A survey for the More in Common non-profit organisation has found that the majority of the public do not support the proposed cuts to personal independence payment (PIP) and believe cost cutting, not getting people back into work, is the main reason for welfare reform.

According to the poll, only 31% of Britons feel that the Government is trying to limit the impact of cuts on vulnerable groups, while 20% think that it is not trying, and 36% think that the Government has actively chosen to target certain vulnerable groups.

54% believe that the cuts to benefits are about saving money with only 32% considering that they are about getting people back into work.

44% of all Britons think that welfare reforms are too harsh, 28% think they are about right and only 10% think they are too soft.  If Labour hope that their welfare cuts will play especially well with Reform voters, they might be disappointed to learn that 41% of Reform voters think they are too harsh, compared to 42% of Labour voters.

When asked about specific PIP descriptors, the public disagree with Labour’s 4 point system.

74% of Britons believe that needing assistance to wash below the waist should automatically qualify someone for disability-related benefits; 72% say the same about needing help to dress their lower body; 70% say the same about needing assistance to get out of the bath or shower.

None of these are 4 point descriptors, so none of them would allow access to the daily living component of PIP.

43% of Britons think that the benefits cuts make Labour appear mean-spirited.

34% of Britons say they know someone on disability benefits and 36% of people who know someone say the proposed reforms have decreased their trust in the Labour Party to manage public finances safely, 36% say it has made no difference and only 15% say the reforms have increased their trust.

Even amongst all Britons, not just those who know a claimant, 30% say the reforms have decreased their trust and only 15% say they have increased their trust.

So, it would seem that in spite of all the bile and hatred below the line on many media websites, the public are less than enthusiastic about benefits cuts - especially for disabled claimants.

You can see a detailed breakdown of the More in Common survey here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    This is on youtube, explaining the multiple impact of the cuts on pensioners. It takes a while to get going and is bit long winded but it does raise the issue of the knock-on effect that losing one benefit has on other benefits, particularly for pensioners.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    I emailed my MP who dosent reply to anyone,  I emailed John Mcdonnell who did reply and on our side. I emailed Ed Davy which a standard reply that if he not my mp can't reply .
    This government is disgusting, let them survive on what we get. People will be homeless.  I.wouldnt put it pass them to open a workhouse to get people working and they will live there 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 57 minutes ago
      @Pixelmum It's a start. Rec'd a very nice email yesterday from the PA to Marsha de Cordova which states:


      From: WALLACE, Millie <millie.wallace@parliament.uk> On Behalf Of DE CORDOVA, Marsha
      Sent: 03 April 2025 16:10
      To: Leonard, Matthew <Matthew.Leonard@lv.com>
      Subject: RE: DISABILITY WELFARE CUTS

      WARNING: This email originated from outside of LV=. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Please report anything you are unsure of using the button in your outlook toolbar.
      Dear Matthew (if I may),

      Thank you for contacting the office of Marsha de Cordova MP with your thoughts and experiences, this is an issue incredibly close to Marsha’s heart and she has been a long-time campaigner for disability rights as a disabled woman herself.

      Thank you for letting us know your personal circumstances, and we have great sympathy for your situation. Unfortunately, as you are a constituent of Steve Race MP, strict parliamentary protocols mean that Marsha is unable to make representations on your behalf. MPs are only permitted to take up casework for individuals who live in their constituency.

      Marsha is continuing to work for the rights of disabled people as one of her key priorities, and takes this opportunity to wish you all the best.
      Millie Wallace
      PA to Marsha de Cordova
      Member of Parliament for Battersea

      I have also sent a copy of the letter I received from my MP (a Starmer stooge) to the campaigns department of RNIB.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Pixelmum Maybe. Let's hope the committee has enough teeth to at least enforce some delays to allow further consultation & less punitive changes later. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    "The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has confirmed that 1.8 million people claiming Universal Credit have now been categorised under the Limited Capability for Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) group."

    If we add those on LCWRA who are still on ESA, the figure would be bigger than that.

    The worst is that all these people are prone to lose their LCWRA all of a sudden once the damn 4 point assessment system gets in place!

    People are only worried about PIP, but people who are only on LCWRA/Support Group would be hit the hardest.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Scorpion And I feel like this group (lcwra only) barely get mentioned which is insane because it's going to be the biggest group!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    The most bizarre thing about the changes seems to me to be that currently you get the LCWRA element of UC if you can't walk more than fifty metres, and yet after the WCA is scrapped you won't get it if you can only walk ONE metre - unless you have the daily living element of PIP.  Restricting the "health element" of UC to just those with the daily living PIP (and ruling out those with just the mobility element) is downright bonkers, and one has to wonder on what advice (if any) they have decided this.  If they don't think you're ill enough to get the health element if you literally can't walk AT ALL, one has to wonder what they think the extra benefit is for.  While there's little chance that the changed to PIP won't go through, we can at least hope that issues such as access to health UC can at least be "tinkered with" without the govt having to admit to a U-turn. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @SLB It's blatant discrimination 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @SLB You're right, it "is downright bonkers". 

