The savagery of Labour’s cuts to benefits was laid bare today, with the revelation that 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, will be plunged into relative poverty as a result of benefits cuts.  370,000 current PIP claimants are expected to lose their PIP daily living component when their award is reviewed after November 2026.

Figures from the Office For Budget Responsibility (OBR) and the DWP’s own impact and equality assessments emphasise how these cuts are aimed almost solely at disabled people.

According to the DWP:

  • Just 0.1 million families with no disability in the household will lose out, 4% of all those affected.
  • 1 million families with some disability in the household will lose out, 96% of all those affected.

This represents one in five of all families with a disabled person in the household. The average loss will be £1,720 per year compared to inflation. 

370,00 current PIP recipients are expected to lose entitlement to the daily living component on review after November 2026, plus 430,000 future recipients.  The average loss is £4,500 per year.

2.25 million current recipients of UC Health (LCWRA) will be hit by the freeze to this element, with an average loss of £500 a year– although they benefit from the increase in the standard allowance.

In reality, the effects of the cuts could be even greater.

58% of new PIP claimants and 52% of PIP award reviews do not score any 4 point daily living descriptors.  So, on the face of it, this would reduce the number of people getting PIP daily living by 1.5 million by 2029-30, virtually one third. 

But the OBR guesses, and they admit it is only guesswork, that the actual number who lose the daily living component will be reduced to 800,000 because people will fight harder to be awarded a 4 point descriptor, including by challenging decisions.

Whatever the final figure, these cuts represent an unprecedented attack on disabled people that many Labour MPs must be desperate to avoid taking responsibility for. 

But, probably within a month or two, they will have to start trooping through the division lobbies to show their wholehearted support for a policy of impoverishing disabled families in order to balance the books.

You can download the DWP Impact assessment and the equality analysis from the bottom of this page

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    I

    'The government says it must cut benefits for the disabled They are completely wrong'

    'I think that the benefit cuts that the Government is promoting are highly abusive. And what is more, they are completely un-neccesary...'
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @X12Bt4 Absolutely love this man! Thank you so much for making these videos, esteemed Professor Richard Murphy. Yours is the best argument, delivered eloquently, from a place of moral fibre and sound reason, by somebody with top credentials. We are all grateful for your gracious support!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @X12Bt4 Thank you. X12Bt4.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @X12Bt4 Seen this earlier and he is absolutely spot on
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    I do NOT know if that is a good or bad thing Councillors resigning as we NEED their support if they are opposed to the welfare cuts. As it those who would be able to vote against the proposals they want to inflict on us.

    The abolishing of NHS England contemporaneously with the welfare reform this is in such a mess!

    I do NOT know about anyone else on this site but just how helpful are your GP's regarding this? In the last few years in the geographical area where I live there seems to be an almost unspoken reliance and need for approval of MSK clinicians (physiotherapists in other words) making all kinds of decisions as to who is even approved for scans. Then we have them making BAD decisions. 

    I KNOW this is NOT the same in all areas of the country. Then we have the same MSK clinicians assessing us for PIP. It is ALMOST as if this profession has taken over, who is eligible for what and when.

    Something NOT right about it to me. 

    GP states it is business decisions, business decisions overriding clinical decisions. 

    Before these announcements on the Green Paper I started to FEEL an INAPPROPRIATE underlying shift.

    On the positive for me this week I approached the hierarchy at Adult Health and Social Care for them to show their support re social workers and managers of the care firm who provide us with the care and support that we NEED. 

    It seems to have been taken seriously.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Half baked ideas!

    The timing of the Labour government’s proposed disability reforms—pulled half-baked from the oven just in time for the Spring Budget—reveals a deeper duplicity. Much like Boris Johnson’s infamous “oven-ready” Brexit deal, this new recipe for welfare reform was rushed, ill-prepared, and is already leaving a poisonous aftertaste for the sick and disabled community.

    Labour came into power desperate to shake off the long shadow of “fiscal incompetence” attached to previous governments. Rachel Reeves’ central mantra has been to prove their economic credibility at all costs. But that “cost” is now being paid by those least able to afford it—those already pushed to the margins by illness, disability, and years of austerity.

