Current personal independence payment (PIP) claimants and other interested parties are being invited to apply to test “emerging recommendations” for changes to the benefit by joining online and in-person workshops.  A maximum of just 300 participants will have an opportunity to give their opinions on whatever the proposed changes may be.

In a press release published this morning, the DWP announced that fifteen workshops that “will help shape recommendations for the future” of PIP are to be held online and in-person across the UK.

The workshops mark a new stage in the Timms Review. Rather than asking participants to identify problems with the existing PIP system, the review says they will be asked specifically to discuss and refine recommendations which are now being developed.

The workshops are aimed primarily at disabled people and people with long-term health conditions.  However, carers, family members of disabled people and support workers are all eligible to register their interest in taking part. No previous experience of taking part in government reviews is required.

With fifteen workshops and a maximum of 20 participants on each, it means that the Timms Review will consult a maximum of 300 participants about "emerging recommendations" which may profoundly affect the lives of millions of disabled people.

The review will also be contacting disabled people’s organisations, charities and MPs to “test and refine its emerging recommendations”.

Co-Chair of the review, Dr Clenton Farquharson, said:  “I would encourage anyone with experience of applying for or receiving PIP to register their interest in taking part. The purpose of these workshops is not simply to hear people’s experiences, but to test the Review’s emerging recommendations against real lives and understand what could make them fairer, clearer and work better in practice.”

The review claims that selection of applicants will be done randomly, but go on to clarify that “the steering group will review and ensure the people chosen represent a balanced range of characteristics. Where a particular characteristic is under-represented, applicants with that characteristic will be identified from the wider applicant pool and selected at random to fill any gaps.”

Reasonable adjustments will be made for participants.

Travel costs and other necessary expenses, such as the cost of a personal assistant will be met.

Participants will also be offered a one-off payment.  However, whilst the review group say participation will not be considered to be work for benefits purposes, any one-off payment will be treated as earnings and could affect any means-tested benefit entitlement, depending on your individual circumstances. It will not affect entitlement to PIP, as PIP is not means-tested. Participants can ask not to be paid or ask for a lower amount.  The group advise potential participants to speak to their work coach or office that administers your benefits before signing-up.

There is a form to complete if you wish to take part, which is largely contact and monitoring details.  The DWP says information provided in the application will be kept confidential and will not be linked to any other DWP records.

Each workshop lasts from 10am to 4pm, with regular breaks, and will have a maximum of 20 participants.

The workshop dates are as follows: 

DateNationLocationFormat
Tuesday 15 September England – London London In person
Friday 18 September England – North East Newcastle/Middlesbrough and surrounding areas Online
Tuesday 22 September England – South Bournemouth In person
Tuesday 22 September England and Wales All regions Online
Thursday 24 September England – Midlands Birmingham In person
Friday 25 September Wales – South Cardiff In person
Tuesday 29 September England – East Norwich and surrounding areas Online
Tuesday 29 September Scotland Glasgow In person
Wednesday 30 September Wales – North Bangor In person
Wednesday 30 September England and Wales All regions Online
Thursday 1 October England – North West Liverpool In person
Thursday 1 October Northern Ireland Belfast In person
Friday 2 October England – Yorkshire and the Humber Sheffield In person
Tuesday 6 October Scotland All Scotland Online
Wednesday 7 October Northern Ireland All Northern Ireland Online

Registration for the workshops opened on Wednesday 12 August 2026 at 10am and closes on Friday 21 August 2026 at 5pm.

 

You can read the guidance page on registering your interest here.

You can register your interest here.

You can read the DWP press release here

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    "A maximum of 300"? Why? Sounds like a more curated and controlled control group, more likely to magically come up with the recommendations the government want.

    Too much lying to the public from the gov AND media. Which people on benefits actually have money to take holidays to Turkey? Yet the public fall for it hook, line and sinker. Too much public really do seem to believe that by cutting the health element in half for new claimants, that they will ever see any of that money themselves or have any kind of saving passed to them. Just so happens I have some spare bridges to sell.

    Also, genuinely curious, why not Liberal Democrats? Greens seem good for sick and disabled, but maybe a little too crazy for me imo.

    Reform voters just seem to want to get one over on those beastly woke people, regardless of the cost.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Claimants already voluntarily give up some of their benefits in exchange for services, just as anyone exchanges their income for the goods they require. We shouldn't have our money cut because it is assumed what we would exchange it for. Pip is supposed to help us have lives closer to those of the fit, with choice and opportunity.

    When I want to exchange my pip for social well being I go out with my friends, who help with mobility and access and I chip in for a meal or the theatre and a taxi, or I pay for accommodation to have a few days away with my family. I don't want my pip confiscating so I can go to something in which I'm not interested organised by social services. So demeaning.

