- Posts: 51
mandatory reassessment
- bro58
wendy wrote: I understand this is not a chat forum.I would have no interest in such a forum.And only sent the email suggesting my query be put under another heading because the initial response to my first question today was along the lines of what a strange text.And that response was based I think because it contained IB in it .The IB part was of no importance to me and I stated that in my next email.I was only interested in the fact that my son has received a text and although you say you are up to date and know all maximus etc. do to contact people - I do not know this and had never heard of text messages being used and was looking for some guidance as to what it might mean.And yes you have said there will be a letter.But I would hope you can understand that when something unexpected happens such as this text that I would turn to your website for advice.This is why we subscribe to your website - it is too serious a subject to leave to chat forums.
Hi W,
Yes, I understand what you are saying !!

Are you now happy with my response regarding the Text ?
Are you happy that you now understand how the forum operates ?
We are here to help all members, but we also have to run the forum in an orderly fashion, otherwise it will "fall to bits" !!

No Mods, No forum !!

Mods were all members once and many if not all of them will continue to go through ESA and PIP reassessments, so we also have our own personal experiences.
We volunteer as Mods in an effort to help members as we have taken the time to research "Benefit" issues and Legislation.
bro58
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wendy2
- Topic Author
- Offline
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
- Posts: 51284
wendy wrote: My son got zero points and we will now be making MR but difficult for people with M.E. as they generally do not see doctors after first few years because nothing doctors can really do or offer.However,we will try to get something from GP and earlier tests that were done over 20 years ago such as brain scans.I will probably be told to refer to MR info on website - and I have read it - but here goes - should any extra evidence be sent with MR or is it not really worth it and wait for making an appeal and having more time to get any support evidence.I know that most of you if not all are ill yourselves and I do apologise if I am being a nuisance
It's s decision that only you/he can take.
The revision rate at MR is low. The success rate at appeal where the claimant attends is about 60%.
Supplying new evidence is likely to extend the time taken for the MR to complete. You can't appeal until the MR is completed.
If you don't supply the evidence to the MR then they can't consider it reducing the likelihood of a revision. Appeals are taking 2-3 months but the period could be much longer depending on where you live.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wendy2
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 51
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
- Posts: 51284
wendy wrote: Hi ,I have noticed that there is another wendy in the forum and will that not be confusing and in one of my email sections little while ago there was a dora talking about a subject totally unrelated to my situation with my son
Even though you share a forum name, the forum software recognises you uniquely, providing you keep you posts together in on topic then there should be no issues, the Mods are used to this situation.
If you click on the profile tab above, you will see that only your posts are displayed.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wendy2
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 51
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.