The DWP has made the first use of its powers to force banks to run checks of claimants’ accounts as part of what it bills as a “crackdown”  that will be “saving taxpayers £1.2 billion by 2030/31.”

Earlier this month we published DWP guidance setting out how the department will use its power to issue Eligibility Verification Notices (EVNs), requiring a bank to identify accounts meeting criteria based on benefit rules. For example, accounts could be flagged where savings exceed a capital limit or overseas transactions suggest someone may have been abroad longer than their benefit rules allow.  

Today the DWP announced that it had issued its first EVN.  According to Lilian Greenwood, minister for innovation, fraud and data: “Implementation will begin through a controlled test-and-learn phase so that systems, data quality, operational impacts and customer outcomes can be assessed before the measure is scaled up.”

A DWP press release is less measured in its language, trumpeting “ Government unleashes £1.2 billion crackdown as part of anti-fraud drive.

“Benefits cheats have been put on notice with tough new anti-fraud measures used for the first time as part of a drive to save billions of pounds for the taxpayer.”

The press release goes on to say that:  “A wider package of reforms, set to be unveiled at the Budget, is expected to save the taxpayer a further £1.4 billion between 2027 and 2032. Measures include the deployment of 2,000 additional anti-fraud specialists into Jobcentres nationwide, as well as tougher checks on Universal Credit claims abroad to tackle fraudsters who fail to report they have left the country to keep payments flowing.”

Subscribe to our free newsletter to stay updated on DWP bank checks.

What has received a great deal less publicity than the alleged level of universal credit fraud is the fact that up to £12.7 billion in UC went unclaimed in the financial year to March 2025, with 2.6 million families missing out.

According to entitledto, the total figure for unclaimed working age benefits stands at £20 billion a year.  Yet as they point out, the DWP claimed that the introduction of UC would increase take-up, because there would be a single point of contact for what had previously been a range of different benefits.

But under tax credits 73% of families with children claimed what they were entitled to.  That has dropped to just 60% under UC.  So, yet again, DWP incompetence has proved to be a huge money saver.

Will the DWP be announcing 2,000 additional take-up specialists to help all the struggling families who don’t know they could be claiming UC?

Somehow, we suspect not.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Well, soon we'll find out how much of a fiasco this will be. I remember some MPs having concerns people would be wrongfully accused of fraud and it'll be the next Post Office scandal. Time will tell.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Why don't the same rules apply for MPs, Paid Royal Family Members, as they also receive money from the treasury?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    It's only fair if we're given the power to look into MP's bank accounts too.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    will someone be looking into MPs bank accounts ? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @rookie I don't think that day will ever come, as MPs are legislators, and won't become turkeys voting for Christmas.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @HBS One day.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has already been experiencing a notable drop in overall front-line work coach numbers—falling from 23,000 in 2021 down to 16,640 by August 2025, driven by resignations, high workloads, and policy changes.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Scorpion @Scorpion They're increasing face to face assessments, but you get a robot work coach. Figures.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @robbie And work coach roles might be filled in by AI, as the DWP launched a digital pilot scheme called "DWP Work Hub, last June, which offers a "Build a CV" tool and "AI Work Assistant" to help jobseekers with career development, interview preparation, and job searching!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Scorpion @Scorpion ...and redeployment to surveillance?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Wondering if the annual independent reviewer will have the opportunity to be involved in the test phase. What it doesn't say is what remedies if any the reviewer has. Maybe none and just parliament calling the DWP to to Westminster to answer questions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @keepingitreal @ keepingitreal
      You've hit the nail on the head. The gaping hole I was inferring to. Alarmingly I assumed reviewer had been appointed however you've highlighted that's highly unlikely yet.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Jane I dont think it's real time oversight. As far as I know they haven' t even appointed an independent reviewer yet, so at best questions after the test phase, and annually in retrospect, which would mean after damage has occurred.