long all that will be likely to go through to implementation?  I've asked such things before on here but it seems to be a lot to happen before anything goes to implementation.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    A panicked chancellor who’s go to is to target societies most vulnerable for funds has zero business & is not fit to be chancellor 

    (Similar train of thought for both starmer and Kendall)

    Internal Labour coup can’t come soon enough

    Disabled community need to make clear that any Labour mp that supports this madness from their leader and ministers will lose the disabled vote and risk their seat next GE (see if individual labour mp job survival instincts kick in)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @tintack They're the TONY B team
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @D
      "Internal Labour coup can’t come soon enough"

      Unfortunately the soulless cabal now in charge of the party have managed to kick out a lot of the left and have stitched things up so that only someone from their own faction has a chance of winning the leadership. Even if Reeves and Starmer were toppled their replacements would be no different. Apart from the minority of left-wingers still hanging on by their fingertips these people are not Labour. They're the Tory B team.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.