A survey for the More in Common non-profit organisation has found that the majority of the public do not support the proposed cuts to personal independence payment (PIP) and believe cost cutting, not getting people back into work, is the main reason for welfare reform.

According to the poll, only 31% of Britons feel that the Government is trying to limit the impact of cuts on vulnerable groups, while 20% think that it is not trying, and 36% think that the Government has actively chosen to target certain vulnerable groups.

54% believe that the cuts to benefits are about saving money with only 32% considering that they are about getting people back into work.

44% of all Britons think that welfare reforms are too harsh, 28% think they are about right and only 10% think they are too soft.  If Labour hope that their welfare cuts will play especially well with Reform voters, they might be disappointed to learn that 41% of Reform voters think they are too harsh, compared to 42% of Labour voters.

When asked about specific PIP descriptors, the public disagree with Labour’s 4 point system.

74% of Britons believe that needing assistance to wash below the waist should automatically qualify someone for disability-related benefits; 72% say the same about needing help to dress their lower body; 70% say the same about needing assistance to get out of the bath or shower.

None of these are 4 point descriptors, so none of them would allow access to the daily living component of PIP.

43% of Britons think that the benefits cuts make Labour appear mean-spirited.

34% of Britons say they know someone on disability benefits and 36% of people who know someone say the proposed reforms have decreased their trust in the Labour Party to manage public finances safely, 36% say it has made no difference and only 15% say the reforms have increased their trust.

Even amongst all Britons, not just those who know a claimant, 30% say the reforms have decreased their trust and only 15% say they have increased their trust.

So, it would seem that in spite of all the bile and hatred below the line on many media websites, the public are less than enthusiastic about benefits cuts - especially for disabled claimants.

You can see a detailed breakdown of the More in Common survey here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    "Starmer criticises watchdog's benefits forecasts" Just saw this pop up on BBC



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Anniesmum The derogatory and dehumanising language labour have been using towards the sick and disabled is shocking too :(
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Anon I know – especially when the tories tried to cut benefits and labour attacked them for it. What gets me it's the statistics they quoted for fraud etc were wrong which they were called out for but never apologised. All is doing is putting a bigger target on the back of disabled and sick people – as if we don't feel bad enough as it is :(
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @keepingitreal Worst government on record.

      14 years of Tory rule was better than this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Pixelmum He also spoke in a way that made me think he believes disabled people can change their behaviour if they are taken off benefits. The OBR doesn’t take this behavioural change into account. Almost implying that disabled people chose to be disabled. Check out this video https://youtu.be/eoBjHzMc-qc?si=WLUBU_IYUSIoHZgH
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Pixelmum Labour side-lining the OBR already after introducing law to prevent future governments from doing that 🙄
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Not quite sure where I should post this but I have an important update that may give others hope. I had to complete my PIP review in August as it was up for end of award in March 2025. Quite tough because lve spent 9 months ( amidst all the speculation and proposed changes) worrying but trying not to. I was convinced l would be down graded in Daily Living.
    Today came the decision: l scored 16 in Daily Living including 4 in two categories and 12 in mobility.
    I obviously don’t know what might happen to people with different conditions but l am trying to send some calming love. I have Lupus (which is of course a serious condition) Polymyalgia Rheumtica. I also have an unhealed broken hip which needs two operations.
    Never the less there are people worse off than me. Don’t lose hope 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Cmjdexter I to have just had my latest review completed and was given a 4 point descriptor It was given to me for the first time Along with an ongoing claim  I was so worried until the letter arrived With all the turmoil and uncertainty about PIP swirling around I am glad about my review But worried for others 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Cmjdexter Quite an achievement without having to go for a dreaded assessment with someone clueless and unqualified. You did well.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Purely paper based and no assessment at all. Because l get ulcer type lesions and rashes, l can provide pictures and l think that helps. It doesn’t mean l am more disabled than someone who has invisible needs, but it means that l have visual evidence 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Cmjdexter Did you have to go for an assessment or was the decision based purely on the paper form?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Just heard on the BBC news that the government values the millions of unpaid carers in this country, is that why they are going to take away our carers allowance if the person who we are caring for loses their pip because of the proposed changes if they come in?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    The people of this country vote for a welfare system and employ MP's, at considerable cost, to administrate the public purse, all of it, correctly distributed to the services we deem it necessary to be credited.
    This is Government for the people, by the people, a democracy functioning properly. 
    Twenty-seven Labour MP'S have grasped the nettle, carrying out the specific tasks they were elected to perform. Pathetic, except for the twenty-seven. 
    Strange policies brought by whimsical MP'S not voted for by the people, are a gross dereliction of duty. 
    This is the tail wagging the dog, an accountable offence, bordering on a dictatorial executive, like the last government! 
    Really, YOU the people, are their employer, so do your employer's duty, s
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    WorkshyLayabout re Bob's situation, he would likely not be considered fit for work, unless he was judged to have recovered after a new wca assessment which he could challenge, especially if he has fit notes. Lcw would be his category, with minimal claimant commitment and engagement with a work coach, therefore he would not be left with nothing. His risk of sanctions reducing his award is also very low, since work related activity does not demand being a job seeker.