    And how, in any case, can they put a standard figure on something like home adaptations? Different things cost different amounts, not a weekly charge. It's utter tripe.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Well ok, yes, bring me physio + healthy meals for £20/week. Ha ha, I look forward to that!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    All this swapping part of your allowance for something is ok if that something is what you want or need, but we should be allowed choice. Not everyone uses their mobility allowance on the motability scheme, because it doesn't offer them a suitable vehicle and/or it's less secure and potentially more expensive than managing your own transport.

    It would be the same for any item or service. People are free already to swap their cash for a variety and different levels of help or care. Depriving claimants of cash and setting up loads of different schemes would end up being more expensive for the state and less value for the claimant, as money would be lost in administration.



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @rookie
      Similar to what has been happening with what remains of the "NHS" (and so-called "democracy" itself) the system sees (note US term) "welfare" as existing primarily for the benefit of bureaucracy and bureaucrats, especially those of higher rank.

      The system serves *itself* .... with, whenever possible,  privatisation as a desirable feature.
      To those who rule -- neoliberal economic cultists regardless of Establishment party-franchise label --  patients, recipients of benefits" etc. are, at least for now, basically just a necessary evil with which to justify *the system* and its careerists. 

      The less disposables the merrier ..... since that frees up more resources to go to what the system sees as the truly deserving .... and that does *not* mean the likes of disabled people, patients, or the general public.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    If people want to exchange some of their pip for whatever, then fine, they can spend the money on that, or sign up for a scheme, like motability. Just don't assume what I need and cut my cash.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 days ago
    O note the front page of today's Times on which some think tank states half of disabled people would swap cash for help
     Nobody has asked me! And no would be the answer but I think we are beginning to see where the Timms Report is heading...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Dbp100 I had 22 years of therapy on the NHS, now the service I used is closed and there's nothing close to the kind of therapy I need. There's no way that taking money off me and giving me an AI bot to text is going to make me better.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Mike I'm not saying I agree with this idea because I most definitely do not, but the problem is that, for many people, the NHS provides a diagnosis - eventually, if you are very persistent and able to co-operate with their rigid protocols - but not therapy or support. Many people are desperate for help to manage their ongoing conditions, but don't receive any input from the NHS, and I wonder if this is why the survey received the responses it is reporting.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Matt Indeed, they somehow came up with the absurd conclusion that HALF of benefit claimants would be happy to lose £1000 a year of their benefit payments in exchange for 'services' like healthy meals and therapy (therapy should already be provided by the NHS! why should benefit claimants have to pay for it?!), absolutely laughable.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Matt Yes I saw that article - 'Britons on benefits 'could be given therapy and healthy meals rather than cash' under Labour reforms' - nobody asked me either. I do not want this!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 days ago
    In other news the good growth foundation led by DWP government advisor Parful Nargund has come out with a report on disability and incapacity benefits. That claims claimants would be willing to voluntarily give up some of their benefits in exchange for services.

    % of disability claimants willing to give up £100+, £50+, £20+ a week of their benefits for a service.

    Leased car 14% £100+, 25% £50+, 33% £20+
    Home adaptations 12% £100+, 27% £50+, 18% £20+
    Home support (to do household chores) 11% £100+, 20% £100+, 34% £20+
    Training 10% £100+, 15% £50+, 22% £20+
    Therapy/CBT 9% £100+, 14% £50+, 26% £20+
    Physio + Healthy meals 9% £100+, 19% £50+, 31% £20+
    Social/wellbeing (group activities) 8% £100+, 13% £50+, 23% £20+
    Job coaching 7% £100+, 10% £50+, 15% £20+

    At £150+ all options fall to 4-8%
    At £300+ all options fall to 1-3%

    The report concludes £50-£100 would be the optional range. And that work focused services would be popular with 16-34 year olds.

    For claimants aged 16-34
    training 30% £50+
    job coaching 25% £50+

    two thirds of claimants (65%) would prefer their benefit purely as money payments, while a quarter (24%) would prefer a mix of flexible payments and funded services or mostly services - rising to two in five (39%) among 16-34 year olds and half (51%) of claimants in work.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Bob Where the heck did they get these figures? Noone asked me.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 days ago
    This is something I couldn’t do. Severe complex ptsd and ME. I am neither physically nor mentally up to it. I feel like someone with my needs won’t be getting heard.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @AF Same here. Last thing I need is even more coping and activation, much less unhelpful schemes. Actually being allowed to put that down could help my condition. And yeah I hope disability advocates will do something, but the health element still got halved.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @AF Exactly their intention, I suspect. Hopefully, the disability charities will be advocating on your behalf.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 days ago
    We are living in a country that is reminiscent of 1930's Germany. The play book is first race and second those with disabilities, as history teaches us it does not stop there. 

    Reform UK and all right wing politicians have one agenda and that is not what's right for all but right for their needs and their billionaire backers both here and abroad.  They utilise the vote from bigots who hate people of colour and mentally and physically disabled and those who's stunted intellect can't see the bigger picture. You only have to watch the fiasco in the US under Trump, the country apart from Trump and his cronies is collapsing socially and financially. 

    So two examples of right wing fascism, one from history and a modern one playing out right in front of our eye's, those who can't or won't see it are complicit if they vote for fascism.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    Reform propose 50 Billion Welfare cuts making the majority of us ineligible,so if the Tories and Reform team  up where in the Quagmire.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    If reform get in then it's definitely the end for the mobility car sceme we must not vote for them 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    Reform and restore are both extremist right wing parties and since we have First Past the Post as our electoral system, neither party will win the next GE. Farage is a clown with the taunt of corruption.

    More worryingly would be a scenario where the Conservatives, Reform and Restore effectively become one party. They may well stand a chance of winning GE if they collaborate together. Whilst a Conservative led Government are unlikely to impose the savage cuts proposed.by Reform, they will certainly will curtail PIP in some form or other - they may extend any recommendations in the Timms Report.

    Like pensioners, we must all register to vote, and where possible, vote in person. Scenes at Polling Stations with voters going via wheelchairs, Guide Dogs etc may prompt politicians to reconsider their plans for welfare reform. As I've mentioned before, mention scrapping the Triple Lock and the readers of the DT react with indignation at any cuts to their standard of living.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    Correction to my earlier post on Reform's welfare policy.
    The £50 billion is the total cut to welfare. £22 billion of that comes from changes to disability and incapacity benefits.

    Additional information on Reform's welfare policy.

    Children with anxiety, depression, ADHD would also be subject to the new system. But only new claimants.

    The employer insurance system would only apply to companies employing more than 5 people And would be accompanied by a NI cut making it cost neutral for employers. If an employer managed to achieve fewer people claiming or get their employees back to work, the employer would see a cut to their insurance payments. So employers would have a financial incentive to keep their employees working, or get them back to work. (on the face of it this seems to create a perverse incentive to not employ people who have health conditions in the first place) 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Bob Is it not an incentive to employ people who do have health conditions - because employers would have a financial incentive to keep their employees working, or get them back to work?

      It might, however, result in greater pressure on the sick, with employers taking on the role of work coaches.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Bob Just a note I did not originally post the £50 billion figure that the media reported. Chen Chen did. I am not Chen Chen. I have never been a Reform party supporter. Even if Reform policy was to increase benefits I would not vote Reform due to finding their other policies repugnant. I thought I mentioned the £50 billion figure as I reported most of the information in the media articles.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Bob Note that this £50 billion in welfare cuts by Reform wasn't announced BEFORE the Clacton by-election! Wonder why??!!

      I suppose telling your potential voters we are going to take your disability benefits away isn't exactly a vote winner!

      Not to mention all the carers who currently save the country billions. How are Councils paying for care going to cheaper? 

      From what I've read Reform want you to have to claim the extra ongoing costs of being disabled back from councils...imagine the extra admin costs, not to mention appeals if denied.

      Also, central government can cut the amounts Councils get and then blame them for not providing care etc

      I also cannot believe employers are stupid enough to believe it will be cost neutral for them to pay for insurance.

      Some people no doubt will be cheering this from the rafters as they think all disabled people are shirkers and grifters.

      I would like to think that most people are sensible and empathetic enough to realise that this would cost more in the long run in terms of lost lives, increased nhs costs etc.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    In other news Reform have given details of their proposed welfare cuts.

    PIP and UC health element for working age claimants abolished. Replaced for some claimants with disability support accounts, run by local councils and mayors, to cover costs such as equipment, adaptations, transport and personal assistance. And for those who are gravely ill or severely challenged a new regularly-reviewed, health security allowance cash benefit.

    Existing claimants would be reviewed over 3 to 4 years. With 2.89 million existing claimants getting their benefits ended or replaced by with disability accounts. And 2.16 million existing claimants being eligible for the new health security allowance.

    Also employers could be obliged to pay a “return to work cover” insurance to fund the cost of the first two years after an employee is signed off sick.

    Let us hope Reform do not win the next general election. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
    I am going to admit  I was going to vote reform but after seeing this I am disgusted 

    NEW: Reform UK has pledged to scrap PIP and the health element of Universal Credit for working-age adults

    Only people with severe disabilities would receive cash payments to save £50bn a year on benefits
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    I feel I need to say that yes we as a community should be concerned about the Timm's report and possible changes, that vigilance and standing up for our right's is important and vital for us all. That being said all i am seeing in some of these comment's is speculation, fear mongering and presumption's no different than the media which like us has no firm evidence of what the government is planning. 

    Unlike the media who's job it is to sentatalise and spread fear or a narrative of their paymaster's, we seem to be doing exactly the same on this platform which is extremely worrying and causes more unnecessary stress. I suffer from schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism, ADHD, OCD and extreme anxiety and have enough to deal with in life without visiting this platform and reading fear mongering and not facts.  

    So for the good of this community lets support each other without false information and speculation that cause us all to suffer. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Kevin Fear is rational in this case, as we all have to remember the main reason for the review is cuts, and they not going to go to all this trouble to make very small cuts, they will be substantial.  Even more so now it has been announced they believe the current system is broken.  I agree though that people need to stop spreading speculation as fact, this is rife on platforms like tiktok.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    pip existing claims people should not have to go threw this mess again from DLA to pip now possible a new benefit it's disgusting attack on disability 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Wayne Neither the Government nor the DWP seems to understand the concept of a lifelong disability.  To be fair, nor did I when my son received his diagnosis as a small child.  The lack of compassion then was soul-destroying and twenty-five years later, nothing has changed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    By it's very nature this is going to exclude most people with severe mental illness because we can't cope with these kinds of stressful situations or prolonged contact with strangers. I personally have been told several times over the years by some physically disabled people that they don't see me as disabled and object to my being eligible for PIP, some have claimed without evidence, that people claiming for MH makes it harder for them. I am very worried that we will be scapegoated and sacrificed on the altar of efficiency, excused by the prejudices of other disabled people. This is divide and conquer and it's wrong.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Aw agree 100%, severe illness of any kind, and the same with severe  fluctuating conditions.  Seams, a lot as they already know the outcome of the "test"
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    The number of physical meetings is very limited. I notice that places where there were protests outside DWP events last year, such as Manchester where we took over the DWP 'consultation', are not on this list. It is quite clear that participants for this event will be cherry picked to exclude any dissent from the narrative that will be pushed at the events. For example, those of in DPAC who have protested at previous events and are known to the DWP, are not going to be allowed to attend these workshops. More performative antics from the Timms review.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 days ago
      @Couch potato You could be right Shirker.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Couch potato That is going to be very dependent on where you live. Where I live unemployment is very low and anyone capable of working could probably get a job. But many areas are not so lucky.

      The other issue is the DWP making erroneous assumptions about who can work. Which will cause detrimental effects to health. I already know three people who the DWP tried to help back into work, two died and the other one ended up in hospital for a year. And the DWP probably considers two of those a success as they got jobs and were working when within months their health suffered as a result. And the DWP seems to not track ill or disabled claimants fates once they get a job.

      What is also concerning is not knowing what the DWP intends to do when the WCA is abolished in regards to those the WCA finds incapable of work due to likely substantial risk. As the DWP has previously attempted to narrow who is eligible and claimed DWP staff would never ask people to do things that would be detrimental. Which seems recklessly complacent when the results can be hospitalisation or death. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Bob @Bob in your opinion John I mean bob 😉😉their is no help towards work it’s a load of rubbish Im already on uc lcw and going in for interviews and I’m on my 3rd work coach now and even the austistic disability advisor has given up I mean being in my 50s too their is no hope 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @ScorpioTiger
      I am a different Bob. There are multiple Bob's posting on this forum. 

      While pessimistic I am a bit less pessimistic than the other Bob.

      I expect the Timms report to be along the same lines as those in the Tony Blair Institute report "An Emergency Handbrake for Welfare".

      Redefining some conditions as non work limiting. With claimant's having those conditions assumed to not qualify and instead be offered help towards working. And having to provide additional medical evidence to disprove that assumption.

      I suspect anxiety, depression, stress, neurodevelopmental conditions (ADHD, autism), and some musculoskeletal conditions will be targeted. No so much based on any expert medical opinion but on public opinion polling. That is targeting those conditions that have already been successfully scapegoated and demonised by the media and politicians as undeserving. To the point the public will accept and even be happy to see their benefits cut.

      I also expect those redefined conditions will be targeted in education, employment, and the fit note system. On the basis people need to be helped to succeed, not defined as incapable. As if they are currently being incentivisd into a life of not working and dependency rather than encouraged to do there best and succeed in education and employment.

      Those conditions that public opinion polling still shows strong support for I expect to avoid direct cuts due to fear of public backlash. So most physical health conditions and those with severe mental illnesses (severe defined as those with psychosis as a symptom) and probably post traumatic stress disorder due to it being viewed as a condition some military veterans suffer from.

      So overall I expect the cuts to be far more targeted than the other Bob expects. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @ScorpioTiger Possibly the Terminally ill or people unable to care for themselves, this has been mentioned before.