A survey for the More in Common non-profit organisation has found that the majority of the public do not support the proposed cuts to personal independence payment (PIP) and believe cost cutting, not getting people back into work, is the main reason for welfare reform.

According to the poll, only 31% of Britons feel that the Government is trying to limit the impact of cuts on vulnerable groups, while 20% think that it is not trying, and 36% think that the Government has actively chosen to target certain vulnerable groups.

54% believe that the cuts to benefits are about saving money with only 32% considering that they are about getting people back into work.

44% of all Britons think that welfare reforms are too harsh, 28% think they are about right and only 10% think they are too soft.  If Labour hope that their welfare cuts will play especially well with Reform voters, they might be disappointed to learn that 41% of Reform voters think they are too harsh, compared to 42% of Labour voters.

When asked about specific PIP descriptors, the public disagree with Labour’s 4 point system.

74% of Britons believe that needing assistance to wash below the waist should automatically qualify someone for disability-related benefits; 72% say the same about needing help to dress their lower body; 70% say the same about needing assistance to get out of the bath or shower.

None of these are 4 point descriptors, so none of them would allow access to the daily living component of PIP.

43% of Britons think that the benefits cuts make Labour appear mean-spirited.

34% of Britons say they know someone on disability benefits and 36% of people who know someone say the proposed reforms have decreased their trust in the Labour Party to manage public finances safely, 36% say it has made no difference and only 15% say the reforms have increased their trust.

Even amongst all Britons, not just those who know a claimant, 30% say the reforms have decreased their trust and only 15% say they have increased their trust.

So, it would seem that in spite of all the bile and hatred below the line on many media websites, the public are less than enthusiastic about benefits cuts - especially for disabled claimants.

You can see a detailed breakdown of the More in Common survey here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    It's not just pip claimants that will be affected but also UC/LCWRA only claimants who could end up being even worse off too 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @sara Pip isn’t cancelled at retirement age rather it’s fixed at what it was pre retirement and even if your condition deteriorates or a new condition affects you, you can’t add it on. You have to apply for attendance allowance instead which is a risk of losing everything and expensive if you have the higher rate care and higher rate mobility. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Claire @Claire, Yes, I feel for you. At the moment I think your award would stand until its scheduled review, but there is no clear information on this. At least we have time to oppose/prepare for the changes. I'm doing all I can to raise awareness because if/when pip is taken from us after we've reached pension age I don't see what we could do. 

      My greatest hope at the moment is that the government has not realised/did not intend the potential extent of damage to pensioners. They surely cannot include the elderly in their 'back to work' agenda? It just doesn't make sense.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Scorpion Everyone is forgetting to fight for cont based esa as well,the loss of that is also going to be devastating to those only on cb esa support group as well as those people on pip as well, there isn't even a safety net around this, other than trying to claim uc and being classed as a new claimant 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @sara This is me Sara,63 next month on a 10 year pip award , support group ESA.The pip will take me beyond pension age,but they will try and stop it I think.Do we think the awards still stand.Shocking,just out of hospital this week I have nothing more to fight with.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Neil Cook People who are only on LCWRA would be affected hardest, yet the public attention is only capturing PIP.

      Someone losing LCWRA and PIP is no different from someone who's only on LCWRA who's losing their LCWRA all of a sudden without any other recourse. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    I've no idea how the word 'hydropower' got into my post! I think it was meant to be 'the proposed'.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    WorkshyLayabout 

    Among DISABLED PEOPLE affected by hydropower green paper injustices are those who have worked and paid taxes; raised the next generation of tax payers; fought, and/or seen their sons and daughters fight for our country; struggled to help the younger generation afford education and housing, with rising student fees, house prices and rent; those who care both for older family and grandchildren, with rising social care and child care costs, whilst still trying to maintain employment themselves years after they expected to be in receipt of their state pension.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    WorkshyLayabout 

    A veteran posting on a Benefits and Work article has identified an anomaly concerning Veterans who receive either War Pensions Scheme (WPS) or Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) due to injuries/illnesses incurred through military service, depending on whether they were injured before or after April 2005.

    They are in receipt of a 100% War Pension due to injuries received in Iraq in 2004.  As a consequence on discharge they applied for and qualified for Higher Rate of DLA/PIP.  However they believe veterans receiving PIP are at a disadvantage because they are subject to reassessment under the new 4 point rules.

    Those injured after April 2005 receive a different scheme called the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) and as a consequence can also receive the Veterans equivalent of PIP known as Guaranteed Income Payment (GIP). This is a lifetime payment with no reassessments and is administered by the Veterans Agency not DWP.

    In essence veterans injured in 2004 and before are thrown to the wolves of the DWP who have no experience of dealing with former members of the Armed Forces.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @Mick Mick, I am the veteran who made the first observation.  You are quite right concerning GIP and AFIP.  My apologies.  Written in haste originally.  However, acronyms aside I believe my observations stand.
      Veterans awarded WPS are at a disadvantage to those on AFCS simple due to dates of injury.

      Les

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Mick @Mick I'm no expert on veterans' benefits,  so I apologise if it was in any way misleading, I was just referencing a veteran's post. Thanks for the added insight.

      I wish you the best managing your own circumstances
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Mick
      Haha funny, three down votes.

      I am a War Pensioner/Veteran.  The above, as sara quoted, is correct.  The only thing incorrect is that the Veteran's equivalent of PIP is not Guaranteed Income Payment (GIP), it is Armed Forces Independence Payment (AFIP).  

      GIP is a payment award made as part of the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS).  If I remember correctly, a GIP award of 50% or higher has to be awarded to qualify for AFIP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @sara Correct, I am one of those Veterans.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    WorkshyLayabout 

    disabled ensioners who have a complete NI record will not get pension credit without the severe disability allowance awarded with PIP. If they don't qualify with the 4 point rule they will be left with the state pension only, no PIP, no pension credit, no winter fuel allowance. 

    On full state pension alone they will also lose at least a few pounds a week housing benefit because the full state pension is higher than the applicable amount for housing benefit. If they have any other (e.g. another pension) income this will be assessed and will also be deducted from their housing benefit, meaning the claimant will have to contribute to their rent from their state pension. With private rents for even modest accommodation subject to the local housing allowance pensioners are already having to use their state pension and disability benefits to make up their rent. Without PIP many pensioners face eviction and homelessness.

    So, disabled pensioners who have paid tax, contributed NI, maybe saved towards a work or private pension, and might also have responsibly saved a small amount of capital which could also reduce their housing benefit, will lose thousands of pounds a year if they lose PIP.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @sara Surely pensioners will apply for Attendance Allowance in this case..
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @sara I do see it and one day the very same people will become pensioners themselves just like those who are not sick today will be sick or disabled tomorrow. This is part and parcel of the divide and conquer attitudes that has ruined society and will fragment people even further. I despair at the short sighted and narrow views some people have towards the whole of society when it is under attack on all fronts!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @James Well at least you see it clearly, James. I sometimes feel alone on this campaign.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Anon Claiming attendance allowance would not guarantee an award, and since attendance allowance and pip cannot be claimed at the same time, an application for attendance allowance is a gamble which would not, even when awarded at the higher rate, be a substitute for some combinations of a pip award of both daily living and mobility. 

      There is no mobility element with attendance allowance, either, so to give up pip would definitely be to lose eligibility for a motability vehicle, whilst at the time risking failing to gain attendance allowance and whilst losing altogether any exiting pip award along with, potentially, pension credit and other associated benefits.

      The better off calculation would be a shot in the dark.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Anon But those with mobility will not be able to do that as it will then become an issue of lose your mobility to claim attendance allowance ! Why do you think Pensioners are of less importance then other groups ?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Thanks for sharing that JC

    I agree with Gingin where the hell did they get this 9 out of 10 from?

    Sounds as if he got that line from the Felix the Cat advert. '8 out of 10 cat owners said their cats prefer it....' 

    How very original!

    Well, we are NOT cats but they are all  Tw-ts!

    I really think that they are making it up as they go along. Jackanory time again!

    I genuinely am losing the WILL!

    You KNOW WHAT, they have already caused irrevocable harm, that  was their intention, from the outset. The language Starmer used to address us when he voiced,  'he had the Balls to do it to us' He is NOT down the pub with his mates. From the outset Starmer and co..., in every word, spoken about the elderly, ill and disabled, the young IS to blame us for their errors with the economy. When it has clearly been their doing since they have been in power. 

    None of it makes any economic sense. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Thanks JC for sharing this.

    I agree GinGin where the hell did he get that per cent from.


    We have ALL discussed these proposals with acumen, educated rationale let Starmer and his acolytes KNOW we KNOW exactly what he was up to. Now this 9 out of 10 will NOT lose PIP I honestly think they are ALL loop the flaming loop.

    Where did he get that rhetoric from? Oh yeah I KNOW where I have heard that before, the Felix the cat advert '8 out of 10 cat lovers say their cats prefer it'

    How original! 


     

    Not as eloquent as I usually am. REAL BAD DAY.







     

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    From my MP KEIR MATHER for Selby
    A quote..The most important thing to note about these changes is that the proposals announced recently are very different to some of the inaccurate leaks we saw in the weeks preceding – which I completely appreciate will have caused some people unwarranted distress and concern. Further, the changes set out below are not due to come into effect until November 2026, with 9/10 people that currently claim PIP remaining eligible.
    How is it the 9/10 people will still get PIP? With the 4 point descriptors? Also if that is the case what money will be saved anyway???
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Gingin I saw that on question time,don't know if its the same guy 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @JC I just saw that statement live on question time,the labour mp stated at first yet no-one would lose their pip,then when pushed by fiona,stated noone will lose it until review, then started mumbling about something which made me think they're gunna reassess everyone early,it kinda tailed off and another question asked about something else 🤔 go watch it,what do you think? Thursdays question time the one just gone
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @JC My mp sent me a similar kind of email but with work is good for you type of thing included and how she supports people getting back to work, font they even know pip is not an out if work benefit?? Obviously not 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @JC Thanks for sharing this. I agree, how on earth did the MP/Labour concoct that figure of 9/10 remaining on PIP. Another lie I’m sure. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    From my my KEIR MATHER for Selby
    A quote..The most important thing to note about these changes is that the proposals announced recently are very different to some of the inaccurate leaks we saw in the weeks preceding – which I completely appreciate will have caused some people unwarranted distress and concern. Further, the changes set out below are not due to come into effect until November 2026, with 9/10 people that currently claim PIP remaining eligible.
    How is it the 9/10 people will still get PIP? With the 4 point descriptors? Also if that is the case what money will be saved anyway???
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Response received from the public contact for the Carers All-Party Parliamentary Group today:

    Thank you very much for contacting me regarding your concerns about the Government's proposed reforms to the welfare system.

    I am so sorry to hear about the distress that this has understandably caused you and other carers. We have been contacted by lots of people in the past two weeks who have shared with us the impact that the devastating changes will have on them and their families.

    As Secretariat for the APPG on Carers, I have already suggested to the Chair of the Group, Anna Dixon MP, that we shortly hold a meeting to enable MPs and Peers who are Members of the APPG to discuss the proposals, and the impact they will have on carers like yourself, and the people you care for, in detail. I will also be sharing your email with Anna and other Members of the Group.

    In case you haven't seen - Carers UK issued the below statement following the Government's Spring Statement last week - as you will see, we said that the proposals were 'shocking' and 'shameful', and an 'unprecedented step in the wrong direction and must be swiftly rectified'. https://www.carersuk.org/press-releases/spring-statement-shocking-carers-benefits-cuts-are-a-first-in-decades/

    As a first step in fighting against these changes, Carers UK has produced a detailed policy briefing which outlines the proposals we are most concerned about, and the impact these will have on carers. You can see this here:
    https://www.carersuk.org/media/l2ua5lqd/carers-uk-briefing-on-pathways-to-work-green-paper-v27-03-2025.pdf

    We have also created a short survey to enable carers to tell us in detail about the impact the reforms will have on them and those they care for. We will use the results from this in the campaign we are running to oppose the reforms. If you would like to complete the survey, you can do so here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2W82GT2

    We have also been working hard to secure media focus on the impacts the reforms will have on carers. Our Director of Policy and Public Affairs, Emily Holzhausen CBE, discussed the impact of the benefits cuts on carers on the Today Programme. You can also read about our concerns in The Guardian, The Independent and The Mirror.

    We are also calling on MPs to push back against the proposed changes. On Thursday last week, we worked with Steve Darling MP, Liberal Democrat spokesperson for Work and Pensions, who raised an Urgent Question asking the Government to make a statement on the impact on unpaid carers because of their proposals. You can watch the video here. The changes were also debated in the House of Lords. We will continue to work with MPs and Peers from all parties to raise awareness of how the proposed changes will have a huge impact on thousands of carers.

    Finally, I wanted to ask if you would be willing to speak to my colleague Grace (CC’d here) who works in our campaigns and media team. We are looking for people who would be willing to talk about the impact the changes would have on them in support of the campaign we are shortly going to be launching. We will of course completely understand if this isn’t something you would like to do, but if you would be interested in having an initial chat to explore this in more detail, please do not hesitate to contact either Grace or myself.

    I hope this is helpful and thank you again for getting in touch.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    This is on youtube, explaining the multiple impact of the cuts on pensioners. It takes a while to get going and is bit long winded but it does raise the issue of the knock-on effect that losing one benefit has on other benefits, particularly for pensioners.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @rookie No one in particular. It's just a generic name I picked when highlighting a situation many who are sick and disabled will find themselves in (if the proposed changes to benefits happen). 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Something will obviously have to be done to fix this problem. There will literally be hundreds of thousands in this situation.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Who is Bob?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Not if they have to pay rent and council tax out of their state pension they’re not lucky! Could easily be left with nothing. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @keepingitreal Wrong. Losing PIP and therefore no longer qualifying for UC LCWRA does not mean a person will get the basic rate. This person is now classified as unemployed. A person unable to work cannot claim jobseeker's.  

      Bob fails the PIP assessment so by default is not entitled to UC LCWRA and is now deemed fit for work. He cannot claim jobseeker's as he's too ill to work. He cannot get paid employment because no employer will take him on. Where does Bob get his money from?

      Furthermore, a person with a sick note that the DWP has declared fit for work often cannot claim jobseeker's because he/she has a sick note that states he/she can't work and doesn't meet the qualifying criterion to get jobseeker's. That criterion is being able to work. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    I emailed my MP who dosent reply to anyone,  I emailed John Mcdonnell who did reply and on our side. I emailed Ed Davy which a standard reply that if he not my mp can't reply .
    This government is disgusting, let them survive on what we get. People will be homeless.  I.wouldnt put it pass them to open a workhouse to get people working and they will live there 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Pixelmum Potentially yes, especially the line  about expecting people to work before there are actually any work opportunities. And the fact they’re actually going to discuss impact on the poorest. Thanks for sharing 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Pixelmum It's a start. Rec'd a very nice email yesterday from the PA to Marsha de Cordova which states:


      From: WALLACE, Millie <millie.wallace@parliament.uk> On Behalf Of DE CORDOVA, Marsha
      Sent: 03 April 2025 16:10
      To: Leonard, Matthew <Matthew.Leonard@lv.com>
      Subject: RE: DISABILITY WELFARE CUTS

      WARNING: This email originated from outside of LV=. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Please report anything you are unsure of using the button in your outlook toolbar.
      Dear Matthew (if I may),

      Thank you for contacting the office of Marsha de Cordova MP with your thoughts and experiences, this is an issue incredibly close to Marsha’s heart and she has been a long-time campaigner for disability rights as a disabled woman herself.

      Thank you for letting us know your personal circumstances, and we have great sympathy for your situation. Unfortunately, as you are a constituent of Steve Race MP, strict parliamentary protocols mean that Marsha is unable to make representations on your behalf. MPs are only permitted to take up casework for individuals who live in their constituency.

      Marsha is continuing to work for the rights of disabled people as one of her key priorities, and takes this opportunity to wish you all the best.
      Millie Wallace
      PA to Marsha de Cordova
      Member of Parliament for Battersea

      I have also sent a copy of the letter I received from my MP (a Starmer stooge) to the campaigns department of RNIB.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Pixelmum Maybe. Let's hope the committee has enough teeth to at least enforce some delays to allow further consultation & less punitive changes later. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    "The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has confirmed that 1.8 million people claiming Universal Credit have now been categorised under the Limited Capability for Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) group."

    If we add those on LCWRA who are still on ESA, the figure would be bigger than that.

    The worst is that all these people are prone to lose their LCWRA all of a sudden once the damn 4 point assessment system gets in place!

    People are only worried about PIP, but people who are only on LCWRA/Support Group would be hit the hardest.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    The most bizarre thing about the changes seems to me to be that currently you get the LCWRA element of UC if you can't walk more than fifty metres, and yet after the WCA is scrapped you won't get it if you can only walk ONE metre - unless you have the daily living element of PIP.  Restricting the "health element" of UC to just those with the daily living PIP (and ruling out those with just the mobility element) is downright bonkers, and one has to wonder on what advice (if any) they have decided this.  If they don't think you're ill enough to get the health element if you literally can't walk AT ALL, one has to wonder what they think the extra benefit is for.  While there's little chance that the changed to PIP won't go through, we can at least hope that issues such as access to health UC can at least be "tinkered with" without the govt having to admit to a U-turn. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @Hightower I'm in the same situation as you – I'm pretty much housebound, on my own and can't even remember when I had a holiday or even day trip out. My lcwra and pip basically goes on rent and utilities and occasional treatment that I can't get on the nhs. I can't move anywhere cheaper as there's just isn't anything. If I lose these benefits I'll be destitute and my physical and mental health will deteriorate. I'm existing not living. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @SLB I,m in the exact same situation as you, SLB. I get the LCWRA and enhanced mobility PIP, but nothing for daily living PIP. With a £415 less p/month cut I will be exactly £105 p/month short of being able to eat and drink. I don,t drink/smoke or go out anywhere EVER so i can,t see how I,m going to be able to reduce my outgoings when the cuts happen?! There’s nothing I can spend less on to manage my finances that I haven,t been doing already for the last few years. Is there any hope?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Anon A How old is he? He might get a pension or an ill health pension from previous employment.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @SLB It's blatant discrimination 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @SLB You're right, it "is downright bonkers". 

      We need to address the case of people who are only on LCWRA in the consultation.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    I genuinely believe that the hope of this Government is to literally kill us off. I get Matt's information we are in a vulnerable situation in more ways than one.  Those of us who are physically unable to work. 

    My MP is also in favor of the reforms, a waste of my time contacting him further. I have ENSURED another way to state my objection to these absolutely inhumane, unlawful proposals. 

    We are ALL in such a state of despair. Definitely impacting on our already disabled bodies, ill-health and psychological well being. Exacerbating what we have to live with everyday is the very reason(s) why we are in receipt of these benefits.

    I have got enough going on with the managed migration from ESA to UC at the moment and to make sure that they enter correctly acknowledge in support group ESA as such straight forward to LCWRA group on UC. Which as of now should be protected as I am migrated across on transitional protection.

    I concur with Neil's comments on this post the scrapping of support group ESA and LCWRA group on UC we do NEED to be left ALONE. 

    In particular with the revelations that Reeves has LIED again about work coaches. Or should I state the limited work coaches. Which surely should MEAN that they are UNABLE to justify going ahead with any of these unlawful and inhumane proposals any further.

    Last I heard they are NO LONGER scrapping the LCWRA but they are freezing it. However, that could have or may change again. 

    I do NOT KNOW how much more any one of us can take and it is NOT as if our primary care providers are able to be or indeed want to be supportive to us.

    Gingin is as always eloquent and RIGHT in everything that you have said over this 4 point malarkey. 

    Neil is also right it is NOT just PIP that is going to be affected. However, PIP in some circumstances dictates ESA award and UC award.

    WE ARE ALL EQUALLY AFFECTED BY THESE PROPOSED UNLAWFUL REFORMS TO AN ABSOLUTE DEVASTATING DEGREE. 

    We ALL have a heartbreaking story to tell and indeed NONE of US deserve to be treated in the way that we are. As NONE of us asked to be or end up DISABLED, for whatever reason for life. 





    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @DJ Indeed & I fear there will be casualties. The cutbacks announced so far are extremely punitive. Some will lose over £100 weekly at a time of ever-rising bills & other costs. People who are financially well-off could absorb such cuts, but not those already struggling & suffering chronic poor health. What's proposed so far by Labour seems brutal, but also avoidable & needs to be legally contested for as long as possible. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    As advised in a separate B&W news article, I have emailed the All Party Parliamentary Groups for Health, Carers, Debt and Financial Inclusion, Genetic, Rare and Undiagnosed Conditions and Poverty & Inequality, as follows:

    Dear [Name of Public Enquiry Point Contact]

    I am contacting you as the public enquiry contact for the [Name of Group] All Party Parliamentary Group, to raise my alarm and distress at the green paper proposals on welfare reform. I would be grateful if you would share this email with all members of the group.