    Whilst all claimants of incapacity and disability benefits are likely to lose some part of their award, I feel you are mistaken in the more extreme of your fears and confused in your evaluation of the impact of the proposals on those over state pension age.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Why do you say he would be deemed fit for work. What about lcw?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @keepingitreal As Bob fails to qualify for PIP, he is no longer entitled to either health element of UC and deemed fit to work. The only benefit he can now claim is the jobseeker's allowance equivalent of UC. His risk of sanction reducing his award is high, since jobseeker's allowance demands being a jobseeker. Sanctions leave him with no money. 

      Pensioners who lose PIP will continue to get state pension (and pension credit for those not getting a full state pension). They will not be left with no income. Bob is not a pensioner. He will be hit harder should his PIP entitlement be removed.

      This is the true impact of the proposed changes. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    This government who allegedly are the grandchildren of the people who originally started the labour movement have for the most part transformed into a party of political opportunities and a carer due to their privileged lifestyles and education and do not see things the way the original founders of the labour movement did. There is a need for a new movement that will revive the original ideals that have been abandoned in a new movement that will prevent this sort of nepotism to happen that will end up destroying the very principles it started out with.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    It's not just pip claimants that will be affected but also UC/LCWRA only claimants who could end up being even worse off too 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @sara It's possible. I wouldn't put anything past Stammer  + Rachel Reeves. They took even winter fuel payments from the elderly. I read that Rachel Reeves even wants to means test the pansion.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @sara Pip isn’t cancelled at retirement age rather it’s fixed at what it was pre retirement and even if your condition deteriorates or a new condition affects you, you can’t add it on. You have to apply for attendance allowance instead which is a risk of losing everything and expensive if you have the higher rate care and higher rate mobility. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Claire @Claire, Yes, I feel for you. At the moment I think your award would stand until its scheduled review, but there is no clear information on this. At least we have time to oppose/prepare for the changes. I'm doing all I can to raise awareness because if/when pip is taken from us after we've reached pension age I don't see what we could do. 

      My greatest hope at the moment is that the government has not realised/did not intend the potential extent of damage to pensioners. They surely cannot include the elderly in their 'back to work' agenda? It just doesn't make sense.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Scorpion Everyone is forgetting to fight for cont based esa as well,the loss of that is also going to be devastating to those only on cb esa support group as well as those people on pip as well, there isn't even a safety net around this, other than trying to claim uc and being classed as a new claimant 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @sara This is me Sara,63 next month on a 10 year pip award , support group ESA.The pip will take me beyond pension age,but they will try and stop it I think.Do we think the awards still stand.Shocking,just out of hospital this week I have nothing more to fight with.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I've no idea how the word 'hydropower' got into my post! I think it was meant to be 'the proposed'.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    WorkshyLayabout 

    Among DISABLED PEOPLE affected by hydropower green paper injustices are those who have worked and paid taxes; raised the next generation of tax payers; fought, and/or seen their sons and daughters fight for our country; struggled to help the younger generation afford education and housing, with rising student fees, house prices and rent; those who care both for older family and grandchildren, with rising social care and child care costs, whilst still trying to maintain employment themselves years after they expected to be in receipt of their state pension.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    WorkshyLayabout 

    A veteran posting on a Benefits and Work article has identified an anomaly concerning Veterans who receive either War Pensions Scheme (WPS) or Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) due to injuries/illnesses incurred through military service, depending on whether they were injured before or after April 2005.