      We need to address the case of people who are only on LCWRA in the consultation.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @SLB My neighbour can't walk at all he's in a wheelchair snd when he gets off it he uses his hands and upper torso to get himself out of his adapted car and into the wheelchair, then gets out at the front door after opening it and gets himself in,he lost his esa ages ago,he still doesn't work but dies obviously get pip,I wonder if he's living on his pip,I bet he's terrified atm,they don't care at all,he list his esa when these changes about using wheelchairs came in
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    I genuinely believe that the hope of this Government is to literally kill us off. I get Matt's information we are in a vulnerable situation in more ways than one.  Those of us who are physically unable to work. 

    My MP is also in favor of the reforms, a waste of my time contacting him further. I have ENSURED another way to state my objection to these absolutely inhumane, unlawful proposals. 

    We are ALL in such a state of despair. Definitely impacting on our already disabled bodies, ill-health and psychological well being. Exacerbating what we have to live with everyday is the very reason(s) why we are in receipt of these benefits.

    I have got enough going on with the managed migration from ESA to UC at the moment and to make sure that they enter correctly acknowledge in support group ESA as such straight forward to LCWRA group on UC. Which as of now should be protected as I am migrated across on transitional protection.

    I concur with Neil's comments on this post the scrapping of support group ESA and LCWRA group on UC we do NEED to be left ALONE. 

    In particular with the revelations that Reeves has LIED again about work coaches. Or should I state the limited work coaches. Which surely should MEAN that they are UNABLE to justify going ahead with any of these unlawful and inhumane proposals any further.

    Last I heard they are NO LONGER scrapping the LCWRA but they are freezing it. However, that could have or may change again. 

    I do NOT KNOW how much more any one of us can take and it is NOT as if our primary care providers are able to be or indeed want to be supportive to us.

    Gingin is as always eloquent and RIGHT in everything that you have said over this 4 point malarkey. 

    Neil is also right it is NOT just PIP that is going to be affected. However, PIP in some circumstances dictates ESA award and UC award.

    WE ARE ALL EQUALLY AFFECTED BY THESE PROPOSED UNLAWFUL REFORMS TO AN ABSOLUTE DEVASTATING DEGREE. 

    We ALL have a heartbreaking story to tell and indeed NONE of US deserve to be treated in the way that we are. As NONE of us asked to be or end up DISABLED, for whatever reason for life. 





    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @DJ Indeed & I fear there will be casualties. The cutbacks announced so far are extremely punitive. Some will lose over £100 weekly at a time of ever-rising bills & other costs. People who are financially well-off could absorb such cuts, but not those already struggling & suffering chronic poor health. What's proposed so far by Labour seems brutal, but also avoidable & needs to be legally contested for as long as possible. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    As advised in a separate B&W news article, I have emailed the All Party Parliamentary Groups for Health, Carers, Debt and Financial Inclusion, Genetic, Rare and Undiagnosed Conditions and Poverty & Inequality, as follows:

    Dear [Name of Public Enquiry Point Contact]

    I am contacting you as the public enquiry contact for the [Name of Group] All Party Parliamentary Group, to raise my alarm and distress at the green paper proposals on welfare reform. I would be grateful if you would share this email with all members of the group.

    These proposals will plunge families like ours into poverty, and we will not be able to ameliorate our circumstances through work. Under these proposals, our household is likely to lose around £900 per month, comprised of LCWRA, PIP daily living and Carer’s Element of UC.

    My husband, who has Myotonic Dystrophy, a progressive neurological disease, has significant daytime fatigue, frequent falls and swallowing difficulties, among other symptoms. Under PIP proposals he would be likely deemed ineligible for PIP Daily Living, as he would not currently score 4 points in one category. My husband is unemployable, due to the significant risk of choking or falling, as well as his daytime fatigue.

    I work part-time in a relatively low-paid NHS administrative job. As I have to care for my husband, I am unable to work full-time. I have calculated that if I were successful in gaining a more senior NHS role our financial position would be improved by £12 per month in the first year, and our total income would in fact drop by £300 per month in the third year.

    We are bringing up two daughters.

    The government has repeatedly said they are ‘putting disabled people at the heart’ of everything they do. But these proposals are only pulling the rug from under us, leaving us with nowhere to turn and nothing we can do to improve our financial outlook. No amount of support from a work coach will make my husband employable. What is more, we cannot even have our say, as the most important elements of the changes are not being consulted on.