    Under the banner of fiscal responsibility, the government has shoehorned sweeping cuts and ideological reforms into rhetoric that feels fundamentally disingenuous. They claim they are “incentivising work,” but they sidestep the uncomfortable truth: people on these benefits have already been assessed as not well enough to work, often through a harrowing process. The supposed “incentive” becomes a threat: lose your income, or prove your suffering more convincingly.

    Further suddenly announced cuts through freezing benefits because they don’t align with OBR forecasts doesn’t just expose the brutality of the policy—it also reveals the underlying logic. Rather than supporting people, this government is attempting to hammer the disabled population into a fiscal model for the spring statement that was never made with them in mind.

    And yet they tell us this was fully consulted on. The Green Paper, they say, reflects community engagement. But the scale of outcry, from across the disabled community and beyond, says otherwise. There has been no real dialogue—just a top-down agenda rushed into the budget to tick a political box.

    This is not reform. It is betrayal dressed up as balance. A recipe forced on the nation’s most vulnerable with no care for the consequences. A dish that looks glossy on the surface, but has a bitter, poisonous damaging core.



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @CaroA When in opposition we kept hearing how they had costed everything but we never got the details and then once in power there was a blackhole wherever they looked. It begets the question as to what were they really doing while in opposition to be so surprised ?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    This is unspeakable - and to try and slide this by the watchdogs to avoid the obvious human rights breaches is beyond sense. 

    Labour have absolutely lost the plot - if they want us to trust them ever again then they need to retract these proposals immediately - and announce that they’re going to consort with disability groups and human rights watchdogs to “fix the broken benefit system” 

    Because this is using explosives to sort the weeds in the garden - utterly insane, devoid of any humanity and compassion and any MP who supports this should resign in shame.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    # The Great Political Illusion?

    Like a master stage magician, the government has directed us to an elaborate spectacle of benefit reforms. With grand flourishes and dramatic pronouncements, they've unveiled a show of tough measures aimed at "getting Britain working" and cracking down on "benefit dependency."

     We're meant to watch in awe as the magician appears to saw the benefits system in half. But as with any magic trick, what matters is not where they tell you to look, but where they don't. While our eyes are fixed on the dazzling display of benefit reforms scheduled for years in the future, the real action happens elsewhere—in the swift and certain implementation of tax increases through the next Finance Bill.

    This performance calls to mind the Wizard of Oz, who created an intimidating projection of power and authority—all smoke, thunder, and commanding voice—while behind the curtain, a very different reality existed. "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!" the Wizard commanded, just as the government might prefer we focus on the imposing specter of benefit reform rather than the immediate tax changes being prepared.

    The Wizard's illusion eventually fell apart when Toto pulled back the curtain. Similarly, the legal system may eventually reveal that many of these benefit reforms cannot be fully implemented as proposed. But by then, the tax increases will already be in place, approved by a public who believed they were part of a bargain where "everyone does their part."

    Like Dorothy and her companions who discovered the Wizard's true nature, we may eventually realize that the fearsome reforms were largely projection and spectacle. But unlike in the story, the taxes paid while distracted by the show won't be returned once the curtain falls.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Apparently More councillors have resigned today because of labours leadership think there will be more that do .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Surely there will be legal action taken against Labour's plans?


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Dave Dee Answer is NO.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Dave Dee Given all the various statements on this now from charities, unions and everyone in between who deals with PIP, I’m hoping they may perhaps get a Judicial Review going. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Dave Dee Given Keir Starmers human rights lawyer background (talk about irony) he'll more than likely find any way round it he can.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Neil Cook Yep, literally.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Dave Dee Let’s hope so. Let’s hope they’ve left themselves wide open to it. But let’s also remember to do our bit as well, namely persistent contact with our own mps…and you can even contact the lords via a link on this site.  Word any contact yourself though, rather than a cut and paste, as I’m sure I’ve read they ignore this kind of communication. And let’s support any protest or charity campaign going on, if possible. Good luck all.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @DJ Brilliant and well said, DJ!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Anon What up, down voter? Hit a nerve, did I?

      Here's another one for the truth twisters......the reason why they don't believe claimants is because they themselves lie so much. Projection, bro.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @M I shall not be adhering to any conditionality ,they can't be permitted to keep changing the goalposts, you're too unwell,disabled one day, and need not engage. The next you have to. !! Nope. There's no magic wand for our health conditions and engaging with the Job centre def ain't one of them. 
      We need to stand up to this s**t.
      In any way we can. Do they think because we are ill we are stupid too. Something has to give the entire changes proposed are far too harsh. Brill idea to make applying for pip much harder to take it away from us , so we are destitute, then expect us to look for work. Yeah sure I'll go in my pjs ,I'll crawl along the floor like I have to do on my worse days. I honestly want to swear,but won't lower myself.  God help us. 
       
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Anon Thing is it is the background that these work coaches are being employed from. That is ALARMING me.

      As with the Assessors on face to face


      I think, that behind the scenes of all of this with the confidence of Starmer and co., that there have been consultations going on in areas that we are still NOT fully aware of and perhaps never will be. 

      We are aware of the disabled charities that they consulted with. It was NOT sufficient that is for sure as they professed they had consulted as this is the argument on one of the 4 legal challenges against them. That was thrown at Labour in Parliament this week.

      The economics make NO sense whatsoever.

      They do NOT need to even be doing this. This 5 billion black hole repetitive nonsense that we are being blamed to have created because we are disabled, sick chronically unwell.

      The DWP involvement regarding the statistics,  THE OBR finally tearing that into pieces on 26 March 2025. 

      I think there is still a lot more to come to light in more ways  than one as to HOW it has evolved that we were to take the rap for and be used as scapegoats with this Government. I think eventually it will evolve that we have been betrayed by more than one entity.

      Which gave the Government the 'Balls' as Starmer said to do it.

      However, what I DO THINK is Starmer and co., never once thought that we would challenge him with the determination that we have.  

      Long term sick, disabled people the attitude towards us has in society almost become as if we are a burden on the NHS, a burden on primary and secondary services a burden on the economy. 

      It is scary it is more than harmful it is inhumane and indeed it is ALL in contravention of Equality Act 2010. The green paper proposals were UNLAWFUL I posted last week how Labour were basically able to go ahead with this because of the strategical deployment of legal tactics.

      QUITE SIMPLY UNLAWFUL





       


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @M Sanctioning a claimant is a decision a work coach makes independently.

      If many of them who claim they do care about claimants (including PCS Union making such claims), then they wouldn't be making these abusive decisions.

      As far as I'm concerned, it is entirely dependent on the work coach to STOP sanctioning ill and disabled people.

      If they truly give a crap and want to help us (which we know isn't true for many), the power is in their hands to STOP SANCTIONING US.

      Grow some balls and make a change from within the jobcentre.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    They'll be bringing back the workhouses next !

    1930's - The Island of Alcatraz
    Regulation No. 5
    You are entitled to food, clothing, shelter and medical attention. Anything else you get is a privilege

    2025  - The British Isles
    Food - millions rely on food banks and breakfast clubs for kids.
    Shelter - housing crisis & homelessness rife.
    Clothing - no doubt many people without a decent coat or shoes for the winter and using charity shops for secondhand clothes.
    Medical attention - thankfully we have the NHS free at point of service - take away disabled people's benefits and they can't pay for prescriptions as many still do have to pay for them.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Andrea Kent I keep saying we will have workhouses the way it’s going 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Andrea Kent @Andrea Kent  you are probably right in your comments or they could also try Papillion as well why not another option I guess.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Andrea Kent "You are entitled to food, clothing, shelter and medical attention. Anything else you get is a privilege"

      I doubt and of the above will be a privilege, considering how they government is treating innocent protesters.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    My local mp Kim Johnson, has said the cuts are sadistically cruel and she won't be supporting them.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Lpot50 Let's hope the majority follow suit 
      Waiting for my local MP Maria Eagle to do the same. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    A third of pip claimants… that’s massive. Everyone is So worried. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Neil Cook I completely understand, it took me three attempts.