    They are in receipt of a 100% War Pension due to injuries received in Iraq in 2004.  As a consequence on discharge they applied for and qualified for Higher Rate of DLA/PIP.  However they believe veterans receiving PIP are at a disadvantage because they are subject to reassessment under the new 4 point rules.

    Those injured after April 2005 receive a different scheme called the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) and as a consequence can also receive the Veterans equivalent of PIP known as Guaranteed Income Payment (GIP). This is a lifetime payment with no reassessments and is administered by the Veterans Agency not DWP.

    In essence veterans injured in 2004 and before are thrown to the wolves of the DWP who have no experience of dealing with former members of the Armed Forces.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Mick Mick, I am the veteran who made the first observation.  You are quite right concerning GIP and AFIP.  My apologies.  Written in haste originally.  However, acronyms aside I believe my observations stand.
      Veterans awarded WPS are at a disadvantage to those on AFCS simple due to dates of injury.

      Les

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Mick @Mick I'm no expert on veterans' benefits,  so I apologise if it was in any way misleading, I was just referencing a veteran's post. Thanks for the added insight.

      I wish you the best managing your own circumstances
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Mick
      Haha funny, three down votes.

      I am a War Pensioner/Veteran.  The above, as sara quoted, is correct.  The only thing incorrect is that the Veteran's equivalent of PIP is not Guaranteed Income Payment (GIP), it is Armed Forces Independence Payment (AFIP).  

      GIP is a payment award made as part of the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS).  If I remember correctly, a GIP award of 50% or higher has to be awarded to qualify for AFIP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @sara Correct, I am one of those Veterans.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    WorkshyLayabout 

    disabled ensioners who have a complete NI record will not get pension credit without the severe disability allowance awarded with PIP. If they don't qualify with the 4 point rule they will be left with the state pension only, no PIP, no pension credit, no winter fuel allowance. 

    On full state pension alone they will also lose at least a few pounds a week housing benefit because the full state pension is higher than the applicable amount for housing benefit. If they have any other (e.g. another pension) income this will be assessed and will also be deducted from their housing benefit, meaning the claimant will have to contribute to their rent from their state pension. With private rents for even modest accommodation subject to the local housing allowance pensioners are already having to use their state pension and disability benefits to make up their rent. Without PIP many pensioners face eviction and homelessness.

    So, disabled pensioners who have paid tax, contributed NI, maybe saved towards a work or private pension, and might also have responsibly saved a small amount of capital which could also reduce their housing benefit, will lose thousands of pounds a year if they lose PIP.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @sara Surely pensioners will apply for Attendance Allowance in this case..
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @sara I do see it and one day the very same people will become pensioners themselves just like those who are not sick today will be sick or disabled tomorrow. This is part and parcel of the divide and conquer attitudes that has ruined society and will fragment people even further. I despair at the short sighted and narrow views some people have towards the whole of society when it is under attack on all fronts!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @James Well at least you see it clearly, James. I sometimes feel alone on this campaign.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Anon Claiming attendance allowance would not guarantee an award, and since attendance allowance and pip cannot be claimed at the same time, an application for attendance allowance is a gamble which would not, even when awarded at the higher rate, be a substitute for some combinations of a pip award of both daily living and mobility. 

      There is no mobility element with attendance allowance, either, so to give up pip would definitely be to lose eligibility for a motability vehicle, whilst at the time risking failing to gain attendance allowance and whilst losing altogether any exiting pip award along with, potentially, pension credit and other associated benefits.

      The better off calculation would be a shot in the dark.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Anon But those with mobility will not be able to do that as it will then become an issue of lose your mobility to claim attendance allowance ! Why do you think Pensioners are of less importance then other groups ?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Thanks for sharing that JC

    I agree with Gingin where the hell did they get this 9 out of 10 from?

    Sounds as if he got that line from the Felix the Cat advert. '8 out of 10 cat owners said their cats prefer it....' 

    How very original!

    Well, we are NOT cats but they are all  Tw-ts!

    I really think that they are making it up as they go along. Jackanory time again!

    I genuinely am losing the WILL!

    You KNOW WHAT, they have already caused irrevocable harm, that  was their intention, from the outset. The language Starmer used to address us when he voiced,  'he had the Balls to do it to us' He is NOT down the pub with his mates. From the outset Starmer and co..., in every word, spoken about the elderly, ill and disabled, the young IS to blame us for their errors with the economy. When it has clearly been their doing since they have been in power. 

    None of it makes any economic sense. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Thanks JC for sharing this.

    I agree GinGin where the hell did he get that per cent from.


    We have ALL discussed these proposals with acumen, educated rationale let Starmer and his acolytes KNOW we KNOW exactly what he was up to. Now this 9 out of 10 will NOT lose PIP I honestly think they are ALL loop the flaming loop.

    Where did he get that rhetoric from? Oh yeah I KNOW where I have heard that before, the Felix the cat advert '8 out of 10 cat lovers say their cats prefer it'

    How original! 


     

    Not as eloquent as I usually am. REAL BAD DAY.







     

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    From my MP KEIR MATHER for Selby
    A quote..The most important thing to note about these changes is that the proposals announced recently are very different to some of the inaccurate leaks we saw in the weeks preceding – which I completely appreciate will have caused some people unwarranted distress and concern. Further, the changes set out below are not due to come into effect until November 2026, with 9/10 people that currently claim PIP remaining eligible.
    How is it the 9/10 people will still get PIP? With the 4 point descriptors? Also if that is the case what money will be saved anyway???
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Gingin I saw that on question time,don't know if its the same guy 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @JC I just saw that statement live on question time,the labour mp stated at first yet no-one would lose their pip,then when pushed by fiona,stated noone will lose it until review, then started mumbling about something which made me think they're gunna reassess everyone early,it kinda tailed off and another question asked about something else 🤔 go watch it,what do you think? Thursdays question time the one just gone
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @JC My mp sent me a similar kind of email but with work is good for you type of thing included and how she supports people getting back to work, font they even know pip is not an out if work benefit?? Obviously not 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @JC Thanks for sharing this. I agree, how on earth did the MP/Labour concoct that figure of 9/10 remaining on PIP. Another lie I’m sure. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    From my my KEIR MATHER for Selby
    A quote..The most important thing to note about these changes is that the proposals announced recently are very different to some of the inaccurate leaks we saw in the weeks preceding – which I completely appreciate will have caused some people unwarranted distress and concern. Further, the changes set out below are not due to come into effect until November 2026, with 9/10 people that currently claim PIP remaining eligible.
    How is it the 9/10 people will still get PIP? With the 4 point descriptors? Also if that is the case what money will be saved anyway???
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Response received from the public contact for the Carers All-Party Parliamentary Group today:

    Thank you very much for contacting me regarding your concerns about the Government's proposed reforms to the welfare system.

    I am so sorry to hear about the distress that this has understandably caused you and other carers. We have been contacted by lots of people in the past two weeks who have shared with us the impact that the devastating changes will have on them and their families.

    As Secretariat for the APPG on Carers, I have already suggested to the Chair of the Group, Anna Dixon MP, that we shortly hold a meeting to enable MPs and Peers who are Members of the APPG to discuss the proposals, and the impact they will have on carers like yourself, and the people you care for, in detail. I will also be sharing your email with Anna and other Members of the Group.

    In case you haven't seen - Carers UK issued the below statement following the Government's Spring Statement last week - as you will see, we said that the proposals were 'shocking' and 'shameful', and an 'unprecedented step in the wrong direction and must be swiftly rectified'. https://www.carersuk.org/press-releases/spring-statement-shocking-carers-benefits-cuts-are-a-first-in-decades/

    As a first step in fighting against these changes, Carers UK has produced a detailed policy briefing which outlines the proposals we are most concerned about, and the impact these will have on carers. You can see this here:
    https://www.carersuk.org/media/l2ua5lqd/carers-uk-briefing-on-pathways-to-work-green-paper-v27-03-2025.pdf

    We have also created a short survey to enable carers to tell us in detail about the impact the reforms will have on them and those they care for. We will use the results from this in the campaign we are running to oppose the reforms. If you would like to complete the survey, you can do so here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2W82GT2

    We have also been working hard to secure media focus on the impacts the reforms will have on carers. Our Director of Policy and Public Affairs, Emily Holzhausen CBE, discussed the impact of the benefits cuts on carers on the Today Programme. You can also read about our concerns in The Guardian, The Independent and The Mirror.