    Family carers are doing a job that Social Care is unable to in these times, but these proposals are making that job near impossible to do.

    The headline loss average of £1700 per year does not apply to my family. The loss would be far greater and I do not see how we would manage at all.

    I implore you to see that these proposals are draconian, that they are discriminatory against the long-term sick and disabled, and that they will cause devastation for families like us. I respectfully ask that you use your influence to oppose these changes.

    Yours sincerely,
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    It's not just the pip cuts either..those of us who are on UC/LCWRA are gonna be really stuffed as and or when those conditions brought in, I just wish they'd leave us alone.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Scorpion I'm on cbesa so stand to lose that with the abolition of esa,I can't claim uc either,my oh withdrew his pension in Feb last year just b4 sunaks announcement, the money was to pay off the mortgage 12k,and to get all the downstairs damp done in the house,he has 28k sitting in his bank account and i dont even think it would even cover it as the kitchen has to come out to fix the damp, were going to lose pip and carers as well,so much for de damping the house,this was our only chance to repair the house,if we use it,it will be classed as deprivation of income,I won't get 4 points on a descriptor,even if I claimed uc I couldn't do the work commitments, what do we do ? It's looking bleak for us and many like us, any savings are going to be spent on the basics leaving me with a damp problem for ever that I can not now fix now nor in the future 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Neil Cook You're absolutely right. People only on LCWRA, like you and me, would be the hardest hit by these evil changes, as they would lose all of their miserable benefits all of a sudden.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    37% of the people on Universal Credit were in employment in December 2024. Universal Credit is available to people on a low income as well as those who are out of work. These statistics define an individual as in employment if they receive employee earnings for the assessment period which includes the count date.18 Feb 2025
    Universal Credit statistics, 29 April 2013 to 9 January 2025

    so nearly 40% of claimants for UC are getting wages and UC? Why is this appalling figure not being spoken about by Govt, national press or the public, that don't even know. Even if all the sick, ill and disabled people in the UK tomorrow miraculously became fit for work they would STILL HAVE TO CLAIM UNIVERSAL CREDIT!
    The system is not broken...your government is!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I emailed my mp,she supports it,dressed up response about people needing to get back to work,well she's not getting my vote,if your mp is Jo platt  don't bother!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Anniesmum I don't know,I'm also mad at the fact I sent the email explaining in detail how we're going to lose everything, signed my own name and the response was addressed to my husband!!   the email received looked like one she's sending out to everyone regarding this,setting out how they're trying to get people into work and she supports that issue then says she is listening to her constituants worries and assures people the changes are not coming till next November,but she supports the changes about people needing to work,there's no way she's voting against these cuts
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Anon Damn! I thought I recognised the name Jo Platt. I wrote to the all party parliamentary group for M.E and it said it had to be sent to her email address. How awful if she supports these cuts! I’m wondering if she will even pass on my email to the rest of the group. I’m so disheartened now. Do you think I can try and send it to one of the other MPs in the group? I’m worried she will delete my email I sent them.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Spoke to a lady today who has previously taken the DWP to court and she said what the government are proposing in the welfare changes will never get through the courts.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    And while I'm here, let's not forget that doing away with social security opens up a multi-£bn private insurance market, plenty of gravy for everyone involved, politicians, the media, everyone. That's all this is about. Greed.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @billkruse I happen to work for a respectable insurance company.  The problem is insurance is that it based on risk.  Those with long term medical conditions who may need more medical treatment, or are likely to find gaining employment much more difficult, are either going to have to pay much higher premiums (which they are unlikely to able to afford) or their applications will be declined.

      If we are going to go down the social insurance model, then the State will have to be insurer of last resort. I can't see any Government wanting to do this due to the cost of administration, claims etc.....nor do I think a health insurance based health service will ever survived the wrath of the electorate. Even in the USA there has been great criticism of United Healthcare...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @billkruse Always has been.  They don’t car about how it will affect us the disabled 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Sad 54% of the participants think that govt needs to or can save money in a fiat economy. Education in these matters would put so much of this nonsense behind us.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @billkruse It isn't 54% that think necessarily that they (the government) need to or can save money, it is 54% that think cost cutting IS the reason for this policy NOT reform. I agree with them that this is less about reform and far more about cutting a budget, whether that actually happens or not is debatable but we are going to be the casualties. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Cutting/removing pip will decrease work participation and increase costs to national health and local councils.  

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I can't fit myself into More in commons seven categories, does this skew their work? are they a bit elitist? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Glad to see a lot of people haven’t fallen for their whole ‘we just want to help people into work!’ gimmick. 

    It’s almost like people are not stupid and if
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Labour's own polling from this More in Common poll has them on 21%, they're down 13% from the last election and Starmer/Reeves are very unpopular, the problem is the Tories have Badenoch/Stride and Reform has Farage/Tice, all six of them aren't my cup of tea at all, it's hobson's choice.

    This is heartening for me because for a long while now the more conservative leaning press have done attack line after attack line about how much the disabled cost the taxpayers, I'm happy that the public sees through the lies and propaganda. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    This is the reply from my MP:

    Dear ...................

    I do not agree with the Government making savings by cutting welfare support, and I share the serious concerns of campaigners regarding Government plans to reform disability benefits.  

    For this reason, in a debate on Parliament on 4th November 2024, I said: 

    "The commitment to delivering the previously planned savings is more than alarming. The truth is that the way disabled people have been treated by the Department for Work and Pensions since 2010 will go down in history as a terrible and inexcusable crime. There is extensive evidence about the serious harm caused to people subjected to dehumanising assessments and sanctions, including reports of deaths directly related to the social security regime. We need a long-term overhaul of the social security system. It is not fit for purpose. I urge the Government to really look at that in detail going forward.” 

    I understand that under one option reportedly being considered, the Universal Credit (UC) “limited capability for work or work-related activity” category would be abolished, which would require often severely disabled or ill people to make preparations for work. That could see claimants lose about £5,000 a year.

    It has also been widely reported that Ministers intend to scrap the work capability assessment used to approve incapacity benefits and align the system more closely with assessments for personal independence payments (PIP), separate disability benefits that are paid whether or not someone can work.

    In January and April 2024, in support of PIP, I signed numerous Parliamentary motions (#EDM 309; #EDM 678) raising concerns about delays in PIP processing times and calling on the Government to review PIP with the aim of reducing these, while making the system easier and less stressful for claimants.
    (https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motion/61799).
    (https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motion/62177).

    I am aware that in January 2025, a high court judge found that an official consultation regarding changes to the WCA was ruled unlawful, following a legal challenge by disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) campaigner Ellen Clifford. The high court said the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) had presented UK-wide incapacity benefit assessment reforms as a way to support disabled people into work without making clear the “primary rationale” of the proposals was cost savings.

    The consultation, which was carried out by the previous Government in Autumn 2023, failed to mention that 424,000 disabled people would see their benefits cut, many losing £416 a month, the judge found.

    I am conscious that documents released to the court also revealed that internal DWP estimates suggested the reforms to the WCA would push 100,000 highly vulnerable disabled people into absolute poverty.

    I do not agree with making welfare savings by cutting welfare support.

    I am only too aware that 14 years of austerity has had a brutal impact on the lives of many disabled people. Research by the Trussell Trust suggests that most food bank users now live in households where somebody is disabled.

    I would have liked the new Government to use the Autumn Budget 2024 to ensure that our social security system works for everyone when they need it.

    It has therefore been clear to me that for many years that the current social security system is not fit for purpose and in many cases actively damaging.

    I note the high proportion of Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) decisions that are overturned at tribunal and am all too conscious that each of the many thousands of incorrect decisions about what support a disabled person should be getting causes real suffering to that person and to their family and friends. There is extensive evidence about the serious harm caused to people subjected to dehumanising assessments and sanctions – and that there are reports of deaths directly related to the social security regime. I support the growing calls for a full transparent independent inquiry into these deaths and for all the information to be released to the public accordingly.

    That is why, in December 2024 and February 2025, I tabled questions asking about whether a public enquiry would be conducted into the deaths and serious harms arising out of the social security system.
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-12-16/20272)
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-02-26/33991)

    I have also tabled multiple written questions to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, enquiring into the assessment process for PIP and mandatory reconsideration request data. You can find their answers here.
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-03-31/151298)
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-03-31/151297)
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-03-31/151296).

    I have tabled numerous questions to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, enquiring into the impact social security reforms have had on vulnerable communities (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-12-16/20273).

    I strongly believe that it should be the new Government’s priority to address these wrongs.

    It is my view that protecting access to benefits ensures that society maintains a basic standard of living for everyone.

    You can see another one my spoken contributions in Parliament, from February 2022, in support of the need for a social security system that provides a safety net for people with disabilities.
    (https://x.com/ApsanaBegumMP/status/1900889599058047474)

    I can confirm that a member of my staff was able to attend the Scope Parliamentary event on 2nd April 2025 where they were able to gather information about the financial impacts of disability cuts and changes, and listen to the stories of disabled people affected.

    I pay tribute to disabled activists – such as of Z2K, Black Triangle, WOW campaign, disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), and others – who have spent years campaigning for disabled people’s rights.

    Thank you again for raising this important issue with me.

    Yours sincerely, 

    ...............
    .........................

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    It annoys me intensely that pip is so much now in the conversation about work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Oh that comment was cut short..
    When we are bombarded with constant changes beyond our control. It's a witch hunt,and sadly WE are the accused.