      DWP clearly messed up your previous claim.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Anon I tried to but it was such a waste of time and so stressful I never went near it ever again 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Neil Cook Please apply for PIP now, if you're able to.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Limbolife I don't get pip but I'm UC/LCWRA and I'm absolutely petrified and scared stiff, once it's taken from me I'm absolutely finished and won't have anywhere to go after that. This government is an absolute RUDDY DISGRACE.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Emailed to my MP yesterday:

    I am one of your constituents and have included my address at the end of this email. You have not responded to any of our previous emails, bar one about assisted dying. I appreciate you must be very busy, but this issue is literally one of life or death for thousands of people in this country, so I would respectfully ask that you read the following and let us know what stance you intend to take on this issue.

    I have done an impact assessment on our individual circumstances, which I think highlights the absurdity of the government’s welfare proposals. I’m currently job seeking, as my NHS role is at risk. My husband is disabled and unable to work. I’ve done a spreadsheet to analyse the impact of me taking a more senior role on the same hours. Under the proposed welfare changes, after losing approximately £900 of our current monthly income (lost PIP, LCWRA, UC Carer’s element), I would be able to improve our circumstances by the princely sum of £43 per month by taking on a more senior role. So we would still have around £850 less PER MONTH than we do now. We need this income just to live, and to cover the extra expenses caused by disability.

    Perhaps I would be encouraged to go full time. Can I rely on the state to care for my husband while i’m at work?

    My husband will be ‘encouraged’ to work because the PIP application will not care that he chokes at almost every meal and is unstable on his feet, or that his daytime fatigue has a big impact on him. Those won’t be boxes he can tick.

    My husband didn’t become disabled through engaging in extreme sports, drinking excessively, smoking or taking drugs. He was born with this health condition. This was not a life choice. Are disabled people of no value to this society? Are they less valuable than those who work? He is of great value to me and my daughters. And my daughters certainly deserve to have their basic needs met as well.

    This government has gone to the extreme with these proposals, and the impact on the most vulnerable in our society will be extreme as well. Please stand up for us.

    Yours sincerely,
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @gingin Gingin

       So eloquent, poignant and so very true.

      It is the fatigue side of a lot of these questions on the PIP process that they FAIL to enable an awful lot of us to be able to tick a box on. 

      To include the taking of medications and the effects. Which would in most claimants situations would exceed more than 4 points, and more, on the descriptor/activities if it were to be included.

      I am disabled due to an RTA as such I can fully appreciate your comments that this was NOT something that we did that culminated in the way we are. 

      Your comments that as disabled people for whatever the reason that we are of NO VALUE to this society resonates I think with US ALL. 

      Your husband is of VALUE 

      I have had NO response from my MP either.

      Is there NOTHING that your primary care GP, or secondary Consultant(s) can do to ensure that he will fall within the category of exceptional circumstances?

      I NOTE that you said that you worked within the NHS, I have felt an extreme unease for sometime even prior to the Green Paper that Starmer and co., have produced regarding a shift in the attitude of primary and secondary health care services. Just this week pointing out in NO uncertain terms to my GP that his attitude is NOT appropriate. I hope that you have at least the support from your GP and any secondary care that your husband's condition falls outside of the box quite literally. However, he is severely disabled.

      This is the final straw from the Government for us ALL. With little or NO support or even regard for the financial hardship indeed in your case, their CRUEL proposals even with you working that the shift in what they are doing MAKES NO ECONOMIC SENSE whatsoever. 






    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @gingin gingin a brilliantly written email, I admire you and your family's dedication to your husband you speak for many I wish I could say that they cared but I don't think they do.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Our household will lose virtually our entire income - because the LCWRA payment is being scrapped too. I'll lose that, my PIP care component and my partner will lose his carer's allowance. I don't know how I'm meant to attend advisor meetings at a job centre without being able to wash, dress or leave the house if my carer has to work full time. (that's if he's even able to find a job) What are we actually meant to live on? Destitution is not going to help people who can't work. This 4 point rule is the most insidious, dangerous, cruel and malicious piece of legislation ever inflicted by a UK government. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Carolyn Hucker I'm in exactly the same position, cb esa scrapped,pip gone and carers gone as well,I can't eat or drink anything if noone is in the house ( dysmotility) yet scored zero for that,my husband wages ate not very much  because I need him caring for me at home for a very good reason, I don't believe I will be protected from the changes as despite multiple health diagnosis, all my points come from mh,they ignored everything else
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    If people keep put  pressure on MPs then it should make more MPs to remove their vote to cuts and one MP who agreed with cuts is not voting for them and human rights people are looking to see if labour have broken rules there's protests to and it don't matter what harriet harman says to the news she thinks that the government are just saying there's big rebellion because they know it's less don't believe her she's not InTouch with nothing just her opinion we are not in the 1980s she's out of date and stuck in 1980s that is gone she doesn't know about how people fight to stop things and is not just MPs it councillors 9 have resigned never mentioned that did she she can't say what's going to happen I think she been told to play it down so it distracts people and takes pressure off and stops the media adding fuel because people have read the news and are writing to MPs she's trying to stop it all people shouldn't stop what they doing because activists are not going to stop the MPs who said they voting against stuff will vote you can't stop human rights the government don't get it .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Lill Does remind you of the 70's and the 80's though doesn't it Lill?

