Claimants who had a face-to-face personal independence payment (PIP) assessment last year were almost a quarter less likely to get an award than claimants who had a telephone or video assessment, figures released by the DWP have revealed.

The statistics were given in a written parliamentary answer by DWP disability minister Stephen Timms.

They show that over the last three years the gap between face-to-face assessments and telephone/video assessment success rates has been growing, rising from 11% in 2022 to 13% in 2024.  The full figures are:

  • 2022  Face-to-face: 42% Telephone, video: 53%
  • 2023  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 56%
  • 2024  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 57%

The difference in success rates does not appear to be explained by, for example, by the DWP inviting people who have less severe conditions face-to-face assessments, because allocation to assessment types appears to be largely random.

According to Timms, where claimants need a specific type of assessment, such as a telephone assessment because of difficulties with travelling, then they will be allocated that.

But all other claimants will get the next available appointment, regardless of whether that is face-to-face, telephone or video. 

Part of the difference in success rates may be the opportunity to for assessors to undermine claims with baseless “informal observations” at a face-to-face assessment, such as:

“Is tanned.  Suggests good health.

Overweight.  Suggests good appetite.

Smartly dressed.  Suggests good drive.”

In November 2024, the latest statistics we have for assessment types:

77% of assessments were remote, either telephone or video, but overwhelmingly these were telephone

18% were paper

4% were face-to-face

1% were unspecified

So the chances of having a face to face assessment have been small since the pandemic. 

However, Timms has also revealed that the proportion of face-to-face assessments is set to rise from Autumn of this year, so the risk will increase in the coming months.

As a method of reducing the number of successful claims and cutting the cost of PIP, switching to more face-to-face assessments appears to be an effective strategy.  It also requires no legislation whatsoever.

But claimants can ask to have  their assessment type changed, for example because travelling to an assessment centre for a face-to-face assessment would be painful or distressing.

The right to a review of the type of assessment you are allocated and the right to a further review are explained at pages 105-107 of our member’s Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews, along with sample written requests for a change of assessment type.

We have also updated the section of the guide headed “What kind of assessment will you have?”  at page 103, to inform readers about the different success rates for different types of assessment.

Members can download the current Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews here.

You can read the full parliamentary question and answer here.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    An assessor once wrote I looked well nourished because I was over weight to look at.  

    The truth was I have fybromyalgia so exercise was limited and I also have an eating disorder so I only ate chocolate and sweet things.  

    My gp had written in my notes after blood tests that I was malnourished and needed extra vitamin type pulls for 3 ro 6 months with a review and possible further intervention.  

    Once I sent that printout to dwp my points increased 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Jaxjax I had an assessor say I looked well and nourished when applying for PIP a few years ago. I was underweight at the time, had been diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, and was actively participating in treatment and weight restoration at the Eating Disorder clinic - having to have blood tests every week as I was on the cusp of being inpatient in terms of physical health. I was also having to wear an adult nappy due to the eating disorder wrecking my digestive system(meaning I had 0 control over my bowels if I ate or drank anything at that point). It was a home assessment as I could barely do anything.

      I scored 0 points on that assessment. The assessors talk absolute rubbish.

      I didn't understand enough, or have enough strength, to fight the decision back then. I was only able to get PIP recently when I had my healthy, non-disabled partner to do the form (and ask for the MR) on my behalf. I did get it at MR stage, just because we had overwhelming medical evidence that the first assessor completely ignored and my partner was not shy about pointing this out... 

      People with health issues do not have the energy, time, or strength to be dealing with this crap. You're screwed unless you have someone to help you who either knows what to include, or like my partner is willing to read up on it to understand what to say on your behalf.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Jaxjax @Jaxjax, So you aren't permitted to eat? To sustain yourself. Don't they realise medication as well as some diseases cause weight gain.
      If you'd gone in like a thin shadow they'd just have ignored that fact too so you can't really win when theirs an aagenda.of my three so far pip since being forced over from indefinite dla read like a cut and paste nonsensical raving lie filled fairy story. I was a man,then a woman, I was 35, no... I was 50 at the time! 
      Things i wore that i didn't, things I done which I didn't. 
      I kept looking at the front of the report at my name incase I'd got the wrong report or another. 
      I'd love to know what the tribunal thought of the first two reports. 
      The third time I got 4 points I did my own MR and got pip reinstated for four years. Review due next year. Or possibly later this yr.i can barely wait for hell to be unleashed again. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Jaxjax @jaxjax, a radiologist asked me when I was in for a scan after a hip fracture whether I was sure I had osteoporosis, as if I had self diagnosed and requested a scan myself! I said a scan after a previous fracture had indicated I did and she said, oh, you don't look the type. And that's not even a dwp assessor, but a specialist clinician. What can we do when the prejudice is everywhere?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    OK. I just looked at the Peston programme from last night. There were some "leaked figures" on there, and I'm going to try to explain them as best as I can.

