The DWP have finally stated that people over state pension age “will not be affected by the proposed changes” to personal independence payment (PIP) set out in the Pathways To Work Green Paper.  However, questions still remain.

Ever since the Green Paper was published there has been a lack of clarity about whether pension age PIP claimants would be caught by the PIP 4-point rule.  Although the Green Paper made reference to the “working-age PIP caseload” there was no explicit statement that pension age claimants would be exempt.

It is the case that, once you reach state pension age, your award will usually become an ongoing award.  Whilst this means your PIP award does not have an end date, it doesn’t mean it will never be checked.

Instead, you are likely to have an award review every 10 years, according to a statement made by Amber Rudd – the then secretary of state for work and pensions – in May 2019.

But this could lead to a situation where claimants could lose their award at the age of say 76.

In an attempt to settle the matter, Labour MP Neil Duncan-Jordan asked the secretary of state in a written question:

“. . . what assessment she has made on the potential impact of the measure set out in the Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper, published on 18 March 2025 on PIP claimants of retirement age.”

DWP disability minister Stephen Timms answered:

 “Our intention is that the new eligibility requirement in Personal Independence Payment (PIP), in which people must score a minimum of four points in one daily living activity to be eligible for the daily living component, will apply to new claims and award reviews from November 2026, subject to parliamentary approval. In keeping with existing policy, people over State Pension Age are not routinely fully reviewed and will not be affected by the proposed changes.”

This does seem to suggest that claimants above state pension age are not being targeted by the DWP.  But it does leave several unanswered questions.

The first is just why this was not made explicit in the Green Paper, when it was clearly going to be a matter of enormous concern.

The second is what does “not routinely fully reviewed” mean?  In fact, thousands of claimants over pension age do have a planned award review after they reach pension age. 

In the year to January 2025, 12,300 pension age PIP claimants had a planned award review.  It is not clear why these happened or whether they will continue after November 2026.

In addition, 19,238 pension age PIP claimants had a change of circumstances review in the same period.

It is possible to move from the standard to the enhanced rate of PIP after state pension age by asking for a change of circumstances review, if your needs increase. 

However, if a claimant does not have any 4-point descriptors then there is nothing in the minister’s answer to guarantee that they would not run the risk of losing their daily living award altogether if they asked for a review after November 2026.

As with so much about the Green Paper, there is an impression of ideas being cobbled together after publication.  This impression was reinforced by a separate parliamentary answer, in which Timms wrote:

 “Some information on the impacts of the Pathways to Work Green Paper was published alongside the Spring Statement and can be found at this link: Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper - GOV.UK. More information on the impacts will be published in due course, a further programme of analysis to support development of the proposals in the Green Paper will be developed and undertaken in the coming months.”

Nonetheless, this news will come as a welcome relief for pension age PIP claimants.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    just a reminder that State Pension is NOT a Benefit!!!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    According to the Express, Reeves now has the Triple Lock in the crosshairs.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    Maybe they should take into consideration the amount of money that they waste fighting people who clearly deserve their awards. The amount they must pay the Tribunal service each year must be huge. Maybe they should just be honest and give people the awards that they clearly should have been given. The DWP are aware of this but they rely on people being to scared or their Mental Health is to frail to actually to attend a tribunal. This is such a shameful way to treat disabled people they should be ashamed of themselves. It’s almost like 
    they get a gold star if they manage to take away someone’s benefit. Maybe not a gold star a bonus perhaps !!!! Disgraceful
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    My post below was  trimmed! Here it is:

    To my mind the government dropped a major clanger making winter fuel allowance dependent on pension credit. In an ideal world it would be dependent on state pension alone. However, if they'd wanted to limit it they should have linked it to pip as well as state pension, especially as pensioners are not to have their pip cut, then all those people who applied for pension credit because of the winter fuel allowance would not have done so.

    Governments have created whole extra layers of spending because they have not got to grips with how welfare functions. Rachel Reeves ENCOURAGED pensioners to apply for pension credit in order to qualify for the winter fuel allowance - hey guys, I'm taking this little bit of pocket money from you (they like to call benefits pocket money, don't they), but you could get SO much more. Have a warm home, have a hot chocolate, have marshmallows.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    Let’s try again…cut off…
    Disabled People Against Cuts are organising this:

    Mass Lobby of MPs on disability Benefit Cuts 21.05.25
    12 noon until 4pm
    Westminster Hall Parliament

    Please contact your MP & ask for a meeting on 21.05.25

    iI couldn’t copy the link to the details. I’m sure details can be found on the DPAC site, here:

    https://dpac.uk.net
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago

    12 noon until 4pm
    Westminster Hall Parliament

    Please contact your MP & ask for a meeting on 21.05.25


    I couldn’t copy the link to the details. I’m sure details can be found on the DPAC site, here:
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    I have placed this link here as I think it is related to the cuts and services and this young lad certainly deserves mention as one of this Labour government's victims. please sign and share

    https://chng.it/jjJwyhSBMT

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @James singed and shared it
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @James I agree with you. It is heartbreaking and we saw too much of it under IDS. A family member had too little help and took his own life in 2013. It was, we were told, a direct result of a stuff up by the Student Loan Company who paid his loan to him while he was too ill to study. DWP then did a review and the stress was too much. It hasn't really left us and as a disabled person I saw how it affected his whole family. For me, every contact with the DWP is a reminder that makes it even harder to function.
      And there will be so many more if the Fraud and Error Bill uses algorithms to search our bank accounts? Why should the poorest and most vulnerable people pay the ultimate price for their utter incompetence?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @James Thanks for sharing this. Signed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    To my mind the government dropped a major clanger making winter fuel allowance dependent on  pension credit. In an ideal world it would be dependent on state pension alone. However, if they'd wanted to limit it they should have linked it to pip as well.as state pension
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    @Anon, I can't find the pip test you referred to with a three tier scoring system. Where did you get that?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Timms response is as clear as mud. All it tells me is they could still be reviewed and there is no guarantee that a reduction in.points upon review won't effect them.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Thank you so much for keeping bang on the news as it happens. And interpretations etc. only place I’ve found any help at all ..as disabled 75 plus this has to be life changing positive news for  thousands like me. An indication from the government from the start would have been humane…I truly despise them for the handling … they need to act but there are ways and means. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @gingin @gingin Its simple to answer Labour no longer represent working class they now only represent Labour mps 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @SpasticusAutisticus voting Green in local elections. Will never Labour again they coned us
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @gingin Means testing pip would be done unfairly ,it's not fair to those who saved all their lives, have working partners,or withdrew pension lump sums just before it happened, the 16k rule is way out of date and they would trap so many people into losing all their support just the same and being forced to live off their own life savings until it was all gone,it wouldn't bother the wealthy claimants but trap everyone else in poverty just the same as these proposals do,I know because I'm one who is set to lose 12k a year under these proposals but also someone who's partner withdrew his pension lump sum last year in February before any of this was said,it's not expendable money,it's his pension, he has no annuity with it either so no monthlypayment,either way we're totally screwed, beyond mad is an understatement 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @gingin I voted Labour for Corbyn, but it will be a cold day in hell before I 'd  vote for them again. I'd sooner vote Green or even Tory. The ex DPP and his current crop of drug using vermin are worse than Thatcher and merely proved how I have always felt, though I won't ever regret giving Corbyn my vote. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @Sam Why don't they act in a way that doesn't penalise at all those who depend on financial support to manage their disabilities? They don't have to act in this way - they have choices. Please don't vote Labour - not only have they put us through hell in their handling of this, but they have more hell planned for us. Don't let them divide us. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Labour have handled things appallingly, but the fact is it was at least partly the tories' plan to link pip to the uc health element that kicked off a rush to claim pip and caused this crisis. In addition, with the state pension age raised and rising, pip was a way to claw back some lost income and not have to struggle on working.

    Then with the winter fuel allowance - a trivial amount in the scheme of things - being tied to pension credit, many over state pension age who were eligible for pension credit - not a trivial amount- but who would never have claimed it, did so, and added to the welfare bill.

    How is it governments are so short sighted? It's obvious if you snatch away someone's income they'll look for alternatives. Politicians have made this mess and then they've scapegoated the people who are victims of it. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @SpasticusAutisticus @SoastusAuticus why do governments always blame the people for any fraud and turn a blind eye to mps who con on there expenses and make out the mp never broke any rules ? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @SpasticusAutisticus @SpasticusAutisticus, I wasn't saying the benefits bill was high or not high. @Anon says it isn't!

      I agree the official estimation of benefits conveniently turns the inefficiency and ineptitude of those running it against us.

      My point was that governments have seized on an increase in disability benefit claims to generate a moral panic about the cost of welfare, and that those in power should have seen coming a swell in claimant numbers, because of the rise in pension age, the proposed link of the health element in uc, the effect of gaining or losing pip on the entitlement to pension credit and the means testing of the winter fuel allowance.