      Just remember how that ended up and the harm inhumane deprivation caused then!

      'PEOPLE GETTING ANGRY'

      We all are though Lill giving them hell!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Lill I sent an E. Mail to my MP , Stating that we elected a Labour government , WHY have we ended up with a heartless Tory one. The government should be taxing the rich not attacking the disabled & the pensioners, the most vulnerable in society, it is shameful.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    This is yet another disgusting attack on the poorest people of our society by a very controversial labour government. This will add more heartache and misery to those who are already at their wits end and I have first hand experience of this from a friend who will most probably give up if she loses her PIP . 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    How are we expected to stand up to 
    such haterad, we are hated and misundersood as much as the asylum seekers are still are .That is what this  government wants.
    Nearly everyones case is definitely different. 
    But the government has just plucked a figure out of the air ,again.And made people like me,scared.
    My take on the government policies is ,try to not worry to much, untill it happens and the brown envelope arrives. 
    I know from experience it's easy to say,but you have to try.
    Because if you're like me, it seriously can lead to deveristateing results.



  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Is anyone else excited by the new opportunities the government is creating for participation in the labour market?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Anon You are RIGHT Anon at 1st a lot of people thought that we would be protected in this category.

      No I actually think they have DELIBERATELY with some of their proposals aimed it at over 55's hoping that it WILL finish us off completely. 


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Steph It's the disabled and will never work again group( me included) that will be made poor for ever by theses policies my money will be lost and I'm looking at a total wipeout,cont esa pip and carers going to be gone leaving me with £350 a month medical retirement pension!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Ask77 Great one 👌 we need a laugh because this is exactly what we're facing,stupid policies by a stupid government 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Just John Excited? Well the government are just adding thousands more who will be looking for jobs by sacking those in government jobs!! kier Hardy must be spinning in his grave to be seeing what his namesake & the woman Reeves are up to. Attacking the disabled & elderly is utterly shameful, when they should be taxing the rich.They sit there comfortable , warm & well fed & attack the poorest, shame on them!!

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Just John With AI creeping in and a reduction in customer service roles for able bodied and well people? Worked at the JC and no employer wanted a member of staff who was frequently unwell - disabled folks required adjustments to work stations some didn't want in their businesses.  This bill is just backing the sick and disabled into absolute poverty. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    250,000 disabled people will be pushed into poverty by these reforms.

    Only 30 Labour MPs are currently opposing it.

    Email every Labour MP with the best counter-argument you can find.

    Re-send the email every 2 weeks.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @gingin That’s the problem there is not one decent Party to vote for, unfortunately our political Parties have forsaken us.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Disabled Rights Movement I have already sent a strong Email & will resend it as you suggest.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Matt Yup, there are local elections here and normally the fight here is between the Lib Dems and the Conservatives. My Lib Dem MP is ignoring my emails so she doesn't appear to give a stuff about my concerns regarding these welfare proposals. And there's no way I'm voting Conservative. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Gingin And if there are local elections in your area, VOTE. Preferably against Labour. And let your MP know why. They may take notice!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Disabled Rights Movement I’ve emailed my Lib Dem MP multiple times with different angles, this has been almost daily lately. She hasn’t responded at all but I’m going to carry on. I think it’s important that we shout as loud as we can and make all the points we can make about how brutal and unjust these proposals are. We must not stand by and do nothing and we must not give up. 
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.