    We are also calling on MPs to push back against the proposed changes. On Thursday last week, we worked with Steve Darling MP, Liberal Democrat spokesperson for Work and Pensions, who raised an Urgent Question asking the Government to make a statement on the impact on unpaid carers because of their proposals. You can watch the video here. The changes were also debated in the House of Lords. We will continue to work with MPs and Peers from all parties to raise awareness of how the proposed changes will have a huge impact on thousands of carers.

    Finally, I wanted to ask if you would be willing to speak to my colleague Grace (CC’d here) who works in our campaigns and media team. We are looking for people who would be willing to talk about the impact the changes would have on them in support of the campaign we are shortly going to be launching. We will of course completely understand if this isn’t something you would like to do, but if you would be interested in having an initial chat to explore this in more detail, please do not hesitate to contact either Grace or myself.

    I hope this is helpful and thank you again for getting in touch.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    This is on youtube, explaining the multiple impact of the cuts on pensioners. It takes a while to get going and is bit long winded but it does raise the issue of the knock-on effect that losing one benefit has on other benefits, particularly for pensioners.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @rookie No one in particular. It's just a generic name I picked when highlighting a situation many who are sick and disabled will find themselves in (if the proposed changes to benefits happen). 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Something will obviously have to be done to fix this problem. There will literally be hundreds of thousands in this situation.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Who is Bob?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Not if they have to pay rent and council tax out of their state pension they’re not lucky! Could easily be left with nothing. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @keepingitreal Wrong. Losing PIP and therefore no longer qualifying for UC LCWRA does not mean a person will get the basic rate. This person is now classified as unemployed. A person unable to work cannot claim jobseeker's.  

      Bob fails the PIP assessment so by default is not entitled to UC LCWRA and is now deemed fit for work. He cannot claim jobseeker's as he's too ill to work. He cannot get paid employment because no employer will take him on. Where does Bob get his money from?

      Furthermore, a person with a sick note that the DWP has declared fit for work often cannot claim jobseeker's because he/she has a sick note that states he/she can't work and doesn't meet the qualifying criterion to get jobseeker's. That criterion is being able to work. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I emailed my MP who dosent reply to anyone,  I emailed John Mcdonnell who did reply and on our side. I emailed Ed Davy which a standard reply that if he not my mp can't reply .
    This government is disgusting, let them survive on what we get. People will be homeless.  I.wouldnt put it pass them to open a workhouse to get people working and they will live there 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Pixelmum Potentially yes, especially the line  about expecting people to work before there are actually any work opportunities. And the fact they’re actually going to discuss impact on the poorest. Thanks for sharing 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Pixelmum It's a start. Rec'd a very nice email yesterday from the PA to Marsha de Cordova which states:


      From: WALLACE, Millie <millie.wallace@parliament.uk> On Behalf Of DE CORDOVA, Marsha
      Sent: 03 April 2025 16:10
      To: Leonard, Matthew <Matthew.Leonard@lv.com>
      Subject: RE: DISABILITY WELFARE CUTS

      WARNING: This email originated from outside of LV=. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Please report anything you are unsure of using the button in your outlook toolbar.
      Dear Matthew (if I may),

      Thank you for contacting the office of Marsha de Cordova MP with your thoughts and experiences, this is an issue incredibly close to Marsha’s heart and she has been a long-time campaigner for disability rights as a disabled woman herself.

      Thank you for letting us know your personal circumstances, and we have great sympathy for your situation. Unfortunately, as you are a constituent of Steve Race MP, strict parliamentary protocols mean that Marsha is unable to make representations on your behalf. MPs are only permitted to take up casework for individuals who live in their constituency.

      Marsha is continuing to work for the rights of disabled people as one of her key priorities, and takes this opportunity to wish you all the best.
      Millie Wallace
      PA to Marsha de Cordova
      Member of Parliament for Battersea

      I have also sent a copy of the letter I received from my MP (a Starmer stooge) to the campaigns department of RNIB.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Pixelmum Maybe. Let's hope the committee has enough teeth to at least enforce some delays to allow further consultation & less punitive changes later. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    "The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has confirmed that 1.8 million people claiming Universal Credit have now been categorised under the Limited Capability for Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) group."

    If we add those on LCWRA who are still on ESA, the figure would be bigger than that.

    The worst is that all these people are prone to lose their LCWRA all of a sudden once the damn 4 point assessment system gets in place!

    People are only worried about PIP, but people who are only on LCWRA/Support Group would be hit the hardest.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact