As a storm of reviews and attempts to change the benefits system are ramped up in 2026, being well informed and fighting back are the things that will make a positive difference for claimants.

Last year, Labour succeeded in getting through its cuts to the health element of universal credit for new claimants, which come into force this April.

But claimants fought back ferociously against PIP cuts, inflicting a huge defeat on the government.

The lesson that ministers have taken from that mauling is that they need to persuade their own MPs of the justification for cuts long before anything goes to a vote, rather than springing things on backbenchers and hoping to force them through before opposition can build.

As a result, this year will see the Streeting, Milburn and Timms reviews report back and it’s unlikely any of them are intended to do claimants any favours. 

We don’t expect to see Labour make any major changes to PIP this year, but we could discover what they have planned before the end of the year, once the Timms review reports.

There are also issues such as when and whether the WCA is to be abolished, whether Unemployment Insurance benefit will be brought in and whether young people will lose access to the UC health element.  Again, this may be the year that we discover what is going to happen, rather than the year that new rules come into force.

So, we’ve revived the PIP/UC changes page that many people relied on during last year’s battles.

It includes information on, amongst other issues:

  • the Streeting mental health and neurodiversity overdiagnosis review
  • the Milburn UC cuts for youth review
  • the Timms PIP review
  • UC changes
  • Fewer PIP reviews more WCA reassessments
  • More face-to-face assessments for PIP and WCA
  • Motability changes

We’ll be keeping the page regularly updated, so that you can track what’s coming.

We’ve also revived the What you can do page, which thousands of claimants used to discover ways to influence MPs during Labour’s attempt to slash PIP eligibility.

At the moment there’s information on contributing to the Milburn review and to the Commons work and pensions committee NEET review, as well as all the general suggestions for actions you can take to raise awareness of benefits issues.

We know it’s easy to feel hopeless when you see the rising tide of anti-claimant propaganda being pumped out by the press and the government.  But ministers were defeated last year largely by the clamour of outrage directed at their MPs by ordinary claimants around the country. And much of that outrage came from Benefits and Work readers, who shared campaigning tips, copies of emails and mutual support and encouragement on these pages.

We genuinely believe that, with Labour struggling desperately in the polls and MPs wondering if they will still have a job by the Autumn 2029, claimant activism could still work the same wonders in 2026 as it did in 2025. 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    "Convicted criminals detained in hospitals set to lose benefits"
    "Government seeking to restore trust and common sense to the benefits system."
    "Serious criminals held in hospitals would lose their benefits worth hundreds of pounds per month, under new proposals."
    "Crackdown on loophole would see those convicted of serious offences treated the same as people serving sentences in prison, who cannot claim benefits."
    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/convicted-criminals-detained-in-hospitals-set-to-lose-benefits

    But it is anyone detained in hospital by court order.

    This would apply to people who are not guilty due to severe mental disorder for the crime they were convicted of.

    And would also include court orders that are done on the threshold of the court is satisfied they did it, without actually convicting them of doing it. By Magistrates courts. So not serious enough crimes to be Crown Court.

    This saves very little money so why are they doing this. Is it to demonise people with mental health conditions. To create the narrative mentally ill = undeserving bad people. Before the next attempt at welfare cuts. Which look likely to be targeted at those with mental health conditions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @John for the simple reason it is  for propaganda

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    We do not live in a time when the governments of the day care for the well being of ordinary people and the less fortunate. This is a government of the rich, for the rich and by the rich!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    I burned out after the anti-PIP reform campaign but may be ready to rejoin 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Gingin You were amazing. I’m sorry you burnt out. You put so much work in. Take care of yourself 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    They need too concentrate on helping out the youngsters with training,studying and work as long term unemployment is bad for your mental health.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Neil Yep. And youngsters are the future.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Post on Rightsnet with anecdotal evidence from one welfare advisor who has noted that PIP reviews are being done swiftly, sometimes in a matter of days with no assessment. They note some awards reduced, some maintained where the evidence submitted supported an award being increased. I think we all need to be prepared to go to appeal, get your support lined up and ready because if this is representative of a new approach nationwide, it looks very much like they are planning cuts by stealth, no new legislation required. GAME ON PEOPLE.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @rookie The DWP will plow on regardless it's about the principle for them.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Aw Spot on, @Aw. The dwp decision makers seem to support or return a worse award than the original decision automatically at mandatory reconsideration, so it's always worth appealing, especially if you have clear medical records to support your claim.

      My award was mysteriously raised after I appealed, without it even going to tribunal. You can't help wondering if they're relying on people just to accept unquestioningly the original/man recon decision, and cuts are therefore being made by stealth, as you say.

      I agree with @John that, for whatever reason, there's an element of a less than thorough assessment of cases, as the dwp tries to push through the numbers, but the result is the same: incorrect decisions resulting in low, or no award.

      We have to persist in challenging those decisions until the dwp realises it will cost them more to defend them than they can save.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Aw When the answer is nefarious plot conspiracy or lazy incompetence it is usually incompetence. It maybe just lazy DWP employees trying to do lots of claims. Not bothering to read the assessment paper work beyond diagnosis and maybe medication or just skimming the paper work. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    I do qualify for PIP but have never claimed it as I get the UCLCW (?) Or what used to be ESA and it's been enough for me. But I've just been told that that suddenly I'm due for another assessment. When you have an assessment, is it like having a new claim and will I be treated as a new claimant and assessed based on the new goal posts they have set? I have agoraphobia and depression, and I can't help but feel always so vulnerable when these conversations happen. Always feel so utterly hopeless, especially when I hear a politician or someone talk about severe social anxiety and mental health like it's a joke!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Kaylee You cant talk to a layman about agoraphobia, if you haven't had it,you cant understand it,believe me ,ive had therapists who didn't understand the condition or understand what we go through especially when panic disorder is attached to it,people only ever understand when they themselves get it,and then they're horrified, they dont want this new thing but dont understand how to rid themselves of it and live in fear of the next attack,my mother was one of them,mocked my agoraphobia for 30 years and this year,developed the condition over the 3 months my dad was in hospital and found herself unable to leave the house and she was ringing ambulances for panic attacks at night,insisting someone sleep with her,she even rang friends to see if they'd live with her temporarily, she got worse,ended up with delirium from stress,and now lives in a nursing home,so you never know when its going to be your turn!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Kaylee You will get a letter with a form to fill out about your condition and then should be able to get a telephone call from them to discuss the form several weeks later.  Just be calm and remember it is not your fault you have these issues and many thousands also do, so there are understanding people out there.  Try asking CAB for help.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Kaylee I do not recall when the WCA LCW LCWRA eligibility criteria was last changed. The eligibility changes proposed by the Tories in 2023 that were widely reported and due to be implement from 2025 never happened. As the Tories lost the general election before the legislation went to parliament, and Labour abandoned the Tories proposed changes. And Labours plan to abolish the WCA is not until 2028-29 if they can get it passed parliament.

      A UC WCA reassessment for LCW LCWRA is just like making a new claim, and eligibility is determined by the rules at the time of the new assessment. If you remain eligible your claim continues it is not treated as a new claim so if you have LCW or UC transitional protection you retain it. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    What is going to happen in 2026?   
      
    Well it looks like Digital ID has been kicked into the long grass, for now.

    I would not trust any Government with our Data, they will definately try revisit it again,  David Cameron started  with the NHS OPT in OUT of your NHS medical records 2013 ish   etc. 

    Digital ID is purely to have control over people. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @clearwater It's only been kicked onto the grass for working people
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @CC Any conviction by using a law for totally different reasons, not intended by Parliament when the law was passed, would be overturned on appeal by the UK Supreme Court. As what matters in UK law is what Parliament intended when the law was passed not how some Judge or Politician would like to interpret the law some time in the future.

      Which is why for example the Supreme Court ruling on Transgender rights was not based on how the law was being interpreted or on science or society or practicality. It was just based on Parliamentary briefings and debates on the bill at the time the legislation was voted on by Parliament. Which failed to mention including Transgender people as their preferred gender. So the Supreme court ruling was they were not covered. And why it is the government who are to blame for not then introducing an amendment to the legislation. And instead disingenuously trying to hide behind the Supreme Court Ruling as if it dictates legislation and laws cannot be changed by Parliament. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @clearwater Laws that were made many many years ago are often used now for totally different reasons Reasons that were either not intended or could not even have been thought of when they were made So any laws made today can and will be manipulated by lawyers businesses or governments in the future What ever is stated about these ID cards They will be used for other reasons If not now then sometime in the future Maybe not even to far in the future
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @tom The government announced digital IDs as an anti illegal immigrants policy. As it would be required by employers and so stop illegal immigrants from working. As if they are not employed off the books cash in hand. Regardless removing the employment part removes the original reason given for the policy. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @clearwater
      If you read the small print it has not, only the employment  part of it has been withdrawn( for now) they rest of it is still active, the one log in, and company directors still need a digital ID to register the company ETC
      They are also still mulling over implementing a age restriction on X  for 16's and under,  Meaning adults may need to verify their age with A digital ID 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    It's not a good time to be disabled and relying on benefits because politicians don't like the disabled community. Timms is a snake in disguise. Tories and Reform want to kick us out of society by imposing major benefits reversals. Lee Anderson wants to bring back the Invacar and shows what he really thinks of disabled people. There's only the Green Party who seem to be flying the Freak flag! They'll get my vote.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @MadSi Labour do too, they are ALL the same , 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    The what you can do page should include vote in the May local elections if your area has an election.

    What we want is a change of direction. Labour MPs will only do that if they think they need to. Labour lossing a lot of votes to the Greens, Your Party, LibDems. Might convince them more than letters from concerned constituents alone. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @John I don't believe Right to Buy should have been touched tbh. Most council housing is old. The problem was that the council weren't using the money to build new properties. Now most tenant can't afford to ever buy their council properties and they will get older and more problematic for the councils. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Michael Replacing private landlords with council housing is a Green Party policy in so far that it is an aspiration with no target date.

      The actual policies are
      Rent control (I think Labour has already passed some legislation on unfair rent increases)
      Making rental income subject to national insurance (Something Labour has considered doing)
      Making all tenancies long term reducing the ability of landlords to evict at whim (Something Labour has considered or is doing)
      Replacing council tax with a property value tax paid by the property owner not the tenant (property value taxes have been considered by Labour)
      Increasing building of council housing (Something all parties aspire to)
      Giving councils the right to buy rental properties at a discount (unsure how this would work, for new builds developers can already be forced to build a percentage of social rented housing that are sold below market price to housing associations or councils)
      End social housing and council tenants right to buy (Something Labour has considered doing)

      Basically left wing Labour policies that rather than being considered would in theory be implemented if the Greens somehow became the government. As the Greens position themselves as the true left wing Labour party. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Tonedial What an absolute insane policy. So the green party in effect want masses of homeless people.

      Which people are actually voting for these lunatics(?) 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Rebecca Barton The Green Party have Said they will definitely Abolish all Private Landlords.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @John I shall be voting Green in May and I shall email my Labour MP to tell her why. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I hope B and W also include changes to Access to Work - if that is hammered then Labour can forget getting more disabled into work.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Matt I should add that the average time for an Access to Work application is now approx 18 months. No sane employer is going to wait that long - and for, like myself, been expected to go through more occupational health it'll mean constructive dismissal, legal action, and I dread to think what the current employment tribunal backlog is like....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Labour is ignoring the disabled. The Tories want to cull the disabled. And Reform is heading towards eugenics. No matter which party, the disabled community is up against the wall. :(
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @RUTH It seems an easy win as every person seems to know someone who is or seems to be fiddling the system So if it is seen to be mainstream to attack those of us who are ill/disabled More will do so and feel they are doing the right thing With all the pedalling of misconceptions by the politicians and media about Cuts are easier if you have a large enough amount of people behind you and or you have annexed a group of people to be the fall guys
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @M. Totally correct! They are all full of hatred towards us in every possible way.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.