    According to the programme, the £810 that we receive for LCWRA UC would go down to either £737 or £664. That's a potential loss of either £73 or £143 a month, depending on which amoutn they go for. Nobody wants to lose £143 a month, of course, but that appears to be the worst case figure. However, it WOULD also mean that there would be a modest increase for those on LCW and basic rate - either £32 or £63 a month.

    NB: Peston talked of 25% and 50% "redistribution." This is not the same as 25% and 50% cuts. For those interested in percentage cuts, they would be 9% of the total of £810 for being in LCWRA or 17%.

    As for PIP, the show suggested that it wouldn't increase with inflation this year, and they would bring in a new set of descriptors with the aim to remove 620,000 people from PIP - out of a current total of 5 million - by the end of the parliament. That's a reduction of 12% of claimants.

    HOWEVER, (and this is my own view, not facts from Peston) the chances of them applying the UC cut to people already on the benefit would be slim. Much of this is to do with the transition protection from ESA to UC. They sold that migration as us not losing any money when we transferred - it is in writing that we will get the same as we got on ESA. If they change that by cutting our UC benefit, someone is bound to take them to court, and there's little doubt that they would win, as they would be breaking the "deal" that we had when we migrated.

    I realise not everyone is (or has been) involved in migration, but I think it's easy to see how difficult it would be to work the new amounts for those already on UC. Headlines in the newspapers of  disabled claimants suddently being stripped of up to £1700 a year would not be pretty. What's more, we can look at the past to see what might happen in the future. In 2017, £160 was taken away from those in the LCW group. BUT if you were already in that group when the change happened, you continued to get that money (and still do). It only applied to new claimants.

    What they could do in a worst case scenario, I guess, is not give those currently on UC any yearly increases until they hit the revised amount (similar to the transition payment), but that's going to be one hell of a lot of admin.

    The Peston show maintains that the figures they gave last night are correct - but nothing has been announced officially. Yes, these figures were leaked, but even the show admitted that they don't know whether LCWRA UC will be cut by £73 or £143 a month. And often political leaks occur in order to gauge what the reaction is from the public and the press before making final decisions. But it's probably fair to suggest that this is a worst case scenario.

    Feel free to correct me on any of the above if I've misinterpreted what was said on the programme.  I hope the above is useful.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @slb Where are the links please because I can't find anything saying that,I'm worried the phrase being banded about re eligibility could be what I've read that means testing is on the table,we will have to wait and see but if they did it I personally would lose most of my income
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Corvus No.  It's simple, straightforward honesty.  You can wrap up my comments how you want and turn it into political point scoring and some bizarre conspiracy theory if that's your thing.   I can't believe you're actually upset that someone says the system is screwed because they get more money than they actually need and others get far too little.  Next you'll be angry at a rich person saying they can actually afford to pay more tax.  

      But I will say it again: if me taking a hundred pounds hit a month meant that money was given to someone struggling to feed their kids, then I would willingly do it. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon Various legit sources have stated categorically that means testing pip is not going to happen.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @SLB They actually do,i just wish I'd remembered which platform I read it on,itv news said that and I quote" rishi sunak was thinking of means testing pip but was advised strongly not to do so,even he didn't do what starmer is prepared to do" that was said and ,when they say " eligibility will change" well eligibility for winter fuel payments changed by means testing it,I am 100% convinced that this WAS their plan,because how else are you saving 5 billion a year and quickly,how can they put a number on it as to say over 800,000 will be affected? How would they know now if it was to be just tightening criteria? that takes too long to reign the cash back in,now I think they gave a problem, many mps can't agree to it and they've halted their big announcement,I think it will be abandoned and they're now trying to come up with something else,for me,the writing was on the wall and I'm convinced they would have tried to present this solution,well I doubt it now because everyone would be up in arms,from disabled to charities and carers who's allowances would be put at risk,not to mention motability schemes
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @slb True
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Many of you will notice how the DWP and the current labour government have been throwing out graphs and predictions of the increase in cost of PIP year on year all the way to 2029. You see only one set of figures however, what you do not see is the year on year increase in tax revenues nor the increase in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on it which would show as a percentage of these the forecasts are in keeping with the growth in revenues and the growth in GDP. This method of costing year on year without taking into account inflation, devaluation of money, and increase in government income through revenues and increase in GDP mislead one into thinking the only thing rising is the cost of welfare and PIP. The government is producing propaganda by slanting facts and misleading people into disregarding other important financial factors. I saw a BBC article today doing exactly the same and yet there are no journalists questioning these basic economic variables worth their salt!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Off topic, but does anyone know how long the saving limits have been £6,000 and £16,000? I came across a post on another forum dating back to 2008 mentioning these amounts - which is helluva time.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Jaxjax You can coz that's what I did when the lady in their call centre told me so after I mentioned i was having trouble budgeting properly on the monthly version of the payment 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Scorpion So with average inflation the figure should be nearly three times that.  Crazy that they have kept it at 6k for 35 years. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @WorkshyLayabout April 2006 saw the lower capital limit rise from £3K to £6K. It's quite unfair that almost 19 years later this hasn't been increased, while just about everything else has gone up by a huge amount. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @WorkshyLayabout The savings limits of £6,000 and £16,000 for means-tested benefits, which determine eligibility and payment amounts, have been in place since 1990 and haven't changed since then. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @WorkshyLayabout
      According to  r/BenefitsAdviceUK on Reddit

      Capital Limits were introduced in 1988, 6k was the max. 3k was the lower limit which is today's money is £8,186.77 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Just like tom from Scotland I have Autism and I have epilepsy and cerebral palsy in my lower back.  so I can’t work . I get pip feel it will be bad for all disabled people let’s be honest liz kendell doesn’t come across as someone who likes disabled people. Everyone try to have a nice week 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @rookie Never would have guessed 😂 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Tomf @Tomf -  'liz kendell doesn’t come across as someone who likes disabled people'

      Ha, ha, you think?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Glad to see there's been at least some kickback against the cuts in the media.

    Btw, just to remind everyone that despite misinformation being spread by the government and media spending on social security is actually less today in terms of share of GDP than it was 10 years ago. Also the forecasted raise in PIP spending by the DWP/OBR is highly dubious as it seems to assume continuation of covid pandemic level rises despite that being essentially a one off event.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Ernie
      Bert and Ernie: Why am I getting Sesame Street vibes? ;)

      Many northern European countries have higher taxation than the UK but lower or equivalent unemployment/economic inactivity rates. Incidentally the way the UK measures unemployment was altered by Thatcher back in the 80s to 'massage' the figures downwards so if anything current UK figures are still even more falsely flattered by European comparisons.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @bert Increases in tax and n.i. means more people being made redundant and having to claim benefits. High taxes means high unemployment means higher welfare bill.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @bert
      Which specific government forecasts are you referring to? Seems you're including pensions and housing benefit here which take up the vast majority of total benefit spending. Actual specific working age UK social security spending (which includes unemployment benefit along with sickness & disability) is just 5% of GDP! This is noticeably lower than many comparable OECD nations. The UK is not spending "too much" on sickness and disability.

      And as I've said above there are significant problems re those gov forecasts on benefit spending anyway.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Gawayn I observed this over 10 years ago that as a percentage of GDP welfare spending has been falling and the same with as a percent of the tax revenues. There is also the surplus from NI taxes and Personal Taxes which is used to generate bonds and to add insult to injury the 1-2% earned in interest from those bonds are then used to off set the so called debt burden, a burden that is artificially created by setting taxes too low and hence the need to borrow and pay the banks that interest. There is something really rotten going on in the Kingdoms of Britain!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Gawayn Isnt the benefit bill long term expected to account for one in every four pounds the government raises in taxs.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    If you have a physical disability that affects your mobility or similar, just by you attending a f2f assessment you have failed in their eyes, I failed both f2f home visit when they did them, and phone, 
    the 1st time I had to got too tribunal to get an award , and the current claim I was made an offer b4 tribunal
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    If this doesn't only apply to new claimants then I am in real trouble. I've been this way for just over 30 yrs, people can't be expected to suddenly be ok especially after a period of time as long as that 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I hope it's new claimants only or I won't be able to afford new batteries for my mobility scooter and I'll be stuck in my flat as a result 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @axab43 Yes sorry axab43 should of explained better I read that people unfit for work Will lose money but raise basic rate for people looking for work and regards to Pip I've just been reasessed and being given same rate for 3 years again but I read this could change with all the Pip getting re vamped so it's confusing what is going on but sounds like certain people are going to lose quite a bit of money a year it's Got me right down on what the hecs going on I'm an amputee with serious rheumatoid arthritis and had 2 strokes im Sick of it all it's getting desperate now 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Charger 7 There is no indication this will apply to new claimants yet.  And your sentence does not make sense as those already receiving PIP will not be affected by what you quoted, which is taking money off those who can't work and giving it to those who can (Universal Credit.)  It has been said PIP will be revamped but historically, this has only been for new claimants and existing claimants only when their claim comes up for renewal. We will have to wait and see, there is a thread about this above
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Neil Cook It's everybody Neil new and old claimants it's says people who are already receiving Pip could be affected by taking money off people who can't work but giving extra who work or look for work and that Pip will be revamped 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    is it definitely next Wednesday when Reeves will announce the cuts?  I'm free and would like to watch BBC Parliament.  I do think we, as a disabled group, need to come up with practical solutions the issue of employment because whoever is in power are only interested in tax receipts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Matt No, it’ll be on the 26th March when she does the spring statement. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The most severe changes Labour wants to enact are going to court, surely "Mr Human Rights Lawyer" Keir Starmer has figured that out? It would be a terrible look for the former head of the CPS to have his plans to brutally cut benefits seen as unlawful. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    It is worth reminding everyone that the Tories cut £156 a month from those in the LCW group of UC back in 2017.  BUT if you were put in that group BEFORE 2017, you STILL get that £156 a month now, in 2025.  

    Using that as a precedent, any new cuts to the amount of PIP or UC would likely only apply to NEW applicants rather than current claimants.  Alternatively, they could work it in a similar way to transitional payments from ESA to UC.  It is highly unlikely that current claimants are going to have cuts of hundreds or thousands each year.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @slb I'm £116 a month better off on Universal Credit.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Steve Correct. It may not effect us initially, but come reassessment, the new deductions (if there is any) WILL apply. And, thet are ramping up UC health assessments ti get it back to pre covid levels, so we will ALL see reductions withing the next couple if years, even if not immediately.

      All reassessments, whether ESA, UC or PIP are treat as new claims upon reassessment, which means new payment levels after review. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Steve Errr...how exactly do you suggest we reject plans?  It's not like we can go on strike, is it?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Steve  People on LCW are still getting the £150 that was ditched in 2017.  So clearly if you stay in the same group after reassessment, you don't lose the money.  Likewise, those moving from ESA to UC are keeping their current rates, and will do if they are reassessed and stay in the same group.   The PIP reassessment form isn't the same as the initial form, it concentrates on changes to the condition, and doesn't start from scratch.  But it's unlikely PIP will be cut anyway, beyond freezing the amount going forward.  Also proposed changes to the WCA were not going to apply to current claimants going reassessed for some years.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @slb PIP is fixed term benefit for the most of claimants and before it ends, DWP sends a renewal and treats it as a new claim and I think the same rules apply to Universal Credit.
      So existed claimants are going to face the same fate as new claimants.
      All we need to do is to be united against these cuts rejecting any plans that damages disabled lives.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    If they are wanting people with long term mental health issues to get off benefits and get a job they are doing it wrong, all this talk has made me so much worse and even further away from ever being able to do as much as volunteer
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Sam Yes,I agree, this ,going on so long now almost a year has ended up in me having yet another nervous breakdown, I was so bad sep to Jan that I couldn't swallow solid food and ended up on ensure complete nourishing drinks,I also for the 1st time in my life developed a fear of the dark nights,had massive anxiety in bed all night and had no appetite ,couldn't go out,couldn't stay in alone, what do they think there doing at all,its pushing me even further away from work than I was in February 2024!! Absolute stupidly if you think frightening people with mh problems with poverty and destitution will suddenly rid them of their " bad nerves" and they'll be skipping back to work is an idiotic approach, it's more likely that they will develop further problems because they can't heal their nervous system at all because its constantly stuck in fight or flight,the result is worsening of the nervous system, anxiety and panic attacks,insomnia, then along comes depression and in some cases agoraphobia will develop as well because of it,mh is no joke and it severely limits your work AND home life
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Gazilla I so feel for you.  Please go and read the link I put up on Ian DUncan Smith's take on this, in this thread. As someone who has tried getting benefit reforms through parliament, he is very skeptical this will work and thinks it will take a long time before it does. Even if it does, you may well still qualify to be on benefits anyway. Avoid media headlines, on the news or in the papers, as they can't guarantee what will happen and are just fearmongering.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Jaxjax I may be ok with working from home as my skills would lend themselves to that (ie work mostly based around computer literacy/editing skills.) For the many whose whole careers have been in construction or retail, to expect them to work from home would be totally unrealistic.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @axab43 Spot on ! These lot will have blood on their hands if they force mentally ill people into jobs and an environment they can't handle. I was raped , contracted HIV and I self harm and have bulimia,  I have bad days and VERY bad days,  I'd be a liability for a potential employer 
      I just hope and pray that Labour realise this is cruel and unsustainable 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Sam Same as me Sam, I self harm and have bulimia and all this worry has made me cut and burn myself more ! The stress and fear we are all facing - I wouldn't wish it on anyone 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I am disabled and I have autism spectrum and am half fortunate is that I am in Scotland and so might only slightly be affected by these cruel cuts being proposed by the UK Government . I feel for those that live in England an my moral conscience that I cannot sleep at night as my concern has always been  to think for those less fortunate than myself. I wish I could work but I cant due to my disabilities and I feel ashamed that I cannot do anymore to stand up for those disabled financially worse off than myself. My heart goes out to every disabled person that might be impacted by these cuts. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Tom I think it is likely that the Scottish government will reduce ADP by a comparable amount as they will receive a reduced block grant from the UK government to cover welfare payments. I live in Scotland and expect to be impacted to the same degree as the rest of the UK. ESA and UC are not devolved. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Tom Some will consider moving to Scotland especially thoses who are living in the North.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I imagine so John 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Well it's seems pretty obvious to me that Starmer, Reeves and Kendall are effectively throwing benefit claiments under a bus. I can't actually believe what I'm hearing and reading about these benefit cuts. Why not go after the billionaire and millionaires instead of taking money off people like us who are getting barely enough money to live on in the first place.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Matt Maybe it's time to limit how much money can be taken out of the country like many other countries have laws against doing so.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @CJA They are doing this because they have no ideas as to how to make the economy grow, invest, or do all the normal things a government does to achieve economic growth. Instead they have managed to contract the economy and reduced government revenue because of their own self inflicted tax freeze and so have little room except to attack money spent on the welfare of the disabled and sick. They took about unsustainable but seem to forget rather conveniently that this increase in the baby boomers population will actually start coming down once the boomers have died off. The spin words to us thinking we are not educated or bright enough to understand things. They try to split the working classes into segments so that they can attack our disabled and sick children, grandparents, and family making them into a scape goat. They are also putting in place things that will affect every single now working man and woman when they fall sick and disabled as they will being after all humans. This is the most disgusting and low attack on the people of the country while pandering to the rich and privileged to become even more richer. If this is not corruption and lack of genuine good government then I don't know what is!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @CJA Because, unfortunately, billionaires can move their money out of the country at the touch of a button and take it to a tax haven, eg Panama. And if you have money, you have power.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
     Very good article well worth a read, posted today titled “labour is becoming the enemy of the vulnerable “ on funding the future
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Peston last night leaked what they're thinking, 25% cut or 50% cut to those on uc lcwra didn't give details on pip cuts,you can probably watch the program on catchup ot maybe itv catchup platform, they gave the amounts as well
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon N I hope so , they haven't even made an impact assessment on how this will affect people , that's wrong for a start 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @HRH Time tour UC migration to after April if possible then you will take the yearly increase with you. 

      And to be honest the inflation increase is a few quid a month.  So I'm not too worried about that.  I've just got my migration letter.  So will complete once April increase has gone thro.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon but these cuts have already happened or will as when we migrate to UC, we wont get inflation increases …
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon @Anon Holy gawd.. that is absolutely insane. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon That literally breaks so many uk & international laws of human rights I can see them being taken straight to court. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Just mathematics:
    PIP in 2028-2029 is projected to be £28bn from £13.3bn in 2019 increasing by 110%.
    The government is spending £22bn on PIP at the moment which means the spending increased by 65% since the pandemic.
    Now the government wants to save £5bn from the post pandemic increase which means cutting down that increase from 65% to 27% by targeting the conditions behind this sharp rise, like mental health conditions especially among young adults.
    Should we worry? Yes, because we do not trust politicians nowadays because they have taken the country from failure to another but I am certain the coming changes will not be bad as the media portrays.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Mr. Unknown The government does not take into account inflation rates, it's own increase in tax revenues, nor devaluation of money to buy things. Measurements like this should not be on year on year cost rises but should be on year on year living standards and in that the governments are failing. It is the standard of living they need to worry about not the costs since it is always offset by increase in tax revenues
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    When will this government realise  if your to I’ll to work how can they make you or force  you to something you can’t actually physically or mentally do. This government won’t get voted in again they have already took away pensioners heating allowance than the farmers dispute now the sick disabled vulnerable group thanks for reading my post 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @diceman24 I imagine they will try to do this and fail. My gp said they will just issue sick notes so I won't be able to go into said work.  So then I imagine I will be back on benefits.  And round and round I would go 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @diceman24 The govt has never said that they will force people who can't work into work.  They have said those that are able to work should be working.  

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact