The DWP have finally stated that people over state pension age “will not be affected by the proposed changes” to personal independence payment (PIP) set out in the Pathways To Work Green Paper.  However, questions still remain.

Ever since the Green Paper was published there has been a lack of clarity about whether pension age PIP claimants would be caught by the PIP 4-point rule.  Although the Green Paper made reference to the “working-age PIP caseload” there was no explicit statement that pension age claimants would be exempt.

It is the case that, once you reach state pension age, your award will usually become an ongoing award.  Whilst this means your PIP award does not have an end date, it doesn’t mean it will never be checked.

Instead, you are likely to have an award review every 10 years, according to a statement made by Amber Rudd – the then secretary of state for work and pensions – in May 2019.

But this could lead to a situation where claimants could lose their award at the age of say 76.

In an attempt to settle the matter, Labour MP Neil Duncan-Jordan asked the secretary of state in a written question:

“. . . what assessment she has made on the potential impact of the measure set out in the Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper, published on 18 March 2025 on PIP claimants of retirement age.”

DWP disability minister Stephen Timms answered:

 “Our intention is that the new eligibility requirement in Personal Independence Payment (PIP), in which people must score a minimum of four points in one daily living activity to be eligible for the daily living component, will apply to new claims and award reviews from November 2026, subject to parliamentary approval. In keeping with existing policy, people over State Pension Age are not routinely fully reviewed and will not be affected by the proposed changes.”

This does seem to suggest that claimants above state pension age are not being targeted by the DWP.  But it does leave several unanswered questions.

The first is just why this was not made explicit in the Green Paper, when it was clearly going to be a matter of enormous concern.

The second is what does “not routinely fully reviewed” mean?  In fact, thousands of claimants over pension age do have a planned award review after they reach pension age. 

In the year to January 2025, 12,300 pension age PIP claimants had a planned award review.  It is not clear why these happened or whether they will continue after November 2026.

In addition, 19,238 pension age PIP claimants had a change of circumstances review in the same period.

It is possible to move from the standard to the enhanced rate of PIP after state pension age by asking for a change of circumstances review, if your needs increase. 

However, if a claimant does not have any 4-point descriptors then there is nothing in the minister’s answer to guarantee that they would not run the risk of losing their daily living award altogether if they asked for a review after November 2026.

As with so much about the Green Paper, there is an impression of ideas being cobbled together after publication.  This impression was reinforced by a separate parliamentary answer, in which Timms wrote:

 “Some information on the impacts of the Pathways to Work Green Paper was published alongside the Spring Statement and can be found at this link: Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper - GOV.UK. More information on the impacts will be published in due course, a further programme of analysis to support development of the proposals in the Green Paper will be developed and undertaken in the coming months.”

Nonetheless, this news will come as a welcome relief for pension age PIP claimants.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    "people over State Pension Age are not routinely fully reviewed and will not be affected by the proposed changes.” BECAUSE WHAT??

    Also, if someone in this group gets a light touch review but has no 4 point descriptors, will they pass the review without being downgraded? I


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @MrFibro Only a bit? In my opinion, his recent (cagey) behaviour stinks profoundly. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Mick This Timms bloke sounds a bit iffy to me.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Quietplease
      Because they want the votes of the Pensioners after shafting them out of the winter fuel allowance!  Trying to buy back their votes!!  Also gives them something to fend off any rebel MP's:  We're looking after the Pensioners and giving a measly amount more to the parents with children, you see, so no need to rebel or vote against as it's all good.

      Playing off disabled and chronically ill against children, Pensioners and parents deliberately.  Usual divide and conquer tactics.

      Then the pension age is to be raised so that will cut out a fair amount for more years as they increase it.  Many will die before they even get to pension age.

      More discrimination towards non pension age disabled as well.

      Good question on the 4 points for Pensioners, if they dont have 4 on a descriptor or are reviewed and don't score 4, are they going to have PIP removed?  What if they don't have a 4 as they approach and then go into pension age?

      Also, what does Timms mean when he says "are not routinely fully reviewed" Routinely, fully?  Does that mean they will be reviewed but not routinely and maybe not a full review but a light touch. The choice of words seems deliberate.  Clear as dog shit as usual.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @sara They are winging it !
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Quietplease @Quitplease, exactly, no room for complacency. It seems as if they're trying to leave pensioners out of the cuts, but they haven't even properly sewn that up, as your observation shows. More questions to ask of the man Timms, I think.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.