    These proposals will plunge families like ours into poverty, and we will not be able to ameliorate our circumstances through work. Under these proposals, our household is likely to lose around £900 per month, comprised of LCWRA, PIP daily living and Carer’s Element of UC.

    My husband, who has Myotonic Dystrophy, a progressive neurological disease, has significant daytime fatigue, frequent falls and swallowing difficulties, among other symptoms. Under PIP proposals he would be likely deemed ineligible for PIP Daily Living, as he would not currently score 4 points in one category. My husband is unemployable, due to the significant risk of choking or falling, as well as his daytime fatigue.

    I work part-time in a relatively low-paid NHS administrative job. As I have to care for my husband, I am unable to work full-time. I have calculated that if I were successful in gaining a more senior NHS role our financial position would be improved by £12 per month in the first year, and our total income would in fact drop by £300 per month in the third year.

    We are bringing up two daughters.

    The government has repeatedly said they are ‘putting disabled people at the heart’ of everything they do. But these proposals are only pulling the rug from under us, leaving us with nowhere to turn and nothing we can do to improve our financial outlook. No amount of support from a work coach will make my husband employable. What is more, we cannot even have our say, as the most important elements of the changes are not being consulted on.

    Family carers are doing a job that Social Care is unable to in these times, but these proposals are making that job near impossible to do.

    The headline loss average of £1700 per year does not apply to my family. The loss would be far greater and I do not see how we would manage at all.

    I implore you to see that these proposals are draconian, that they are discriminatory against the long-term sick and disabled, and that they will cause devastation for families like us. I respectfully ask that you use your influence to oppose these changes.

    Yours sincerely,
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    It's not just the pip cuts either..those of us who are on UC/LCWRA are gonna be really stuffed as and or when those conditions brought in, I just wish they'd leave us alone.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Scorpion I'm on cbesa so stand to lose that with the abolition of esa,I can't claim uc either,my oh withdrew his pension in Feb last year just b4 sunaks announcement, the money was to pay off the mortgage 12k,and to get all the downstairs damp done in the house,he has 28k sitting in his bank account and i dont even think it would even cover it as the kitchen has to come out to fix the damp, were going to lose pip and carers as well,so much for de damping the house,this was our only chance to repair the house,if we use it,it will be classed as deprivation of income,I won't get 4 points on a descriptor,even if I claimed uc I couldn't do the work commitments, what do we do ? It's looking bleak for us and many like us, any savings are going to be spent on the basics leaving me with a damp problem for ever that I can not now fix now nor in the future 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Neil Cook You're absolutely right. People only on LCWRA, like you and me, would be the hardest hit by these evil changes, as they would lose all of their miserable benefits all of a sudden.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    37% of the people on Universal Credit were in employment in December 2024. Universal Credit is available to people on a low income as well as those who are out of work. These statistics define an individual as in employment if they receive employee earnings for the assessment period which includes the count date.18 Feb 2025
    Universal Credit statistics, 29 April 2013 to 9 January 2025

    so nearly 40% of claimants for UC are getting wages and UC? Why is this appalling figure not being spoken about by Govt, national press or the public, that don't even know. Even if all the sick, ill and disabled people in the UK tomorrow miraculously became fit for work they would STILL HAVE TO CLAIM UNIVERSAL CREDIT!
    The system is not broken...your government is!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    I emailed my mp,she supports it,dressed up response about people needing to get back to work,well she's not getting my vote,if your mp is Jo platt  don't bother!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Anon @Anon, would it be alright if I link to your post on the APPG thread on Science for ME. More people need to know what Jo Platt is like.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Anniesmum I don't know,I'm also mad at the fact I sent the email explaining in detail how we're going to lose everything, signed my own name and the response was addressed to my husband!!   the email received looked like one she's sending out to everyone regarding this,setting out how they're trying to get people into work and she supports that issue then says she is listening to her constituants worries and assures people the changes are not coming till next November,but she supports the changes about people needing to work,there's no way she's voting against these cuts
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Anon Damn! I thought I recognised the name Jo Platt. I wrote to the all party parliamentary group for M.E and it said it had to be sent to her email address. How awful if she supports these cuts! I’m wondering if she will even pass on my email to the rest of the group. I’m so disheartened now. Do you think I can try and send it to one of the other MPs in the group? I’m worried she will delete my email I sent them.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.