      You have drawn attention to a sad fact - not everyone knows what they can claim, and you are right that the media have helped inform more people. Advice centres and sites such as B&W have also played a part in making people aware of their entitlement and successful with their claims.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @SpasticusAutisticus Good-grief do they have any human staff working in the DWP? In our experience + the way the DWP has handled Tom's uncle switching from ESA to Universal credit, we were beginning to think the DWP was one mass computer system, maybe been operated by one cleaner, whilst mopping the floor.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @keepingitreal Appalling: That's one way to dislike it. I would say this government has treated the disabled + sick with utter contempt.

      I was no fan of Sunak, but under his government, he wanted to turn the PIP into some new version of Argos, where disabled people shopped via a catalogue + copons, which was terrible.
      Whatever the last government started, this government has had ample time to have changed it: So, whatever is going on now is fully down to this incompetent government that holds contempt for anyone who is vulnerable.

      As soon as this government came into power, they immediately mugged the elderly of their winter fuel allowance.  They then passed various laws to snoop + spy into the bank accounts of the elderly, the disabled + the terminally ill.
      Then the whole world watched on, while our PM, Chancellor + all the front benches went shopping for free gifts, the PM got so exited by this, he even let other men dress his wife.

      As soon as they they finished their shopping spree. They immediately went out to mug the disabled of their PIP + any other sickness benefit they might get. At least Dick Turpin had the decency to wear a mask. This Labour government is now in danger of probably raiding the orphanage.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @keepingitreal  I had zero idea any such change was in the pipeline and I read the disability press so it seems implausible that Joe Public would know to claim, although maybe the fact the he online local presses constantly run ads saying "this is how much you could get" might have something to do with it?
      And yet again, governments turn round and blame those who manage a successful claim!I'd been disabled for 15 years before my parents or I saw a penny of help, and it had kept my parents near to the breadline when I was small, despite the fact a stunning level of  incompetence and abuse in the NHS had crippled me at birth.ertainly nobody asked me if I'd prefer to keep my dignity because further down the line people would throw bricks at me in the street and my parents having swallowed the Daily Heil would decide that their daughter was best forgotten.
       
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So the government has changed their mind about pensioners. After taking their winter allowance of them. The government is obviously thinking about votes also after making this change why not do the severe life long conditions like neurology diseases with no cure and medical evidence to back this up and put their minds at rest give these people who suffer every minute of the day  give them dignity they deserve come on government wake up and ask disabled people how best to reform the green paper thank you fir reading my post 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @Diceman24 My last posting was cut short, why?

      I'll try writing it again.

      Thinking of their votes? We got some news for you, Labour is now becoming unelectable.
      Rachel Reeves is on a one woman mission to destroy the Labour Party.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @Diceman24 Thinking of their votes? Got some news for you: 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I think I recall Liz Kendall saying in the House that the most severely disabled will not be subject to review where there is no chance of health improvement. I might be wrong and guess we will just have to wait and see what will be in a Bill they intend to bring forward.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Sam And not many doctors will sign a piece of paper confirming that someone has no chance of health improvement, as treatments are deemed unlikely to provide clinical benefit or prolonged survival.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Pearse English. Trouble is they get to decide what severely disabled means. I'm assuming anyone who isn't is a coma is not severe enough 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    https://sites.google.com/view/openletterdisabilitybenefits/home

    This open letter has been signed by over 1250 initial signatories across the United Kingdom in its first few days, including healthcare professionals, disabled people, carers, academics, and grassroots organisers standing together:

    Open Letter: Disability Benefits Cuts Are Creating a Public Health Emergency
    18th April 2025
    To: Chancellor Rachel Reeves, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Liz Kendall, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, and Members of Parliament,
    As frontline clinicians, we issue an urgent public warning: the Government’s proposed £4.5 billion in cuts to disability benefits, outlined in the Pathways to Work Green Paper, will not only plunge hundreds of thousands into poverty — they are already devastating lives in our clinics, emergency rooms, and communities. We urge immediate national attention to this crisis.
    The figures are damning. Your own impact assessment shows that 3.2 million families will lose an average of £1,720 annually. PIP claimants face an average reduction of £4,500 per year, and 50,000 children are projected to be plunged into poverty. The most vulnerable households — those receiving combinations of PIP, Universal Credit health elements, and Carer’s Allowance — face staggering losses of over £12,000 each year.
    These are not individuals with mild or moderate health conditions. PIP and UC assessments already require extensive documentation and rigorous medical scrutiny. Freedom of Information requests reveal that PIP cuts will not only strip benefits from 46% of current claimants (2,891,000 people), but also from 13% (1,608,000 people) of those assessed by health professionals as having the most severe disabilities.
    Poverty is poisonous for health. Life already costs significantly more for disabled people - Scope estimates an extra £1,010 in monthly outgoings due to disability-related expenses. At the same time, 30% of disabled people are living in poverty, and 69% of those referred to food banks are disabled. These benefits are not luxuries — they prevent cold homes, missed meals, and untreated illness.
    We are already witnessing the severe mental health consequences of these proposals. Since the Green Paper's announcement, patients with serious mental illness — including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and complex trauma — have presented with heightened anxiety, symptom escalation, and increases in both self-harm and suicidal ideation.
    One claimant, who lives with unstable borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder, told Benefits & Work: “I struggle understanding the world and understanding what people mean... I tried volunteering and it sent me off the deep end. After being unable to volunteer and hearing about the PIP changes, I tried to kill myself with tablets. Now I've got permanent stomach damage.”
    Another, diagnosed with schizophrenia, said: “This will be catastrophic for me. I will lose all sense of independence. My mum is my only carer, and as she gets older, I’m aware that once she is gone I will be all alone... I feel suicidal at the prospect of these changes, and my symptoms are worsening.”
    These are not isolated accounts, nor is the risk limited to those with mental health conditions. Stress is not a side effect — it is a known accelerator of physical and mental deterioration across nearly all disabilities. These testimonies are early warning signs of a broader humanitarian emergency.
    Meanwhile, carers — the unsung backbone of our healthcare system — are being pushed to breaking point. Already disproportionately affected by mental health challenges, hundreds of thousands now face losing Carer’s Allowance if the person they support no longer qualifies for PIP. One woman told Benefits & Work: “If I lose my disability benefits, my mother loses her Carer’s Allowance. Then she’ll have to place me in a nursing home.”
    We are hearing increasing reports of carers skipping meals, medications, and their own healthcare in order to provide essential support. Stripping support simultaneously from disabled people and their carers is not just morally indefensible — it is economically reckless. Carers save the UK taxpayer an estimated £162 billion annually by reducing the need for formal care. More generally, every £1 spent on disability benefits returns £1.48 in reduced hospital admissions, decreased social care needs, and other cost savings — none of which have been factored into the Office for Budget Responsibility’s models. These cuts are short-sighted, dangerous, and built on flawed economics.
    We further reject the claim that these cuts will “incentivise work” or produce “behavioural change.” Some people are too disabled to work — either permanently or temporarily. Even the government's own figures show that 13% of those currently on enhanced PIP for severe disability would be left with no support at all. Decades of research tells us poverty does not motivate — it crushes hope and erodes both physical and mental health. And many of the 1 in 6 PIP claimants who are in work won’t be able to do so deprived of what is quite literally a personal independence payment, trapping people into impoverished lives.
    Healthcare professionals, disabled people, and carers should have been consulted. Instead, sweeping reforms affecting some of the most vulnerable people in the UK were announced without transparency, safeguarding, or democratic accountability. The most dangerous elements of the Green Paper — including the proposed rule requiring claimants to score four or more points in a single PIP activity — have been excluded from the consultation and left to be decided behind closed doors.
    We are deeply alarmed that safeguarding guidance will not be published until autumn — after the expected vote in Parliament. This makes meaningful scrutiny impossible. It is also entirely incompatible with basic safeguarding principles. Changes to LCWRA criteria and the absence of exemptions for severe and enduring conditions are ethically indefensible.
    We are already seeing the consequences: clinicians are reporting increased safeguarding concerns, worsening health outcomes, and growing despair among claimants. This is not a theoretical risk — it is unfolding now.
    We are therefore taking the unprecedented step of issuing this open letter. We warn you now: if enacted, these changes will trigger a wave of preventable health crises, family breakdowns, and avoidable deaths.
    We all want a benefits system that is effective, transparent, and empowering. We share your goal of enabling disabled people to live full and meaningful lives, including through work where appropriate. But these proposals will achieve the opposite. They will deepen health inequalities, institutionalise despair, and leave a legacy that no government should want to bear.
    This will be your legacy — or your turning point.
    We urge you to withdraw disability benefits cuts immediately, and to ensure that any future reforms are co-designed with disabled people, carers, and clinicians — rooted not in austerity, but in dignity. The disabled community is already in the later stages of a 'Commission on Social Security'.
    Fiscal gains must follow humanity — not drive it off a cliff. The wellbeing of millions depends on your response.

    Respectfully,
    This open letter has been signed by over 1250 initial signatories across the United Kingdom in its first few days, including healthcare professionals, disabled people, carers, academics, and grassroots organisers standing together. These initial signatories represent the broad consensus that the proposed cuts represent a serious public health concern. Additional signatures continue to be collected - everyone counts. Please sign at the bottom of the form or here.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Anon My comment was cut short seems to be a glitch in the system here... I was just saying it's wonderful to have the assistance of AI but it is hard work all the same!  Then said I do hope we can all keep going with so little time left before June's vote.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Anon Hi thank you so much and for your other comments (if you were the previous Anon/s) but this is just the letter somebody else has written and organised I just copied it in here because I think it is a wonderful letter and I hope many more people sign it.  Somebody in the previous article forum gave the link thankfully.

      Otherwise i'm grateful Ive got AI assisting me with formulating my ideas although it is dare I say it hard work (that word...) 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CaroA All time greatest comment.

      CaroA is leading our defense.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Sadly my next pip assessment is when I’m 65, I will still have 2 yrs left to retire 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @Vicks @Vicks your lucky, me brother pip assessment is in 2027 and he probably not get 4 points and he lose his money and god help us cos he goes nuts again. Before he go pip he did all our heads in and he in and out hospital more times than nurses cos he self harm or he suicidal. He nearly did me head in it embarrassing to when you feel like your stalking Bristol Royal Infirmary to see your brother 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Vicks Mine too. It's the story of my life, so near yet so far.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Vicks I was not due to get my pension until I was 66, but was due a PIP review when I was 64. With Covid it was late, albeit still before my state retirement age. I eventually got it when I was 65; I got what I now believe came to be known as a light touch review. A very short form (compared to the initial PIP application), basically asking me if I still needed the same amount of help. Basically just a yes or no tick box form. I was very wary so I added in more details than was asked for. I received my decision very quickly. I was given an ongoing award with another light touch in ten years. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Vicks do they tend to reassess the same year or does it get delayed a year or two?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    More discrimination against younger/middle-aged claimants. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Finally got my UC claim sorted. Just needed to take three forms of identity in to jobcentre plus. The guy said as I'm migrating from ESA support group I don't need to have anymore appointments. Just check my payments are correct each month. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @SpasticusAutisticus @SpasticusAutisticus going to vote Green in local elections. Never going to vote Labour again not trust them again
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Mel Same. Good luck. If they can manage not to stuff that up too, I will ve amazed. The DWP couldn't run a bath and the projected "Fraud and Error" Bill means every time they miscalculate, WE are going to be the ones paying it back. Never mind, if Reform get in, there wont be an NHS or a welfare state at all, Farage wants to do a Trump. I seriously hope I am dead before then. I remember when politicians had brains!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    It's going to take a substantial chunk out of the already vanishingly small savings the government wants from the cuts if 700,000 pensioners are not subject to them, particularly if, as they grow older, they get an upgrade to higher rate, which seems only likely, unless the forked tongue of Timms has already seen a way round that.

    Why pursue these ill conceived measures at all, when so little would be achieved?




    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @Dave @Dave its not fare to. Why pensioners alowed to keep pip?  and they get pension and cares allowance to and working age people who may have worse problems no get it. When me brother got pip he had to prove loads he entitled to it and they stil refused him and he had to appeal for it and he got it after. pip designed for working age people with health problems who need extra support. Old people got pensions and cares allowance and they definitely not working age. not forget old people also go triple lock on pension to. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Dave What happened to my post? It's been cut short:
      I'll try writing it again.

      What a farce. First this government mugged the elderly of their winter fuel allowance, becouse we can't afford it. Then the same government quickly without any thought decided to then mug the disabled of their PIP, with the pretence of getting them all into work + of course we can't afford it.
      They then suddenly realise there are terminaly I'll people on PIP + now suddenly hold on there are also disabled elderly people on PIP too.

      Only a few weeks ago there is no money for winter fuel allowance. Suddenly now there is money for some elderly to get PIP.
      It is now coming a total farce the way this government is going with the PIP.
      You are one day entitled to PIP, then suddenly the next day without any change to your health your condition has now suddenly vanished + you are not entitled to PIP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @godgivemestrength What a farce. First this government mugged the pensioners of their winter fuel allowance. Becouse we can't afford it. 
      Then the same government then quickly without any thought decided to then mug the disabled of their PIP, with the pretence of trying we can't afford it. They then suddenly realised there are termialy I'll people on PIP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @godgivemestrength Someone did mention an article in the Times that the savings that Reeves envisage won't materialise so it is possible that this Govt will come back to claw even more money off us. Didn't read the Times article due to their blasted paywall (and if you do subscribe it is a nightmare to cancel, apparently)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Oh, well that's all perfectly clear then. Hip hooray 🙄 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact